I'd love to know how you plan to support that claim.
Ussually life supports my claims.
I'd love to know how you plan to support that claim.
Wow!!! Just Wow!!! I always thought you were a biggot but didn't realise you were actually proud of it too..
You got ordinary Muslims who may go to the mosque every friday, don't eat pork and wear a hijab if they are women, I don't mind those, they can belong to the society and if that's multiculturalism, I like it.
Most Europeans aren't that tolerant, which is a shame really.
I'm all for giving rights to minorities, however everything should be done so the minorities remain minorities and don't attain to much political power.
What political rights would have non-muslims in future islamized Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia.
Ussually life supports my claims.
I agree.Most Europeans aren't that tolerant, which is a shame really.
Beofre I was mainly talking about how no new Muslims should be allowed to immigrate.That is different to what you said earlier.
I have nothing more to say anymore.
Most Europeans aren't that tolerant, which is a shame really.
I'm all for giving rights to minorities, however everything should be done so the minorities remain minorities and don't attain to much political power.
And what if the Romans start copying you?This is true, its my beleif that when you go into another country you should leave all of your ''stuff'' in the contry you left, '' in rome do like the romans''
And what if the Romans start copying you?
Because that's how culture works, folks.
Also, memories, are you aware you're saying 'this is true' to a post which purports to limit the political power of minorites simply because they're minorities?
I think you know that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about minorities acquiring political power through legitimate means. Which is fine. That's progress.YES! how would you feel if I entered your house told your whole family that im in charge now and that we have to walk on our hands/wear pink at all times/and sleep on the floor? (this is a rather comical representation to help you better understand)
No, it's not. Otherwise there would not be a black American president right now.Minorities must not have to much political power. Yes this is true!
Not really. I'm talking about minorities being able to start their own political parties, being able to vote etc, in short, not being treated as second-class citizens, simply because of their smaller population. Of course people have to obey the law. That doesn't mean they're not allowed to legitimately change the law as the political system allows.And if you look closely you will find this to be so In pretty much any culture. If I go to some place in the middle east and start doing as I like, ( not respecting religious rules etc) Theirl be consequences. BECAUSE I AM A MINORITY!! there! simple isnt it?
No, it's not. Otherwise there would not be a black American president right now
They're still a minority.This is a very simplistic response, the black community is wholly compatible with the United States of america's values, way of tought etc, why the Muslim community in most cases is not!
Your exact words were:Its some for of counter culture, Incompatible in one word. Im talking about these incompatible minoritys. they dont accept our way of life, and would change it if they could!
Minorities must not have to much political power.
That's a bit presumptuous, given you've never met or spoken to any of these Muslims with political power in Western states. And what to do if one of these is elected to lead?They MUST not gain to much political power. Its like giving the keys to your house to someone that wants to burn it down.
They're still a minority.
Your exact words were:
No qualifiers. No 'Incompatible minorities only'.
But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
And you're still wrong.
In the UK, there are Muslim Mayors, Councillors, MPs; in the States there are Muslim Senators.
What to do with these chaps and ladies?
That's a bit presumptuous, given you've never met or spoken to any of these Muslims with political power in Western states. And what to do if one of these is elected to lead?
the muslim senators embrace the western view, im talking here about extremists.The ones who do not embrace the culture that is hosting them.Its not a question of race,but a question of ideas. We are all part of the human race science has recently proven that the whole concept of race is something of the past. Thats why we should say minorities in ideas not in race.
This is a very simplistic response, the black community is wholly compatible with the United States of america's values, way of tought etc, why the Muslim community in most cases is not!
As far as Sharia goes, non-muslims have the same political rights as muslims in an islamic state. Whether or not those countries will allow for that is upto the government officials.
The amount of knowledge he/she would need to have in order to actually win any votes to run for head of state would in all intents and purposes make him/her muslim. The way it usually works is people vote on the guy/gal they think has the most knowledge i.e. would make a good leader. E.g If you have a scholar and a student as the candidates, who are you going to chose as your leader? If you have a braincell, you'll vote for the scholar. Unless it is a popularity contest or facebook application, you will vote for the scholar. So it really doesn't matter if they're muslim or non...it's a matter of knowledge. Typically, it will be a muslim head of state in a muslim country. Just as it would be a non-muslim in a non-muslim state, That;s not to say noone else cannot apply tho...Can the head of state be a non-Muslim? If not, no political equality.
That would occur in any state where there is a muslim population....I don't see how this is any more problematic in a sharia state than it is in a non-sharia state that has a muslim population. The only ''problem'' identified in your example is the % of non-muslims i.e. your pool is smaller...which is your problem not Sharia's....
.... My Christian or Jewish male friend must find his wife from a 20% subset of the population, since a non-Muslim male cannot marry a Muslim woman. This is not a trivial matter and can not be explained away with a wave of the hand. It's simply unfair.
Political and social rights are the same for muslim and non on a general bases in a true sharia state. I really don't see what inequality you could level at non-muslims in a sharia state. Certainly not at the non-muslims given the following:In a sharia state there is explicit inequality between people of different faiths as far as political and social rights. This is my fundemantal problem with a sharia state, or a state based on any religion for that matter.
It does if the children feel more connected to the culture of their parents than the culture of their country.And btw "the culture that is hosting them" does not apply to the children of immigrants (who are born in their land of choice)
You do know that science actually invented the idea of race, to begin with right?
And btw "the culture that is hosting them" does not apply to the children of immigrants (who are born in their land of choice)
Well, unless your saying that Canadians should embrace the Indigenous culture of North America or go home. If we used that idea, a lot of white folks will need to leave.
Also i have a feeling that you wouldn't be able to separate the "extremists"(as you call them) from the rest.
Except that some of the black community is also the Muslim community.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.