Grace_Seeker said:So, are you saying that:
a) Indonesia is NOT wonderfully modern?
or
b) Islam and the west are NOT compatable?
or
c) both?
i answer B
I suppose it depends on what you mean by "compatible", "the West" and "Islam" :thankyou:

Grace_Seeker said:So, are you saying that:
a) Indonesia is NOT wonderfully modern?
or
b) Islam and the west are NOT compatable?
or
c) both?
i answer B
Well, won't this inevitably lead to segregation of practicing Muslims?
Apparently, their 'Islamists' bro. Whatever that means!
Bear in mind that not all 'western Muslims' are practising Muslims. But for many, it leaves us with an identity crisis, struggling to reconcile our religious values with western values.
HT are non violent, one of the reasons i never joined them as violence although not usually the first answer, if very rarely the last either.
they are considered 'extremist' and 'islamist' because they believe in a khilafate, believe in politically working towards it and are very vocal on this point.
but i dont find it helpful when muslims use the labels of the disbelievers, we should examine their beliefs and actions in accordance with the Quran and sunnah to decide if they extremist or not according to that criteria.
Bear in mind that not all eastern muslims are practicing.
Bear in mind that most eastern countries are dictatorships or authoritarian.
Bear in mind that Rule of Law is an islamic value, something missing in the east but quite evident in the west(except USA from time to time)
Bear in mind that in the West you are more free as a muslim to loby the govt, than you are in places like Egypt. (Unless you want to spend time with the nail removalist)
...ect
No i don't think Islam and the west are polar opposites.
But if some do consider the west and Islam to be incompatible with each other, it makes me think that there is probably less freedom for a non-Muslim person from the west to live in a strict Muslim culture than for the Muslim to live in a western society. Agree or disagree?
I think you are right, they are not polar opposites. They are not necessarily always going to be harmonious, but they are not two ends of a continuim. Indeed, I suspect that in a truly secular western society it is no more difficult being Muslim than it is to be any other practicing faith, for all faiths will occassionally challenge the status quo, and face ostracisim as a result.
But if some do consider the west and Islam to be incompatible with each other, it makes me think that there is probably less freedom for a non-Muslim person from the west to live in a strict Muslim culture than for the Muslim to live in a western society. Agree or disagree?
I'm going to have to largely disagree. Non-Muslims seem to live quite nicely in places like the Malaysia, Indonesia, UAE, KSA (they have their own compounds in which alcohol is allowed, free-mixing is not frowned upon, and I believe I recall reading that the selling of Christmas ornaments are quite a hit in Saudi Arabia around Christmas time), and other Muslim countries that are not under the influence of war. I don't imagine, for example, that living in Egypt or Morocco is a great difficulty for many non-Muslims. Libya or Lebanon might not be as free, understandably. I think it varies from country to country, depending on the prevailing political situation.
But, I also don't know what freedoms you are speaking of that would be restricted.
I think of a girl who worked as a volunteer at a local hospital. A member of my church was the volunteer coordinator there, and when this girl (who was a Muslim) arrived she was wearing the traditional headscarf. My church member was glad to have her as one of her volunteers, not concerned about her being a Muslim and happy to accommodate any of the issues that were important to this woman's faith as long as it did not impact patient care. I've been told by some, that I would not be equally free to walk down the streets of some cities that were the population is predominately Muslim wearing a cross, carrying my Bible, ans engaging in conversation about my faith with those who asked me about it. Now I know that isn't everywhere, but those are some of the freedoms of personal expression that I am thinking of.
To say: "they have their own compounds in which ______ is allowed" sounds a lot more like segregation than freedom to me.
Of course, it may be that people choose to live in self-imposed ghettos or other people like themselves. In that circumstance we shouldn't say that the problem is the willingness of the dominant culture to grant freedom to people, but of those minority group to withdraw from being in contact and communication with the society in which they are living.
