Is Islam a continuation of Christianity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aishaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 82
  • Views Views 18K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you know what the christian crusaders did after they captured the city? raped all women and then killed every single one including the women and children and the elderly.
What has it to do with Jesus or Muhammed? Are you thinking this will put Muhammed it "better light"? Are we discussing crimes commited by Christians?
You know too good that's a long subject! Probably as long as the one about crimes committed by Muslim. Adherents of all faiths commited such things. Not only Christians.
It is often said that we shouldn't hold Islam guilty of terrorism. Please do the same for us. Don't hold our faith gulity of all crimes we have done. And as you know Jesus DIDN'T fight. Unlike Muhammed.. And i think that was Aishaas point - more or less...
So how is that justified in the name God?
it wasn't. But many people comite crimes with God's name on their lips.
Christianity means... followers of christ.
I'm not sure but i think "christian" means "belonging to Christ". And this name was given to us by pogans in Antioch
n.
 
Islam and Christianity seem fairly incompatible as far as religious belief and traditions. Mostly because of what glo has mentioned, which is that Jesus formed a new covenant and Islam seems to return to the old Judaic Law. That doesn't mean Christianity and Islam cannot co-exist, which they obviously can. I think the problem arises when we start questioning the beliefs of the other faith. I don't mean educational questions or honest dialogue, I mean the "This is what my God says so your God is obviously false" sort of questioning. We must accept that we are followers of the same God, and followers of God should never hate each other.
 
Last edited:
What has it to do with Jesus or Muhammed? Are you thinking this will put Muhammed it "better light"? Are we discussing crimes commited by Christians?
You know too good that's a long subject! Probably as long as the one about crimes committed by Muslim. Adherents of all faiths commited such things. Not only Christians.
It is often said that we shouldn't hold Islam guilty of terrorism. Please do the same for us. Don't hold our faith gulity of all crimes we have done. And as you know Jesus DIDN'T fight. Unlike Muhammed.. And i think that was Aishaas point - more or less...
it wasn't. But many people comite crimes with God's name on their lips.
I'm not sure but i think "christian" means "belonging to Christ". And this name was given to us by pogans in Antioch
n.


Actually , I can't seem to visit a board without the topic of Islam/bombing and terrorism seem to be entwined... So yes it is a daily occurance and people are judging!....Thing is it is all a smoke screen for all the oppressions and crap going on in the world.... just read today's headlines of how Marines in his patrol seized an Iraqi civilian from his home, threw him into a hole and put at least 10 bullets in his head and chest after growing frustrated in their search for an insurgent. Not to mention the desecration of the Quran by drawing crosses on them, or urinating on them ... is it because no Islamic media is coming out and stating Christian terrorists are doing that, that we assume they are just a bunch of riffraff ?well, I am not sure they are, it is clearly a holy war. or is it because every media that speaks for Islam or Muslims is considered a terrorist organization?....I am not really sure what Muslims are guilty of as no one has proven to me without a doubt that they are indeed behind the atrocities, with discernible proofs. I can't imagine why any Muslim a true Muslim would go on bombing a building with civilians in it?....
Thing is what most Christians don't seem to understand, is that Muslims have utmost respect for all of God's messengers, Jesus included.... None of us have to go around MALIGNING, his character, to prove, that Islam is the true religion. unlike the bazillion website that pop out every with the most unspeakable falsities about Islam and Muslims.

Keltoi for what it is worth I actually agree with you on this one!
 

Actually , I can't seem to visit a board without the topic of Islam/bombing and terrorism seem to be entwined... So yes it is a daily occurance and people are judging!....Thing is it is all a smoke screen for all the oppressions and crap going on in the world.... just read today's headlines of how Marines in his patrol seized an Iraqi civilian from his home, threw him into a hole and put at least 10 bullets in his head and chest after growing frustrated in their search for an insurgent. Not to mention the desecration of the Quran by drawing crosses on them, or urinating on them ... is it because no Islamic media is coming out and stating Christian terrorists are doing that, that we assume they are just a bunch of riffraff ?well, I am not sure they are, it is clearly a holy war. or is it because every media that speaks for Islam or Muslims is considered a terrorist organization?....I am not really sure what Muslims are guilty of as no one has proven to me without a doubt that they are indeed behind the atrocities, with discernible proofs. I can't imagine why any Muslim a true Muslim would go on bombing a building with civilians in it?....
Thing is what most Christians don't seem to understand, is that Muslims have utmost respect for all of God's messengers, Jesus included.... None of us have to go around MALIGNING, his character, to prove, that Islam is the true religion. unlike the bazillion website that pop out every with the most unspeakable falsities about Islam and Muslims.

Keltoi for what it is worth I actually agree with you on this one!

Well firstly, I must say that the people in jails who were suspected charged etc for these crimes were not scandanavian Christians! with names like sven or john.. they are Muslims who have admitted thier parts in it. They say they are in a holy war against the west. This again is a clear difference between Islam and Christianity, The Quoran states in many places about killing the unbelievers. ´Smite them at thier necks ´ I am lead to believe is one such part of a Surat. Jesus clearly taught peace and invited people to follow him He did not give the ultimatum Conform or die. More evidence is found by training schools training Muslims to be suicide bombers. The evidence is emmence and if you dont think that Muslims did these things.. then who do you think did Id like to know.
Also.. People in Christianity can leave and conform to another religeon if they choose to.. The choice is there. Islam welcomes Christians to conform.. but then makes it against Islamic law to leave the religeon. Anyway.. I dont wish the thread to go too far in to attacks and crimes as this is not the point of the discussion, we are discussing the differences between the two religeons and whether Islam is in fact a continuation of Christianity.

Digital Storm.. you say that if a slave girl is used sexually then he must marry her.. is this in some way enslaving her as a concubine?

Speaking of carnal desires,, sex is mentioned a few times in the Quoran,a woman should be ready at all times for her husband for instance. This is not at all a fair or respectful thing to wish upon a woman. Jesus did not teach such clear chauvanism. Islam says the Jesus is a recognised messenger and that the message was the same, but there seems to be massive differences between Jesus´s life and Mohammed´s life and thier teachings.
 
I suggest you reread your bible then and its views on women/ sex/ subservience... I can't be embroiled in this affair as it is clear you are not really interested in abridging differences... I am rather surprised you are married to a Muslim? for many reasons really! ... one of which... how come he didn't take the time to explain to you the verses in the Quran in the very least? that you have to come here with supreme vehemence and utmost hostility seeking clarification?

Some views from the bible including views on women/ polygmy and so-called peace... if you feel like they have been taken out of context... then by all means try to apply the same logic to your understanding of Islam
peace


polygmy in bible

Gen.4:19 And Lamech took unto him two wives.

Gen.16:1-4 Now Sarai Abram's wife bare him no children: and she had an handmaid, an Egyptian, whose name was Hagar. And Sarai said unto Abram, Behold now, the LORD hath restrained me from bearing: I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her. And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai. And Sarai ... gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife. And he went in unto Hagar, and she conceived.

Gen.25:6 But unto the sons of the concubines, which Abraham had....

Gen.26:34 Esau ... took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite.

Gen.28:9 Esau .. took ... Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael ... to be his wife.

Gen.31:17 Then Jacob rose up, and set ... his wives upon camels.

