Europe is at the current time scared, distrustful and slightly confused of devoted Muslims. There are many reasons for this, some which are not to do with Islam at all - but a projection of history.
We in Asia are actually more open toward difference despite of many accusations being casted to us by western imperial power. myself for example, I had been living in Buddhists surrondings without any problem and we're from Hadhrami Arab ancestries. I also have Orthodox Jew friends from Bnei Tmeinan (Yemeni Jews) and Ashkhenazim and we contacting each other although our country have no diplomatic treaties among each other. we try to find points of similarity among us without losing respect on each other.
The irony of course being (In Europe) is that most anti-immigration, anti-Islamic political parties, pressures groups and such tend to claim that their motives are Christian and their interests being to maintain that 'Christian' heritage.Europe is hostile to muslim world, because many many Europeans lost their faith in God and many many european christians replaced submission to the Creator for religion of human rights. I often hang out with traditional catholics and among them there is no hatred to islam or other religions. I am also a traditionalist and I respect Islam and I see its good points.
I live in India and don't know much about European Union and muslims living there, but it makes me think 'Is EU acting hostilely towards muslim world?' as some news like banning of hijab in France and banning of Minarets in Switzerland and the popular slogans in EU 'Stop Islamification of Europe!' surface the internet.
Anyone, brothers or sisters from Europe tell me (I know many people here are from Europe) the situation of the muslims in EU.
Thank you.
The irony of course being (In Europe) is that most anti-immigration, anti-Islamic political parties, pressures groups and such tend to claim that their motives are Christian and their interests being to maintain that 'Christian' heritage.
Many non-religious liberals, socialists often speak out for Islam (the most famous of course being George Galloway).
In the USA, of course the contempt comes from evangelical and fundamentalist Christians based on fear of Islamic terrorism (and just about everything) trumped up by Faux News, their pastors, and their televangelists.
There is also one important fact - racism and its reasons. Racism is the child of modernity and secularism. Racism was born in Europe and USA as the sign of fear to "aliens" when the religious life was fading - in XIX century. Nowadays racism is strongest in countries with largest numbers of atheists - England, USA, Sweden, Holland. Racism is a reaction of middle class in secular societies against foreigners. Because religious societies are theocratic and the "foreigners issues" are dealed in different way.
Geert Wilder isn't a Christian. He's an atheist who considers himself allied culturally with Christians.The irony is that those christians (like for example Geert Wilders) want to defend christian values like for example tolerance to same sex marriages, feminism or secular state. This is their christian heritage :skeleton:
How fascist of you.Christian should struggle for social reign of Christ The King.
There is also one important fact - racism and its reasons. Racism is the child of modernity and secularism. Racism was born in Europe and USA as the sign of fear to "aliens" when the religious life was fading - in XIX century. Nowadays racism is strongest in countries with largest numbers of atheists - England, USA, Sweden, Holland. Racism is a reaction of middle class in secular societies against foreigners. Because religious societies are theocratic and the "foreigners issues" are dealed in different way.
Geert Wilder isn't a Christian. He's an atheist who considers himself allied culturally with Christians.
His reasons, whether you accept them or not for opposing Islam are based in humanitarian concerns, not religious.
How fascist of you.
This is the most ridiculous post I have ever read in a long time.
It was worth to write it then.
I challenge you to back a single claim in this paragraph up. None of it is sources, all just speculation mixed with a bigoted rant against Secular Democracy. Indeed I find it quite redundant that you even claim this since you champion a time where things such as slavery, torture, religious war, fascism, totalitarianism, despotism existed. You champion a time where the Inquisition had effect, where the average life expectancy was under 40 years old, where diseases were considered punishments, curses or both. Where the masses languished in poverty, illiteracy, ignorance and under the control of others.
Technology, industry,is one thing and spirituality,morality is other thing. I call Medival best period in Europe's history. One continent under spiritual power of pope, and political power of catholic emperor. Bare in mind that Medival DID NOT invent things like concentration camps, Gulag, communism, national socialism, Holocaust, total war, genocides. Have You ever thought why Holocaust and artrocities of Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot DID HAPPEN after Enlightment and french revolution? From Robespierre and Napoleon was a straight path to Stalin and Hitler.
