Abz2000
Abz Iz Back!!!
- Messages
- 5,358
- Reaction score
- 589
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
-“I regret Myanmar’s decision to refuse the fact-finding mission,” Lee said in reference to the UN body appointed by the Human Rights Council to investigate rights violations in conflict areas in Myanmar, the participants of which have seen their applications for visas refused.....-
........Lee expressed dismay that her visit was marked by many restrictions, with authorities providing “the excuse of short notice” in denying her access to sites, and her sources reportedly facing intimidation by special branch police officers.
Those who met with her, Lee said, were “photographed, questioned before and after meetings, and in one case, even followed.” This, she added, was “unacceptable.”
“I am disappointed to see the tactics applied by the previous government still being used,” the Special Rapporteur said.
https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burm...rges-myanmar-accept-fact-finding-mission.html
August 3, 2017 7:16PM EDT
UN: Myanmar’s Threat to Block Fact-Finding Mission
Stand Up to Bullying Tactics of Visa Denial
A Myanmar border guard police officer stands guard in Tin May village, Buthidaung township, northern Rakhine state, Myanmar July 14, 2017. © 2017 Simon Lewis/Reuters
(Geneva) – The United Nations needs to insist on its ability to carry out a mandated fact-finding mission on Myanmar, Human Rights Watch said today, releasing a series of questions and answers on the topic.
In March 2017, the UN Human Rights Council established a fact-finding mission to investigate alleged human rights abuses in Myanmar. Since then, however, various Myanmar government officials have publicly said the government plans to block these efforts by denying visas to mission members. The mission will officially begin its work in August.
Myanmar’s threat to block the UN Fact-Finding Mission from entering the country will only end up harming the government’s standing on human rights.
John Fisher
Geneva Director
“Myanmar’s threat to block the UN Fact-Finding Mission from entering the country will only end up harming the government’s standing on human rights,” said John Fisher, Geneva director. “Even if the mission doesn’t get access, we’re confident that they will carry out their work and produce a report that advances justice for the victims of human rights abuses in Myanmar.”
If Myanmar follows through on its threats and refuses to provide visas to the mission members, it will be joining an ignominious group of pariah states, including North Korea, Syria, Eritrea, and Burundi, that have denied Human Rights Council-authorized fact-finders’ access to their countries.
Human Rights Watch is issuing the Q&A to emphasize the need for the Fact-Finding Mission’s work, to clarify the scope of its mandate, and to highlight the government’s attempts at obstruction.
The document answers basic questions about the mission and its mandate, the current human rights situation in Myanmar, and the likely effect of visa denials on the mission.
“The United Nations needs to stand up to Myanmar’s bullying tactics of threatening visa denials,” Fisher said. “The Burmese military has long avoided any accountability for its widespread and serious abuses. Granting entry to the Fact-Finding Mission would send a signal that the government is prepared to work collaboratively with the international community to help identify perpetrators of serious crimes, and deter future crimes by all parties to Myanmar’s armed conflicts.”
https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/08/03/un-myanmars-threat-block-fact-finding-mission
On March 24, 2017, the UN Human Rights Council authorized a three-member Fact-Finding Mission to Myanmar.
Aung San Suu Kyi, who leads the country’s civilian government as state counsellor and also serves as foreign minister, has stated that the UN’s decision to establish an independent international inquiry was not “in keeping with what is actually happening on the ground.” Kyaw Tin, deputy minister of foreign affairs, said on June 30 in parliament that, “We will order Myanmar embassies not to grant any visa to UN fact-finding mission members.”
Even if the UN team is not granted access to the country, the mission intends to work from abroad and produce a written report by March 2018.
Why did the Human Rights Council set up a Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar?
The UN Human Rights Council adopted a resolution creating the Fact-Finding Mission because it was concerned about the recent serious allegations of human rights abuses there.
In a March resolution, the Council pointed to a February 2017 report by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights that found that crimes against the ethnic Rohingya community in northern Rakhine State “seem to have been widespread as well as systematic, indicating the very likely commission of crimes against humanity.”