Ex.21:10 If he take him another wife....

Dt.21:15 If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated....

Judges 8:30 And Gideon had threescore and ten sons of his body begotten: for he had many wives.

1 Sam.1:1-2 Elkanah ... had two wives; the name of the one was Hannah, and the name of the other Peninnah.

2 Sam.12:7-8 Thus saith the LORD God of Israel ... I gave thee ... thy master's wives....

1 Kg.11:2-3 Solomon ... had seven hundred wives ... and three hundred concubines.

1 Chr.4:5 And Ashur the father of Tekoa had two wives, Helah and Naarah.

2 Chr.11:21 Rehoboam ... took eighteen wives, and threescore concubines.

2 Chr.13:21 But Abijah waxed mighty, and married fourteen wives....

2 Chr.24:3 Jehoiada took for him two wives....

Mt.25:1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.

1 Tim.3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife....

Titus 1:6-7 If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly. For a bishop must be blameless.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


violence in the bible

1) In Leviticus 25:44-46, the Lord tells the Israelites it's OK to own slaves, provided they are strangers or heathens.

2) In Samuel 15:2-3, the Lord orders Saul to kill all the Amalekite men, women and infants.

3) In Exodus 15:3, the Bible tells us the Lord is a man of war.

4) In Numbers 31, the Lord tells Moses to kill all the Midianites, sparing only the virgins.

5) In Deuteronomy 13:6-16, the Lord instructs Israel to kill anyone who worships a different god or who worships the Lord differently.

6) In Mark 7:9, Jesus is critical of the Jews for not killing their disobedient children as prescribed by Old Testament law.
7) In Luke 19:22-27, Jesus orders killed anyone who refuses to be ruled by him.

Context is important, of course, and many of these seeming cruelties disappear when read as such. However, this would not stop a Christian terrorist from interpreting the Bible in a manner necessary to concoct a religious justification for unspeakable horrors, as Pope Urban II did, for example, when he preached the First Crusade in 1095 or as many American preachers did when they used Leviticus to defend slavery.

Political and religious extremists have abused Islamic, Jewish, or Christian scriptures continuously throughout history. Cal Thomas, a man who claims to be Christian, would do well to learn something of his own faith s scriptures and history before accusing Islam s Quran of promoting violence.


But to bring a sword
[Categories: Doctrines and teachings of Jesus]

I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword is one of the reported sayings of (A teacher and prophet born in Bethlehem and active in Nazareth; his life and sermons form the basis for Christianity (circa 4 BC - AD 29)) Jesus in the (The sacred writings of the Christian religions) Bible. It is a common case of confusion dealing with understanding Christian parables. In ((New Testament) disciple of Jesus; traditionally considered to be the author of the first Gospel) Matthew 10:34-36
"Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household."Similarly, in the (One of the four Gospels in the New Testament; contains details of Jesus's birth and early life) Gospel of Luke, 12:51-52 ( Jesus says:
"Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three..."

of women

Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Is.3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.

1 Cor.11:3 "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God."

1 Cor.14:34-36 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church."

Eph.5:22-24 "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing."

Col.3:18 "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord."

1 Tim.2:11-15 "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing

1 Pet.3:1 "Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands."
 
Last edited:
aishaa,
i am neither christian or muslim so if i say something wrong i'm sure a muslim will make necessary corrections.
i also find islam much closer to judaism. christianity brought in some foreign elements (maybe from the greeks?) - such as god having a son, the divinity of jesus, the sacrifice of jesus dying for humanity's sins, the resurrection, etc.
islam's position is that there was only islam. so the bible and the new testament were also islam, but they were changed by people over the years so to put things "back on track" god revealed the qur'an to muhammad.
muslims, unlike jews, do revere jesus and consider him very important, but do not regard him as divine.
so, i guess it would be correct to say islam is not a continuation of anything, but a returning to the original.
 
How did this happen?.. as Christianity is based on what happened when it happened, everything Jesus said was recorded AT THE TIME..
Actually the 4 gospels were written between 68CE and 110CE and remained anonymous until 180 CE until they were attributed to 'Matthew', 'Mark', 'Luke' and 'John', the earliest of whom (Mark) never even saw the historical Jesus.
as I believe the teachings of Prophet Mohammed was
False. The Prophet Muhammad pbuh has over 60 scribes writing down the Qur'anic revelations for him and his companions used to record his teachings as well.
the testemonies of Aisha were not accepted by Islam because she was a woman..
Again, shows your ignorance. Aisha rd was one of the MOST prolific narrators of Ahâdîth, having narrated an astounding total of 2210 Ahâdîth!! So Muslim have 2210 of her testimonies which we follow and implement. Even in her lifetime she was known for providing religious rulings and knowledge.
but none the less you have to read with interest about Prophet Mohammeds clear low opinion of women
Why don't YOU read the teachings of Prophet Muhammad for yourself. THIS is what Prophet Muhammad pbuh taught about women:
Women in the Sunnah

There is certainly no shortage of statements from the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) which honor women and promote their rights, beginning with the explicit mandate:
'I command you to be kind to women.' (Sahîh Bukhârî).

He often described a man's treatment of women to be reflective of his own nobility or worth.
The Prophet said: 'None but a noble man treats women in an honorable manner. And none but an ignoble treats women disgracefully' (Sunan At-Tirmidhî)

The Prophet said: 'The most perfect believers are the best in conduct and the best of you are those who are best to their wives.' (Musnad Ahmad)

The Prophet said: 'The most perfect of the believers in faith are the best of them in moral excellence, and the best of you are the kindest to their wives. (Sunan At-Tirmidhî)

Muslims are commanded to always follow the example of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). In light of this, the Prophet said: 'The best of you is the one who is best to his wife. I am the best of you to his wife and I'm the best to my wife.' (Sunan At-Tirmidhî, Sunan Ad-Dârimî, Sahîh Ibn Hibbân)


There is no one who could describe better about how the Prophet (peace be upon) was with his wives, then the latter themselves.
A'isha, the wife of the Prophet, was asked, "What did the Prophet used to do at home?" She answered, "he kept himself busy helping the members of his household, and when the time for prayer came, he would go out for the prayer". (Sahîh Bukhârî). The Prophet Muhammad participated in the household chores and helped his wives. "He would attend to his clothes, milk his sheep and serve himself." (Musnad Ahmad)

The Prophet advised one of his companions, Abdullah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'Aas, who used to fast all day and pray all night: 'Do not do that. Fast and break your fast, pray qiyaam and sleep, for your body has a right over you, your eyes have a right over you, your wife has a right over you and your visitors have a right over you.' (Sahîh Bukhârî, Sahîh Muslim)

The Prophet censured those who quarreled with their wives, describing them as being driven by the most evil of devils:

"Iblîs (Satan) sets up his throne on water, then he sends out his armies of devils (to incite humans to do evil). The closest to him of these troops are the ones who cause the most tribulation. One devil comes and says, 'I have done such and such.' Iblîs says, 'You have not done enough.' Then another one comes and says, 'I never left him alone until I created trouble and caused division between him and his wife.' Then Iblîs comes close to this devil and says, 'How excellent you are!' " (Sahîh Muslim)

Likewise, the Prophet denounced those men who were unfaithful regarding their wives' secrets:

