harmful impurities

[yasoooo]

Thank you, Muhammad and rjltrevisan.This is my reply.



Christians are considered
Father is god

Christ is god

Holy Spirit is god

3 beings make up your one God.
And like or lump it, if you claim each is God (which you do), your claiming 3 God's.

"the priest keeps referring to all three entities as God. So which one is God?"


So, according to whoever, there is one god who can be three different beings at the same time?

BIBLE IS FULL OF CONFUSION BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE CHANGED MANY THINGS IN IT, IMAGINE SOMEONE WITH RIGHT THINKING SAYING PEOPLE KILLED THEIR GOD, THEN WHO IS THE MOST POWERFUL ? PEOPLE OR GOD?



the truth


Christ and the Holy Spirit are messengers of God
they have no authority except by God’s permission




God is only the Father
Christ is the Messenger of God
The Holy Spirit is an angel to transmit revelation to the prophets



God is One, from Adam to Muhammad, peace be upon them
But people have turned away from worshiping God according to their own whims

God is one and there are not many gods
god has no wife, or biological son

Christ is the son of God in the figurative sense only because all the prophets are sons of God
The God we worship is (the Father), as Western Christians call him

But Muslims and Christians of the East, call him allah

The truth is that Jesus preached the same message that the Prophets in the Old Testament preached. There is a passage in the Bible which really emphasizes his core message. A man came to Jesus and asked “Which is the first commandment of all?”Jesus answered, “The first of all the commandments is Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.’’[Mark 12:28-29]. So the greatest commandment, the most important belief according to Jesus is that God is one. If Jesus was God he would have said ‘I am God, worship me’, but he didn’t. He merely repeated a verse from the Old Testament confirming that God is One.

Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):


“They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary’ while the Messiah has said, ‘O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.’ Indeed, he who associates others with Allah - Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers.


They have certainly disbelieved who say, ‘Allah is the third of three.’ And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment.


So will they not repent to Allah and seek His forgiveness? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

The Messiah, son of Mary, was not but a messenger; [other] messengers have passed on before him. And his mother was a supporter of truth. They both used to eat food. Look how We make clear to them the signs; then look how they are deluded”

[al-Maa’idah 5:72-75]

“The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, ‘Three’; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs”

[an-Nisaa’ 4:171]




Dr Zakir Naik uses Bible to prove Trinity is a Lie

 

[yasoooo]

Did the Bible say that Jesus was dead? Yes and No. The common notion is Jesus was dead and this is the belief in Christianity as Paul had taught that Jesus had died for our sins.


After the crucifixion, Jesus had appeared among the disciples but in disguise, as a gardener to Mary Magdalene, as traveller from outstation to people on way to Emhaus, as a fisherman, etc always on a lookout for the Jews because he was afraid. Why was Jesus displaying such weird behavior? Because he was not dead yet but had remained alive.

To prove that he was not resurrected, he even asked for food to eat several times. The earliest Gospel of Mark with shorter ending did not report any resurrection but it was added to other gospels later.

Was Jesus killed or resurrected? - Dr. Zakir Naik

​

Roman, Greek and Jewish evidence that Jesus died. The Romans crucified criminals by the thousands and it was not worth their while to spend time writing and retaining documents of what happened. Thus, there is no extant record of the crucifixion of Jesus. Long after the time of Jesus, some historians wrote about Jesus, but not from personal knowledge or from records they gained access to. The most famous of these, and perhaps the only first-century historian to mention Jesus, was the Jewish historian Josephus. Assuming he actually wrote the Testimonium Flavianum (it is not possible that this passage is entirely authentic) We have no evidence, historical or otherwise, for the crucifixion of Jesus, and he did not rise from the dead. But this death and resurrection of Jesus is the heresy of Paul and the four anonymous writers Christians are looking for a God to kill to bear their sins Is there anything more ridiculous than that? Paul introduced into Christianity, perhaps from his pagan surroundings, the ideas of God becoming man and God dying for the sins of man. Striking differences in accounts of Jesus’ crucifixion: An analysis of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John Even the four scribes disagreed The four scribes disagreed on the issue of crucifixion, and their statements are conflicting. Here, I cannot be certain that Christ was the crucified one. I do not rely for salvation from hell on a book that The four scribes do not know how to verify the facts in it Therefore, the opinion of the party that supports crucifixion does not matter because they are seeking the help of these false scribes! a tomb being found empty or the conversion/martyrdom of people do not prove that a resurrection took place. Even if they are accepted as 'minimal facts' (which they aren’t universally), We don’t have direct writings from most apostles so it is not possible to claim there was 'unanimous' teaching of all apostles. Modern scholarship (including figures like Bart D. Ehrman) emphasises that early Christianity included multiple competing views. Rival interpretations, which at one time had been orthodox, opposed to Paul’s very individual views, later became heretical. As for the crucifixion, the Qur’an tells us that Jesus عليه السلام was not killed or crucified. This does not rule out the possibility that someone else was crucified in his place. Historical sources do not refute this possibility; they simply suggest what people at the time thought had happened. As mentioned above, the Gospels were written by anonymous authors decades after Jesus عليه السلام, so they cannot be considered 'eyewitness testimony'.

