Funeral Home Employee Arrested For Allegedly Molesting A Corpse

[GuestFellow]

Hmm...are you suggesting that necrophilias engage in safer sex than homosexuals?

Salaam,

I doubt it. I mean dead bodies are rotting away and may be full of diseases. Then again, I'm not an expert on these issues, so I could be wrong.

 

[TrueStranger]

Salaam,

I doubt it. I mean dead bodies are rotting away and may be full of diseases. Then again, I'm not an expert on these issues, so I could be wrong.

The experts on this issue are mainly in straitjackets.

Brother, don't take everything I say on this thread seriously.

 

[جوري]

Salaam,

:wa:

Possibly because diseases can spread.

Not really, disease has never deterred anyone from doing anything.

From a legal perspective, yes. However, from a medical perspective, diseases can spread, so no.

Again not really. Most bacterias and viruses and helminths need a live host to thrive so again less likely to contract something from the dead than the living. It is safer in fact.. for even if the critters are still live you're already missing major routes of transmission such as respiratory droplets. They are not breathing at ya are they?

I'm not a medical doctor, but I'm speculating arguments that could arise for and against necrophilia. The argument for necrophilia is consent. The argument against necrophilia is diseases. Pure speculation on my part. Thought I make that clear before members start to make assumptions.

Well like I stated if consent were given prior would that make it OK? I hope I have clarified about the diseases.. It isn't an excuse for the living and certainly not the case with homosexuals who are at higher risk for many more diseases especially anal cancer.

I'm speaking from a legal perspective, the law based in most western countries. The government does not care what people do in their sexual lives. As long as sex does not result in the spread of new STDs and there is consent involved, I suppose it is legal. People can even harm themselves in sex and this is not illegal, as long as there is consent involved.

Who says? and what 'new' STD's are there with the dead that are unbeknown to us?

 

[GuestFellow]

The experts on this issue are mainly in straitjackets.

Brother, don't take everything I say on this thread seriously.

Salaam,

I thought you were serious.

 

[GuestFellow]

:wa:


Not really, disease has never deterred anyone from doing anything.

:wa:

So diseases cannot spread?

Again not really. Most bacterias and viruses and helminths need a live host to thrive so again less likely to contract something from the dead than the living. It is safer in fact.. for even if the critters are still live you're already missing major routes of transmission such as respiratory droplets. They are not breathing at ya are they?

If that is the case, then I suppose it could be legalised if consent is given through some sort of documentation. Again, I doubt this will happen. It is likely most people would be against this.

However, I would like to ask a question. If a person is less likely to contract a disease from something that is dead, does it affect the severity of this disease? By severity, I mean is it life-threatening or does it cause deformities?

Well like I stated if consent were given prior would that make it OK?

It depends.

Personally, I'm against it because Islam prohibits this.

I hope I have clarified about the diseases..

You did. Thanks.

Who says? and what 'new' STD's are there with the dead that are unbeknown to us?

I remember reading something about a person having sex with a monkey and then AIDs were developed. That is why I thought, people having sex with a dead body may result in new diseases. Keep in mind, I'm speculating. What I have said is based on no evidence. Just some guess work. I'm never had an interest in science.

 

[Alpha Dude]

Tragic - I just saw your signature. It's ironic in this context:

DOES IT NOT SAY KEEP REFRIGERATED!!!

Possible solution to keep it fresh? :skeleton:

 

[جوري]

Diseases can spread just not as bad with live people.
I am always amused and surprised by the values and agendas pushed I wouldn't be surprised that one day this would become legal. It is just a question of what defines our morality. I never thought 'consent' was enough a reason to legalize something. Else incest too would become legal and in fact I have seen them defending a brother/sister relationship in Germany with 'Who are we to define a family unit'
and in all likelihood it will be more and more normal as sperm donors increase and women see no need for a male to have a family and the males are interested in other males anyway... We should look forward to all sorts of oddities to take place in the near future ..

 

[GuestFellow]

Diseases can spread just not as bad with live people.

I'm aware, but some diseases are worse than others? So is it possible for a disease from a dead body to be more dangerous than a disease from a living human being?

I never thought 'consent' was enough a reason to legalize something.

It is. You can have two people that give consent to fight. If one gets injured and tries to sue the other, the claimant will not get damages because the claimant gave consent to the fight.

Two couples can give consent to harm each other in sex. There was actually a case on this and the defendant was not convicted of any offence. They actually burnt each other and carved stuff on each others bodies...

Else incest too would become legal and in fact I have seen them defending a brother/sister relationship in Germany with 'Who are we to define a family unit'
and in all likelihood it will be more and more normal as sperm donors increase and women see no need for a male to have a family and the males are interested in other males anyway... We should look forward to all sorts of oddities to take place in the near future ..

I doubt incest will be legal due to similar genetics resulting in deformed babies. Then again, I heard alcohol and smoking increase the chances of deformed babies.

I agree that the legalisation of homosexuality has opened many doors.

