Give yourselves a Good-Beating!

  • Thread starter Thread starter أحمد
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 59
  • Views Views 10K
Ahmed Waheed said:
:sl:

:D A hadith may be fabricated in one book or chapter of a book, and yet in another; it may be authentic. The question of authenticity; we go to Ali (as); the cousin of the Prophet (saw). He said that there are 3 steps to ahadith authenticiation, from which even one being flawed fabricates the hadith.


  1. :thumbs_upSanad: Channel (chain) of narration; through whom is the narration narrated, and can they be trusted.
  2. :thumbs_upLuqa: Quranic compatibility with the hadith; the Prophet (saw) NEVER spoke against the Quran.
  3. :thumbs_upTa`weel ul-Athr / Ta`weel fil-Iman: meaning of the transmitted statement, and its effects on Iman.

:) I will Insha-Allah elaborate on this in the near future, if necessary. :p So please do ask if you want it explained Insha-Allah . . .

:w:

:sl:
I am under the impression that you explained this in another forum in details anyway so I'll look for a link to put here inshallah
:w:
 
:sl:

Jazak'Allahu Khayran (again ;) ) brother Ahmed Waheed for posting all that info! :) I especially liked your explanation of how ahadith can be tested for authenticity. :) In a million words, I couldn't have put it better. :brother:

And that was an excellent article by you Ansar Mash'Allah :)

:w:
 
:sl:

:D:):shade::p;)
[font=&quot][/font] While many believe that Islam is a violent or evil religion, just believing so does not make it a fact. Islam is a religion that can be MISQUOTED just like any other religion. By answering these questions about Jihad (Jeehad or Jehad) and terrorism, we hope to present you with the true teachings of Islam.

No matter what, the conclusion is always yours, we only hope that you would consider the source where you get your information about Islam. Is that source - say the media- a legitimate source for information about any religion? Would that source be a good source for information about your own belief? Should we consider an Islamic source if we would like to find what does Islam teach?



What is Jihad?

How can Islam be called the religion of peace when it was spread by the sword, or by force?

If Islam is the best religion, why are many of the Muslims dishonest, unreliable, and involved in activities such as cheating, bribing, dealing in drugs, etc.?

Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

Doesn’t Islam promote violence, bloodshed and brutality since the Qur’an says that Muslims should kill the Kafirs (Non-believers, pagans or infidels) where ever they find them as in (9:5)?

Is Islam intolerant of other religious minorities? Why do Muslims prosecute people of other religions in other countries?

Isn't true that the Quran teaches that if a Muslim wish to convert to another religion he should be killed? Why Muslims who convert to another religion should be killed?

What does Islam teach about killing innocent people?

Choose a section of the common questions about Islam:

General questions about Islam

Questions about women or woman in Islam

Questions about The Mosque (worshipping place) and prayers in Islam

Questions about Muhammad, Mohammad, or Muhamet peace be upon him.

Back to the main articles page

If you have a question or a comment that you would like to share with others and us, please feel free to e-mail it to: [email protected]

Q1-What is Jihad?

The word "Jihad" means struggle, or to be specific, striving in the cause of God. Any struggle done in day-to-day life to please God can be considered Jihad. One of the highest levels of Jihad is to stand up to a tyrant and speak a word of truth. Control of the self from wrong doings is also a great Jihad. One of the forms of Jihad is to take up arms in defense of Islam or a Muslim country when Islam is attacked. This kind of Jihad has to be declared by the religious leadership or by a Muslim head of state that is following the Qur’an and Sunnah.

Top

Q2-How can Islam be called the religion of peace when it was spread by the sword or by force?

Without proofs, it is easy for anybody to make the "CLAIM " that Islam was spread by force. We will share with you some PROOFS of our claim, that nothing other than the force of truth, reason and logic spread Islam as we share with you some of the facts and some history of Islam.

1. WESTERN CONVERTS TODAY

If you get to visit any of the Islamic centers or Mosques in the Western Hemisphere, especially in big cities, you will find a large number of westerners, both men and women worshipping there. These people had the chance to find out about the true Islam and decided to become Muslims.

How did Muslims force these converts in their own western world to accept Islam? What weapon did Muslims use against those who were born and raised in other faiths except the force of truth, reason and logic to force them to accept Islam?

2. HUGE INCREASE MUSLIM POPULATION IN 50 YEARS

An article in Reader’s Digest ‘Almanac’, yearbook 1986, gave the statistics of the increase of percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in ‘The Plain Truth’ magazine. At THE TOP WAS ISLAM, WHICH INCREASED BY 235%, AND CHRISTIANITY HAD INCREASED ONLY BY 47%…!?

May one ask: Which war did Muslims lead against the whole world between 1934 and 1984 that converted millions of people to Islam?

3. ISLAM IN THE DISTANT PARTS OF THE WORLD

Indonesia and Malaysia provide another example supporting that Islam was not accepted by force. The number of Muslims in these two countries alone exceeds the Muslims in all the Arabic speaking countries combined, which leave us with a few questions, such as:

· How did Islam flourish there?

· How was Islam introduced to these non-Muslim lands, which were simply too far from any "military" reach?

Islam was introduced to that side of the world through MERCHANTS, who went there for business. They were exemplary in character in dealing with the non-Muslims they encountered, by treating them with respect and trading in commerce honestly (two core attributes of Muslim character). Muslims did not have the ability to cross all that land and sea from Arabia to spread in Indonesia by force. Rather, through those good and honest Muslim MERCHANTS, Islam was accepted there by way of example.

4. LET THE 14 MILLION TESTIFY

Muslims were the rules of the Arab world, a good portion of Asia Minor and all of North Africa for about 1400 years and that's how the official language have become the language of the Quran, the Arabic language. For a few years the British ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled the Arab world most of the time. Yet today, there is an estimated 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians, Christians, Catholics and also Jews. They have held their religion for all these generations through these 1400 years. If the Muslims had used the sword as many "CLAIM", there would have not been a single Arab who would have remained on his other religion. Especially when we consider that Muslims could have done with Non-Muslims as they please and did not have to worry about the Geneva Convention or the U.N at that time.

5. OLD BUILDINGS' TESTIMONY

In countries where the dominant religion is Islam, there are many old churches and synagogues that are older than the inception of Islam -- more than 1400 years. If Islam does not teach tolerance and respect to other faiths, then why would Muslims keep those buildings with their monks, priests and even their own scriptures, long before any of today's modern human rights and other world organizations such as the U.N?

6. NO COMPULSION IN RELIGION

It is very clear in (2:256): "Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clear from Error, whoever rejects Taghut (anything other than the real God, false deities, Satan, idols and so on) and believes in God, hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knoweth all things".

Again we find: "Say: The truth is from your Lord; Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject". (18:29)

7. MORE HYPOCRITES?

The Holy Quran also warned Muhammad (pbuh) and Muslims against HYPOCRISY and THE HYPOCRITES. The Quran describes the hypocrites as:

"Of the people there are some who say: "We believe in God and the Last Day, but they do not (really) believe". (2:8)

In fact there is a whole chapter (63) that is entitled The Hypocrites. Any rational mind will find it extremely difficult to believe that Islam teaches forcing others to accept it even if they were not convinced with it, only to create more HYPOCRITES.


  • These are some of our "ADULT PROOFS" that Islam was not spread by force. These are not some articles in a newspaper, a history book that was published by a specific interest organization or something that somebody said on the TV. These are logical, practical, true and indisputable proofs.
Top

Q3-If Islam is the best religion, why are many of the Muslims dishonest, unreliable, and involved in activities such as cheating, bribing, dealing in drugs, etc.?

1. The teachings of Islam

as Muslims we acknowledge that there are many who are strong in their faith who always do good and there are those who are weak faith who act with foolish. Any rational mind would have to agree; just because there are some Muslims who misrepresent Islam by doing many shameful acts, that does not mean that Islam teaches so. If you want to judge how good Islam is then judge it according to its authentic sources, i.e. the Glorious Qur'ân and the Hadeeth.

2. Muslims are people like other People

Just like any other religion, in Islam there are also the same people. Those who hold wrong or foreign beliefs or simply misunderstand their own scriptures. Just as there are many Christian cults with foreign beliefs such as the KKK for example, there are some "so called" Muslims who hold some twisted beliefs that are foreign, strange and in many cases, contrary to the true teachings of Islam just as the KKK does. The religion of Christianity is not responsible for what some -the KKK- do in its name. And Islam can't be responsible for what wrong some do in its name.

Holding any religion responsible for the wrongdoing of its followers is not fair to:


  • That religion, whichever it is, because realistically, any religion is responsible only for what it teaches.
  • All religions, because there will always be somebody who is doing something wrong.
  • Ourselves, when we have to consider that all religions to be evil or bad.
3. Don’t judge a car by its driver:

If you want to judge how good is the latest model of the "Mercedes" car and a person who does not know how to drive sits at the steering wheel and bangs up the car, who will you blame? The car or the driver? But naturally, the driver. To analyze how good the car is, a person should not look at the driver but see the ability and features of the car. How fast is it, what is its average fuel consumption, what are the safety measures, etc. Even if I agree for the sake of argument that the Muslims are bad, we can’t judge Islam by its followers? If you want to judge how good Islam is then judge it according to its authentic sources, i.e. the Glorious Qur'ân and the Hadeeth.