'Verily among the most evil of people with Allah in ranking on the Day of Resurrection is a man who goes to his wife and whose wife goes to him, and then he spreads her secrets.' (Sahîh Muslim, Musnad Ahmad, Sunan Abû Dawûd)

Prophet Muhammad forbade hostility towards one's wife: 'The believer should not harbor hatred towards his wife. If he dislikes something in her, then surely he will be pleased with another quality in her.' (Sahîh Muslim)

Instead, he encouraged both men and women to be patient with their spouses: 'If any man shows patience with his wife's bad temper, Allah will give him a reward similar to the reward of Ayyub for his patience, and if any woman shows patience with her husband's bad temper, Allah will give her a reward similar to the reward of Asiyah daughter of Muzahim, the wife of Pharoah (Cf. Qur'an 66:11).' (Al-Kabâ'ir of Adh-Dhahabî)

The Prophet encouraged couples to enjoy time together: 'All activities of a man in which there is no mention of God are frivolity, except for four things: A man enjoying time with his wife, training his horse, walking between two purposeful goals, and teaching another man to swim.' (Sunan An-Nasâ'î, Mu'jam At-Tabarânî)

He spoke of the mutual rights of men and women on many occasions: 'Consult with women. Indeed, you have some rights over your women and they have some rights over you. It is their right on you that you provide for their food and clothing generously, and your right on them is that they do not let anyone whom you dislike in the house, walking upon your floor. (Sunan Ibn Mâjah, Sunan At-Tirmidhî)

And he said concerning the virtuous woman:
'The life of this world is bountiful, and the best of bounties is the righteous woman.' (Sahîh Muslim)

Perhaps the clearest example of Islam's honoring of women is in its directives for man to be dutiful to his mother. The Prophet said in a famous narration: 'Paradise lies at the feet of your mother' (Musnad Ahmad, Sunan An-Nasâ’i, Sunan Ibn Mâjah)

Scholars have proven the preference of the mother over the father from the following narration:
A man came to Prophet Muhammad asking “ O Messenger of God, who among the people is the most worthy of my good company?” The Prophet said “Your mother”. The man said “then who else?” The Prophet said “Your mother”. The man asked, “then who else?” The Prophet replied “Your mother” When the man asked for the fourth time, only then did the Prophet say, “Your father” ( Sahîh Bukhârî, Sahîh Muslim)

The Prophet did not stop at commanding kindness to wives and honoring one's mother. He continually singled out daughters when emphasizing the good treatment of one's children. The Prophet said: 'Anyone who cares for three daughter, gives them a good upbringing, marries them to good husbands and treats them well, they will enter paradise. The companions asked, "What about two daughters?" He said, "Even two daughters". They asked what about one daughter? He said "even one". (Sunan Abi Dawûd, Musnad Ahmad, Mustadarak Al-Hâkim). It is significant that in the above narration, the Prophet has promised nothing short of paradise to the believer on account of good treatment to women. Can there be any weightier statement in favor of women?

The Prophet explictly forbade any gender bias towards one's children, though it was prevalent in pre-islamic arabian culture. The Prophet said: 'Whoever has a daughter born to him, and he did not prefer his son over him, Allah will admit him to Paradise because of her.' (Mustadarak Al-Hâkim)

The Prophet also extended honorable treatment to include one's sisters in addition to daughters: 'There is no one who has three daughters, or three sisters, and he treats them well, but Allah will admit him/her to Paradise.' (Al-Adab Al-Mufrad of Bukhârî)

The Prophet said: 'There is no one among my ummah who has three daughters, or three sisters, and he supports them until they are grown up, but he will be with me in Paradise like this – and he held up his index and middle fingers together.' (Mu'jam At-Tabarânî)

Thus, the Prophet not only made virtuous treatment of women a path to paradise, but he said it would bring one close to the Prophet himself in paradise.

In another narration, the Prophet Muhammad said that a believing woman's sacrifice for he daughters was a cause for her entrance to paradise. A'isha, the wife of the Prophet (peace be upon him), said: 'A poor woman came to me carrying her two daughters. I gave her three dates to eat. She gave each child a date, and raised the third to her own mouth to eat it. Her daughters asked her to give it to them, so she split the date that she had wanted to eat between them. I was impressed by what she had done, and told the Messenger of Allah about it. He said, “Allah has decreed Paradise for her because of it”.' (Sahîh Muslim)

At a time when a woman was valued only for material benefits or superficial qualities, the Prophet Muhammad taught his companions to value women for their piety. The Prophet said: 'A woman is married for four reasons: for her property, her status, her beauty, and her religion; so marry one who is religious, may you be blessed.' (Sahîh Bukhârî)

The Prophet also said: 'Whoever Allah has blessed with a virtuous woman has been helped with half of his religion. So let him be mindful of God concerning the remaining half.' (Mu'jam At-Tabarânî, Mustadarak Al-Hâkim)

He also upheld women's right in choosing their spouse, as seen in the following narration:
Al-Khansaa’ bint Khidaam complained to the Prophet that her father wanted her to marry someone she didn’t want, saying “I do not wish to accept what my father has arranged.” The Prophet said, “Then this marriage is invalid, go and marry whomever you wish.” Al-Khansaa’ said, “I have actually accepted what my father has arranged, but I wanted women to know that fathers have no right in their daughter’s matters” (i.e. they have no right to force a marriage on them). (Fath Al-Barî Ibn Hajr, Sunan Ibn Mâjah)

The Prophet said: 'Assuredly, women are the twin halves of men.' (Sunan Abî Dawûd, Sunan At-Tirmidhî, Musnad Ahmad).

In light of the numerous teachings honoring women, it would be no exaggeration to say that the greatest advocate of women's rights was none other than the Prophet Muhammad himself, peace be upon him.

http://www.load-islam.com/artical_det.php?artical_id=794&section=family_society&subsection=Women
let alone 9 wives and certainly never married a child.
Another myth refuted here:
http://www.islamicboard.com/refutations/5337-marriage-aisha-prophet-pbuh.html
IF Jesus and Mohammed were both soley messengers.. then why was Jesus born to a virgin.. yet Mohammed was not..
Why were Moses and Muhammad spoken to by God directly why Jesus was not? Why will Moses and Muhammad pbuh be the first risen on the Day of Resurrection and not Jesus? Why was Adam created directly by God, an honor not bestowed uoon any other human being after him? God honors ALL his prophets and Messengers in different ways.
Why was Jesus given the gift of healing.. yet Mohammed was not
False. Prophet Muhammad pbuh cured MANY people miraculously. By God's will, he immediately healed the broken leg of Abdullah ibn 'Atîq, the wound leg of Salama Ibn Al-Akwa, the eye inflammation of 'Alî ibn Abî Tâlib, the bleeding wound of Al-Harith Ibn Aws, and the eye of Qatâdah Ibn An-Nu'man which had been wounded so severely that it had prolapsed onto his cheek. After being healed, from that day on he could not tell which eye was the one that had been wounded since it was perfectly restored.

Jesus will return and will marry like all the other Prophets and he will die. And I've alread addressed the allegation about the marriage of Prophet Muhammad saws above.

