Article: http://electronicintifada.net/blogs...rance-cracks-down-free-speech-order-defend-it
"Launching the French government’s newly declared (or re-declared) “war on terrorism,” and its crackdown on dissent, Prime Minister Manuel Valls said that “racism, anti-Semitism and justifying terrorism” were “not opinions.”
Comment: Anti Islam is an opinion, but Anti Semitism is not and is a criminal offence.
"France, Germany and other European countries already have “hate speech laws” and it has been much remarked upon how unevenly they are applied.
Why, for example, has a Germany so concerned about “extremism,” and whose leader Angela Merkel marched in Paris, not banned the growing anti-Muslim marches in its own cities?"
Comment: Hate speech laws are applied to protestors, large or small, marching against the ban on the Face Veil and can lead to arrest and incarceration.
“The questions of immigration and Islam have been clearly posed. They must be asked calmly, involving everyone.” (former French President)
Comment: So Islam is now a question and is intermingled as much of a serious issue as immigration. Whether 'the question' about Islam is asked 'calmly' or violently, does it really matter, the fact is it is a threat. Notice he did not say 'Islamic terrorism' or Islamic extremism' he said very clearly 'Islam'.
"Sarkozy has proposed a host of repressive measures from arming local police to “expelling any imam who holds views that do not respect the values of the republic.”
Could anyone imagine Sarkozy, or any politician, demanding “expulsion” of French Jewish or French Christian clerics if they espouse views that are antithetical to the republic like believing that Israel should be “Jewish” or that France should be “Muslim-free?”
Sarkozy’s clear implication – although he doesn’t say it – is that every Muslim cleric is always already foreign and has some other place outside France to which they more properly belong.
The government’s crackdown appears to be an effort to pander to this authoritarian sentiment and head off Sarkozy’s challenge."
Comment: The above remarks show 'freedom of speech' is free as long as some people exercise it (Non Muslims) and others refrain from it (Muslims). When 'freedom of speech' is given to some, but denied to others, what is left of 'liberal democracy'? After all, one of the key features or definitions of what constitutes a liberal democracy is that all minorities are respected and must share the rights and privileges of the majority. Any breach in this definition makes the same society move closer to authoritarianism. Is France becoming authoritarian in its approach to Islam and Muslims?
"It was already on such bogus grounds that France banned rallies during the summer protesting Israel’s massacre in Gaza. And for years, France has been prosecuting activists in the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement."
Comment: The above relates to charges the protests were 'Anti Semetic' and in breach of the 'hate' laws despite the peaceful nature of the marches. While donations, charities and organisations that accept and collect for Jewish causes is permitted, those advocating the same for Palestinians are held to be illegal.