4. Judge Islam by its best follower i.e. Prophet Mohammed (pbuh):

If you practically want to check how good a car is put an expert driver behind the steering wheel. Similarly the best and the most exemplary follower of Islam by whom you can check how good Islam is, is the last and final messenger of God, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Besides Muslims, there are several honest and unbiased non-Muslim historians who have acclaimed that prophet Muhammad was the best human being. According to Michael H. Hart who wrote the book, ‘The Hundred Most Influential Men in History’, the topmost position, i.e. the number one position goes to the beloved prophet of Islam, Muhammad (pbuh). There are several such examples of non-Muslims paying great tributes to the prophet, like Thomas Carlyle, La-Martine, etc.

5. Muslims best as a whole:

In spite of all the black sheep in the Muslim community, Muslims taken on the whole, yet form the best community in the world. We are the biggest community of tea-totallers as a whole, i.e. those who don’t imbibe alcohol. Collectively, we are a community that gives the maximum charity in the world. There is not a single person in the world who can even show a candle to the Muslims where modesty is concerned.

Top

Q4-Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims.

1. Muslims are people like other People

Just like any other religion, in Islam there are also the same people. Those who hold wrong or foreign beliefs or simply misunderstand their own scriptures. Just as there are many Christian cults with foreign beliefs such as the KKK for example, there are some "so called" Muslims who hold some twisted beliefs that are foreign, strange and in many cases, contrary to the true teachings of Islam just as the KKK does. The religion of Christianity is not responsible for what some -the KKK- do in its name. And Islam can't be responsible for what wrong some do in its name.

Holding any religion responsible for the wrongdoing of its followers is not fair to:


  • That religion, whichever it is, because realistically, any religion is responsible only for what it teaches.
  • All religions, because there will always be somebody who is doing something wrong.
  • Ourselves, when we have to consider that all religions to be evil or bad.
2. Islam and killing an innocent

The ruling for killing an innocent in Islam is similar to the ruling that was given to the children of Israel (i.e. in the Old Testament):

"If any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people". (5:32)

it is unrealistic to say that Islam encourages Muslims to kill innocent people Just because they are Non-Muslims, when it makes killing an innocent as much of a crime as to killing all people.

3. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’

A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and practice the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good mathematician, he should know, follow and practice the fundamentals of mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics.

4. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same

One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fundamentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much respect.

5. Let the numbers do the talking

It is true that there are many Muslims who do shameful and evil acts, but how many are they in comparison with the total number of Muslims? There are about 1.3 billion Muslims in the world today, it will be illogical and unrealistic to judge 1300 million people according to what a few are doing because of their misguided belief.

6. The media and the negative news

In most cases, the media can only "sell" the "interesting" and usually the "negative" news. Have you ever heard about an airplane that took off and landed safely in the media? Even though there are hundreds of flights that take off and land safely every day, do we hear about them? But wouldn't we all hear about that one that crashes? Negative news is usually what drives the media. And most of us don't need a reminder that we can't just believe everything they tell us

It will be understandable then, why you would always hear negative news about Islam if your information about Islam were going to be through the "negative" media.

7. Consider the source

If one asked you where to find a source to learn about your own religion for example, would you tell him to watch the news to find out about your own religion?

Would you tell him to read the newspaper and that will be enough?

Or, would advice to read your scriptures or to read for a recognized scholar about your religion?

If you would like to know the truth about Islam, you need to consider the appropriate source, this is a logical and reasonable notion that no two would differ about.

8. Muslims best as a whole:

In spite of all the black sheep in the Muslim community, Muslims taken on the whole, yet form the best community in the world. We are the biggest community of tea-totallers as a whole, i.e. those who don’t imbibe alcohol. Collectively, we are a community that gives the maximum charity in the world. There is not a single person in the world that can even show a candle to the Muslims where modesty is concerned.

Top

Q5-Doesn’t Islam promote violence, bloodshed and brutality since the Qur’an says that Muslims should kill the Kafirs (Non-believers, pagans or infidels) where ever they find them as in (9:5)?

1. Misquoting any scriptures

All scriptures, no matter which ones, are subject to being misquoted by those who would use them to satisfy their own agenda or by those who simply lack an underlying understanding of the contextual elements of the verses at hand. If a scripture says; "God is one" it will be hard to misquote such a verse. However, other more layered verses become targets of misquotation. In this paper we will look at some examples of these misquotations that has been used against Islam. A proof of that is that we usually hear or read about all these negative verse, but not once we have heard the context or at least what does the following verse says…!

2. What's the context?

As a very basic right in any civilized community, Muslims as well as all other people are entitled to defend themselves. However, when the Revelation of the Quran first commenced, Muslims were not even allowed to fight back in self-defense.

The tribe of Quraish in Mecca saw their position as guardians for the "house of Abraham" threatened. They kept idols for different (gods), those idols were worshipped by many tribes in the area, while Muhammad (peace be upon him) called for belief in One God. Blinded by ignorance, the tribe of Quraish thought it must dismantle this new religion that called for submission to One God to replace their many Gods that were under their guardianship.

During the first few years of Islam, Muslims were persecuted in Mecca, where Mohammed (Peace Be Upon Him) started calling for Islam. Many were killed and others suffered persecution and humiliation. It was ten long years before Muhammad (pbuh) was commanded to migrate with whoever survived of his followers to Medina, which is about 260 miles North of Mecca. The powerful tribe of Quraish in Mecca, trying to finish off Islam and Muslims, was unable to stop the successful departure of Muslims from Mecca. For those still residing in Mecca, the Quraish decided to finish them all for good and they increased their hold on the city. They started by taking all the properties that belonged to Muslims, thus trying to prevent them from leaving Mecca on foot for the arduous 260 miles trip through in the desert.

Many Muslims still had the courage to leave the city on foot for the sake of God, so the Quraish plotted to kill everyone who left the city for Medina by intercepting them in the desert. After Muhammad (pbuh) made sure that every one of his followers had left the city, he too fled the city of Mecca with his closest friend, Abou Baker after miraculously surviving the assassination plot the tribe of Quraish had planned for him. Three years later, after a total of thirteen years of persecution, humiliation and killing, God allowed Muslims the right for self-defense by declaring to them the following verse: "Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors". (2:190)

Unfortunately, this self-defense has been generally misinterpreted and maliciously misconstrued by many, in an attempt to show that the commandments were a declaration of war for Muslims against everybody else. You might have heard this quotation from chapter 9, which states: "slay the Non-believers (infidels) wherever ye find them", which has been quoted repeatedly out of context. Let's take a closer look at this verse and its meaning:

Chapter 9 starts by clearly pointing out to whom the commandment apply. Specifically, these commandments were concerning:"…those of the pagans (Non-believers or infidels) with whom ye have contracted mutual alliances" (9:1). More specifically, those who did not honor the treaty and committed aggression towards Muslims, as we will see in (9:4), yet Muslims were still unable to dissolve their treaty until Allah (God in Arabic) had commanded Muslims to dissolve their part of the " treaty " too.

(9:2) "Go ye, then, for four months, (as ye will), throughout the land…" The Prophet was directed to give his enemies a four-month grace period, a cessation of hostilities, during which they could review their attitude and plans towards Islam and Muslims. Had the commandment been just to "storm them all and kill them all" there would be no need to allow such long period for warning.

Some also have misunderstood the word " people" in verse (9:3) which says: " This is a proclamation from God and His Messenger to the people on the day of the greater pilgrimage…" to refer to all humankind. Or to make the verse sounds as if it is a command for Muslims to wage war against all people, overlooking the exception found immediately in the next verse. In (9:4), the exceptions are:

" … Those idolaters who have honored their treaties with you in every detail and have not aided anyone else against you"




  • [*]THE MEANING COULD NOT BE CLEARER OR MORE UNEQUIVOCAL, IT ONLY CONCERNS THOSE WHO HAVE COMMITTED AGGRESSION AGAINST MUSLIMS AND VIOLATED THEIR RIGHTS, EVEN THOUGH MUSLIMS HAD SIGNED A PEACE TREATY WITH THEM AND HONORED IT PEACEFULLY.
In (9:5) God commanded Muslims to fight back after they exercised patience for years, losing many lives and masses of properties. At that time The unbelievers (infidels) were the enemy who committed all forms of aggression against the Muslims, that's why God commanded Muslims at that time to fight back: "Slay the Pagans (Non-believers or infidels) wherever ye find them". With the exception found in (9:4): " … Those idolaters who have honored their treaties with you in every detail and have not aided anyone else against you"

3. Example from another history

We know that Great Britain once colonized many other countries in the world including the U.S. It is normal to expect all people of these "colonized" countries to seek independence from Britain. Suppose that George Washington as the commander in chief of the continental army in the American Revolution against Britain, was trying to boost the morale of the American soldiers during the war and he said: "Whenever and wherever you find the British, kill them". Today if I say that George Washington said: "Whenever and wherever you find the British, kill them", without giving the context, I will make him sound as if he was an evil butcher who's only goal is to kill the British people -not the soldiers- for no reason. Yet, considering the situation as a whole and quoting him in context as to when that statement was made, wouldn't what George Washington have said -in the example- sound logical?

4. What about those caught in the middle?

In every conflict there are innocent people who have no inclination to support either of the fighting sides. The prophet was instructed to guarantee such people safety and security and secure for them right of passage until they reached their safe lands. God said:

"If one amongst the Non-believers ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of God; and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are people without knowledge" (9:6).