It leaves a person like myself very confused as I learn Islam..
You're not learning about Islam; you're posting dozens of baseless anti-islamic allegations.
Ansar.. I apoligise if you find me to be nagative I assure you I was not trying to be.
Your comments indicate otherwise. Instead of asking what the Prophet pbuh taught about women, you make allegations about his teachings and yet we have seen the voluminous amount of evidence against you which shows that the Prophet pbuh honored women and elevated their status beyond any other religion or system, even today.
You mentioned I have not asked questions.. I have actually asked a few like the differences in the lives of Prophet Mohammed and Jesus and why are they so different if in fact they are both just human messengers. These were genuine questions.
No they are not. They are assertions placed in the format of a question. The statement, "Why did Muhammad not perform any miraculous healing?" is not a genuine question, you are making the assertion that he did not miraculously heal people, whereas the reality, as we have seen, is that MANY people were miraculously healed at his hands, by the will of God.
You are right when you say I dont know enough.. which is exactly why I came here to discuss Islam
If you really wanted to discuss you would STICK TO ONE TOPIC. That way you could learn more and understand that issue before proceeding to another one. Instead, you throw dozens of allegations all at once in the hope that your opponents will not be able to give each issue its due attention and sufficient explanation.
I have not meant to be offensive and I apoligise if I came accross that way.
I'm not interested in your apology; it is meaningless if you repeat the same behavior that you are apoologizing for. Why not ask about 1 issue at a time and then discuss that? What are you afraid of?
We only have to look at how he took Jewish women such as Safia Bint Huyay.
Yes, read all the information rather than selective misquotations from anti-islamic sources.
http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2005/umm-ul-mukminin-safiyyah-the-jewish-wife-of-muhammad/
Safiyyah was the daughter of Huyayy ibn Akhtab, the undisputed leader of the Banu al-Nadir as well as a Jewish rabbi. Hence, she was of noble regal and rabbinical heritage. She became a captive of the Muslims when they seized al-Qamus, the fortress of Khaybar. When a Companion of the Prophet(P) heard of Safiyyah’s captivity, he approached the Prophet(P) with a suggestion that since she was a lady of Banu al-Nadir, only the Prophet(P) was fit enough to marry her. The Prophet(P) agreed to this suggestion and hence granted her freedom and married her.
This significant act of marrying Safiyyah(R) was indeed a great honour for her, for this not only preserved her dignity, it also prevented her from becoming a slave. Haykal notes that:
The Prophet granted her freedom and then married her, following the examples of great conquerors who married the daughters and wives of the kings whom they had conquered, partly in order to alleviate their tragedy and partly to preserve their dignity.1
The marriage to Safiyyah(R) has a political significance as well, as it helps to reduce hostilities and cement alliances. John L. Esposito notes that
As was customary for Arab chiefs, many were political marriages to cement alliances. Others were marriages to the widows of his companions who had fallen in combat and were in need of protection.2
Indeed, when Bilal ibn Rabah(R), a Companion of the Prophet, brought Safiyyah along with another Jewess before him(P) by passing through the Jews that were slain in the battle, Muhammad(P) personally chided Bilal and said “Have you no compassion, Bilal, when you brought two women past their dead husbands?”3
As for the accusation that Safiyyah was coerced into marriage or taken advantage of, as alleged by a known Islamophobic, this claim has no basis at all. It is known that Safiyyah(R) remained loyal to the Prophet until he passed away.4 We have in fact the Prophet(P) making the following offer to her, as recorded by Martin Lings:
He [the Prophet Muhammad - Ed.] then told Safiyyah that he was prepared to set her free, and he offered her the choice between remaining a Jewess and returning to her people or entering Islam and becoming his wife. “I choose God and His Messenger,” she said; and they were married at the first halt on the homeward march.5
The other wives of the Prophet(P) used to show their jealousy of her by making slights upon her Jewish origin. But the Prophet(P) always defended her. Once Safiyyah was vexed to the extreme by the taunts of all the Arab wives of the Prophet(P). She took the complaint to the Prophet(P), who felt great compassion for her. He consoled and encouraged her. He equipped her with logic by saying: “Safiyyah, take courage and be bold. They are in no way superior to you. Tell them: I am a daughter of the Prophet Harun, a niece of the Prophet Musa, and a wife of the Prophet Muhammad”. This is thus an excellent example of the Prophet Muhammad(P) trying to wipe out pre-Islamic anti-Semitism amongst the Arabs.
Conclusion
With the evidences laid bare before us, we do not see the justification of accusing the Prophet(P) of being a “rapist”, as those anti-Islamic critics allege. That the Prophet(P) himself married Safiyyah(R) so as to avoid the certainty of her being a slave of the Muslims and helped her to defend herself from the taunts of her co-wives is enough proof that the Prophet(P) was a man of exemplary conduct and remained honourable even to relatives of his most bitter foes.

And only God knows best.

  1. Muhammad Husayn Haykal, The Life of Muhammad (North American Trust Publications, 1976), p. 373 [back]
  2. John L. Esposito, Islam: The Straight Path, pp. 19-20 [back]
  3. A. Guillaume (trans.), The Life of Muhammad: A translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (Oxford University Press, 1978), p. 515 [back]
  4. An account of how Safiyyah’s loyalty was affirmed by the Prophet(P) himself is recorded in Muhammad Husayn Haykal, op. cit., p. 374, of which an online document can be found. [back]
  5. Martin Lings, Muhammad: His Life Based On The Earliest Sources (George Allen & Unwin, 1983), p. 269 [back]
you can read about this full story for yourself (Ibn Saad, al-Tabaqat, pp. 120-123).
This is clearly not an anti Islamic source.
You've just shot yourself in the foot! You are referencing an arabic source on Sîrah - do you know about Mustalah al-Hadîth? Do you even know arabic? If not, then you have not read what is written in Tabaqat Ibn Sa'd yourself, only some selective quotation or translation on an anti-islamic site. You should know that with the books of Sîrah there are many types of narrations in them including the fabricated, weak, and the authentic. The Sahîh books of Sunnah are the ones whose narrations have been authenticated.
so therefore.. Islam is a continuation of Christianity.. it doesnt make any sense to say that it isnt if Islam existed before and after Christianity. IF it isnt.. what was Christianity?
Christianity was the pervesrion of Islamic teachings after Prophet Jesus pbuh. 'Christianity' itself is a name that comes from the derogatory label used by pagan disbelievers for the followers of Christ. Islam has always existed so it can in no sense be considered 'a continuation of Christianity'.