 

[yasoooo]

A study of the Bible, especially the accounts of the crucifixion, reveals various inconsistencies. These contradictions question the reliability of the Bible we have today and what is mentioned within it. Just as a lawyer, on hearing differing accounts from so-said eyewitnesses that place the entire case into doubt, is compelled to question the reliability of what he has heard, so too is the case with students of religion when they read various clashing accounts in the Bible.


In most cases, the authenticity of an eyewitness is completely dropped when a story, between two people, doesn’t match.
None of the four gospel writers was an eyewitness to the crucifixion; we only have second-hand reporting. Now, I’m no lawyer, but I know enough to know that second-hand reporting in courts, in some cases, is ruled out.

. Seeing such differences, any student of religion is compelled to seriously question the authenticity of their words.


Vinegar or myrrh
Before Jesus was placed on the cross, the Bible states he was given something to drink.
Matthew writes:
“They gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.” (Matthew 27:34)
However, Mark states:
“And they gave him to drink wine mingled with myrrh: but he received it not.” (Mark 15:23)
Luke and John are quiet regarding this matter.


Time of the crucifixion
It is important to record the time at which an incident occurred when determining the authenticity of a story. This is, among all other evidence, a crucial point that can build the authenticity of a narration. If there seems to be a complication or mismatch between two stories of the same incident, it opens the entire case to more questions.
When we read the Bible, two different times in the accounts of the crucifixion have been recorded by Mark and John.
Mark states:
“And it was the third hour, and they crucified him.” (Mark 15:25)
“And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King!” (John 19:14)


And
The color of Jesus' robe

We read in Matthew 27:28, “And they stripped him and put on him a scarlet robe.” This was just before the crown of thorns scene. So there he was naked except for the scarlet robe.



The soldiers twisted together a crown of thorns and put it on his head. They clothed him in a purple robe
◄ John 19:2 ►

The first meeting between Hashem and the Christian missionary Ken | A clip worth watching

A dangerous prophecy that no one talks about from the Bible proves that Christ was not crucified and raised to heaven

 

[yasoooo]

John 10,30 Jesus claims that He and Father are one.

Jesus say in the bible ' before Abraham was I am ' Dr Zakir Naik #HUDATV

Did Jesus pay for our sins by Dr. Zakir Naik

1.1K views · 23 reactions | (68 ) **** الخطيئة و كذبة الإعتراف ...... ( ب ) 🤚 🤚 🤚 🤚 --------------------------------- كما ذكرنا سابقا فى المقال رقم ( 14 ) ***** التوبة وطلب الغفران فى المسيحية ...... ( أ ) يجب أن يكون طلب المغفرة من الله (ال

(68 ) **** الخطيئة و كذبة الإعتراف ...... ( ب ) 🤚 🤚 🤚 🤚 --------------------------------- كما ذكرنا سابقا فى المقال رقم ( 14 ) ***** التوبة وطلب الغفران فى المسيحية ...... ( أ ) يجب أن يكون...

www.facebook.com

allah

God is One, from Adam to Muhammad, peace be upon them

But people have turned away from worshiping God according to their own whims


And all the prophets were sent, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, etc.

God (the Father) alone is the God of all humanity.
3 Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with humans forever
Genesis 6:3

It doesn’t make sense that God sends countless Prophets like Noah, Abraham and Moses to tell people to believe in one God, and then suddenly sends a radically different message of the Trinity which contradicts his previous Prophets teachings. It is clear that the sect of Christianity who believed Jesus to be a human Prophet and nothing more, were following the true teachings of Jesus. This is because their concept of God is the same as that which was taught by the Prophets in the Old Testament.



