The Hanbalî jurist Ibn Qudâmah writes: “If a vital part of the animal is deleted, such as its chest area or its belly, or the head was drawn separate from the body, then it is not prohibited. However, if the deleted part does not prevent such a creature from living, such as removing the eye, hand, or leg, then it is still a complete image and is prohibited.” [al-Mughnî (10/199)]
Drawing an image with all the essential parts for life - such as the chest area, the abdomen, the head - will surely be prohibited even if the person does not intend to draw someone specific and just something from his imagination. The prohibition will be there as long as the drawing looks like a living creature, whether human or animal. This is unlawful. This is the emulation of Allah’s creation. It was mentioned in an authentic hadîth that Allah said: “Who is more of an oppressor than the one who aspires to create as I create.”
It seems like apretty straight forward question though. Do you really need to phone an Imam in the middle of the night to give an answer?
Oh and cheese, is that a drawing of living creatures in your avatar?
ull have to read the entire thread u are referring to
Yeah I'm still confsed. Why is there a thread debating drawing things versus photographing them? And if a mirror is haraam or not? I mean, it just doesnt seem consistent.
Prawn,
A mirror can't be compared to drawings and photography. And I think Akulion answered your question when he said: usage of photography and diagrams is essential to and allowed in islam for the purpose of gaining knowledge
Medical text books are full of drawings/diagrams of the human body and parts. How else can students learn? Impermissability applies to drawings and photography in displaying complete images of living things. Hope that makes sense.
That's just super
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.