5. Chapter 9 verses 1-6… promote violence, bloodshed and brutality against Non-Muslims?

Now that you have seen for yourself the context and the situation in its reality as to when were these verses revealed, not as some misquoted it. How could these verses be simply an advocacy of aggression or warmongering? As you have seen, a careful examination of the above verses reveals the following critical points:

  1. Muslims, as well as others in any civilized community, are entitled to SELF-DEFENSE.
  2. The enemy who Muslims had to defend themselves against -at the time- happened to be A CERTAIN GROUPof infidels (Non-believers).
  3. It could have not been simply a declaration of war against all the Non-Muslims or infidels because of:
    1. The exception of those who did not violate Muslims rights or committed aggression towards them in (9:4).
    2. The commandment of offering protection of those caught in the middle in (9:6).
6. Prisoners of war

The Islamic law, "the Shari'a", is a comprehensive law, it covers most aspects of life in the most practical way, when taken as a whole or in its complete form, not when misquoted. If it so happen that a war situation arises and if Muslims should have the upper hand, then what should be done with captives of war (P.O.W)?

With the (false) idea that Muslims are out there to fight and kill all those who are Non-Muslims, one should expect that Muslims would not grant captives their lives, especially those who are warriors who could return to fight again later. This would be the only logical action against the P.O.W, if Muslims goal were to kill the infidels. Yet, according to the "Shari'a", Muslims cannot kill children, women, elders, Monks or the enemy warriors who surrender or those who were injured and their injuries prevent them from causing harm to Muslims. As the Holy Quran teaches:

"…When ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind (the captives) firmly: Thereafter (is the time for) either generosity (i.e. free them without ransom) or ransom". (4:8)

If Islam commands Muslims to rage war against all others, why would it forbid them from killing everybody even the captives? Over fourteen hundred years ago, while every army at the time cared only of achieving a sweeping victory taking no prisoners, over thirteen hundred years before the civilized Geneva Convention?

What does Islam teach about killing innocent people?

The ruling for killing an innocent in Islam is similar to the ruling that was given to the children of Israel (i.e. in the Old Testament):

"If any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people". (5:32)

Top

Q6-Is Islam intolerant of other religious minorities? Why do Muslims prosecute people of other religions in other countries?

Unfortunately, many make this claim that Islam does not tolerate other religious minorities ignoring these important facts:

1. LET THE 14 MILLION TESTIFY

Muslims were the rules of the Arab world, a good portion of Asia Minor and all of North Africa for about 1400 years and that's how the official language have become the language of the Quran, the Arabic language. For a few years the British ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled the Arab world most of the time. Yet today, there is an estimated 14 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians, Christians, Catholics and also Jews. They have held their religion for all these generations through these 1400 years. If the Muslims had used the sword as many "CLAIM", there would have not been a single Arab who would have remained on his other religion. Especially when we consider that Muslims could have done with Non-Muslims as they please and did not have to worry about the Geneva Convention or the U.N at that time.

2. OLD BUILDINGS' TESTIMONY

In countries where the dominant religion is Islam, there are many old churches and synagogues that are older than the inception of Islam -- more than 1400 years. If Islam does not teach tolerance and respect to other faiths, then why would Muslims keep those buildings with their monks, priests and even their own scriptures, long before any of today's modern human rights and other world organizations such as the U.N?

3. MORE HYPOCRITES?

The Holy Quran also warned Muhammad (pbuh) and Muslims against HYPOCRISY and THE HYPOCRITES. The Quran describes the hypocrites as:

"Of the people there are some who say: "We believe in God and the Last Day, but they do not (really) believe". (2:8)

In fact there is a whole chapter (63) that is entitled The Hypocrites. Any rational mind will find it extremely difficult to believe that Islam teaches forcing others to accept it even if they were not convinced with it, only to create more HYPOCRITES.

4. NO COMPULSION IN RELIGION

It is very clear in (2:256): "Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clear from Error, whoever rejects Taghut (anything other than the real God, false deities, Satan, idols and so on) and believes in God, hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knoweth all things".

Again we find: "Say: The truth is from your Lord; Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject". (18:29)

5. MODERN HISTORY AND POLITICS

A few hundred years ago, Jews were welcomed and flourished in Muslim Spain even when they were persecuted in the rest of Europe. They consider that part of their history as the Golden Era. In Muslim countries, Christians live in prosperity, hold government positions and attend their church. However, the same religious tolerance is not always available to Muslim minorities as seen in the past during Spanish inquisition and the crusades, or as seen now by the events in Bosnia, Israel and India. Muslims do recognize that sometimes the actions of a ruler do not reflect the teachings of his religion

6. GOVERNMENTS DO WHAT GOVERNMENTS DO

Almost anywhere in the world, there are governments or rulers who are doing something that is against the teachings of the major religion in their countries. In the west where the major religion teach "don't kill", governments allow the killing of the unborn children. There are other example you probably are already aware of where governments do what they like, and in many cases what they do is against the teachings of the major religion. If we are to consider that Islam is a bad or evil religion because some Muslims people or governments do something wrong or evil in its name. Then how should we regard other religions when countries with the majority of its people believe in that religion, yet the governments allow the killing of the unborn children.


  • That religion, whichever it is, because realistically, any religion is responsible only for what it teaches.
  • All religions, because there will always be somebody who is doing something wrong.
  • Ourselves, when we have to consider that all religions to be evil or bad.
Top

Q7-Isn't true that the Quran teaches that if a Muslim wish to convert to another religion he should be killed? Why Muslims who convert to another religion should be killed?

This is another misconception about Islam. You might have heard or read for somebody who made that claim, we should not just consider anybody's CLAIM to be a FACT Consider the source

There is no such verse that teaches so in the Quran. Further more, when you search the Quran you will find to the contrary of that. The Quran is rich with verses that teaches tolerance to other religions and to those who choose not to believe in anything at all, here are some examples:

(2:256): "Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clear from Error, whoever rejects Taghut (anything other than the real God, false deities, Satan, idols and so on) and believes in God, hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And God heareth and knoweth all things".

(18:29): "Say: The truth is from your Lord; Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject".

(109:6): "You shall have your religion and I shall have my religion".

Of course the Quran does not encourage one to leave Islam, but it offers him the freedom to be convinced with what it teaches. This way one do not become a Muslim just because his father, mother or somebody always told him so, but after being convinced with Islam without any doubts in his mind, so that a Muslim accepts Islam with conviction and devotion. This is also the reason why it will be very hard to find one who converts from Islam to another religion. I can not say it is impossible, I can only say that under the normal conditions, it will be very hard to find somebody who would convert from Islam.

Top

Q8-What does Islam teach about killing innocent people?

The ruling for killing an innocent in Islam is similar to the ruling that was given to the children of Israel (i.e. in the Old Testament):

"If any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people". (5:32)

Choose a section of the common questions about Islam:

General questions about Islam

Questions about women or woman in Islam

Questions about The Mosque (worshipping place) and prayers in Islam

Questions about Muhammad, Mohammad, or Muhamet peace be upon him.



Back to the main articles page

If you have a question or a comment that you would like to share with others and us, please feel free to e-mail it to: [email protected]


:w:
 
:sl:

:D More Jihad on www.tafsir.com

html-1.gif
Surah Al-Baqarah2 Jihad is made Obligatory


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Baqarah2 Abandoning Jihad does not alter Destiny


html-1.gif
Surah An-Nisa4 Refraining from Joining Jihad is a Sign of Hypocrites


html-1.gif
Surah An-Nisa4 The Encouragement to Participation in Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah An-Nisa4 Encouraging Jihad to Defend the Oppressed


html-1.gif
Surah An-Nisa4 The Wish that the Order for Jihad be Delayed


html-1.gif
Surah An-Nisa4 Allah Commands His Messenger to Perform Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah An-Nisa4 The Mujahid and those Who Do not Join Jihad are Not the Same, [and Jihad is Fard Kifayah]


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Ma'idah5 Commanding Taqwa, Wasilah, and Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Anfal8 Encouraging Believers to fight in Jihad; the Good News that a Few Muslims can overcome a Superior Enemy Force


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Among the Wisdom of Jihad is to test the Muslims


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Providing Pilgrims with Water and maintaining the Sacred Masjid are not equal to Faith and Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Admonishing clinging to Life rather than rushing to perform Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Jihad is required in all Conditions


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Why Hypocrites would not join in Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and Hypocrites


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Hypocrites are barred from participating in Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Admonishing Those Who did not join the Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Legitimate Excuses for staying away from Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 Rewards of Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Taubah9 The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Hajj22 Permission to fight; this is the first Ayah of Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Hajj22 The Command to worship Allah and engage in Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah Muhammad47 The Situation of the True Believer and the Sick-Hearted when the Command for Jihad was revealed


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Fath48 Allah conveys the News that there will be Many Cases of Jihad, and that Jihad distinguishes the Ranks of the Believers and exposes the Hypocrites


html-1.gif
Surah Al-Fath48 Acceptable Reasons for not joining Jihad


html-1.gif
Surah At-Tahrim66 The Command for Jihad against the Disbelievers and the Hypocrites


:w:
 
:sl:

:D More Jihad . . .

[Dr. Riffat Hassan is a member of the Islamic Research Foundation International and is an award winning scholar, an inimitable voice for moderate Islam & interreligous dialogue and Professor for Religious Studies and Humanities at the University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. In February 1999, she founded The International Network for the Rights of Female Victims of Violence in Pakistan (INRFVVP), a non-profit organization with a worldwide membership, which has played a noteworthy role in highlighting the issue of violence against girls and women, particularly with reference to “crimes of honor” (website: www.inrfvvp.org; E-mail: [email protected])]

On September 11, 2001, four domestic flights within the United States were hijacked by persons identified by American intelligence agencies as being of Muslim and Arab origin. Two of these planes hit the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York, while a third one hit the Pentagon in Washington, D. C. The fourth plane crashed in Pennsylvania, killing all aboard. The nature of the assaults and the efficiency with which they had been conducted shocked not only the Americans but also the rest of the world. Horror-stricken, millions around the globe, watched the massive tragedy unfold before them on television screens. As the reality of what had happened - the damage done to buildings which were symbols of American power and prestige - and the loss of thousands of human lives - sank in, many people in the United States began to feel that the world had changed forever.