The truth is that Jesus preached the same message that the Prophets in the Old Testament preached. There is a passage in the Bible which really emphasizes his core message. A man came to Jesus and asked “Which is the first commandment of all?”Jesus answered, “The first of all the commandments is Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.’’[Mark 12:28-29]. So the greatest commandment, the most important belief according to Jesus is that God is one. If Jesus was God he would have said ‘I am God, worship me’, but he didn’t. He merely repeated a verse from the Old Testament confirming that God is One.


, Christ said

3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.

John 17:3


Christ confined divinity to the Father alone


That is, Jesus independently of himself, defines the Father as the Only True God, which it appears, you reject His CLEAR words here, to which even a child could see.

An important part and basic part of scripture is, Jesus defines the Father independent of himself as the Only true God and not that God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit there.

 

[yasoooo]

There is no unconditional love

faith and actions always work together
Christians follow Paul and pagan doctrines such as the doctrine of crucifixion and redemption and do not follow Jesus

Christ says in John 5:28 28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.

This means that salvation is by works, but this contradicts what Paul said in Ephesians 2:8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—


Therefore, good deeds and faith in God (the Father) will remain the basis through which people will be held accountable before God. Christ will not bear the mistakes of people.

22 “Have faith in God,” Jesus answered.

,


And in Matthew 16-27: and then he will reward each person according to what they have done.





Key Verse: 2:22, “You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.”

the main theme of the entire book of James: faith and actions always work together. In James’ time, there were some people who claimed to have faith without any practical evidence. They thought that faith should be grounded on sound doctrine and that was most important; which is true. But they tended to dismiss action as irrelevant. They claimed to have saving faith without any visible evidence in their practical lives. James refuted this idea very clearly, saying that faith and deeds work together, and that faith without deeds is dead. Genuine faith always produces actions.


Did Jesus (Pbuh) die for our sins? - Dr. Zakir Naik

 

[yasoooo]

- John 20:28: Thomas worships Him as “My Lord and my God!” Jesus accepts it.


This means “teacher,” not “Lord.”

Isaiah 53 does not speak of Jesus.

The Quran denies that Jesus is God, he is a messenger of God.

Does Jesus have two natures? (Speakers' Corner)

Two Natures of Jesus? Mohammed Hijab VS Christian - Speakers Corner

 

[Cristian]

How the Gospels Insult and Slander Christ

1- The Gospels often mention the commandment of Christ about the parents - the father and the mother - but we find that Jesus himself does not abide by this command and these commandments, as we find him insulting his mother in front of people .

His mother asked him to turn water into wine at the wedding, , and he said to her: “4 “Woman,[a] why do you involve me?” Jesus replied. “My hour has not yet come.”
John 2:1-11


Dear reader, how can someone who has grown up on morals talk to his mother like that in front of a group of people????



We also wonder, is it appropriate for the mother of Christ, the “Christian and Pure Mary” to supervise the making of wine and distributing it among the crowd???
in spite of

Christ, peace be upon him, did not drink alcohol

According to the correct verses of the Bible

With regard to drinking wine, we read in Isaiah 5:22: “
22 Woe to those who are heroes at drinking wine and champions at mixing drinks,

” And in Leviticus, 10: 8-10, we read: “

8 Then the Lord said to Aaron, 9 “You and your sons are not to drink wine or other fermented drink whenever you go into the tent of meeting, or you will die. This is a lasting ordinance for the generations to come, 10 so that you can distinguish between the holy and the common, between the unclean and the clean,



But the other verses that refer to the prophets and Christ drank wine, these verses are invalid because these verses were invented and written by unknown writers, in addition to Paul, who destroyed the original doctrine of Christ.