he Quoran states in many places about killing the unbelievers. ´Smite them at thier necks´ I am lead to believe is one such part of a Surat.
Pathetic misquotations again.
http://www.load-islam.com/artical_d...section=wel_islam&subsection=Misconceptions#5
Once again a poor translation serves the purpose of the Islam-haters very well. Let us examine a more accurate translation before analyzing the verse:
47:4 Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers in battle, smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been God's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of God,- He will never let their deeds be lost.
So we now see some grievous mistakes made in the poor translation quoted. 1. The verse makes NO mention whatsoever of "killing and wounding" 2. "Thus are you commanded by God to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam " is a complete addition to the verse and is not found anywhere in the Qur'an! 3. That verse does not use the word Jihad at all It is very clear that the context of this verse is in battle, and when in battle the defenders of humanity should attack the unjust oppressors until they are subdued. Professor Shahul Hameed comments on verse 47:4 by saying:
The context of this verse was when the Muslims were to fight their enemies for their very existence. After thirteen years of endurance and patience, the prophet and his companions had to leave their home town of Makkah and to emigrate to Madinah. When the people of Madinah had welcomed him there and he was accepted as a leader there, the Makkans became unhappy. They wanted to eliminate Muhammad and his religion; and so they sent their army to root out Islam. And the crucial battle took place in Badr. It was just before this that Muhammad received the revelation from God to fight: {And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits.} (Al-Baqarah 2:190)
This meant that the Prophet and his companions were not to start the fighting; but to defend themselves against aggressors. That was how fighting was ordained; but we must know that once we fight, we fight to defeat the aggressors, so that we can live without fear of molestation and invasion; so that we can live in peace; so that justice is done. Remember God does not command any one to start fighting; rather He permits people to fight in self defence or for the defence of those who are attacked unjustly. (SOURCE)
The historical context again illustrates a condition of constant struggle and war. In such a condition, God reassures the believers that He is with them, and to therefore have full faith, strength and bravery in battle and not to cower from the enemy. As Abdullah Yusuf Ali writes:
When once the fight (Jihad) is entered upon, carry it out with the utmost vigour… (Yusuf Ali, The Holy Qur'an, Text, Translation and Commentary )
Likewise, Dr. Maher Hathout writes:
Clearly, these verses are applicable in the heat of battle and against an aggressive combating force. (Hathout, Jihad vs. Terrorism; US Multimedia Vera International, 2002, p.49)
Muslims are encouraged to restrain the enemy by capturing them, and to therefore minimize loss of life. Moreover, the verse specifically mentions that Muslims should subdue the enemies "until the war lays down its burdens", i.e. until the enemy stops fighting. Similar to this verse:
8:61 But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in God: for He is One that hears and knows (all things).
So the verse is very specific, in that it is limited to the context of a battle and the Muslims should only fight until the enemy is subdued or inclines towards peace i.e. they should not transgress limits. In the event of a battle, the verse guides Muslims to abstain from transgressing limits and only to fight the enemy until they are subdued or cease fighting. Shaykh Muhammad Saalih Al-Munajjid comments about the treatment of prisoners:
If the Muslims capture them and take them to a place that has been prepared for them, they should not harm them or torture them with beatings, depriving them of food and water, leaving them out in the sun or the cold, burning them with fire, or putting covers over their mouths, ears and eyes and putting them in cages like animals. Rather they should treat them with kindness and mercy, feed them well and encourage them to enter Islam... ...The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to enjoin the Muslims to treat prisoners well, whereas the Romans and those who came before them the Assyrians and Pharaohs, all used to put out their prisoners’ eyes with hot irons, and flay them alive, feeding their skins to dogs, such that the prisoners preferred death to life. (SOURCE)
Therefore, Islam has laid out clear rules and regulations for Muslims to follow in the event of war, which is only used as a last resort.
More evidence is found by training schools training Muslims to be suicide bombers.
Schools are for educating people, not for training them to become bombers as the killing of civilians is something categorically prohibited by Islam and condemned by ALL the Muslim scholars. Here's one example from Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Sâlih Al-'Uthaymîn, the renowned Saudi scholar considered by many to be one of the greatest of our century. The Shaikh stated, during a tele-link Birmingham UK, on the 28th July 2000:
...Likewise I invite you to have respect for those people who have the right that they should be respected, from those between you and whom there is and agreement (of protection) [i.e. Non-Muslims]. For the land which you are living is such that there is an agreement between you and them. If this were not the case they would have killed you or expelled you. So preserve this agreement, and do not prove treacherous to it, since treachery is a sign of the hypocrites, and it is not from the way of the Believers.
And know that it is authentically reported from the Prophet that he said : "Whoever kills one who is under and agreement of protection will not smell the fragrance of Paradise."
Do not be fooled by those sayings of the foolish people : those who say : 'Those people are Non-Muslims, so their wealth is lawful for us [i.e. to misappropriate or take by way of murder and killing].' For by Allaah - this is a lie. A lie about Allaah's Religion, and a lie in Islamic societies.
So we may not say that it is lawful to be treacherous towards people whom we have an agreement with.
O my brothers. O youth. O Muslims. Be truthful in your buying and selling, and renting, and leasing, and in all mutual transactions. Because truthfulness is from the characteristics of the Believers, and Allaah - the Most High - has commanded truthfulness - in the saying of Allaah - the Most High -
"O you who believe - fear and keep you duty to Allaah and be with the truthful"
And the Prophet encouraged truthfulness and said : "Adhere to truthfulness, because truthfulness leads to goodness, and goodness leads to Paradise; and a person will continue to be truthful, and strive to be truthful until he will be written down with Allaah as a truthful person".
And he warned against falsehood, and said : "Beware of falsehood, because falsehood leads to wickedness, and wickedness leads to the Fire. And a person will continue lying, and striving to lie until he is written down with Allaah as a great liar."
O my brother Muslims. O youth. Be true in your sayings with your brothers, and with those Non-Muslims whom you live along with - so that you will be inviters to the Religion of Islaam, by your actions and in reality. So how many people there are who first entered into Islaam because of the behaviour and manners of the Muslims, and their truthfulness, and their being true in their dealings.
but then makes it against Islamic law to leave the religeon.
Refer to this discussion:
http://www.islamicboard.com/comparative-religion/29147-who-wants-live-theocracy.html
Speaking of carnal desires,, sex is mentioned a few times in the Quoran,a woman should be ready at all times for her husband for instance.
Again, betrays your ignorance. The Qur'an doesn't say this, and what is found in the sunnah is the mutual rights and respect of BOTH spouses.

Instead of posting dozens of different claims and then not following up on any of them when they are exposed to be lies, why don't you focus on one topic and ask the Muslims here questions with an aim to learn and better understand that issue? Surely that cannot be so difficult.
 
I think you might find that in the matter of a marriage Jesus relied upon Torah to a large extent since the teaching of Torah then needed less further clarity in the matter of marriage than it needed in other matters. But also I will manifest that I am not a scholar so can not immediately point to, but that surely these are not the only statements Jesus made about marriage.

Assalam Alaikum rvq

I just now had a look back through this post and noticed that my own commentary in this instance could be misconstrued. However not by any person whom truly believes in Gospel.

Thereby we must regard any instances of any person taking to themself the belief that maybe Jesus was an imposter who faked his crucifiction for profit, as persons not accepting of Gospel in Allah.

Assalam Alaikum
 
Yes.. in fact I do have some questions which I do hope you will be able to answer....and I mean them genuinely and not retoricly.
The Quran says in sura 96.1 & 96.2 that man was created from a blood clot, but 21.3 & 24.45 says from water,19.67 from nothing, 3.59 & 35.11 from clay, 15.26 from mud and 16.4 & 75.37 says from a thickened liquid. Which part of the Quran is wrong?.
MOD: 1 question at a time.
 
Yes.. in fact I do have some questions which I do hope you will be able to answer....and I mean them genuinely and not retoricly.
The Quran says in sura 96.1 & 96.2 that man was created from a blood clot, but 21.3 & 24.45 says from water,19.67 from nothing, 3.59 & 35.11 from clay, 15.26 from mud and 16.4 & 75.37 says from a thickened liquid. Which part of the Quran is wrong?.
MOD: 1 question at a time.

Hi Aishaa.

