Adolf Hitler said if you tell a big lie and repeat it often it will be believed. That is true of evolution which is science fiction accepted as scientific fact. Its proponents deny it is atheistic but their dogmatic rejection of intelligent design proves that it is.
Judges ban creationism in public schools because it promotes belief in God. But atheism, disguised as evolutionary science, is permitted.
By distorting the First Amendment, they make it illegal for teachers to say that some scientists reject evolution or that the theory is not a fact. Such radical interpretations of the constitution destroy freedom.
"Congress" in that amendment ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ... ") has been broadly defined to include schoolboards and teachers. But it only prohibits Congress from creating a state religion. God's existence is a theological topic, even for atheists. When science teachers tell students that the theory of evolution is a fact, they promote atheism, which isn't a scientific concept.
In contrast to the supernatural creator in the Bible, evolutionists believe in a natural "creator." In their view, the creation was its own creator.
Not all scientists accept evolution.
Allan Sandage, an astronomer, said, "It was my science that drove me to the conclusion that the world is much more complicated than can be explained by science. It is only through the supernatural that I can understand the mystery of existence." John Kramer, a Canadian biochemist, said, "The complexity of nature clearly points to a creator." Robert Hosken, a biochemist from Australia, agreed, "I cannot help but attribute the complexity of the design to a creator, rather than to random evolutionary forces."
Are these scientists ignorant about science? Belief in God is more logical than atheism. Simple paper clips or complex electronic devices wouldn't exist without intelligent human creators. What about the first humans and animals?
Their creation by a supernatural creator makes the most sense.
ROBERT KOHTALA
Chassell
Judges ban creationism in public schools because it promotes belief in God. But atheism, disguised as evolutionary science, is permitted.
By distorting the First Amendment, they make it illegal for teachers to say that some scientists reject evolution or that the theory is not a fact. Such radical interpretations of the constitution destroy freedom.
"Congress" in that amendment ("Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion ... ") has been broadly defined to include schoolboards and teachers. But it only prohibits Congress from creating a state religion. God's existence is a theological topic, even for atheists. When science teachers tell students that the theory of evolution is a fact, they promote atheism, which isn't a scientific concept.
In contrast to the supernatural creator in the Bible, evolutionists believe in a natural "creator." In their view, the creation was its own creator.
Not all scientists accept evolution.
Allan Sandage, an astronomer, said, "It was my science that drove me to the conclusion that the world is much more complicated than can be explained by science. It is only through the supernatural that I can understand the mystery of existence." John Kramer, a Canadian biochemist, said, "The complexity of nature clearly points to a creator." Robert Hosken, a biochemist from Australia, agreed, "I cannot help but attribute the complexity of the design to a creator, rather than to random evolutionary forces."
Are these scientists ignorant about science? Belief in God is more logical than atheism. Simple paper clips or complex electronic devices wouldn't exist without intelligent human creators. What about the first humans and animals?
Their creation by a supernatural creator makes the most sense.
ROBERT KOHTALA
Chassell
