The admonishment a Qurayshi woman gave to al-Faruq because of his prohibition of increasing the dowries of women
The leader of the believers `Umar ibn al-Khattab once ascended the pulpit of the Noble MEssenger salAllahu `alayhi wa sallam and criticised the people for increasing the dowries of the women, and warned those who set it at more then four hundred dirhams. Then al-Faruq descended from the pulpit, and a woman of the Quraysh confronted him and condemned his speech.
Imam Abu Ya`la related from Masruq that he said,
'`Umar ibn al-Khattab ascended the pulpit of the Messenger of Allah salAllahu `alayhi wa sallam and said, 'O people! How (much is that) you increase in the dowries of the women! And at the time of the Messenger of Allah the dowries were 400 dirhams or less. If increasing the dowries was a form of righteousness in the sight of Allah, or for gaining his favor, you would not have been able to surpass them (the Sahabah). So I will find out abuot any man who increases the dowry of a woman over 400 dirhams!"
He then said, "then he descended and a woman from the Quraysh confronted him and said, "O Leader of the believers! Have you prohibitted the people from raising the dowries over 400 dirhams?"
He said, "Yes."
She said, "Have you not heard what Allah revealed in the Quran?"
He said, "And what is that?"
She said, "Have you not heard Allah say,
وَآتَيْتُمْ إِحْدَاهُنَّ قِنطَاراً
"...and you have given one of them a Qintar (of gold i.e. a great amount) as Mahr.."
He said, "O Allah forgive me! All the people are more knowledgeable than `Umar!"
Then he returned and ascended the pulpit once more and said, "O People! I prohibited you to increase the dowries of women to over 400 dirhams but now whoever wishes to give form his wealth what we wishes, he can.
Abu Ya`la said: I think he said, "Whoever wishes to do more, he may do so."
In another narration, "So `Umar said,
'Indeed a woman debated with `Umar and defeated him."
What we find in this story:
1. The Muslim woman did not allow the fact that she was a woman to stop her from the duty of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, nor the fact that the admonished one was the Leader of the Believers and the second most important man in the entire Ummah after it's Prophet.
2. The woman used as her proof in admonishing al-Faruq what Allah had revealed in the Quran.
3. No member of the Ummah is free from mistakes. Any person's statements- as stated by Imam Malik-
'...Can be taken or rejected, except for the occupant of this (the Prophet's) grave.
4. The compliance of al-Faruq with what was in the Noble Quran without wavering or trying to distort it's meaning or finding technicalities or finding any other arguments and he was- as described by Al-Hurr ibn Qays ibn Hisn- truly following what was in the book of Allah.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, this story was narrated by both al-Baihaqi in Sunan al-Kubra and Abdul Razzaq in al-Mussanaf. The chains of both al-Baihaqi and of Abdul Razzaq are weak. Al-Baihaqi, in fact, points out taht the chain he records is broken.
[Abu Bakr al-Baihaqi, Sunan al Kubra, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr, nd., vol 7, p 233]
Al-Albani points out that not only are the chains of al-Baihaqi and Abdul Razzaq weak because they are broken, they also contain weak narrators that further weakens their chains.
Hence, he concludes that this narration from Umar ibn al-Khattab is definitely weak. [ Muhammad Nasir al-Din al-Albani, Irwa al-Ghalil fi Takhrij Ahadit Manar al-Sabeel Beirut, al-Maktab al-Islami, 1979, vol 6, p 347.]