Empathy
It seems that we are all ‘wired’ for social engagement and such engagement changes over time and it may be that our boundaries expand or sometimes become smaller. In the Enlightenment many great ideas emerged and one major strand was that we are all rational human beings, detached agents pursuing our own self-interest and typically nation states reflect that view. But this must I think be seen a one part of the picture and an empathetic view expand s the picture. We can see this is families and communities and perhaps in the modern world most importantly in written communication and it is easy to see how this expands or extends our social networks and because it bring understating, expands our empathy – that is why it is such a dangerous trend in any society or community to try to close the door on communication be it in restrictions on books, or what people say, or making people see the world through some social, politically, religious or any other form of self contracted or accepted lens.
Jeremy Rifkin said that it is a conundrum of history that a complex civilization bring more people together but they create more entropy (or you can say disorder) in the process so we need to find a way of increasing empathy but decreasing entropy. This can be done by having a law for everything and everything has a law but institutions and circumstances don't stand still so in a way is an impossible goal and in any case, human nature simply cannot tolerate such totalitarianism. One possibility is further more powerful and open communication facilities and so a greater sharing of information and through that resources and perhaps the creating of new institutions.
It seems that we are all ‘wired’ for social engagement and such engagement changes over time and it may be that our boundaries expand or sometimes become smaller. In the Enlightenment many great ideas emerged and one major strand was that we are all rational human beings, detached agents pursuing our own self-interest and typically nation states reflect that view. But this must I think be seen a one part of the picture and an empathetic view expand s the picture. We can see this is families and communities and perhaps in the modern world most importantly in written communication and it is easy to see how this expands or extends our social networks and because it bring understating, expands our empathy – that is why it is such a dangerous trend in any society or community to try to close the door on communication be it in restrictions on books, or what people say, or making people see the world through some social, politically, religious or any other form of self contracted or accepted lens.
Jeremy Rifkin said that it is a conundrum of history that a complex civilization bring more people together but they create more entropy (or you can say disorder) in the process so we need to find a way of increasing empathy but decreasing entropy. This can be done by having a law for everything and everything has a law but institutions and circumstances don't stand still so in a way is an impossible goal and in any case, human nature simply cannot tolerate such totalitarianism. One possibility is further more powerful and open communication facilities and so a greater sharing of information and through that resources and perhaps the creating of new institutions.