Dear reader, reflect on what the Qur’an said about Christ and his mother, where he said about his pure and chaste mother (42) And @ when the angels said, ""O Mary, indeed Allah has chosen you and purified you and chosen you above the women of the worlds. ) (Al Imran) This is Mary, not Mary, who prepares and distributes wine Dear reader, reflect on what the Qur’an said about Christt, “ (32) And [made me] dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant. ” (Surat Maryam, verse 32). Do not believe some verses in the Bible that aim to spread corruption by unknown writers whose goal is to destroy the message of the prophets and the message of the Prophet Jesus, peace be upon them;

"women" was a respectful term, read the statement understanding the meaning and you will see he is far from being disrespectful. He use the same "women" word in greek when he was in the cross, and of course its not an offense against his mother.

And the wine was for a marriage, which was normal in such ceremonies, much much different from the verses you mention in which is saying "Woe to those who are heroes at drinking" and scenarios of abuse or getting into holy places... You probably see a problem in this situation because the Quran says so, and because you see authority in him, but that doesn't means that the Bible has to be aligned with the Quran necessarily. Actually thats one of the greatest problem of Islam, the continuity issue... Because you try to affirm that you guys are a continuation, but since the difference is so tremendous you have to say that everything was corrupted, even though the evidence for such corruption is not supported by history. There are indeed variants, and many, but 99% are related to grammar, order of words and irrelevant details. So the difference you based in the corruption that the muslims believe in, is simply not there. Which is expectable, since Mohammed said that theres light and orientation in the Torah and Injeel... How it can be a "good book" and corrupted book at the same time?

 

[Cristian]

There is no unconditional love

faith and actions always work together
Christians follow Paul and pagan doctrines such as the doctrine of crucifixion and redemption and do not follow Jesus

Christ says in John 5:28 28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.

This means that salvation is by works, but this contradicts what Paul said in Ephesians 2:8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—


Therefore, good deeds and faith in God (the Father) will remain the basis through which people will be held accountable before God. Christ will not bear the mistakes of people.

22 “Have faith in God,” Jesus answered.

,


And in Matthew 16-27: and then he will reward each person according to what they have done.





Key Verse: 2:22, “You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.”

the main theme of the entire book of James: faith and actions always work together. In James’ time, there were some people who claimed to have faith without any practical evidence. They thought that faith should be grounded on sound doctrine and that was most important; which is true. But they tended to dismiss action as irrelevant. They claimed to have saving faith without any visible evidence in their practical lives. James refuted this idea very clearly, saying that faith and deeds work together, and that faith without deeds is dead. Genuine faith always produces actions.


Did Jesus (Pbuh) die for our sins? - Dr. Zakir Naik

Zakir is no reference in the Gospels, he doesnt know Greek and make false equivalences to try to find parallels with the Quran.

 

[yasoooo]

I have mentioned more than once that Jesus, the Prophet of God, did not drink alcohol, did not commit adultery, and did not encourage adultery.

But here I expose your Bible, which slanders Christ.

Through the corrupted verses in your book that mention Christ encouraging people to drink wine at the wedding in Cana.

And expose your book that says Christ allowed prostitutes to enter the Kingdom of God despite their actions, something that God (the Father) and the Prophet of God, Christ, forbid.

This has been my goal from the beginning: to expose the corruption of the distorted Bible and to clarify the true teachings of Christ, which are in accordance with the law of the ancient prophets and consistent with the teachings of the Quran.

It is clear from the statements of those who have spoken of the corruption of Christianity that the Jew Paul was the first to introduce into Christianity the idea that wine and pork are permissible. Therefore, this was not included in the Gospel revealed to Jesus (may Allah exalt his mention).

Alcohol is completely forbidden in Islam and Christianity, despite its few benefits.

The harmful effects of alcohol are numerous.

They ask you ˹O Prophet˺ about intoxicants and gambling. Say, “There is great evil in both, as well as some benefit for people—but the evil outweighs the benefit.”1 They ˹also˺ ask you ˹O Prophet˺ what they should donate. Say, “Whatever you can spare.” This is how Allah makes His revelations clear to you ˹believers˺, so perhaps you may reflect

Surah 2, verse 219


you not know that the unrighteous[a] will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God

1 Corinthians 6:9-10

Whatever names are given to alcohol, or even drinking a little of it, always leads to immorality, and the person becomes a drunkard, in addition to the physical and economic damage.

This is corruption on earth, and God does not grant people signs that could destroy them and encourage them to destroy themselves.

Alcohol and Pork prohibited in the Qur'an and the Bible - by Dr. Zakir Naik_4171

 

[yasoooo]

The unreliability of the Bible
People increasingly question the validity of the Bible because so much of the Bible has been found to be invalidated by science, archaeology and history.