The post September 11 world was - and is - radically different from the world which had existed until that fateful day. The sense of invulnerability and invincibility which had characterized the consciousness of the only remaining superpower in the world was suddenly, and irrevocably, lost. The crumbling of the gigantic structures of the World Trade Center towers seemed to remind all of us of the finite and fragile nature of all human constructions, and of our own mortality.

Waves of disbelief, grief, anger, fear, and bewilderment swept through the viewers of the death scenes with varying degrees of intensity. In the face of the most serious attack ever on American soil, it was understandable that many people in the United States wanted to lash out at those who had been responsible for the heinous crimes. The immediate perpetrators were dead and could not be punished. But there were others - like Osama bin Laden - who were believed to have masterminded and financed the crimes. Apprehending Osama bin Laden and his network of operatives, including the "sleepers" who were said to be in the country, seemed to be necessary in order to make a bleeding nation whole again, and to restore confidence in the "manifest destiny" of the United States to lead and control the world.

In the aftermath of September 11, more attention has been focused on Islam and Muslims than perhaps at any other point in modern history. . Much of this attention – particularly in the case of mainstream U.S. television channels – has been negative, not only with regards to those who committed the criminal acts, but also with regards to Islam and Muslims /Arabs at large.

The September 11 assaults on the U.S have been condemned strongly by the global community including a large number of Muslims from all walks of life ranging from leaders of Muslim countries to ordinary people. However, the crisis was perceived - and described - from the outset in terms which polarized the world into two absolutely opposed camps. The worldview which became dominant in the discourse of both American administration and media was symbolized by expressions such as “us versus them”, “either you are with us or you are against us”, “good versus evil.” Dualistic thinking which permeated this discourse seemed, at times, to be cosmic in magnitude. It appeared as if the so called “clash of civilizations” between the “West” and “the world of Islam” posited by Samuel Huntington had indeed come to pass.

However one interprets the fateful events of September 11, 2001, one thing is clear. The world changed forever on the day. There is now no going back to the situation which existed prior to this day. We cannot go back - we can only go forward. This poses a serious challenge both for (non-Muslim) Westerners and for Muslims. How and on what basis are we going to create a new world-order in the aftermath of what happened on September 11, 2001? Is it possible to “depolarize” the world and to build a bridge between “the West” and “the world of Islam”?

George Santayana had stated with acute insight that those who do not know their history are condemned to repeat it. As we reflect on the critical questions posed above, we need to be aware of the long history of negative stereotyping and imaging of Islam and Muslims in the West. Though there are a number of Americans who had not paid any serious attention to Islam or Muslims until the Arab oil embargo of 1973 or the Iranian Revolution of 1979, propaganda against Islam and Muslims is nothing new in the West.

It is as old as the first chapter of Islamic history, when the new faith began to move into territories largely occupied by Christians and Muslims were seen not only as ‘”the Other” but as “the Adversary”. . Dante, the great poet of medieval Christianity, painted a gruesome picture of the Prophet of Islam in his well-known poem The Divine Comedy. Portraying him as physically “divided” with his guts hanging out, Dante assigned the Prophet Muhammad to all but the lowest levels of hell for the grievous “sin” of dividing the world of Christendom.

St. Thomas Aquinas, the most outstanding Scholastic philosopher who owed such profound debt to the thinkers of Muslim Spain - who were the precursors of the Renaissance in Europe - described Islam as nothing but a construct to accommodate the lust of Muhammad. Christian voices such as those of Dante and Aquinas form the backdrop of Thomas Carlyle’s historic lecture on “The Hero as Prophet: Mahomet: Islam” in a series entitled On Heroes, Hero-Worship and The Heroic in History. Writing in mid-nineteenth century, Carlyle urged his fellow Christians to dismiss “our current hypothesis about Mahomet, that he was a scheming Imposter, a Falsehood Incarnate, that his religion is a mere quackery and fatuity.”



How persistent has been the misrepresentation of Islam, Muslims and Arabs in the work of “Orientalists” who have played a major part in shaping Western perceptions of all three has been very ably documented by Edward Said, Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University in New York. One major result of Said’s landmark work Orientalism (published in 1978) was that non-Muslims who have written about Islam subsequent to the publication of his book no longer call themselves “Orientalists” since this term is now been discredited. However, the mindset exhibited by so-called scholarly experts on Islam from Bernard Lewis (writing about “the Rage of Muslims” ) to Samuel Huntington (writing about “the Clash of Civilizations”) as well as so-called media experts appearing daily on American television channels, is very similar to that of the non-Muslim detractors of Islam of earlier times.

Given the reservoir of negative images associated with Islam and Muslims in “the Collective Unconscious” of the West, it is hardly sur­prising that, since the demise of the Soviet Empire, “the world of Islam” is - once again - being seen as the new “Enemy” which is perhaps even more incom­prehensible and intractable than the last one. The routine portrayal of Is­lam as a religion spread by the sword and characterized by “Holy War,” and of Muslims as barbarous and backward, frenzied and fanatic, volatile and violent, has led, in recent decades, to an alarming increase in “Muslim-­bashing” - verbal, physical, and psychological - in a number of Western countries. After September 11, 2001, the “crusade” against Islam and Muslims so evident on television screens in the United States, has become even more relentless and intense.

One major difficulty that many Muslims encounter in the negatively-charged, media-dominated environment in the post-September 11 U. S., is the use of “loaded” language to refer to central tenets in Islam. Two words which have been used extensively to depict Islam as a religion which is narrow, rigid, and militant. are “fundamentalism” and “jihad”. However, from an Islamic perspective, the way in which these two terms are used in popular discourse leads to deep misunderstanding about Islam and Muslims..

The word “fundamentalism” comes not from the history of Islam but from the history of American evangelical Protestant Christianity of the 1920s. As pointed out by The Encyclopedia of Religion (( Mircea Eliade, Editor in Chief, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1987, Volume 5, pp. 190-191)

‘Fundamentalism’ is a subspecies of evangelicalism. The term originated in America in 1920 and refers to evangelicals who consider it a chief Christian duty to combat uncompromisingly ‘modernist’ theology and certain secularizing cultural trends. Organized militancy is the feature that most clearly distinguishes fundamentalists from other evangelicals. Fundamentalism is primarily an American phenomenon..

However, Muslims who know English but are mostly unaware of the history of the word “fundamentalism” in American Christianity, use the term “fundamentalist” to refer to a person who believes in the fundamentals of something. The vast majority of Muslims believe in the fundamentals of Islam such as belief in God and the prophets sent by God, in prophetic books, the Day of Judgment, and duties directed toward God (“Haquq Allah”) as well as those directed toward God’s creatures (“Haquq al ‘ibad”). Therefore, if they are asked whether they are “fundamentalist”, they are likely to answer in the affirmative, unaware of how this statement is going to be interpreted by someone who associates being a “fundamentalist” with being an “extremist” if not a “terrorist.”

There is no counterpart of the word “fundamentalism” as it exists in the history of American Christianity in any Islamic language. It is most unfortunate that this word has acquired wide currency not only amongst non-Muslims but also amongst Muslims. However, colonized people often internalize the vocabulary of the colonizer hence the adoption of this word by many Muslims is not surprising even though it is highly regrettable.

Another word which is constantly been misused, especially by U.S. media, is “jihad”. “Jihad” is a core Qur’anic concept which derives from the root-word “jahada” meaning “striving” or “making an effort”. The highest form of “jihad” in Islam (“jihad al akbar”) is against one’s own shortcomings and weaknesses. It is an ongoing struggle to make one’s self better in every way. A lesser form of “jihad” (“jihad al-asghar”) is struggle against socials ills and injustice. Defensive war can be a part of the lesser “jihad” but the Qur’an repeatedly points out that “God loves not aggressors”. “Jihad” as ongoing effort is a part of everything that a Muslim is required to do – from praying five times a day (“salat”) to fasting in the month of Ramadan (“siyam”) to wealth-sharing (“zakat”) to performing pilgrimage (“hajj”) to standing up for justice and testifying to the truth. It is so pivotal to Islam that it cannot be abandoned despite its persistent vandalization by the American media. It must, therefore, be purged of the negative images attached to it, and understood as a moral struggle for the attainment of a higher state, both by individuals and by societies.

