'Abd-al Latif
CagePrisoners.com
- Messages
- 3,680
- Reaction score
- 921
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_43Ws3kQsV8[/media]
I think both George Galloway is a joke and a disgrace to the UK, though I admire him. And as for the Purely Iranian government funded press TV, that equally is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Iranians take on life.
The "truth" is nothing but a matter of opinion, it's not that truth hurts it's simply that he is a radical socialist with the usual blinkers on.
Long live me, long live my Country. Long live the TRUTH
I think both George Galloway is a joke and a disgrace to the UK, though I admire him. And as for the Purely Iranian government funded press TV, that equally is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Iranians take on life.
TRUTH........
Like it was the Arabs that caused the Arab Palestines refugee problem, and that it is in their financial interest to keep the fake & corrupt UNRWA.
Or do you mean the truth that the totally faked Arab Uprising against the Turks was a staged show orchestrated by the Old British Empire in order to exclude France gaining land in Syria and other Arab states, less palestine of course and the deliberate orchestrated violence by the British who used Arabs who were only too willing to slaughter the jews in another faked uprising against this time zionism. Just so Britain could go back on a promise it gave to the jews.
And when it came to the defence of Palestine (less the 2/3rds under Jordan's control) from the British Forces, only a poxy 40,000 arabs could even be bothered to fight when the Jews lost as many defenders as the corrupt Arabs could even Muster.
Or the thruth that the Pan-Arab plan of the British was a failure and Arabs have no claim to the state of Israel, it's nothing more than a bogus claim.
Is this the truth that you mean!!!!!!!
George Galloway speaks what he has ascertained as the truth irregardless of his nationality or any other preconditional factor. Is this the truth or is this an opinion?
It is an opinion as to what constitutes the truth. George Galloway is no more qualified to ascertain "the actual state of the matter" than many people who disagree with him.
You don't need a qualification to ascertain the truth, look into the facts of history and the truth will be ascertained.
Don't be confused with the Philosophical meaning of truth because that view is complete nonsense.
There is no such thing as 'the' truth when it comes to history, except in the most trivial and mundane matters such as dates. The selection of 'facts' used to establish historical 'truth' is always subjective even on the rare occasions (and this is not one) in which all the facts are available to the researcher, hence historical 'truth' is also subjective. Even among scholars far more knowledgeable than Galloway will ever be, disagreement regarding the conclusions that can rightly be drawn from the same set of facts is common.
I didn't copy it from wikipedia, I wouldn't turn to wikipedia unless I couldn't find information anywhere else. My quote is from dictionary.com.What 'view' are you talking about? There is no one 'philosophical meaning of truth', nonsensical or otherwise, nor is 'truth' a technical term in philosophy. The Wiki article you quoted (uncredited, I note) lists more than a dozen views on the subject.
Trumble said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.