One, the supernatural contains no explanatory power. If their is a mystery, appealing to a bigger mystery only complicates, not explains the situation.

Two, it contradicts most of what we learn about the cosmos and how it works. This is due to the fact that it was written by bronze age and iron age shepherds.

Three it upholds immorality. The bible holds that slavery is ok, rape and murder done in the name of god is acceptable. Genocide is god’s past time. Racism

Four, it is not supported by evidence. The claims made in the bible are first, second or even third hand accounts. They are not supported by third party neutral accounts, geological records and so on.





Here we have a document. Well, more accurately, many many version of a document because it’s been translated many times over many centuries and in widely-differing societies and each time new nuances and preconceptions are, wittingly or unwittingly, introduced by the translators. How should we translate the Greek word παρϑενον (‘parthenon’) in Luke 1.26? A young woman? Or a virgin? It makes a huge difference to how what follows is interpreted.

Some versions are not translations so much as paraphrases so they will reflect the standpoint of the paraphraser even more. Which version is authoritative? Can a translation ever be authoritative? How many of us can read the Koine Greek of the New Testament (not that hard to learn, superficially, for anybody who wants to make the effort). How many can read the Aramaic of the Old Testament? (Much harder).

And then, it’s not a single document, it’s an anthology of many different writings. What is canon and what isn’t?

There is no consistent guidance and I’d be prepared to bet that you cannot find three verses in the Bible that are not at least partially contradicted elsewhere in the same tome. It is at least partly why Christianity is now broken up into 5 main denominations and maybe 33,000 sub-denominations. I mean, if you all agreed on all the guidance in the Bible, then surely that wouldn’t happen.

Dr. Zakir Naik's 41 Scientific Errors In The Bible​

The Quran & The Bible In The Light Of Science, Dr Zakir Naik VS Dr William Campbell

 

[yasoooo]

"And We have sent down to you (O Muhammad) the Book (the Quran) in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it and trustworthy in highness and a witness over it (the collection of old scriptures)…" (Quran 5:48)

Islam affirms that God revealed the Quran as a witness over the previous scriptures and confirmation of them,Meaning the Quran confirms whatever is true in previous scriptures and rejects whatever alterations and changes human hands have made to them.

The idea that Muhammad claimed that Bible hasn’t been corrupted and was perfectly preserved and therefore deserves the following and the same attention (or almost the same) as Quran is a myth which originated among certain Christian missionary circles and has been often used as this conversion technique.


It’s essential to note that when Quran talks about the book given to Jesus, it talks about it in the singular. It doesn’t talk about New Testament Gospels, but the Gospel. Quran doesn’t talk about either of the 4 canonical Gospels (Mattew, Mark, Luke, John) or other non-canonical gospels (Thomas, Judas, Mary, Philip, Marcion etc). Quran talks about the Gospel of Jesus, the original message of strict monotheism which was given by God to the prophet Isa ibn Maryam (Jesus son of Mary).

What many people fail to understand is that at no point in his life Muhammad ever claimed that he came to establish a new religion, or bring some kind of completely new unheard message. Muhammad claimed that he came to deliver the message which was given to all previous prophets (which is of strict monotheism and submission to one and only God).


“O people of the Book! Now there has come to you Our Messenger; explaining to you much of that which you used to conceal of the Book and overlooking much. Indeed there has come to you a light (ar. noor) from Allaah and a perspicuous Book, with which Allaah guides those who who seek His good pleasure to ways of peace; bringing them out of darkness into the light, by His permission, and guiding them to a straight path.” [Soorah al-Maa’idah 5:15-16]”

The only book for which Allah had promised to keep as it is is Kur'an. It is now as it was when recited to Muhammad pbuh, unchanged. Other books in which a muslim believes are torah and gospel but in such preserved Kur'an it is said that they were changed for that some people can benefit their own selfish interests.

So Musilms, when they read old and new testament they find remenants of truths in it and believe it. For example in red letter bible ( in which all of the sayings of Jesus pbuh are in red) Muslims believe in, I think all of those quotes. But for example they completely disagree with Paul.


