Re: Earth is rotating according tot the Qur'an!!!!
The difference between him and his interpretation and this is that he was qualified to make it. He had reached that state of knowledge (after studying the many sciences of Islam, Usul ul Qur'an, etc etc) which allowed him to make this interpretation. He explains verses by quoting other verses (as was done for this verse), and he quotes appropriate verses which explain the verse under discussion (as was done for this verse); then he quotes Ahadith that have been narrated on the same topic as the verse, and he quotes the isnaads of some. Then he quotes the views of the salaf, including the Sahaabah and Taabi’een, and he states which view he believes to be superior. He also avoids odd dissenting opinions. It is quite a flawed comparison to compare him to the ones who have interpreted this verse as such.
Brother Al MAdani
I say, we are not even a drop in a ocean compared to Ibn Kathir and the likes of him, (may Allah reward them for every word they have written). But let us have no illusions. It's a fact that we can understand some verses of the Qur'an better than people used to do in the past, like the verses about the rotation of sun and the moon, iron, water cycle, the two types of seas, the darknesses of the deep sea, that there are under water waves as well one above the other etc.
Allah had not given them the ability to find more out about these scientific facts, but today we know them, Alhamdolillaah. That's why the Qur'an is a book for the Alamien, and not only for the Sahaba or the Tabien, (may Allah be pleased with them).
You see that's exactly why I object to this explantion of this particular verse (27:88). It is Haram for the laymen to interpret the Qur'an based on themselves, and their limited knowledge of the Qur'an and Sunnah. The Messenger has said:
'Let Hell fire be the residence of who interprets the Qur'an according to his own view.'
This hadith was reported by at-Tirmidhi.
Something similar was narrated in (Abu Dawud, Book 25, Hadith 3644). We all know about this, brother. You are quoting Hadith's and sayings of the Sahaba at a wrong moment. They were not talking about this. You have to read what the muhaditien have said about that Hadith.
Can I go to Ibn Kathir, or Al Qurtubi, or At Tabari or any other Mufasir and say to him: "Let Hell fire be the residence of who interprets the Qur'an according to his own view?" Can I do that, like the Quranites, (may Allah guide them), did? Ibn Kathir is interpreting the verses according to his own view, because not everything he says in his Tafsir is from the Qur'an and Sunnah. Can I do that? No, because the Prophet was not talking about that. He was talking about people like Al Qaida who use the verse of Qisas as proof to attack thousands of innocent civilians, which is prohibited in Islam.
Yusair bin 'Amr narrated that the Prophet said: "
There will appear some people who will recite the Quran but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body".
(Sahih Bukhari, Vol 9, Book 84, Hadith 68).
The Qur'an verses do not go beyound their throats! They do not read what the Mufasirien have said about it, they do not know the rulings of qisas etc. They take just one verse from the Qur'an or one Hadith and then they give a fatwa that every american can be killed, wether soldier or civilian even if they contradict the Ijma of ALL scholars in the past.
So we shouldn't be like that. If we quote a verse from the Qur'an or a Hadith, we have to know in which context it was said and what the scholars have said about it. The above given verse is speaking about science, and people in the past did not know much about science. This is as far as I understand it, ALLAHU AALIM.
Take the verse about the two easts and the two wests. Zakir Naik and others have said something completely different than Ibn Kathir. Does it mean that one of them is going to Jahanam, because of that?
Take the verse about the two seas. Ibn Kathir says: "He has placed a barrier of land between these two types of waters, so that they do not transgress upon each other".
That's what he said, and by Allah, I am not trying to say bad stuff about Ibn Kathir, this man was masha'Allah one of the greatest mufasirien, respected over the whole world. But what I try to say is that today we know, that what Ibn Kathir said there, is not correct. Alhamdolillah, Ibn Kathir tried his best, to explaine those verses to the people BUT he could not have known the unseen, today we have seen and investigated the facts.
And Allah says,
"On no soul doth Allah Place a burden greater than it can bear".
(Qur'an 2:286).
Allah will not hold him responsible for that, Insha'Allaah, because he did not know better. As we all know, a scholar will be rewarded, even for his mistakes if he had the right intention.
And, wallahie, I don't know why eveybody is taking it like this :haha:
I cannot force anyone to believe what I believe ofcourse. If you think that this interpetation is good, take it Alhamdolillah, if not, no problem at all.
I do not know the scholar you are referring to
http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Quran/Science/scientists.html
Shaykh Zindani met all those scientists and showed them the Ayas of the Qur'an that speak about science and you can listin to what they said. Shaykh Zindani was a famous Mojahid as well, in the past.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Majeed_al-Zindani
The fact is that whether the rotation of the earth is mentioned in the Qur'an or not, the Qur'an is true.
100% correct
There is no doubt that scientific facts are in the Qur'an such as the fetus stages etc. But what I objected to is the way you are interpreting this verse which was not the interpretation of the Classic Mufasireen and are changing its interpretation to 'prove' something else.
The same can be said about many other scientific Ayas as I said above. You cannot stick to the interpretations of the classic mufasirien if the Aya is speaking about science. If it is about Islam, then they are the ONES we should refer to, ALLWAYS.
But what the mufasirien had said in the past, is ofcourse, contradicting science today. Mufasirien said in the past that the earth is flat and the sun is rotating around the world, even some scholars of today. Why don't you stick to that? Because we know that it was based on their Ijtihad, and we do not blame them, and we know that there is no proof in the Qur'an that the earth is flat and the sun is rotating around the earth.
Wallahu Aalim,