You've really impressed the forum with your knowledge up their. It takes many arduous years of study to learn how to copy and paste.
 
Creation of Man
96.2
He has created man from a clot (a piece of thick coagulated blood).

21.3
With their hearts occupied (with evil things). Those who do wrong, conceal their private counsels, (saying): "Is this (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) more than a human being like you? Will you submit to magic while you see it?"

24.45
Allâh has created every moving (living) creature from water. Of them there are some that creep on their bellies, and some that walk on two legs, and some that walk on four. Allâh creates what He wills. Verily Allâh is Able to do all things.

19.67
Does not man remember that We created him before, while he was nothing?

3.59
Verily, the likeness of ‘Îsâ (Jesus) before Allâh is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: "Be!" - and he was.

35.11
And Allâh did create you (Adam) from dust, then from Nutfah (male and female discharge semen drops i.e. Adam’s offspring), then He made you pairs (male and female). And no female conceives or gives birth but with His Knowledge. And no aged man is granted a length of life nor is a part cut off from his life (or another man’s life), but is in a Book (Al-Lauh Al-Mahfûz ) Surely, that is easy for Allâh.

15.26
And indeed, We created man from dried (sounding) clay of altered mud.

16.4
He has created man from Nutfah (mixed drops of male and female sexual discharge), then behold, this same (man) becomes an open opponent.

75.37
Was he not a Nutfah (mixed male and female sexual discharge) of semen emitted (poured forth)?

Above are the quotations from the Quran. I have pasted it here for you to see for yourself that there is no contradiction, nor any mistakes. Are you not familiar with the science of today? Body contains all of the properties mentioned in the Quran and we’ve only come to know about them in last hundred years. Adam was created while he was nothing before that… he was created from dust, clay, mud… and Quran also mentions that we are made from water… what is the body made of? 99% water is it not? It doesn’t mean that body is made from water only… Quran Also mentions it is made from nutfah… the semen of male and female…how is this in any contradiction… when the fetus is developing.. in the very early stages.. Does it not take the appearance of a clot of blood? There is no contradiction; it merely gives different stages…


Spread by the sword?
4.74
Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allâh, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allâh, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward.

9.29
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah [2] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9.5
Then when the Sacred Months (the 1st, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (See V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.[1]

You must read in context sis, if you’ve read the chapter you’re quoting you must know the verse before it mentions a treaty which was violated. A peace treaty violated by the pagans of Makkah, which started the war… and these verse deal with the war and during that time… You should know already that killing innocent people is strictly forbidden in Islam.


Hadith
Allah did warn Muhammad (sws)… Muhammad (sws) himself made duah to Allah to save him from old age and dependency on others… If Allah willed he would have ate the food prepared by the Jewish lady, but he only put it in his mouth and then he was warned so he removed the food… but he poison was enough to kill him slowly. Also he is a perfect example for us muslims to follow… for they all went through so much pain carry the message of Islam out to the world and live out their life till their last breath according to Islam. Therefore Islam guides us all aspect of our lives… from childhood to death.


Scriptures
4.47
O you who have been given the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Believe in what We have revealed (to Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) confirming what is (already) with you, before We efface faces (by making them like the back of necks; without nose, mouth) and turn them hindwards, or curse them as We cursed the Sabbath-breakers[2]. And the Commandment of Allâh is always executed.[3]

3.84
Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "We believe in Allâh and in what has been sent down to us, and what was sent down to Ibrâhîm (Abraham), Ismâ‘îl (Ishmael), Ishâq (Isaac), Ya‘qûb (Jacob) and Al-Asbât [the offspring of the twelve sons of Ya‘qûb (Jacob)] and what was given to Mûsâ (Moses), ‘Îsâ (Jesus) and the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between one another among them and to Him (Allâh) we have submitted (in Islâm)."

Yes, of course it calls on Muslims to believe in the previous messengers, if they do not, they are not Muslims… as they are rejecting the commands of Allah swt. But the Quran refers to the true followers of Christ, those who believed in monotheism. Not the bible of today, in which there are many versions and many branches of Christianity. Also in another verse, it is said that only Islam will be accepted on Day of Judgment after the revelation of Muhammad sws.

If you need further explanation in anything else… don’t hesitate to ask :)

Peace.
 
Yes.. in fact I do have some questions which I do hope you will be able to answer....and I mean them genuinely and not retoricly.
What a joke! You paste the exact same allegations that are commonly found on online anti-islamic websites which Muslims have refuted long ago, and then you claim that they are your own genuine questions! Look at your first claim...
The Quran says in sura 96.1 & 96.2 that man was created from a blood clot, but 21.3 & 24.45 says from water,19.67 from nothing, 3.59 & 35.11 from clay, 15.26 from mud and 16.4 & 75.37 says from a thickened liquid. Which part of the Quran is wrong?
None; thank you for exposing your ignorance once again:
Ansar Al-'Adl said:
What was Man created from?


The allegation is as follows:

What was man created from? A blood clot [96:1-2], water [21:30, 24:45, 25:54], "sounding" (i.e. burned) clay [15:26], dust [3:59, 30:20, 35:11], nothing [19:67] and this is then denied in 52:35, earth [11:61], a drop of thickened fluid [16:4, 75:37]

The obvious explanation to this question is that these references describe different aspects or stages in man's creation. This has always been the understanding of such verses.

We will give a brief explanation of each verse, while presenting them in chronological order.

Most of the references refer to two different aspects of creation: Original creation and Embryological development.
Original creation
19:67 Does not man remember that We created him before, and he was nothing?
The phrase and he was nothing is the translation of the arabic wa lam yaku shay. Some confusion may have resulted because Yusuf Ali's translation renders it as out of nothing, which is not very accurate at all. The phrase literally means, and he was nothing.

Hence, this verse states that human beings were nothing, and Allah brought us into existence. This is a tremendous favour bestowed upon us, that we may be thankful to Allah swt.

This is allegedly in contradiction to the following verse:

52:35 Were they created by nothing, or were they themselves the creators?
Ibn Kathir Ad-Damishqi (d.1372CE) has explained this verse as follows in his renowned Tafsir Al-Qur'an Al-Azim:
Allah asks them, were they created without a maker or did they create themselves Neither is true. Allah is the One Who created them and brought them into existence after they were nothing.(Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Abridged, Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, 2000, vol. 9, p. 297)​
Hence, this verse is not in contradiction to the previous verse at all, after closer examination. Even if we choose to translate verse 52:35 as "Were they created from nothing..." it would also be correct as Allah swt developed the human being from previously created substances.

20:55 Thereof (the earth) We created you, and into it We shall return you, and from it We shall bring you out once again

The original creation of Adam pbuh was from the dust of the earth.

30:20 Among His Signs is this, that He created you from dust; and then,- behold, ye are men scattered (far and wide)!

This dust was then mixed with water to produce what is mentioned in the following verse:
15:26 And indeed, We created man from dried (sounding) clay of altered mud [min hama’in masnoon]

An interesting commentary on these verses has been provided here:
http://harunyahya.com/miracles_of_the_quran_p1_08.php#1

Sheikh Muhammad Mutwalli Ash-Sha`rawi also comments:
If we take dust and add water to it, it will be mud. If it is left for some time, it will turn into clay. These are simply the stages of the creation of man. Man thus comes from dust, turned into clay after the addition of water. If we scrutinize this issue, we will find out that man, in his daily life, needs earth and depends on it in so many aspects. It is this earthy soil where we grow the plants upon which we live. Thus, preserving the materials of man depends on the source from which these materials are created.