You wish to impose an authoritarian system of control over people whether they want it or not. You wish to create a society of clerical fascism. It is a modern concept, but it is not what you do not want.Amadeus85 said:Fascism, mix of socialism and nationalism(child of french revolution) is definitely modern doctrine, just like communism and national socialism.
So I have nothing to do with fascism .
I'm still waiting for you to back up your claims.Technology, industry,is one thing and spirituality,morality is other thing. I call Medival best period in Europe's history. One continent under spiritual power of pope, and political power of catholic emperor. Bare in mind that Medival DID NOT invent things like concentration camps, Gulag, communism, national socialism, Holocaust, total war, genocides. Have You ever thought why Holocaust and artrocities of Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot DID HAPPEN after Enlightment and french revolution? From Robespierre and Napoleon was a straight path to Stalin and Hitler.
You wish to impose an authoritarian system of control over people whether they want it or not. You wish to create a society of clerical fascism. It is a modern concept, but it is not what you do not want.
Does a mother asks her child about decision? Doesnt mother forbids the child to touch fire or electricity? Should a child not listen to her mother? Here we have mother with 2 thousand years of experience.
Please don't tell me about "clerical fashism", You could also use sentence "the fight of class", this is old communistic sentence used by the red terrorists killing priest in eastern and central Europe.
You call the medieval period the best period? Why? Because clerical fascists were in control? Never mind the rampant superstition, slavery, bigotry, disease, famine, warfare and general unpleasantness for the average person in that period - it was run and maintained by catholics.
As I said, technology, materialistic life and spirituality are two different things. How can You know that Medieval couldn't exist till today and experience technological improvement. Bare in mind that last two true catholic, "Medieval" states did exist in half of XX century, Spain and Portugal.
Also, can you please tell me the specific period (Yes, I *do* want dates here) that you think was fantastic and under the "spiritual power of pope".
It's not easy to say, it depends on which european country we are talking about. For example Spain and Portugal managed to remain catholic (theocratic, because secular means atheistic) till half of XX century. Austria and Hungary till 1919, Colombia till 60's in XX century. And for example the revolution destroyed the catholic order in France in end of XVIII century, in England, Germany, Holland and Scandinavia reformation destroyed it in XVI century. The end of catholic order is always the acceptance of secular(atheistic) state. For me, Medieval means state ruled by God's law, reign of Christ who has two swords - Church and state. Secular means atheistic, reigns of unbelievers, sects, and the horned creature from undergdround.
What a ridiculous analogy.Amadeus85 said:Does a mother asks her child about decision? Doesnt mother forbids the child to touch fire or electricity? Should a child not listen to her mother? Here we have mother with 2 thousand years of experience.
Please don't tell me about "clerical fashism", You could also use sentence "the fight of class", this is old communistic sentence used by the red terrorists killing priest in eastern and central Europe.
Because then it would not be medieval. It would be a modern state. This is horrendous really. Just because you want 'spirituality' at the expense of others. Just because you want the warm feeling bought on by clerical control over the fruitfulness of scientific "materialistic" advancement that you rely on every day: clean water, safe food, modern hygiene, modern medicine, modern transport, electricity, mass global communication (internet, mobile phones, television).As I said, technology, materialistic life and spirituality are two different things. How can You know that Medieval couldn't exist till today and experience technological improvement. Bare in mind that last two true catholic, "Medieval" states did exist in half of XX century, Spain and Portugal.
So you can't even tell me what you mean by your 'ideal' period. No dates, only referencing Spain and Portugal Catholicism. Concerning Spain however - click here. Is that the period you're talking about?It's not easy to say, it depends on which european country we are talking about. For example Spain and Portugal managed to remain catholic (theocratic, because secular means atheistic)
I can only describe the last sentence here as paranoid concepts born from absolutely nothing.Austria and Hungary till 1919, Colombia till 60's in XX century. And for example the revolution destroyed the catholic order in France in end of XVIII century, in England, Germany, Holland and Scandinavia reformation destroyed it in XVI century. The end of catholic order is always the acceptance of secular(atheistic) state. For me, Medieval means state ruled by God's law, reign of Christ who has two swords - Church and state. Secular means atheistic, reigns of unbelievers, sects, and the horned creature from undergdround.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.