All too often “jihad” has been translated as “holy war” which is understood as a war undertaken for God or an absolute cause. Those who engage in this war must continue the fight until victory or death. The Qur’an which regards the rational faculty as the greatest gift of God to humanity and constantly urges humankind to make use of reason, does not support any war that is non-defensive or conducted outside of the bounds of rational thinking. “Holy war” is the translation not of “jihad” but of “crusade” - a term used to refer to wars undertaken by Christians in Europe in the 11th, 12th , and 13th centuries, to liberate the Holy Land from the “infidels” (Muslims)

:w:
 
:sl:

:D Also read this; from: http://www.bangsamoro.com/columns/war_07_29_03.php

"JIHAD AL-AKBAR"
By Warina Sushil A. Jukuy


A Catalyst for Proactive Change in Muslim Communities of Sulu

Posted July 29, 2003

Twenty-nine years ago, I understand the Sulu folks most. To be specific that was 1974. I was barely seven years old then. Nine years later, I perceived the island of my soul through the idealistic eyes of a sixteen-year-old. Twenty years later, to be specific, now in 2003, it has turned into a total stranger. The latter is my perception of Sulu as a 36 year old. At seven, I regarded myself as a Tausug Filipino. At sixteen, I regarded myself as a Bangsamoro first, and a Filipino next. It has only been two years that I regard myself as a Muslim foremost and nothing else. To the Supreme Creator belongs the world. The universal world that mankind has warped and perverted when it conceptualized territory, government, and sovereignty. The very same concepts that have deepened the diversity of human life far more than the complexity of Nature itself minus mankind, has ever done. Indeed, a concept of the people, for the people, and by the people. Ironically, each phrase is exclusive to people. Paradoxically, somehow somewhere in those concept must be the Almighty God.
The Province of Sulu of the Southern Philippines is dominantly Muslim. The natives therein are called Tausugs (meaning People of the Current) regardless of religion they profess. Sulu, a component of the ARMM (Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao) is comprised of 18 municipalities. The highest official of the land is the Provincial Governor, and under him are the 18 municipal mayors.
In 1450, there existed a Sulu Sultanate; and 71 years later the Spanish colonizers came and occupied Las Islas Filipinas but not Sultania de Jolo. By virtue of the 1898 Treaty of Paris, the Sulu Sultanate was ceded by Spain to the Philippine territory through American colonial rule of the archipelago. This is a historical blunder that America needs to rectify in the interest of justice.

Forty-eight golden years of sovereign power under a sovereign Sultan ruler must not be unjustly effaced to oblivion by a treaty to which the Sultanate of Sulu was never a party. Foreign transgressors grossly violated a sovereign right and such violation must be redress and shall be righted.

The dissolution of the Sultanate consequently dissolved the sovereign rights and powers of its constituents. They have been marginalized and been reduced to a minority in their own ancestral homeland. This is tantamount to genocide of their indigenous soul.

Now, I, Warina Sushil A. Jukuy, as a struggling and straggling Muslim and a Tausug individual who belongs to one of the 13 ethno-linguistic groups of the Bangsamoro people of Mindanao, Philippines, do hereby dedicate this column, Jihad-al-Akbar, as a humble initiative by way of the pen and paper. I have no weapon, no wealth and no power to wield. All I’ve got for weapon is my pen; for wealth is my humble ilm; and my power as a human being emanates from Him, Ya Rabb.

I am highly motivated to explore the possibilities of empowering the concept of Jihad-al-akbar as a dynamic medium for an impetus towards whole-rounded developmental change in every Muslim’s life; and using the mimbal/pulpit as a venue for proactive change.

Consequently, by using the mimbal as a medium to generate consciousness, the Qur’an and the Sunnah as the fundamental guidelines within our din or way of life (Islam) shall be essentially re- interpreted and thus re-applied to meet the contemporary challenges of our times. Probably, the interpretation and application of it might in the future transcend beyond the Islamic doctrine but shall imbue into every aspect of our practical lives. Insha’allah.

In this millennium, the term jihad is provocative that even its mere utterance will generally put the speakers in "surveillance spotlight," and the listeners to such spoken term in a "state of paranoia," so to speak. Consequently, the famous quote of "Either you are with us or you are with them," will hound either speakers or listeners.

Lately, jihad has been attributed myopically and indiscriminately to suicide bombers, terrorism, Al-Qaeda Network, Jamaah Islamiyaah, to name a few of those notorious extension terms, and most unfortunately, to Islam and its followers, the Muslims.

The misconception, however inadvertent it may be, is quite appalling; especially as Islam’s root word and conceptual meaning is essentially PEACE. Muslims or not, the term jihad has been established to connote and denote holy war. Historically, the term "holy war" came to being in Europe during the Crusades, the latter to mean as "war against Muslims. Holy war in such Crusades’ context has no counterpart in Islamic glossary.

"Jihad means striving. In its primary sense it is an inner thing, within self, to rid it from debased actions or inclinations, and exercise constancy and perseverance in achieving a higher moral standard."(www.salafipublications.com <http://www.salafipublications.com>)

Jihad is the struggle of a Muslim by way of his niyat or intention, by way of his hand, or by way of his speech. However, what is disheartening is the fact that Islam and Muslims have been perceived by the world generally to be associated with jihad or holy war, bloodshed and violence. This is an unjust misconception of what Islam and being a Muslim stands for.

On the other hand, it is disturbing that most Muslims in the Philippines understand most the concept of Jihad as a mode of defense through fighting (Jihad al asghar, the lesser jihad or bunu qital) in the name of Islam. Understandably, Muslims are under obligation to defend Islam as this can never be dissociated from the totality of his life because Islam is more than a religion as it is a comprehensive way of life. What is perplexing is why the concept of the greater struggle which is Jihad al akbar (the Greater Struggle against the Self and all other forms of nafs or appetites) is not as deeply ingrained in the system of the Muslim Filipinos.

Almost 600 years of intermittent war and peace have remained chronicled in the hearts, minds and souls of the Bangsamoro people in their struggle for right to self-determination. Bangsamoro elders, leaders and intellectuals have tried to transcend beyond the trappings of the invincible sovereignty idealism all in the name of Agama (Islam), Hulah(Territory) and bangsa (Nation), to no avail. History has proven consistently that sovereignty issue is far superior from issues of human rights, liberty and dignity of man.

Peace processes thru 1976 Tripoli Agreement, (Organization of Islamic Conference) OIC-GRP (Government of the Republic of the Philippines), 1996 SPCPD (Southern Philippines Council for Peace and Development) that led to the contemporary ARMM (Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao) have been tried and tested to give life to peace and development in the Southern Philippines. Presently, Balikatan 03-1 that involves US-RP Joint Military Exercise looms in Sulu in the name of peace and development. However, peace and development have frozen in the chambers of polemics, and have been reduced to mere euphemistic verbal artifact. No conscious and decisive effort is made to solicit the real meaning of peace and development from the stakeholders of Sulu.

The Muslim folks known collectively as the Bangsamoro people are vigilant in defending Islam and the Muslim communities from any form of unjust aggression but it seems that we are NOT as vigilant in upholding the true meaning of Islam and the real essence of being a Muslim. In layman’s term a Muslim’s duty in this lifetime is to enjoin good and forbid evil. Graft and corruption not only in the government but even in private and public life is ingrained in every aspect of a Filipino life, be he Muslim or not.

Enjoining good and forbidding evil is to put Allah in the center of one’s life. Such goals need not be actualized through autonomy or through secession. A Muslim can enjoin good and forbid evil wherever he is. This goal must start with the self and this is where the Struggle Against the Self and all other forms of nafs or appetites known as Jihad al Akbar comes in. Jihad al Akbar can be a catalyst for holistic change in Muslim Communities. Jihad al Akbar can be inculcated in the Muslim communities of Sulu in order for peace and development to be achieved. Jihad al Akbar teaches that the real enemy is not from without but from within.

The advocacy of Jihad al Akbar in Sulu is timely and relevant. As a proponent of said concept I have implemented this advocacy as an NGO worker in my capacity as publisher-editor of Jihad al Akbar, a Tausug-English Weekly magazine, bearing the slogan: “The catalyst for Proactive Change”. Said magazine 12 pages 11 X 17 came off the press on its maiden issue last Eid ul Fitri of 2002. It consists of 3 sections: Agama, Hulah, and Bangsa.

This magazine can “somehow” clear local and possibly global misconceptions about Jihad, Islam and Muslims among Muslims and non-Muslims alike. If Islam can properly and meaningfully be inculcated through Jihad al Akbar then Muslim communities in the Philippines and the rest of the world can actually benefit from its universal practical teachings within Islamic perspective by upholding al-Qur’an and Sunnah.

“Conquering the self” might prove to be financially advantageous to world economy; a huge bulk of military budget allocations could be apportioned to basic social services.

The mimbal and madaris will be the media of instruction to promote peace and development of one’s self among the jamaah (congregation) via Jihad al Akbar as a catalyst for proactive change.

The Muslims and non-Muslims in Sulu shall understand the practical meaning and application of Islam as a way of life via Jihad al Akbar. All levels of the Sulu strata shall benefit from Jihad al Akbar (Struggle via Self-Purification), government officials, ARMM officials, military, academe, NGOs/People’s Organizations and or civil societies, barangays, families, youths, and jamaahs in Sulu, spiritual leaders and the madaris.

It shall serve as impetus for subsequent in-depth studies on the merits of Jihad al Akbar on one’s personal life regardless of race, creed or religion.

Jihad-al-Akbar
The Greatest Struggle Against the Self and all other forms of Nafs or Appetites
Tausug-English Weekly Mag
The Catalyst for Proactive Change
Jolo, Sulu
Philippines
telefax:992-63-65/992-66-85 Zamboanga City



:w:
 
:sl:

:D More Jihad shortly on its way Insha-Allah . . . :p

:shade: Please also refer to: http://www.illegalvoices.org/knowledge/general_articles/natural_islam.html

Bismillah [hidayahnet] SPIRITUAL AND INTELLECTUAL JIHAD

cahaya malam
Sat, 07 May 2005 15:35:07 -0700



From: Megawati Mustafa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPIRITUAL AND INTELLECTUAL JIHAD


SPIRITUAL AND INTELLECTUAL JIHAD
A BEST-CASE SCENARIO
FOR THE HOLY LAND

by Dr. Robert ****son Crane


The grand strategy of Islam has always been to address issues of conscience
in both domestic and foreign policy by focusing on causes rather than merely on
effects. It focuses on the inner rather than the outer, on the spiritual
dynamics of change rather than merely on their result in current events. And it
focuses on the power of ideas in shaping human affairs rather than on the power
that comes from bombs and ballots.