Scientists have analyzed the human body and found that it is composed of 16 substances including oxygen and manganese. These elements are no more than the elements of the earth?s crust. This experiment was not meant for proving the credibility of the Qur'an; rather, it was solely for scientific research purposes.


In addition, death itself serves as a proof of creation. When we try to demolish a building, we follow the reverse order of building it; we start with the last floor. By the same token, since we have not eye-witnessed the creation of man, then we shall see how death occurs. Actually, we witness several deaths everyday. When man dies, his soul leaves his body, then the decline starts; his body becomes dry (which is similar to the stage of clay) and then decays and turns finally into dust which was his original substance. Life is given to man through the soul that is blown into his body. When the soul departs, man dies and starts his way back to his original form going through the stages of his first creation. Thus, death stands as a living proof for creation
(SOURCE)​
21:30...We made of water every living thing. Will they not then believe?
This verse explains that all living things are composed of water.

Dr. Zakir Naik has commented on the above verse by saying:
Only after advances have been made in science, do we now know that cytoplasm, the basic substance of the cell is made up of 80% water. Modern research has also revealed that most organisms consist of 50% to 90% water and that every living entity requires water for its existence. Was it possible 14 centuries ago for any human-being to guess that every living being was made of water? Moreover would such a guess be conceivable by a human being in the deserts of Arabia where there has always been scarcity of water? (SOURCE)​
The following link also comments on this:
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_58.html

Embryological development

16:4 He has created man from a nutfah; and behold this same (man) becomes an open disputer!

Dr. Omar Abdul Rehman has explained this as follow:
Nutfah (The drop)

Al-Nutfah in Arabic means a drop or a small part of fluid and Nutfah in general describes a stage where the beginnings of a human being are found in this fluid (Ref: 6A, 12/6; 17/118; 19/120: 13A, 3/436: 15A, 17/116: 1C, 2/121: 7B, 3/116: 4D, 9/235-6: 5D, 6/258: 4A, 30/234: 7A, 4/336: 10A, 13/9: 12A, 4/288). Its real meaning can only be deduced from the text of Qur'an; evidently it is a comprehensive term and includes male and female gametes and part of their natural environments of fluid. It also includes zygote, morula and blastocyst till implantation in the uterus. This is illustrated by the following citation:​


"was he not a drop or part of germinal fluid (Mani) emitted or programmed" (Surah Al- Qiyama, Ayah 37)

Here "Mani" means male or female germinal fluid (Ref: 1D, 5/276: 5D, 10/348:2D, 6/2497).

The Prophet's Hadith confirms the fact that the offspring is created from part of the germinal fluids.


"Not from all the fluid is the offspring created"

(Sahih. Muslim: Kitab Al-Nekah, Bab Al-Azl)

It is also known that not all parts of the ejaculate are equally potent in the fertilisation process. "In the first portion of the ejaculate are the spermatozoa, epididymal fluids, and the secretions from the Cowper and prostate gland fluids. In the last portions of the ejaculate are the secretions of the seminal vesicles. Most spermatozoa appear in the first part of the ejaculate, which is made primarily of prostatic secretions. Thus spermatozoa in the initial portion of the ejaculate have better motility and survival than those in the later portions, which are chiefly vesicular in origin".
(SOURCE)​
And concerning the verse:
96:2 Created man, out of a (mere) clot of an Alaqah
Dr. Omar Abdul Rehman states:
The 'Alaqah stage

"Then (thumm) We made the drop into an 'Alaqah". (Surah Al-Mu 'minun, Ayah 14)

In Arabic the word ‘Alaqah in fact has several meanings;

  • [*]

    something which clings or a suspended thing (Ref: 7B, 5/440: 1D, 4/125: 2D, 4/1529: 3D, 343: 4D, 10/267: 5D, 7/20)
    [*]a leech-like structure (Ref: 9A, 3/242: 20A, 2/281: 7B, 5/139: 2D, 4/1529: 3D, 343: 4D, 10/267)
Amazingly each of these terms can be applied to the developing embryo with stunning precision. All of these terms encompassed by the word ‘Alaqah describe the appearance of the embryo as well as its relationship with the womb. From the discussion below it becomes clear that the embryo resembles a primitive multicellular organism which is attached to a host and feeding on its blood.

a) something which clings

Modern science informs us that once the egg has been fertilised in the Fallopian tube it undergoes successive divisions to form a ball like structure of 12-16 cells by the third day. This structure is called a blastocyst and it reaches the uterus in 4 to 5 days. The blastocyst then lies free in the uterine secretions for a further 2 days. About a week after fertilisation the blastocyst begins to attach and implant into the uterine wall. By the 11th to 12th day it is completely embedded in the uterine wall. At this stage chorionic villosities begin to develop like roots in the soil, these draw nourishment from the uterus necessary for the blastocyst's growth. These formations cover the whole blastocyst and make it literally cling to the uterus. By the end of the second week implantation is complete. Inside the blastocyst the embryo is anchored to the wall of the chorionic cavity by a connecting stalk. Hence, these different ways of clinging and attachment seem to represent the most dominant features from day 7 to 21, and are perfectly described in the Qur'anic description by the word ‘Alaqah. For greater detail see S. Hussain (1986) ‘Al-‘Alaq:the mystery explored, Ark Journal, London, pp. 31-36.

b) a suspended thing

The 3 week old embryo inside the blastocyst which is embedded in the uterine wall is seen to be suspended in the chorionic cavity by means of the connecting stalk and is surrounded by the amniotic cavity and the yolk sac. Therefore, the term ‘Alaqah accurately describes the suspended embryo after it has been implanted.

c) a leech-like structure

The word ‘Alaqah can also be translated as ‘leech like structure'. The leech is a elongated pear shaped creature which thrives on blood sucking. At this stage of development the embryo from top view does bear a resemblance to a leech. This resemblance is even more marked if the 24 day old embryo is seen from the side. It is also interesting to note that the embryo is now dependent on the maternal blood for its nutrition and behaves very much like a leech!. (For greater detail see Moore, KL. ‘A scientists interpretation of references to embryology in the Qur'an.' Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of US and Canada, 1986, 18:15, and Moore, KL. and Azzindani, AMA.: "The Developing Human, Clinically Orientated Embryology, With Islamic Additions". 3rd Ed., Dar Al-Qiblah and WB Saunders).

In conclusion, whichever of the above terms are used to translate the word ‘Alaqah they are all stunningly accurate descriptions of the embryo at this stage in it's development as confirmed by modern science.

There is a gap of a few days between the stages of implantation (Nutfah) and 'Alaqah and this period is clearly explained by the above Ayah:

The word "Thumm" in Arabic is a conjunction indicating a time lag and the Ayah will, therefore, mean that after some time we created the "Nutfah" into 'Alaqah.
(SOURCE)​
These explanations make it evident that each verse is describing different stages in the creation of man.

As you can see, we've already written articles years ago on all the allegations you're about to come up with. Do yourself a favor and try to educate yourself about the fundamentals of this religion rather than pasting age-old allegations and making a fool of yourself.