 

[GuestFellow]

Tragic - I just saw your signature. It's ironic in this context:

Possible solution to keep it fresh? :skeleton:

Salaam,

LOL

The phrase reminds me of something funny. My cousin sisters got into an explosive argument about peas and I heard one of them scream, DOES IT NOT SAY KEEP REFRIGERATED!!!

 

[جوري]

I'm aware, but some diseases are worse than others? So is it possible for a disease from a dead body to be more dangerous than a disease from a living human being?

Hep C is one of the few diseases that will live for a while outside and in dead bodies other than that, the death of the person spells the death of the diseases in most cases. Also some of the major routes of transmission come to a halt as well mainly respiratory droplets and fecal/oral.. Blood is a major form but most dead people get embalmed so the chances of something are low.. However there are cases of mad cow from cadvaric corneal transplants and of course other things like CMV etc can pose a risk in case of organ donation.. I am not aware of anything else.. and if sex with the dead becomes common place maybe new things will happen as the hadith goes and if someone can find it for me. Whenever people commit new crimes never before committed Allah swt plagues them with new diseases.. so you never know I wouldn't rule it out..

It is. You can have two people that give consent to fight. If one gets injured and tries to sue the other, the claimant will not get damages because the claimant gave consent to the fight.

Yeah I saw a woman die in one of those boxing matches she signed up for.. I find that very unfortunate

I doubt incest will be legal due to similar genetics resulting in deformed babies. Then again, I heard alcohol and smoking increase the chances of deformed babies.

there's a slightly higher risk but new diseases can even arise de novo with folks who are world's apart.. I don't know what to tell you other than when men are left to define and redefine morality it will wreak havoc upon all that's in creation.

I agree that the legalisation of homosexuality has opened many doors.

I wouldn't be bothered so much except that it is creeping on children programming the other day I came out of my room to see my niece watching something on one of the children's channels a kid who couldn't be classified as anything but a fruitcake .. and I got really angry and she didn't understand naturally..
but even Illuminati and satanism is made ok through such loveable programs as 'Sponge Bob'

This stuff infuriates you so much more when you've kids at such a tender age exposed to it and having it hammered into their subconscious ..

 

[GuestFellow]

^ Salaam,

I just find it disturbing how everything is changing way too fast. It is not what has been changed, but the pace of it. As for children, yes, they should not be taught this kind of stuff. The solution here is home-school, but not practicable for all parents. Overall, having this discussion with you, I would not be surprised if necrophilia is legalised. Hope it does not happen.

 

[tw009]

I read a similar news few months back, I did not have a peaceful sleep for days. Astagfirullah!!!!

 

[Bambino]

Disgusting +o(

 

[aadil77]

Oh why won't they give necrophilia a chance the way they do homosexuality? Maybe in the next 20 yrs or so...

Probably will as long as its a consenting adult corpse

 

[Dagless]

Great thread. I've lol'd more than once reading it so far

The Green River Serial killer used to re-visit his dead victims too. A necrophiliac serial killer. These men are seriously disturbed.

 

[LauraS]

Just because most in western countries accept homosexuality doesn't mean we would accept this. Most people accept homosexuality as just the way people are, gay men are more feminine and gay women more masculine- there must be a reason for this somewhere. I, personally find homosexuality very different from necrophilia. One involves a loving relationship between two people, another a one sided attraction to corpses. Why does it have to turn into a dig at the west? Disgusting crimes take place in eastern countries too. People are people at the end of the day, and can be rather strange....^o)

 

[جوري]

Just because most in western countries accept homosexuality doesn't mean we would accept this. Most people accept homosexuality as just the way people are, gay men are more feminine and gay women more masculine- there must be a reason for this somewhere. I, personally find homosexuality very different from necrophilia. One involves a loving relationship between two people, another a one sided attraction to corpses. Why does it have to turn into a dig at the west? Disgusting crimes take place in eastern countries too. People are people at the end of the day, and can be rather strange....^o)

Sure people are people at the end of the day, but in the east this is still a crime whereas it is applauded in the west and promoted and meant to be exported overseas.
Gay men are more feminine and the women more masculine? You don't find this an unusual assertion and a 'homophobic' stereotype?

 

[LauraS]

Necrophilia isn't applauded. Homosexuality isn't applauded more than just accepted, I know there are events like the gay pride parade. To be honest its not meant as a mean stereotype, its true in a lot of cases, I have a few friends who it is true for. That's why I think there must be a link there somewhere.

 

[جوري]

That's more your personal opinion than a fact.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/06/us-overseas-aid-human-rights


as an example of pushing the agenda not merely turning a blind eye to it..

best,

 

[LauraS]

Hmm well of course it can't be said all westerners approve of homosexuality and certain areas of America are not exactly shining examples of torelant societies. Although certain cultures don't approve of homosexuality, a death penalty is awful. My gay friends are amongst the nicest people you could meet, they can't force an attraction to women they don't feel.