As a part of their violent crackdown on the community since October 2016, Burmese security forces burned at least 1500 buildings in predominantly Rohingya areas, raped or sexually assaulted dozens of women, and committed extrajudicial executions. Human Rights Watch released satellite imagery showing the destruction caused by the arson of these buildings. Human Rights Watch also conducted research among Rohingya who fled into neighboring Bangladesh, documenting the kinds of human rights abuses that Burmese security forces inflicted on them.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/08/02/qa-united-nations-fact-finding-mission-myanmar
MANDATE
The Human Rights Council on 24 March 2017 decided (through Resolution A/HRC/RES/34/22) to dispatch urgently an independent international fact-finding mission, to be appointed by the President of the Human Rights Council, to establish the facts and circumstances of the alleged recent human rights violations by military and security forces, and abuses, in Myanmar, in particular in Rakhine State, including but not limited to arbitrary detention, torture and inhuman treatment, rape and other forms of sexual violence, extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary killings, enforced disappearances, forced displacement and unlawful destruction of property, with a view to ensuring full accountability for perpetrators and justice for victims, and requests the fact-finding mission to present to the Council an oral update at its thirty-sixth session and a full report at its thirty-seventh session.
MEMBERS
The Commission is composed of:
Mr. Marzuki Darusman (Indonesia), Chair of the Fact-Finding Mission
Ms. Radhika Coomaraswamy (Sri Lanka), Member
Mr. Christopher Dominic Sidoti (Australia), Member
DOCUMENTATION
Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/RES/34/22 on the situation of human rights in Myanmar
24 March 2017
PRESS RELEASE
Human Rights Council President announces appointment of Marzuki Darusman as Chair of Myanmar Fact-finding Mission
27 July 2017
President of Human Rights Council appoints Members of Fact-finding Mission on Myanmar
30 May 2017
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/MyanmarFFM/Pages/Index.aspx
It seriously looks as if the burmese regime steered or used the september 25 2017 incident as a means of attempted justification for regime crimes, an excuse to deter investigation, and also as a way of killing potential witnesses (including village leaders) who could give testimony of the crimes commited in the past few years.
‘And then they exploded’:
How Rohingya insurgents built support for assault
Rohingya leaders and some policy analysts say Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi's failure to tackle the grievances of the Muslim minority, who have lived under apartheid-like conditions for generations, has bolstered support for the militants.
By: Reuters | Yangon |
Published on: September 7, 2017 12:38 pm
A Rohingya man carrying his belongings approaches the Bangladesh-Myanmar border in Bandarban, an area under Cox's Bazar authority, Bangladesh, August 29, 2017. (REUTERS/Mohammad Ponir Hossain/File Photo)
(RELATED NEWS
Deportation order for all, not just Rohingyas: Centre to tell Supreme Court
Welcome the refugee
Share Myanmar’s concern over Rakhine violence, says PM Narendra Modi)
When the former UN chief Kofi Annan wrapped up his year-long probe into Myanmar’s troubled northwest on August 24, he publicly warned that an excessive army response to violence would only make a simmering conflict between Rohingya insurgents and Myanmar security forces worse. Just three hours later, shortly after 8 pm, Rohingya insurgent leader Ata Ullah sent a message to his supporters urging them to head to the foot of the remote Mayu mountain range with metal objects to use as weapons.
A little after midnight, 600 km northwest of the country’s largest city Yangon, a rag-tag army of Rohingya militants, wielding knives, sticks, small weapons and crude bombs, attacked 30 police posts and an army base.
“If 200 or 300 people come out, 50 will die. God willing, the remaining 150 can kill them with knives,” said Ata Ullah in a separate voice message to his supporters. It was circulated around the time of the offensive on mobile messaging apps and a recording was subsequently reviewed by Reuters.
The assault by Ata Ullah’s group, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA), was its biggest yet. Last October, when the group first surfaced, it attacked just three police border posts using about 400 fighters, according to Myanmar government estimates. The Myanmar army is now estimating up to 6,500 people took part in the August offensive.
Its ability to mount a much more ambitious assault indicates that many young Rohingya men have been galvanized into supporting ARSA following the army crackdown after the October attacks, according to interviews with more than a dozen Rohingya and Rakhine villagers, members of the security forces and local administrators. The brutal October response led to allegations that troops burned down villages and killed and raped civilians.
The crisis in ethnically-riven Rakhine state is the biggest to face Myanmar’s leader Aung San Suu Kyi, and her handling of it has been a source of disillusionment among the democracy champion’s former supporters in the West. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appealed to Myanmar authorities on Tuesday to end violence against Rohingya Muslims, warning of the risk of ethnic cleansing, a possible humanitarian catastrophe, and regional destabilisation.
