Is Paul respected by muslims ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter avk
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 45
  • Views Views 11K
Anybody who has studied debating or even taken any advanced science classes will tell you that you can not prove anything is false. We can not prove a negative concept.

I am sorry, but what? If you do an advanced science course you will learn that science progresses by falsibility. You take a theory and you attempt to prove it wrong, if you cannot, you accept it as a provisional explanation in the absence of a better one. It is proving things exist that is hard.

If I were say that a flying saucer crashed into my house last night and I now have an alien creature living with me, there is no way you can prove that statement is false.

Unless I go around to your house and see if there is a wacking great flying saucer poking out the top.
 
Brother are you refering to offensive claims against christianity or defensive for islam ???

I am refering to we need to present the Truth about Islam and stop trying to discredit or disprove Christianity.

The Qur'an has enough validated about it, that we can prove it is true.

We can never disprove anything, all we can do is offer explanations why we believe something is not true, but that will never be accepted as absolute proof.
 
Brother are you refering to offensive claims against christianity or defensive for islam ???

Does that refer to me? I am in no position to judge his views on Islam although there is a campaign to ask him to stop his more deviant views. So it is his views on other religions which I know are false. Look at his claim that Moses raped three year old girls for instance. I would have assumed this was grossly offensive in Islam too, but no one seems to have asked him to take that claim down.
 
Brother If your talking about pornographic calims against bible if thats your case in specific or the other harsh ways expressed against the bible then I may agree with you on some points , I cannot say all since its a general statment
 
On the contrary brother , I know people from the same website who actually asked him to take these down , trust me brother we are not subjective , some of us actually know :)
 
I am sorry, but what? If you do an advanced science course you will learn that science progresses by falsibility. You take a theory and you attempt to prove it wrong, if you cannot, you accept it as a provisional explanation in the absence of a better one. It is proving things exist that is hard.


Unless I go around to your house and see if there is a wacking great flying saucer poking out the top.

Not quite the presenter of a theory attempts to validate that his theory is correct. Detractors of the theory attempt to invalidate the given evidence. You do not present a theory unless you have reason to believe it is true and you can validate your claim.




That would give you evidence to support your belief that the story is false, if you did not see the wreckage, but I could counter with that the aliens are so far advanced they cleaned up all the evidence and left no trace..
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top