I agree, many are as dangerous as the boy scouts. (my son told me he had been infested after he was invested as a cub scout)
But read also about the many different forms of belief which are within the guise of freemasonry. I prefer the idea of lodges myself. But maybe there are real lodges identifying as Freemasons as though without a lodge.
Perhaps I might be in trouble here though because I fell asleep in front of the computer and in my mind an image of a plain clothes police man was leaping out of the computer screen and telling he'd rip the bloody lodge insignia off if he has to so as to get to the bottom of the accounting about the two forms of measuring qibla. They ought to know better than to pick on me since the police here have studiously prevented me marrying. Who ever "they" are that is, but it sure looked like the guy who had been tailing me. . . .
. . . so you see, it can be very dangerous to begin to even contemplate the world of Freemasons. (whereas the AFP are only distressed about a poem I wrote for the dalai lama - they seem to have wanted to be able to charge me for sedition to prove that they have not been wasting policing resources on taking sides against me in a family court case - but the poem I wrote is hardly seditious and the context of sending it to the dalai lama web site is hardly every likely to want them engaging in the matter)
However there is a portion of how the definition of a Mason works, in which Ka'ba takes on a significance of distinguishing us each from the other in our general mental capablities and tolerances as well as strengths. Any Lodge or individual Mason, who identifies those differences accurately, has a character strength of real worth. But many who identify as Freemasons are not in that category, but only like the idea of having a mental agility which freemasonry might seem to enable, but really no more than any esoteric sort of lesson.