Rohingya leaders and some policy analysts say Suu Kyi’s failure to tackle the grievances of the Muslim minority, who have lived under apartheid-like conditions for generations, has bolstered support for the militants.
The Plight Of Rohingya Refugees Living In India
Major counteroffensive
The fledgling militia has been transformed into a network of cells in dozens of villages, capable of staging a widespread offensive. Myanmar’s government has declared ARSA a terrorist organisation. It has also accused it of killing Muslim civilians to prevent them from cooperating with the authorities, and of torching Rohingya villages, allegations the group denies. The latest assault has provoked a major counteroffensive in which the military says it killed almost 400 insurgents and in which 13 members of the security forces have died.
Rohingya villagers and human rights groups say the military has also attacked villages indiscriminately and torched homes. Myanmar government says it is carrying out a lawful counter-terrorism operation and that the troops have been instructed not to harm civilians. Nearly 150,000 Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh since Aug. 25, leading to fears of a humanitarian crisis. Some 26,750 non-Muslim villagers have also been displaced inside Myanmar.
Suu Kyi has said she would adopt recommendations of Kofi Annan’s panel that encouraged more integration. She has also previously appealed for understanding of her nation’s ethnic complexities. In a statement on Wednesday, she blamed “terrorists” for “a huge iceberg of misinformation” on the strife in Rakhine. She made no mention of the Rohingya who have fled.
Suu Kyi’s spokesperson, Zaw Htay, could not be immediately reached for comment. On Monday, however, he told Reuters Myanmar was carrying out a counterterrorism operation and taking care of “the safety of civilians, including Muslims and non-Muslims.”
“Not how humans live”.
In an interview with Reuters in March, Ata Ullah linked the creation of the group to communal violence between Buddhists and Muslims in Rakhine in 2012, when nearly 200 people were killed and 140,000, mostly Rohingya, displaced. “We can’t turn the lights on at night. We can’t move from one place to another during the day,” he told Reuters in previously unpublished remarks, referring to restrictions placed on the Rohingya population’s behaviour and movements. “Everywhere checkpoints: every entry and every exit. That’s not how humans live.”
A Rohingya community leader who has stayed in northern Rakhine said that, while the rest of Myanmar enjoyed new freedoms under Suu Kyi after decades of military rule, the Muslim minority have been increasingly marginalized. Support for the insurgents grew after the military operation last year, he said. “When the security forces came to our village, all of the villagers apologised and asked them not to set the houses on fire – but they shot the people who made that request,” he said.
“People suffered because their sons got killed in front of them even though they begged for mercy, their daughters, sisters were raped – how could they live without constantly thinking about it, that they want to fight against it, whether they die or not.” Reuters couldn’t independently confirm the villagers’ accounts. Last month, a Myanmar government probe – led by former head of military intelligence and now Vice President, Myint Swe – rejected allegations of crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing during the crackdown last year.
Rohingya refugees walk on the muddy path after crossing the Bangladesh-Myanmar border in Teknaf, Bangladesh, September 3, 2017. (REUTERS/Mohammad Ponir Hossain)
Cell network
Villagers and police officers in the area say that ARSA had since last October established cells in dozens of villages, where local activists then recruited others. “People shared their feelings with others from the community, they talked to each other, they told their friends or acquaintances from different regions – and then they exploded,” said the Rohingya community leader.
Rohi Mullarah, a village elder from the Kyee Hnoke Thee village in northern Buthidaung, said the leaders sent their followers regular and frequent messages via apps like WhatsApp and WeChat, encouraging them to fight for freedom and human rights and enabling them to mobilize many people without the risk of being caught going into the heavily militarised areas to recruit. “They mainly sent phone messages to the villagers, they didn’t … move people from place to place,” he said. He said his village was not involved in the insurgency and even posted a signboard in front of it that said any militants would be attacked by the villagers if they attempt to recruit people.
Many Rohingya elders have for decades rejected violence and sought dialogue with the government. While ARSA has now gained some influence, especially among young, disaffected men, many Rohingya elders have condemned the group’s violent tactics.........
http://indianexpress.com/article/wo...support-for-assault-myanmar-refugees-4832324/
Last edited: