Zzz_
Account Disabled on Request
- Messages
- 541
- Reaction score
- 11
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
As'salaamu alaikum,
I have been conversing in PM with a fellow member from here who is a convert bro residing in europe. The topics we have touched are genetics, human origin, races, and of the sort. With his permission, i'm opening this thread so we can get more views on the matter, both, in terms of Islam and in terms of science. I"ll share some of his views and what I"ve stated to start off.
Does mankind have one origin, one adam and eve ?
I said,
Regarding taking Adam's story literally. Yes, you have to take that literally bro. Not only all 3 abrahamic faiths tell the same story but the Quran clearly states the origin of man. Deny that is denying the verses, which is tantamount to disbelief.
(Remember) when your Lord said to the angels: "Truly, I am going to create man from clay". So when I have fashioned him and breathed into him (his) soul created by Me, then you fall down prostrate to him." (Quran 38:71-72)
“And God said: ‘O Mankind! Be dutiful to your Lord, Who created you from a single person (Adam) and from Him (Adam) He created his wife (Eve), and from them both He created many men and women.’” (Quran 4:1)
His was of the view,
If one adam and one eve was the beginning then how did we spread?
‘Abbas, by Murrah from Ibn Mas‘ood and by other companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) that Adam did not have (in his grandchildren) a baby boy unless it was accompanied by a girl, so he married the male of a couple to the female of another, and the female of a couple to the male of another.
If we look at it from a scientific view point then Richard Buggs, an Oxford University-trained evolutionary genomicist at Queen Mary University of London, sheds light on this.
"...population geneticists (M. Nei, T. Maruyama and R. Chakraborty 1975 Evolution, 29(1):1-10) showed that even a bottleneck of a single pair would not lead to massive decreases in genetic diversity, if followed by rapid population growth... From a bottleneck of a single fertilised female, if population size doubles every generation, after many generations the population will have over half of the heterozygosity of the population before the bottleneck (Barton and Charlesworth 1984, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:133-64). If population growth is faster than this, the proportion of heterozygosity maintained will be higher. This means that a single pair of individuals can carry a great deal of heterozygosity with them through a bottleneck, if they come from an ancestral population with high diversity, and they will pass that on to the population they found, so long as it grows rapidly..." - https://evolutionnews.org/2018/01/adam-and-the-genome-and-human-genetic-diversity
I said Allah says He created us in tribes and nations so we can get to know one another and that inter-race marriages make good looking babies. And that intermarrying creates a bigger gene pool and strengthens the traits and genes your kids will inherit.
He was of the view,
And he is of the view that his european race is big and strong and is incompatible with the little poodle asian race to inter marry.
My last reply to him was that the white europeans came from the little brown asians he looks down upon so much. The white people are the newest kid on the block, not someone superior as they think but rather as a result of a mutation of one of those brown people, much like how their blue eyes are also a result of mutation and deviation from the normal masses of the time. There are different studies on this subject. One study shows the irish descendant from the syrians. Another study shows most euopeans most likely came from people of hindus Valley (indian subcontinent) since they show the most variation in skin complexion within their group and also most variation in their skin color change (tanning) from sun light exposure vs lack of sun light.
http://www.irishcentral.com/roots/t...-and-the-middle-east-239166271-239671671.html
I have been conversing in PM with a fellow member from here who is a convert bro residing in europe. The topics we have touched are genetics, human origin, races, and of the sort. With his permission, i'm opening this thread so we can get more views on the matter, both, in terms of Islam and in terms of science. I"ll share some of his views and what I"ve stated to start off.
Does mankind have one origin, one adam and eve ?
I said,
Regarding taking Adam's story literally. Yes, you have to take that literally bro. Not only all 3 abrahamic faiths tell the same story but the Quran clearly states the origin of man. Deny that is denying the verses, which is tantamount to disbelief.
(Remember) when your Lord said to the angels: "Truly, I am going to create man from clay". So when I have fashioned him and breathed into him (his) soul created by Me, then you fall down prostrate to him." (Quran 38:71-72)
“And God said: ‘O Mankind! Be dutiful to your Lord, Who created you from a single person (Adam) and from Him (Adam) He created his wife (Eve), and from them both He created many men and women.’” (Quran 4:1)
His was of the view,
I don't take kindly someone of a different race to me trying to appropriate me and those of my race as being one of theirs. I don't belong to "THE human race", I belong to MY own and unique separate race.
I don't take the Adam story literally. I believe the black clay means carbon, so "Adam" is all organic life which is different from those made from smokeless fire or pure energy. There are many species of particular animals so how can there be only "one species" of people? Impossible! Especially since they look so amazingly different to each other! I believe that the "one human species" propaganda is just political to make people united under a totalitarian world order.
As for the belief that all humans come from Adam and Eve, who is to say then that there weren't MULTIPLE Adams and Eves -- Adams and Eves for every respective race?
As for the Adam and Eve story, that is more a metaphorical rather than literal. The Quran is actually packed with many metaphorical statements. The reason why the Adam and Eve story is not literal is because a) if there were only two people originally on Earth, they would have probably been killed by a predator or some accident or some disease or some other thing, b) all humans would look the same, they would look like members of one big family. They would share a physical RESEMBLANCE, but they DON'T. The different races of humans look VERY different! -- some much more different than others. And c) If Islamic law is perfect then why would it prohibit incest? If every human hypothetically WERE of two original breeding partners then ALL human breeding would be an act of incest and inbreeding that would have been going on for thousands or even millions of years! Right? So this is why the Adam and Eve story is a metaphorical story. It can NOT be literal as it would simply defy all scientific logic!
If one adam and one eve was the beginning then how did we spread?
‘Abbas, by Murrah from Ibn Mas‘ood and by other companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) that Adam did not have (in his grandchildren) a baby boy unless it was accompanied by a girl, so he married the male of a couple to the female of another, and the female of a couple to the male of another.
If we look at it from a scientific view point then Richard Buggs, an Oxford University-trained evolutionary genomicist at Queen Mary University of London, sheds light on this.
"...population geneticists (M. Nei, T. Maruyama and R. Chakraborty 1975 Evolution, 29(1):1-10) showed that even a bottleneck of a single pair would not lead to massive decreases in genetic diversity, if followed by rapid population growth... From a bottleneck of a single fertilised female, if population size doubles every generation, after many generations the population will have over half of the heterozygosity of the population before the bottleneck (Barton and Charlesworth 1984, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:133-64). If population growth is faster than this, the proportion of heterozygosity maintained will be higher. This means that a single pair of individuals can carry a great deal of heterozygosity with them through a bottleneck, if they come from an ancestral population with high diversity, and they will pass that on to the population they found, so long as it grows rapidly..." - https://evolutionnews.org/2018/01/adam-and-the-genome-and-human-genetic-diversity
I said Allah says He created us in tribes and nations so we can get to know one another and that inter-race marriages make good looking babies. And that intermarrying creates a bigger gene pool and strengthens the traits and genes your kids will inherit.
He was of the view,
Then that is your opinion that mixed race offspring don't look like abominable freaks. But it certainly IS my opinion (as well as all my friends) that the hybrid offspring off different races DO look like abominable freaks. Also take note of what Mohammed Ali said--- HE was a Muslim who DID agree with me! He stood up for black rights, and he was fiercely against race mixing as he knew it ruins the natural beauty of each race in its untainted form. Miscegenation is PARTICULARLY bad when the races are very dissimilar and extraneous physically. You regard the offspring of mixed-race couples as "looking better" while I see such offspring as the hideous work of Shaytan and products of the emerging totalitarian Jew World Order.
The North European races are MORE than big enough in member numbers not to have to borrow from different races to "strengthen the gene pools"!! We have PLENTY ENOUGH genetic diversity as free standing races!
And he is of the view that his european race is big and strong and is incompatible with the little poodle asian race to inter marry.
EVERY member of my race are big strong and masculine. This is yet another reason why I would never want to race mix with a diminutive cute little Asian. They are simply INCOMPATIBLE for me to breed with as they are likely to cause my sons to become puny and effeminate looking. And I would have my friends laugh at me as they will say "Your sons look like puny effeminate homos, hahahaha!" I do NOT want that to happen, therefore I will have it no other way except to breed with a BIG STRONG TEUTONIC WIFE who CAN produce me big strong masculine featured sons! And not that any off my offspring would ever want to contaminate our genes through the disgusting act of race mixing as they have common sense and are hard-wired against such degenerate behaviour, but IF they hypothetically DID want to I would have no other choice except to kill them. I will NOT have any of my offspring embarrass me.
My last reply to him was that the white europeans came from the little brown asians he looks down upon so much. The white people are the newest kid on the block, not someone superior as they think but rather as a result of a mutation of one of those brown people, much like how their blue eyes are also a result of mutation and deviation from the normal masses of the time. There are different studies on this subject. One study shows the irish descendant from the syrians. Another study shows most euopeans most likely came from people of hindus Valley (indian subcontinent) since they show the most variation in skin complexion within their group and also most variation in their skin color change (tanning) from sun light exposure vs lack of sun light.

http://www.irishcentral.com/roots/t...-and-the-middle-east-239166271-239671671.html