The challenge of bringing peace through justice in the Holy Land requires the
transformation of Jewish self-perceived identity. Jews can perfect themselves
as a people and thereby fulfill their destiny in the Holy Land only if they
recognize the threats that secular Zionism poses to their future and instead
embrace the guidance and opportunities of spiritual Zionism so beautifully
taught by the Chief Rabbi of Palestine from 1919 to 1935, Rebbe Abraham Isaac
Kook.

Identity transformation is required also for both Christians and Muslims. The
Holy Land can resume its normal role as the worlds leading center of
civilization interchange and enrichment only if the Christian civilization of
the West transforms its drive for stability, and the Muslim civilization of the
East transforms its drive for survival, into a drive for peace through justice.

The Jewish, Christian, and Muslim peoples can fulfill their destiny as the
principal catalyst of a new global civilization only by drawing on the best
from their past in a joint effort of civilization renewal. This process of
civilization renewal requires Muslims to found dedicated institutes of higher
learning. A pioneering and cutting-edge venture in civilization renewal has
been undertaken by a diverse group of progressive Muslim intellectuals,
scholars, and professionals. They have founded Crescent University as a modern,
mainstream, and egalitarian seat of higher learning modeled on other successful
faith-based institutions. Their mission is to develop an American Muslim
university equal to Oxford and Harvard by the middle of the present century.


Part One


Transformation of Self Identity from Secular to Spiritual Zionism


The current events of April, 2002, are a denouement of the so-called Second
Intifada, which began in September, 2000, as a reaction to Prime Minister Ariel
Sharons symbolical assertion of Israeli sovereignty over the Haram al Sharif
or Temple Mount in the heart of Old Jerusalem. His occupation of the Temple
Mount by an armed force of a thousand Israelis put an end to the decade-long
Oslo peace process, which, in the Palestinians perception, had succeeded only
in gradually and incrementally restricting their rights and hopes in the Holy
Land.

Increasingly, even supporters of secular Zionism are concluding that present
trends seem to be leading to an eventual holocaust. Even separation of peoples
into two sovereign ghettos might accomplish no more than buy time before the
inevitable. There are alternatives, among which perhaps the most promising is
the Abraham Federation, explained on the website of the Center for Economic and
Social Justice, www.cesj.org. Any successful solution, however, must address
the most fundamental of the root causes of conflict, which is secular Zionism
itself.

Conflict over the past century in the Holy Land, including the failure of Oslo,
is an effect of the secularization of Judaism during the 19th century in
Europe, caused in part by anti-Semitism, and by the devastating blow to the
faith in the twentieth century by the Holocaust, which produced the phenomenon
of secular Zionism. Alienated from their own culture, and vulnerable to modern
nationalist demagoguery, a growing portion of the Jewish nation came to elevate
control over physical land to an ultimate value and goal. A minor, splinter
faction before the Holocaust, the secular Zionists by mid-century had become
the dominant force in a revolution that replaced spiritual Zionism as the
return to God by a secularized Zionism as the return to a modern secular state.
The self-identity of Jews world-wide thus was transformed into loyalty to a
national-security-state based on political and military power in conflict with
the rest of the world.

The future of Jews in the Holy Land will depend on the extent to which they can
overcome this secular transformation and re-transform their identity to recover
and connect with their spiritual roots.

More than four years before the Second Intifada, the Associate Editor of the
Middle East Affairs Journal, Laura Drake, identified the underlying problem of
identity transformation in her 54-page article, Reconstructing Identities: The
Arab-Israeli Conflict in Theoretical Perspective. This profound think-piece,
published in the Winter/Spring issue of 1997-98, summarized her just-completed
doctoral dissertation at American University.

Dr. Drake focuses on the identity destabilization and identity deconstruction
among Israelis who no longer consider themselves Zionists and among Arabs who
consider Arab identity to be merely a function of geography. She suggests that
such a post-modern loss of consciousness on one side both causes and results
from hegemony on the other side.

The beginning of the 21st century revealed how easily this negative process of
identity loss can be reversed by threats to physical security deliberately
instigated and aggravated by extremists on both sides. In early 2002, the
mutual incriminations of a terrorist/anti-terrorist dance of death refurbished
secular identities. At the same time it made ever more clear the need for the
spiritual leaders of all the parties in the Holy Land during the rest of the
21st century to recover their pre-Holocaust and pre-Intifada identities as
peoples called by God to bring peace through justice to the world.

The flourishing of Jewish civilization in the Holy Land will never come merely
from the post-modern loss of modernist identities, because such a vacuum is
unstable. Long-run security will come only from positive and pro-active
commitment to recover classical identities.

The apostle of such classical identity for Jews was Abraham Isaac Kook, who was
Chief Rabbi of Palestine from 1919 to 1935. He taught that every religion
contains the seed of its own perversion, because humans are free to divert
their worship from God to themselves. The greatest evil is always the
perversion of the good, and the surest salvation from evil is always the return
to prophetic origins.

Although the fundamentalist Gush Emunim, who have established fanatical
settlements deep into the West Bank, invoke Rebbe Kook as their mentor, they
make the sacrilegious error of turning his spiritual teaching into a call for
secular nationalism of the most extreme kind. Abraham Isaac Kooks entire life
bespoke his message that only in the Holy Land of Israel can the genius of
Hebraic prophecy be revived and the Jewish people bring the creative power of
Gods love in the form of justice and unity to every person and to all mankind.
For the basic disposition of the Israelite nation, he asserted, is the
aspiration that the highest measure of justice, the justice of God, shall
prevail in the world.

Universally recognized as the leading spokesperson of spiritual Zionism, Rabbi
Kook went to Jaffa from Poland in 1904 to perfect the people and land of Israel
by bringing out the holy sparks in every person, group, and ideology in order
to make way for the advent of the Messiah.

As a Lurianic Cabbalist, committed to the social renewal that both confirms and
transcends halakha, Rebbe Kook emphasized, first of all, that religious
experience is certain knowledge of God, from which all other knowledge can be
at best merely a reflection, and that this common experience of total being
or unity of all religious people is the only adequate medium for Gods
message through the Jewish people, who are the microcosm of humanity.

If individuals cannot summon the whole world to God, proclaimed Rebbe Kook,
then a people must issue the call. He appealed therefore to the Jewish people,
whose commitment to the oneness of God is a commitment to the vision of
universality in all its far-reaching implications & and whose vocation is to
help make the world more receptive to the divine light & by bearing witness to
the Torah in the world. This, he taught, is the whole purpose of Israel, which
stands for shir el, the song of God. It is schlomo, which means peace or
wholeness, Solomans Song of Songs.

But he warned, again prophetically, that, when an idea needs to acquire a
physical base, it tends to descend from its height. In such an instance it is
thrust toward the earthly, and brazen ones come and desecrate its holiness.
Together with this, however, its followers increase, and the physical vitality
becomes strikingly visible. Each person then suffers: The stubbornness of
seeking spiritual satisfaction in the outer aspect of things enfeebles ones
powers, fragments the human spirit, and leads the stormy quest in a direction
where it will find emptiness and disappointment. In disillusionment, the quest
will continue in another direction. & When degeneration leads one to embrace an
outlook on life that negates ones higher vision, then one becomes prey to the
dark side within. & The spiritual dimension becomes enslaved and darkened in
the darkness of life.

Rebbe Kook warns that the irruption of spiritual light from its divine source
on uncultivated ground yields the perverse aspect of idolatry. & It is for this
reason that we note to our astonishment the decline of religious Judaism in a
period of national renaissance. The love of the nation, he taught, or more
broadly, for humanity, is adorned at its source with the purest ideals, which
reflect humanity and nationhood in their noblest light, & but if a person
should wish to embrace the nation in its decadent condition, its coarser
aspects, without inner illumination from its ancient, higher light, he will
soon take into himself filth and lowliness and elements of evil that will turn
to bitterness in a short span of history of but a few generations. & This is
the narrow state to which the community of Israel will descend prior to an
awakening to the true revival.

By transgressing the limits, Rebbe Kook prophesied, the leaders of Israel may
bring on a holocaust. But this will merely precede a revival. As smoke fades
away, so will fade away all the destructive winds that have filled the land,
the language, the history, and the literature.

Always following his warning was the reminder of Gods covenant. In all of
this is hiding the presence of the living God. & It is a fundamental error for
us to retreat from our distinctive excellence, to cease recognizing ourselves
as chosen for a divine vocation. & We are a great people and we have blundered
greatly, and, therefore, we suffered great tribulation; but great also is our
consolation. & Our people will be rebuilt and established & through the divine
dimension of its life. All the builders of the people will come to recognize
this profound truth. Then they will call out with a mighty voice to themselves
and to their people: Let us go and return to the Lord! And this return will be
a true return.

And at this time, prophesied Rebbe Kook, who always sharply defended the
validity of both Christianity and Islam as religions in the plan of God, the
brotherly love of Esau and Jacob [Christians and Jews], and of Isaac and
Ishmael [Jews and Muslims], will assert itself above all the confusion & [and
turn] the darkness to light.


