Hi Bibleblevr:
For completion, let me provide a response to your questions from another perspective. But first, a little preamble so that you, as a Christian, may understand this perspective better.
We Christians believe that God’s revelation is contained in our Bible. That has been and will always be an uncompromising non-negotiating position for us. Muslims believe that God’s revelation is contained in the Qur’an, and that has been and will always be an uncompromising non-negotiating position for them.
Fortunately, a scientific comparative analysis of both books can be made to see whether there is harmony between the teachings of both books. A comprehensive study has been undertaken, assuming that both books are entirely correct. The study found that there is harmony between the principal teachings of the Bible and the Qur’an, and that harmony was reached without damaging the integrity or compromising the teachings of any verse in the Bible or Qur’an.
The study is called Brothers Kept Apart and you are urged to read it. I believe that the only rational conclusion anyone can come to after reading the book, is that Christians and Muslims are brother who have been needlessly kept apart for that past 1,300 years.
Now to your questions.
1 Is the Bible considered true in your religion, if so why do you contradict Jesus' claim to be the son of God which is the base of Christianity.
The Qur’an instructs Muslims to believe the books sent before. It should be noted that the Bible was compiled as a single document 200 years before Mohammed, and the Gospel was available in Arabic centuries before Mohammed.
The concept of Son of God described in the Bible is not the same concept in the Qur’an; hence there is no contradiction. Mohammed was preaching a departure from the polytheistic religions of the region to the one God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He found the Greek and Roman religious ideas of gods compounding through sexual intercourse repulsive. Since you have not read the book, you may not be aware that the concept of the trinity taught to Mohammed was of father, mother and son. Even Christians find this concept offensive.
2 Was Mohammad originally a Christian before he received his prophetic revelation and if he wasn't than why did he base so much of the Koran off the Bible .
The evidence is that he belonged to a tribe of decedents of Ishmael, the first born son of Abraham, whom God declared that He would make a great nation. God also made this promise to Abraham’s younger son, Isaac. God sent prophets to the Israelites when they strayed from fulfilling their purpose as recorded in the Bible. Therefore, it is not inconceivable that God would send a prophet to the Ishmaelites if they too strayed.
By the time of Mohamed, the Ishmaelites had forsaken the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and turned to polytheism. Mohammed called the people back to a relationship with the one God of their forbearers. While his first wife was alive, his message was very similar to that of Jesus. Also, if God is the source of the revelation, then we should expect harmony.
3 Finally what part of the Koran disagrees with the bible and if no part disagrees and it is basically a repeat of the what the bible says, than why did a religion begin from it.
As explained in the preamble, the principal teachings of the Bible and the Qur’an are in harmony. A new religion started because at the time, our Christian religion had developed traditions that were not supported by the Bible. There are over 20,000 early church manuscripts that describe the development of these traditions. It should be noted that the Bible remained unchanged, but Christian tradition changed.
All of the evidence is available in Brothers Kept Apart, which is the culmination of 30 years of research.
Regards,
Grenville