Islam Is Not The Root Of Extremism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zman
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 31
  • Views Views 5K
I dont care how its vice versa and u said this before which confused me. You havent explained yourself in what u meant by it. In any case, I dont see the need in putting Islam and violence together.

Massalaama
 
I dont care how its vice versa and u said this before which confused me. You havent explained yourself in what u meant by it. In any case, I dont see the need in putting Islam and violence together.

Massalaama
If these two words cannot be put together then how do you think some religious scholars easily motivate their followers to violent demonstrations.
 
:sl:
Judaism, christianity (in their original form) and Islam all teach peace and tolerance because they are religions from Allah SWT, spread by Allah SWT's prophets. All the prophets were peaceful people and free from sin. These scriptures were for the most ignorant and corrupt people taught to them by the respective Prophets peace be upon them all.
 
If these two words cannot be put together then how do you think some religious scholars easily motivate their followers to violent demonstrations.

Violence is the doing of people NOT Islam. Its like saying Islam is the root cause of idol worshipping. At one time the Arabs worshipped Allah alone and soon worshipped idols as they went astray. Does that mean I can blame Islam for idol worshipping because people ignorantly followed their own desires? I don't think so. Islam layed out the correct way of worshipping Allah but people followed their vain ways. Just like Islam also lays out the platform for the proper approach to peace and resolution but people choose not to listen. Is that Islams fault or the people?
 
Last edited:
I know what you mean. But as long as it exists and some people here persist on saying things which they themselves don't realize, i'll keep speaking even till it closes.

:sl:
 
If these two words cannot be put together then how do you think some religious scholars easily motivate their followers to violent demonstrations.
naaaaahh, you must be joking with this statement?? or arent you??? :O :p hmmm... :p lolll
dude if you had a company and you were the president, and some of your employees shoot somebody on a supermarket, should your company be blamed bc you employee shoot somebody? i think yes, and you as a president of the company should endup in jail, "and you mr/mrs iqbaal are going to jail, we don't care if you have anything to do with your employee's personal life :D:D:D:D" lol

i'm sorry to tell you but your system of judging Islam is messed up. :)
 
naaaaahh, you must be joking with this statement?? or arent you??? :O :p hmmm... :p lolll
dude if you had a company and you were the president, and some of your employees shoot somebody on a supermarket, should your company be blamed bc you employee shoot somebody? i think yes, and you as a president of the company should endup in jail, "and you mr/mrs iqbaal are going to jail, we don't care if you have anything to do with your employee's personal life :D:D:D:D" lol

i'm sorry to tell you but your system of judging Islam is messed up. :)
Yes my company would be responsible if my employees shoot the people and then come into the company to get the shelter. I'd be responsible for their evil actions if I don't disown them but instead I pay them when they do no job other than just killing in the name of the company.
 
Your missing the point. So you agree Islam is not the cause of extremism, rather you said vice versa. Your still wrong in saying that. Either way it means the SAME thing. It doesnt change. Ok this is what you meant when you said vice versa:

Violence is the cause of Islam.

Reading that, your basically saying violence created Islam or the reason why Islam exists, Na Audhubillah. Tell me, does that make sense to a sane minded Muslim? You really need to re examine what you say.
 
Last edited:
Your missing the point. So you agree Islam is not the cause of extremism, rather you said vice versa. Your still wrong in saying that. Either way it means the SAME thing. It doesnt change. Ok this is what you meant when you said vice versa:

Violence is the cause of Islam.

Reading that, your basically saying violence created Islam or the reason why Islam exists, Na Audhubillah. Tell me, does that make sense to a sane minded Muslim? You really need to re examine what you say.


Violence is the cause of Islam.

There was violence by Kafirs. That made the oppressed people of Mecca and nearby areas convert to Islam.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top