Part Two


Civilizational Renewal


If the causes of conflict are fundamentally the loss of spiritual awareness
and commitment, the cures are their recovery. This is particularly important
for Muslims in America, because they are called to the spiritual path both by
their own religion and by their presence in America, whose founders and entire
purpose are deeply spiritual. The spiritual power both of America and of
American Muslims can be recovered only by recognizing their common origins in
reliance on and commitment to their loving Creator.

Muslims are vice-regents of Allah, subhanahu wa taala, born with khilafa.
Every individual Muslim has a duty, fard ain, and the entire umma here in
America has a responsibility, fard kifaya, to be Gods servants in weaving
Allahs grand design. Their role and very existence here in America is part of
the divine purpose to bring real meaning and substance to the Founders
conviction that America can and should be a moral leader of the world.

America is perhaps the only country where a truly Islamic culture can flourish
and therefore may be the only leading Western country that can become
functionally Islamic. By this I do not mean that the majority will make the
shahada and formally become Muslims, but rather that the common principles of
classical America and classical Islam will provide the paradigm of thought that
guides public life.

The basic paradigm of what we call American traditionalist thought, which
originated in the Glorious Revolution of 1688 in England and culminated in the
American Revolution almost a century later, is that order, justice, and freedom
are interdependent. When freedom is construed to be independent of justice,
there can be no justice and the result will be anarchy. When order is thought
to be possible without justice, there can be no order, because injustice is the
principal cause of disorder. When justice is thought to be possible without
order and freedom, then the pursuit of order, justice, and freedom are snares
of the ignorant.

This triune nature of peace through justice is thoroughly Islamic, but Muslim
scholars have spelled it out in unsurpassed detail. The vision of Islam was
fully articulated during the Islamic classical period and culminated in the
writings of Al Shatibi six centuries ago in direct reliance on thematic
analysis of the Quran and on the diplomacy of the Prophet Muhammad ( ). The
great scholars of Islam, every one of whom was imprisoned at least once for
refusing to corrupt Islamic tradition, developed guidelines for developing and
applying Islamic law (shariah) in the form of a set of Islamic universal
principles (kulliyat), essentials (dururiyat), or purposes (maqasid). Although
there are some important fiqi guidelines to observe in this field, al Shatibi
explained that the number and inner tectonics of these maqasid are flexible
according to time and place.

The secret to the functional Islamization of America is to articulate vision.
Vision shapes the public policy agenda, and whoever shapes the agenda controls
policy.

For purposes of agenda formation, the universal principles of Islamic thought
are seven responsibilities. When observed, they produce corresponding human
rights. The first, haqq al din, is the duty to respect and maintain the purity
of divine revelation, without which human reason is unreliable. The next three,
which promote human survival, are haqq al haya, the duty to respect human life
and the human person; haqq al nasl, the duty to respect the human family and
group rights at every level of human association; and haqq al mal, the duty to
respect private property and the universal human right to individual ownership
of the means of production.

The second set of three maqasid promotes quality of life. These are haqq al
hurriya, the duty to respect group self-determination through political
freedom, including the second-order principles of governmental responsiveness
(shura), representative government (ijma), and an independent judiciary; haqq
al karama, the duty to respect human dignity, including freedom of religion and
gender equity; and haqq al ilm, which is the duty to respect knowledge,
including freedom of thought, speech, and association, subject to the other six
universal principles. These universal principles of Islamic law constitute a
definition of justice, which, in turn, is the Islamic definition of human
rights.

In order to clarify the picture of the real Islam in Western societies, the
principal requirement is for Muslims to reflect the wisdom and beauty of Islam
in their daily lives, because this is the best form of dawa. Their
responsibilities, however, go beyond this, particularly now that Islam has
become well established in America during a century when its future and the
future of civilization hang in the balance. They must introduce Islam into the
public discourse on all issues of conscience. For this they need concerted
effort by Muslim think-tanks or policy centers, and behind the think-tanks as
essential intellectual support must be the institutionalization of higher
education in the Muslim equivalent of Harvard or Oxford.

Some of the opinion leaders in the Muslim umma talk glibly about founding
think-tanks, but without any idea of why, what, or how, other than to vent
their frustration with American foreign policies. They are narcissistic to the
extent of conceiving that a Muslim think-tank should address only issues that
directly concern Muslims. They treat Islam as a special-interest group rather
than as a universal religion divinely revealed to bring balance in our
stewardship of the earth, mercy to the poor, wisdom to the powerful, and
justice to all.

The function of a Muslim think-tank is to provide vision for a network of
like-minded think-tanks in the non-Muslim policy community. It also should
explore and evaluate different options for action.

In Islam, commitment to action is known as jihad. There are three kinds of
jihad. The first two are found in the hadith or history of the sayings and
actions of the Prophet Muhammad ( ). These are the jihad al akbar or greatest
jihad, which is the struggle to overcome ones unruly self. The second is the
lesser jihad, the jihad al saghrir or asghrar, which is the armed battle to
defend the human rights of ones own people and of people everywhere. The third
jihad, mentioned only by the word of God in the Quran, Surah al Furqan 25:52,
is the jihad al kabir or great jihad. This jihad is called for in the
exhortation wa jihidhum bihi jihadan kabiran, which means struggle with it
[divine revelation] in a great struggle. This is the intellectual jihad, which
normally follows the first two.

In the modern era, when the instinct to defend oneself with armed force can be
self-defeating, the call to a great jihad requires Muslim intellectuals to
counter the impending clash of civilizations by providing the intellectual
basis for cooperation among civilizations in the articulation of common
principles and the pursuit of common goals.

The scholars and political activists of Islam have a four-fold task, which is
to: 1) develop a framework of thought consistent with the universal principles
of classical Americas founders and of the classical scholars of Islam; 2)
address the major issues of conscience in the world within the framework of
these principles, known to Muslims as the maqasid al shariah; 3) enlist the
leaders of interfaith dialogue, without which there can be no real
civilizational cooperation and renewal; and 4) from this position of strength,
engage the deep but destructive thinkers, who otherwise will develop a
counter-culture on their own, cut off from the perennial wisdom that produces
civilization. The challenge to the Muslim umma or community worldwide is
nothing less than to mount a movement of global civilizational renewal at a
time when the barbarians are not only at the gates of civilization but
entrenching themselves inside.


Part Three


New Frontiers in Erudition and Enlightenment


After the calamity of Americas Black September, 2002, it became obvious to
both Muslims and non-Muslims that enlightened Muslims need a reputable
institutional voice in the mainstream of intellectual and political life. Only
by cooperating with the intellectuals and opinion leaders of all faiths can
Muslims help strengthen Americas original vision and values and shape a
corresponding agenda for addressing the issues of conscience and concern both
in America and around the world. The alternative is continuing confrontation by
Muslim radicals steeped in ignorance, extremism, paranoia, hatred, and global
terrorism.

The younger generation of the ten-million-strong Muslim population in America,
which now produces 100,000 high school graduates a year, can play a critical
role in reviving the classical, revolutionary thought of Americas
revolutionary founders as well as of the enlightened scholars of Islam. This
task of renewing the wisdom of the past in an ecumenical, classical education
is necessary to build a world civilization that recognizes the legitimacy of
all the world religions within the common paradigm that we might call
functional Islam.

In response to the need, concerned Muslims formed Crescent University to serve
both the national and global needs of Muslims by providing a ground-breaking
seat of higher learning to produce new generations of thinking Muslims from all
walks of life committed to help shape Americas global role and to promote
Islamic ecumenism and the resulting global Islamic unity. Muslims must become
creators rather than consumers of knowledge and technology so that they can
become opinion leaders in the broader society.

The Muslim community in America has now come of age with a critical mass of top
scholars and scientists, as well as prosperous professionals and entrepreneurs,
to fill the distinctive marketing niche revealed in a Crescent Steering Group
poll, which found a strong communal desire for a prestigious Muslim university
to rank with the best universities in America. In order to keep it highly
selective, skilled headhunters will recruit the finest faculty, both Muslim and
non-Muslim, and professional marketers will attract the best students. The
objective is not to replicate any inward-looking madrassah-style or seminary
training but to incubate leaders of forward-looking Muslim generations residing
and working in the West.

Crescent is a true university in the sense of its universal scope and its
commitment to exploring new frontiers of knowledge together with its peers,
such as Harvard and Yale, in the Ivy League. Crescent becomes a bridgehead to
the future by stimulating critical Muslim thinking in an atmosphere of
scholarly ingenuity, innovative investigation, philosophical diversity, and
exploratory erudition.

Visionary in outlook and futuristic in orientation, Crescent exists to
revitalize Islamic thought and theology and catalyze an authentic spiritual
renaissance. Its purpose is to renew in the modern world the enlightenment of
early Islam, when scholars and students from across frontiers and faiths
pioneered the peerless intellectual freedom and dynamism renowned at Cordoba
University in Andalusia and Sankore University in Timbuktu, as well as in Al
Azhar in North Africa, Baghdad, and similar centers in Southwest Asia. These
educational Meccas pioneered the scientific method in their search primarily
for truth. They were copied by Europeans in their search primarily for power.
Both East and West now recognize the need for a reinforcing balance.

Crescent, as the first fully-fledged American Muslim university, will
encapsulate Islams twin focus on reason and revelation, scholarship and the
sublime, science and religion. In its cutting-edge under-graduate and
professional schools, Crescent will be the principal platform from which a new
generation of informed, forward-looking Islamic leadership will emerge to help
America meet the challenges of the modern world. By emphasizing the unique
epistemological synthesis of scientific exploration and human wisdom, of
secular knowledge and sacred understanding, of professional development and
moral rearmament, Crescent can revive the Islamic genius in intellectual
originality, scientific inquisitiveness, and technological leadership that
spawns vibrant civilization.