He had the right to accept Jesus but he didnt had the right to change his teachings. And for the old testament there are some major disagreements, example Scenes of incest of prophet Lot and his daughters. On the other side Muslims find Muhammad pbuh being prophesied in both of them and thet believe it. Bottom line, Muslims refere to Kur'an to validate texts of old and new testament, Kur'ans authority is derived from his miraculous preservation, scientifical correctness, purest and most profound literal work of arabic language from which arabic grammar actuality derived.



. Muslims don’t believe and can’t believe that Bible is completely preserved since Christians don’t believe in that too. Christians accept that there are certain differences between different books in the Bible, The four Gospels which talk about the life of Jesus, have many differences in their accounts. Where was Jesus born? When he was born? Did he completely approve or was unhappy with the Mosaic Law? What was the correct lineage of Jesus? How did Jesus recruit his first disciples? How sure was John the Baptist of Jesus’s divinity? Did the last supper take place before or after the Passover? How did Judas kill himself? and etc. Different Gospels give different answers to these questions or don’t mention those moments at all.


. Does the Quran Endorse the Bible? Responding to Christian Missionaries - Adnan Rashid

In the Quran Allah informs us that He revealed a number of books, including the pages of Prophet Abraham (Ibraaheem may Allah exalt his mention), the Psalms of Prophet David (Daawood may Allah exalt his mention), the Torah of Prophet Moses (Moosaa may Allah exalt his mention), the Injeel (Gospel) of Prophet Jesus (‘Eesaa may Allah exalt his mention), and finally, the Quran of Prophet Muhammad sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allah exalt his mention ). Of these revealed texts only the Quran remains intact in its original form. All of the others (as complete books) have been lost, their remains have survived only as fragments or tampered with in some way so as to make their authenticity doubtful. Nowhere in the Quran is the Bible even mentioned, to say nothing of its being among the revealed texts of Allah, or as Christian claim “The Word of God.” Further, we know from respected scholars that although some fragments of the Psalms, the Torah, and the Injeel (the teachings of Prophet Jesus) may be found in the Bible, comprised of the Old and New Testaments, the Bible cannot rightfully be called “The Word of God.”



So if the Bible is neither narrated by God nor written by Him, and, as such, is not ‘the word of God,’ then what is it? By any objective criteria, the Bible is a book containing a compilation of stories, legends, folk tales, folk lore, myths, sagas, narratives, poetry, fragments of scriptures (fragments from the Psalms, the Torah, and the Injeel as already mentioned), letters (esp. in New Testament), visions, dreams, accounts of events from doubtful sources (not eye witnesses), editors’ or scribes’ notes, as well as human errors.







. On the contrary, the Glorious Quran is the Speech of Allah and, through the Angel Gabriel, was revealed to Prophet Muhammad sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allah exalt his mention ); later compiled into a book more than 14 centuries ago it remains preserved in its original form until today.

 

[yasoooo]

Abraham, Moses, Jesus , Mohmmed all had visions from God and set new laws, and they were called prophets as they did prophets

(do not eat pork, only eat kosher food, circumcision,
.worshiping God the father etc.) would be called a prophet.



Paul was a false prophet (wolf). He would disguise himself as an apostle (sheep’s clothing) otherwise everyone instantly would have realised he was one of the false prophets to come that Jesus spoke about.

Surely a man who has a vision from someone he considers is God: set news laws, i.e. to stop worshiping God the father, but now includes the worship of Jesus and abolish the previous laws.
He is considered a false prophet

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15 KJV
“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” Matthew 24:24 KJV

Paul never knew Jesus.

Paul decides to abolish the law, the law of what’s forbidden to us and doing works, good deeds e.g:



"But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed."


Jesus never said he was going to die for our sins. Something as major as that would surely have been mentioned at least once in the four gospels by Jesus.

Paul here abolishes the law because he says “Jesus died for our sins”.

“I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.” John 17:4 KJV

Jesus is speaking to God here and clearly mentions that his teachings, the miracles he performed (by the finger of God) is complete, that all his work is now done. The work God gave Jesus to do is done. Jesus could have said “I have finished all things except dying on the cross for everyone’s sins”, but he didn’t.



The Christian Dilemma Nobody Can Answer | Mansur | Speakers Corner

“Islam Restricts Women” Muslim Woman Confronts Muslim | Hashim | Speakers Corner

Unitarian Christians Break Under Questioning | Hashim | Speakers Corner