Ansar Al-'Adl
Jewel of LI
- Messages
- 4,681
- Reaction score
- 922
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
Re: Music is Haraam

Hello Callum,
Of the kinds you mentioned before, I don't think classical is as bad as rock, but if you look at the history of music you will see that each form gradually evolved into a worse form (from an Islamic point of view). Some scholars wouldn't consider the forms of music you've mentioned in the above quote prohibited, and they certainly aren't as bad as the other forms, but I'm just pointing out that they have led to the other forms.
To repeat, Islam does not say that all forms of music are prohibted, indeed there is a vast range of music that is considered permissable in Islam, so long as it does not lead people away from their religion.
Peace.

I'd have to hear it to be sure, but from your description, I would say that most scholars would not consider it haraam.Khojestah said:is music without instrunments haram, i'm talking about music that keeps u in the thought of Allah (SWT). like music by kamaluddin, he uses no instrunments,
Hello Callum,
The only thing I can think of that you might be hinting at is inspiring violence. However, having been involved in Martial Arts myself, I know that discipline and self-control are amongst the greatest fundamentals of martial arts. Any Martial Artist will tell you that actual fighting is a very small part of martial arts. But if the instructor teaching whatever form of martial arts it was did not educate his students on self-control and the appropriate situations in which to use violence, then I would say that such training could be considered harmful as well if it was indeed inciting violence, contrary to the principles of Islam.[In the text of the Islamic ruling on music that you linked me to, it said that sport was a good alternative to music. Among the sports mentioned were martial arts and marksmanship. The obvious question to ask is: can you see how those disciplines could inspire actions Islam would consider immoral?]
I understand your point about money, but I still believe that music is one of the biggest tools being used by the secularist to bring about their revolution in the west which consists of a rejection of traditional values and encouraging indulging one's desires. At many events which Islam would consider immoral, you will find that music is used to influence the environment heavily. I'm sure my fellow Muslims here know some other Muslims who listen to music, and they can easily be distinguished from the more pious Muslims who focus on reading the Qur'an and praying etc. Moreover, music can have a very large negative influence on people's behaviours, the one example that comes to mind is the murders.However, that is no reason to condemn all secular music. The people who make "music" of the kind I have described represent a tiny minority in the history of music. The point I'm trying to make is that music did not inspire such actions and words, money did.
I can understand your point here, but the kinds of music you speak of are outdated now. They have evolved into the forms of music we have today. So the emphasis on music in society has resulted in what we see today.I don't really see how instrumental music can be considered as leading to sin. There are some truly beautiful pieces of music in the world which do not have lyrics directing people to be violent, lustful or whatever. I'm thinking of things like Francisco Tarrega's elegant meditation "Recuerdos del Alhambra", about the famous palace complex in Granada in Spain, or Edward Elgar's Cello Concerto in E minor, an immensely moving elegy inspired by the horrors of the First World War. Works of art like this help people to come to terms with their history, to understand themselves and where they came from. Is it sinful to appreciate such things?
Of the kinds you mentioned before, I don't think classical is as bad as rock, but if you look at the history of music you will see that each form gradually evolved into a worse form (from an Islamic point of view). Some scholars wouldn't consider the forms of music you've mentioned in the above quote prohibited, and they certainly aren't as bad as the other forms, but I'm just pointing out that they have led to the other forms.
Agreed. As long as it is done within the boundaries of Sharia there is no harm. In fact, our website has a large collection of Islamic music (Nasheeds) under the media section.For me, the most impressive thing about music is its ability to bring people together. It's a cliche, but only because it's true. Sometimes, when people are brought together by something like music, they can accomplish great things. Think of Live Aid, in 1985, which sent an estimated $100 million to help feed the starving in Africa. Or, of course, the recent Live 8 concerts, intended to change the minds of political leaders regarding third world debt and unfair trade restrictions. Are these petty matters? Of course not.
Secular music is not the only way to achieve such benefits, however.Would you be happier if all secular music was banned, and such benefits would not be available
Drugs have also brought pleasure to countless millions around the world.not to mention the pleasure that music brings to countless millions around the world?
To repeat, Islam does not say that all forms of music are prohibted, indeed there is a vast range of music that is considered permissable in Islam, so long as it does not lead people away from their religion.
Peace.