The entire curriculum of Crescent is infused with the total spectrum of secular
knowledge and spiritual learning, the timely and the timeless. Its graduate
schools in the humanities will excel in everything needed to produce a global
ethic by focusing on both personal and community responsibilities and on human
rights (collectively known as the maqasid al shariah) inherent in the
overarching Islamic paradigm of individual morality and economic and social
justice. This will lead to new frontiers in normative economics, political
governance, civic responsibility, and communal altruism, as well as personal
ethics. These, in turn, will produce an Islamic ethics and an Islamic ethos as
a model for the ongoing search in all the world religions.

Crescents bed-rock and all-embracing pluralism provides a haven for all
open-minded seekers of truth, both Muslims and non-Muslims, to engage in an
on-going process of interfaith dialogue, religio-cultural interaction, and
spiritual affirmation, in order to strengthen the pillars of all civilizations
in the structure of a global unity incorporating diversity, which is possible
today for the first time in human history

All the religions and denominations in America recognize that their faith and
future depend on faith-based education and they all have founded and are
maintaining universities that bring to bear their contributions to the mosaic
that is America and to the solution of its problems of conscience. Muslims can
do no less, particularly because Islam by its very nature is universal and
ecumenical and therefore is well-suited for leadership in bringing
non-sectarian faith-based wisdom into the public square. Islam, as developed
and applied in America, can and should be a principal force in completing the
American Revolution, or, as President Ronald Reagan put it, in launching the
Second American Revolution as a non-hegemonic model for the entire world. The
Muslim contribution to this task of civilizational renewal can best begin with
the founding of Crescent as a world-class American Muslim university dedicated
to this goal.

The teaching method or pedagogy of Crescent University customizes the
world-famous Oxford and Cambridge (Oxbridge) collegiate and tutorial system in
a residential community of scholars and students, with class sizes limited to
20 students. Crescent follows the Continental system of comprehensive
examinations at the end of the first two years and upon graduation, as well as
the system of external examiners to avoid the debilitating grade inflation that
is contaminating American academia.

The core curriculum is based on the great books of Western and Eastern
civilizations, building upon and enhancing the successful experiments at the
two St. Johns campuses and at Sarah Lawrence College. The great books at
Crescent include those of the Islamic civilization as part of the broader
Islamic, Christian, Jewish civilization, which can become the basis of a
pluralist and open world civilization of the future. For this purpose, student
body and faculty will include both Muslims and non-Muslims.

Study abroad, particularly in the professional schools, and mastery of at least
two Muslim languages, is encouraged. The Crescent law school, once activated by
the year 2010, will offer degrees in both American law and Islamic
jurisprudence and a unique advanced degree in comparative legal systems
designed to include both. This latter degree would require intensive study in
major Islamic universities of the Muslim world.

Crescent University is egalitarian, enlightened, and co-educational. Women will
play crucial roles not only in the student body but in the faculty and in the
administration of the university. Crescent restores the Islamic ordinances of
gender equity, while respecting, for example, the wisdom of single sex
dormitories.

Down-stream projects include a university academic press, convention center,
teaching hospital, think-tanks, and an adjacent research complex and business
park.

The first of Crescents family of associated research associations is the
Center for Understanding Islam, which was founded in the Fall of 2001 as a
clearing house for both popular and scholarly answers to key current questions
about the teachings of Islam. Its website is www.cuii.org. The Centers purpose
is to help Muslims offer a common framework for explaining the wisdom of Islam
in the contemporary world. The larger purpose, as given in its publication,
Islam: Short Answers to Key Current Questions, March 2002, 23 pages, is to
cooperate with concerned persons of all faiths in developing a global ethic as
guidance for addressing all issues of conscience in both domestic and foreign
policy. This Center for Understanding Islam is not a think-tank in the common
sense of the term, because it carefully does not address specific policies of
any government or even recommend a specific agenda for public policy.

Crescent University and its associated organizations are committed to its twin
focus on reason and revelation, science and religion, scholarship and the
sublime. Its five operating principles are: 1) erudition and excellence; 2)
ecumenism; 3) egalitarianism; 4) environment; and 5) enlightenment. Together
these are the keys to success for a modern world-class university.


Conclusion


The best-case scenario for the future of the Holy Land envisages the revival
of both spiritual and intellectual jihad, designed to address issues of
conscience in both domestic and foreign policy by focusing on causes rather
than merely on effects. It focuses on the inner rather than the outer, on the
spiritual dynamics of change rather than merely on their result in current
events. The grand strategy of Islam therefore relies on spiritual and
intellectual jihad, the jihad al akbar and the jihad al kabir, rather than on
the jihad al saghrir or lesser jihad of employing physical force. It focuses on
the power of paradigms and ideas in shaping human affairs in the hope and
prayer that peace through justice and global unity is a paradigm whose time has
come.







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/hjtSRD/3MnJAA/i1hLAA/TXWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

All views expressed herein belong to the individuals concerned and do not in
any way reflect the official views of Hidayahnet unless sanctioned or approved
otherwise.

If your mailbox clogged with mails from Hidayahnet, you may wish to get a daily
digest of emails by logging-on to http://www.yahoogroups.com to change your
mail delivery settings or email the moderators at [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
title "change to daily digest".
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hidayahnet/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




<img>

  • Bismillah [hidayahnet] SPIRITUAL AND INTELLECTUAL JIHAD cahaya malam

:w:
 
Eddi said:
:sl:
Ahmed Waheed said:
:sl:

:D A hadith may be fabricated in one book or chapter of a book, and yet in another; it may be authentic. The question of authenticity; we go to Ali (as); the cousin of the Prophet (saw). He said that there are 3 steps to ahadith authenticiation, from which even one being flawed fabricates the hadith.



  1. :thumbs_upSanad: Channel (chain) of narration; through whom is the narration narrated, and can they be trusted.
  2. :thumbs_upLuqa: Quranic compatibility with the hadith; the Prophet (saw) NEVER spoke against the Quran.
  3. :thumbs_upTa`weel ul-Athr / Ta`weel fil-Iman: meaning of the transmitted statement, and its effects on Iman.

:) I will Insha-Allah elaborate on this in the near future, if necessary. :p So please do ask if you want it explained Insha-Allah . . .

:w:
I am under the impression that you explained this in another forum in details anyway so I'll look for a link to put here inshallah
:w:
:sl:

:shade: The question of authenticity is more to do with how than what; as you need to know how you can trust the narrator to be telling the truth. How can you trust the narrator to remember a statement with such accuracy. How well does it conform to the laws of Islamic Aqeedah (Quran). How does it affect your Iman and Taqwah.

:) I look forward to the links by :brother: Eddi . . . Insha-Allah . . .

:w:
 
Last edited:
Ahmed Waheed said:
:sl:

:shade: The question of authenticity is more to do with how than what; as you need to know how you can trust the narrator to be telling the truth. How can you trust the narrator to remember a statement with such accuracy. How well does it conform to the laws of Islamic Aqeedah (Quran). How does it affect your Iman and Taqwah.

:) I look forward to the links by :brother: Eddi . . . Insha-Allah . . .

:w:
:sl:

:zip: Allah knows best. I haven't found any links to post.

:w:
 
Eddi said:
:sl:

:zip: Allah knows best. I haven't found any links to post.

:w:
:sl:

:D There's no time limit . . . but its good to get them here quick . . .

:w:
 
Ahmed Waheed said:
Eddi said:
:sl:
Ahmed Waheed said:
:sl:

:D A hadith may be fabricated in one book or chapter of a book, and yet in another; it may be authentic. The question of authenticity; we go to Ali (as); the cousin of the Prophet (saw). He said that there are 3 steps to ahadith authenticiation, from which even one being flawed fabricates the hadith.

  1. :thumbs_upSanad: Channel (chain) of narration; through whom is the narration narrated, and can they be trusted.
  2. :thumbs_upLuqa: Quranic compatibility with the hadith; the Prophet (saw) NEVER spoke against the Quran.
  3. :thumbs_upTa`weel ul-Athr / Ta`weel fil-Iman: meaning of the transmitted statement, and its effects on Iman.
:) I will Insha-Allah elaborate on this in the near future, if necessary. :p So please do ask if you want it explained Insha-Allah . . .

:w:
I am under the impression that you explained this in another forum in details anyway so I'll look for a link to put here inshallah
:w:
:sl:

:shade: The question of authenticity is more to do with how than what; as you need to know how you can trust the narrator to be telling the truth. How can you trust the narrator to remember a statement with such accuracy. How well does it conform to the laws of Islamic Aqeedah (Quran). How does it affect your Iman and Taqwah.

:) I look forward to the links by :brother: Eddi . . . Insha-Allah . . .

:w:
:sl:

:D The 3 steps I mentioned are not very difficult to carry out; once one has knowledge of Islamic History; and they can work out who existed when and who can be trusted to remember and narrate a narration. :shade: Also one must be certain that the narration doesn't contradict the Quran, nor does it cause doubts and confusion in Iman . . .

:w:
 
:sl:

It isn't confusing but ...... I'll just go pop down to the shops and buy some knowledge of islamic history. :brother:

:w:
 
Osman said:
:sl:

It isn't confusing but ...... I'll just go pop down to the shops and buy some knowledge of islamic history. :brother:

:w:
:sl:

:D Alternatively; you can learn Arabic, and I'll email you enough Islamic Literature to last a lifetime Insha-Allah . . . And it won't cost a penny . . .

:w:
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top