I think of a girl who worked as a volunteer at a local hospital. A member of my church was the volunteer coordinator there, and when this girl (who was a Muslim) arrived she was wearing the traditional headscarf. My church member was glad to have her as one of her volunteers, not concerned about her being a Muslim and happy to accommodate any of the issues that were important to this woman's faith as long as it did not impact patient care. I've been told by some, that I would not be equally free to walk down the streets of some cities that were the population is predominately Muslim wearing a cross, carrying my Bible, ans engaging in conversation about my faith with those who asked me about it. Now I know that isn't everywhere, but those are some of the freedoms of personal expression that I am thinking of.
Depends on which part of the west your talking about really. The dominant culture in places like Europe is very different to places like America.(in term of faith)I think you are right, they are not polar opposites. They are not necessarily always going to be harmonious, but they are not two ends of a continuim. Indeed, I suspect that in a truly secular western society it is no more difficult being Muslim than it is to be any other practicing faith, for all faiths will occassionally challenge the status quo, and face ostracisim as a result.
But if some do consider the west and Islam to be incompatible with each other, it makes me think that there is probably less freedom for a non-Muslim person from the west to live in a strict Muslim culture than for the Muslim to live in a western society. Agree or disagree?
Getting there, if we aren't already. But it will neither be the first not last time for either of us, I suspect.Are we way off topic here? I'm sorry if we are.
I don't think of "ghetto" as having to be synonymous with "slum".Regarding ghettos being self-imposed...I don't believe it's reasonable to say that any minority chooses to "withdraw from the contact and communication with the society in which they are living." Even in a free country, ghettos happen out of circumstances that have to do with finances, access to opportunity, etc. much more than pure choice. No parent decides, "Well, wouldn't it be awesome to bring up my children in a slum where the schools are horrid and drug/gang problems abound." Ghettos cannot be likened to compounds, in any way, shape or form. Not to my mind.
A part of a city, not necessarily a slum area, occupied by a minority group. The term was first used for the enforced concentration of Jews into specific residential areas in European cities from the Middle Ages, but has now spread to include other ethnic groups in unofficial ghettos, especially black minorities in the USA. Lifestyles within the ghetto differ distinctly from those of the ‘host’ population and the prejudices of the host confine the sub-group to particular locations. see redlining. Although ghettos are characterized by social disadvantage, most ghettos display a spread of socio-economic groups and the better-off may move to the affluence of the ‘gilded ghetto’.
from Answers.com
This is very true.And I think of a woman who was a Muslim, who went to a battered women's shelter that had a Christian philosophy. Her faith was impacted by the people who ran the place, and she did convert to Christianity. At the time, she felt pressured into it, although she is now content with her decision. I know this isn't every Christian organization...but it does happen, indicating that freedom is something found and lost everywhere.
I understand your point about prevailing tensions. My daughter (who happens to be a Muslim from Turkey) was living with me in the USA in 2002-2003, less than a year after the destruction of the World Trade Center and when the USA invaded Iraq. I never once saw or heard anyone say something to her about wearing her headscarf, but I also know that know one needed to say anything directly to her, comments were all around her on new broadcasts, in the comments made by late night comedians, and discussions not directed at her but simply general conversation among the public which she of course overheard.Additionally, do you know how common it is for a practicing Muslim woman in the USA to be scolded by a non-Muslim for donning the head-scarf or face veil? It certainly is not be governmental policy...but society is certainly free to pick on my freedom in dressing choices. The Muslim city in which walking down the street wearing a cross...which city was that? Dubai, Kuala Lampur, Cairo or Beirut, it would be accepted, probably without the paternalistic scolding I occasionally get in the US of A. Kabul or Baghdad, perhaps not so accepted...less so to do with governmental policy, I'm sure, than to do with prevailing tensions.
I buy that as well.Freedom is not really a zero-sum game in any society. We have some freedoms here that we don't have elsewhere...and they might have some freedoms there that we don't have here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.