Also, you've shown that you are either willfully obtuse or mentally deficient since my last post responded to your claim ON VERSE 4:74 BUT YOU ASKED ABOUT THE SAME VERSE AGAIN AS IF YOU HADN'T EVEN NOTICED THE REFUTATION!!
 
Yes.. in fact I do have some questions which I do hope you will be able to answer....and I mean them genuinely and not retoricly.
The Quran says in sura 96.1 & 96.2 that man was created from a blood clot, but 21.3 & 24.45 says from water,19.67 from nothing, 3.59 & 35.11 from clay, 15.26 from mud and 16.4 & 75.37 says from a thickened liquid. Which part of the Quran is wrong?.
MOD: 1 question at a time.
Maybe this thread suits better to refutation board???:?
And i doubt you will find here answer to question "which part of the Quran is wrong?". And i don't think that Muslim board is a place to ask it...
n.
 
if she were sincere, the Muslim board would be the very source to seek clarification... but that isn't what she is looking for, anymore than she actually is married to a Muslim... either this or her occipital, frontal and hippocampus are in a major mal-functions... since not only is she unable to see, process, understand or store any of the information she is afforded here....
 
And i doubt you will find here answer to question "which part of the Quran is wrong?". And i don't think that Muslim board is a place to ask it..
:sl:

actually this is the best place to ask such questions if u really want to know the (real and true) answer rather than a lie posted but anti muslims.

:w:
 
It is true that I have sought information from where I can.. and yes I have copied and pasted questions.. only because I would like to hear the answers to them for myself. I have also seen many others who have pasted. When I ask questions that does not praise Mohammed to the highest.. I am slammed as an anti islamist,
I am in fact married to a Muslim. I married my husband on the 8th of Febuary 2006 in the Government office in Cairo. I can scan and e mail my marriage documents if I am doupted. I dont know why I am greeted with such hostility when I ask questions that I admit are sensitive.. but none the less wanting the answers to.. I have not been unkind or called anyone names.. yet I have been called an anti Islamist and ignorant and mentally defeiciant because I seek the answers to some questions that some people maybe dont like.
There are many parts of the Islamic religeon which I agree with wholeheartedly..but some I dont understand because it contradicts the teachings of Jesus.. which is why I posed the question.. Is Islam a continuation of Christianity? It seems to have turned in to a mud slinging debate rather than a discussion.. but I havent been unkind or slung mud at anyone. Yes I have researched what I can and asked what I can.. whether it be sites that have posed these questions before.. that I myself would like the answers to.. and while we´re on the subject.. Why not?.. is it wrong to ask a question that someone has asked before?
My husband wants me to conform to Islam.. he wants me to sign on the dotted line.. I cant do that without asking questions and debating, whether they are likeable questions or not. I am at a stage in my life where it is most sensitive.. I put what I have read and ask questions that maybe sensitive.. but instead of helping me.. I am feeling that I am being slammed for even asking them.. even if they are questions pasted that have been asked before.. or of my own ..does it matter which? I dont want to embrace Islam as religoen that will effect the rest of my life without knowing the person who was responsible for it.. knowing what his views were.. I may be wrong but there are many who dont actually know about his views as a person.. just the teachings he gave the world.. surely the two are just as important? Dont Slam me for being unknowledgable.. dont call me names because I ask questions that you think are too sensitive for your liking..and dont talk about me as if I am not here.. (anymore than she actually is married to a Muslim... ) She? I am here.
Until I met my beloved husband I knew nothing about Islam and I have struggled to learn. My husband says I should learn alone because I will feel that he is influencing me.. which I can understand.
It seems to me right now.. that I should learn the Quoran.. memorise it and dont mention anything that might upset anyone.
Dont read anything about Mohammeds life as a man only as a prophet.. because people dont like hearing it..Stick to whats in the Quoran and Ill be oK.
Learning (or trying to) about Islam has been so difficult because people dont want to discuss Mohammeds life.. the way he was with women.. war..the money he made called Booty at that time..Every time I read something about his life and then mention it.. its like.. HOW dare you!!,, Is it that Muslims put thier heads in the sand about who he was.. or do they just not like hearing it? Or didnt it happen at all?
Cant one person here discuss Mohammed and the way he lived with women etc without getting angry and bitter?
Its not his personal life thats important anyway.. its the message he brought us.. so why do Muslims refuse to recognise the personal life he lead?
Does it matter that he married a child of 9?.. yet some Muslims say no.. she was older!! when its common knowledge how old she was..
Its his views and his opinions that matter more if he is to carry the message of God. Its these views and how he saw the world around him including women.. money etc I am interested in as well as the Quoran itself.
I will be guided be God and the help I have from whatever source to know the right way, and depending on which way he wants me to go will be the road that is easiest for he will make it so.
 
:sl:

The Quran says in sura 96.1 & 96.2 that man was created from a blood clot, but 21.3 & 24.45 says from water,19.67 from nothing, 3.59 & 35.11 from clay, 15.26 from mud and 16.4 & 75.37 says from a thickened liquid. Which part of the Quran is wrong?.
did u really read these verses or just took the word os the anti islamic who said these things??
if u r really eager to learn about islam- have u been looking inthe right vplaces- there r many islamic sites out there who will be more than happy to answer ur question and have already refutes the questions asked by the anti islamists

i find it offensive when u say "wife-child"(or was it child-wife). do u know how old aisha was when the prophet died??

and another question- did u read the biography of the prophet to know if he really died of that poison the jewish woman put to him?? how do u know he died of the effect of that poison and not something else??

if u really want to lkearn about islam them do that in the right places

:w:
 
It isn't even the questions... many of us even Muslims want to undserstand and learn.. just the other day I asked a scholar about suret Ad Dukhan verse
[Pickthal 44:48] Then pour upon his head the torment of boiling water.

ذُقْ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْعَزِيزُ الْكَرِيمُ {49}
[Pickthal 44:49] (Saying): Taste! Lo! thou wast forsooth the mighty, the noble!

I didn't understand why the verse can speak of hell's torment and at the same time call the sinner mighty and noble? until I asked and learned the story behind it...

There is a clear way in which to ask questions with sincere intent on learning not accusing and then stating well the replies were cut and pasted... if even simple effort of looking into the attatched websites you would clearly see the person who answered your questions is the same one whose name appears as the author on these websites.... so how dare you not only accuse us the whole lot of us of either burrying our head in the sand but cutting and pasting your replies?... do you not read what was written in response to your questions? Do you discern the meaning of the verses and the replies written you?

For each we have appointed a divine law and traced out the way. Had Allah willed He could have made you one community. But that He may try you by that which He hath given you He made you as ye are. So vie one with another in good works. Unto Allah ye will all return, and will then inform you of that wherein ye differ. -- 5:48 I hope in Good works means something to you the next time you cut and paste your next Q
peace
 
Last edited:
ye u cud say that or u cud say that islam was always the religion but the people altered the teachings of Jesus (which he got from the same God) and called the religion christianity. If this hadnt happened there would be no need to send Muhammad saws to correct the religion and leave it in perfection as he did. Islam was, is, and will be the only religion.

Judaism/Christianity etc is just alterations of the original teaching to fit the desires of people (gender free-mixing/eating wateva they like/living in a way which suits them etc etc)


peace n respect and sorry for any offence i have caused.

:peace: and :respect: :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top