Islamic icon omitted from '2012'

you have failed to see the double standards because you missed my point again. in both instances i mentioned that our ways of life/beliefs were at threat hence the drive for both of us to react the way we did/do,

Ah, maybe this is the crux of the problem. You believe that when people insult your beliefs that your beliefs are threatened. I don't see that.

You believe in Islam. How does someone insulting your belief threaten it? Does it change the way you feel about Islam? Does it make Islam any less true to you? Is Islam in any way, shape or form actually harmed by these insults?

I don't believe that insulting a belief harms that belief.

even under secular laws, correct me if im wrong, it is illegal to defame anyone's religion anyway so im not too sure why we are getting the full blame here.

In some countries it is illegal. In others it is not. In the United States, for example, I am not aware of any such laws. Freedom of speech here is a basic part of our law that is in our Constitution. One of the few limits is on speech that incites violence.

I am not sure what you mean, exactly, when you say "the full blame". While I believe that much of the insults hurled at Muslims and Islam are uncalled for, I also believe that the overreaction of some Muslims is uncalled for also.

the question still goes begging: what is their agenda with us that they have the need to stir our anger? it says more about them then it does about us.

It says a lot about both sides.

2)what about the businesses that lost profit when we decided to boycott them? so acting does sometimes help

You bet it does, and such non-violent reactions are the ones that make the biggest impact. The violent ones are the ones that actually end up hurting Muslims more than the intended target. Look at the riots that ensued. How many Muslims lost their lives and how many Danes? Who actually lost the most in this battle?

3) is this really about us? what i mean is that direct comments, (i,e ones intended to insult Islam, not ones that are intended to insult Muslims) are made etc hence, is it really our honor for us to ignore.

The intent is often to rile Muslims. Surely many of those that reprinted the cartoons had that intention. Then when the Muslims called for violent measures the insulters pointed their fingers and said "look, that is what Islam is all about". So who hurt the image of Islam the most, the publishers and the bloggers, or the Muslims that rioted and the leaders that called for peoples death?

And again, did any of their pictures or words truly hurt Islam? Does God really need people to defend him with violence?

*sighs*seems like you didn't read my previous post. did you?

Yes, I did. That is why I have all these questions for you. I honestly want to know your answer to them. I truly want to understand the reasoning behind endorsing violence against someone for an insult. I want to understand how someone can believe they are defending their beliefs, or honoring their Prophet, by calling for people to be killed or beaten over an insult.
 
some hadeeth say that the nearrest sign for the coming of Imam Mahdi is a cometh witha luminous tail which will muslims and non muslims around the world..

Is the event 2012 linked with hadeeth of the coming of Imam Mahdi?
 
The 2012 is Mayan, not Muslim. The Mayans were not aware of Muhammad or Islam at all. 2012 is not even the end of the Mayan calendar. The whole premise is based on a misunderstanding of a Mayan text, therefore I would completely safe saying that 2012 has absolutely zero to do with any Islamic beliefs about the end of the world.
 
Adding what titus says, this is 5th calander era is going to finish as per Mayan calander. Thier calander is distributed in 7 different calanders. One important thing in Mayan beleifs is that they did not believe in end of time. According to them the world's distruction and re-construction will remain going on so with the end of one era and starting with another.
 
The upcoming disaster movie "2012" lays waste to many political, cultural and religious buildings and landmarks. But one Islamic icon was too sensitive to touch: the Kaaba, the cube-shaped building in the heart of Mecca, one of the holiest sites in Islam.

Director Roland Emmerich told SCI FI Wire that he wanted to include the religious site in the film, but was talked out of it. "My co-writer Harald [Kloser] said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie. And he was right," he explained.
A fatwa in the Islamic faith is a religious opinion by scholar on a legal, civil, or religious matter. The term gained meaning in the Western world in 1989 when Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for the death of author Salman Rushdie, whom he accused of blasphemy.
Another well-known and deadly fatwa was issued by Osama bin Laden in 1998 and called for Muslims to execute Americans and their allies, according to the Columbia Encyclopedia .

Emmerich went on to say, "We have to all in the Western world think about this. You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is.

"So it's just something which I kind of didn't [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out."
If Emmerich was only saying this because he was specifically asked this question by a journalist, then it's the journalist stirring up trouble.

If Emmerich said this unbidden, then he is (perhaps unwittingly) stirring up trouble that will gain his film publicity.

Either way, if the requisite visual effects were completed, the scene will probably end up on the DVD as a deleted scene. I personally wouldn't find such a scene offensive as such - the movie is about The End of the World (TM), after all, with every manmade structure in existence collapsing under the stress of misbehaving computer-generated tectonic plates. Boneheaded spectacle ('Oh my God, all the buildings are ASLPODING!') rather than propaganda.

As for his movies - they're all pretty cheesy, but Independence Day was fun. The new trailers for 2012, to me, have looked utterly boring. That's not some petty swipe at the guy as a result of this article - I felt that way before I'd even seen this thread. Empty spectacle doesn't really do it for me anymore.
 
Last edited:
The movie was not that good anyway, I thought they would show the end of the world with everybody going to die and all but noooo for some strange reason the ''hero's'' tried to manage to escape vulcano's, falling buildings, earthquakes, Tsunami's etc..

And they did show the Ka'aba for a second but not getting destroyed infact in my opinion it was the most peaceful place/scene in the whole movie. Everyone was in chaos, everything getting destroyed but only the Ka'aba looked secure....even though it was only for a second.
 
The movie was not that good anyway, I thought they would show the end of the world with everybody going to die and all but noooo for some strange reason the ''hero's'' tried to manage to escape vulcano's, falling buildings, earthquakes, Tsunami's etc..

And they did show the Ka'aba for a second but not getting destroyed infact in my opinion it was the most peaceful place/scene in the whole movie. Everyone was in chaos, everything getting destroyed but only the Ka'aba looked secure....even though it was only for a second.

The only redeeming feature of the movie in my opinion is the special effects. Otherwise, it's your typical film written by a chimp with a keyboard trying to make and average story into a fantastic movie, and in the process making the movie worse.
 
The only redeeming feature of the movie in my opinion is the special effects. Otherwise, it's your typical film written by a chimp with a keyboard trying to make and average story into a fantastic movie, and in the process making the movie worse.


Same thoughts, the special effects were the only thing that kept me from falling asleep.

The story was really bad, the ending was ridiculous/no-sense.
 
Ah, maybe this is the crux of the problem. You believe that when people insult your beliefs that your beliefs are threatened.
I don't see that. You believe in Islam. How does someone insulting your belief threaten it? Does it change the way you feel about Islam? Does it make Islam any less true to you? Is Islam in any way, shape or form actually harmed by these insults?
I don't believe that insulting a belief harms that belief.
maybe threat was a bad word to choose. try insulted, ridiculed, mock, scorn, etc.

The intent is often to rile Muslims. Surely many of those that reprinted the cartoons had that intention. Then when the Muslims called for violent measures the insulters pointed their fingers and said "look, that is what Islam is all about". So who hurt the image of Islam the most, the publishers and the bloggers, or the Muslims that rioted and the leaders that called for peoples death?
isn't it my fault that my house gets robbed if i choose not to lock the doors and windows at night? Who is blame? The thief or me?
i wouldn't blame say a Christian/non-Muslim if they got all passionate if they had their beliefs insulted. i really wouldn't. heck, i'd be pretty peeved off at a Muslim if they choose to insult other peoples beliefs as well.

And again, did any of their pictures or words truly hurt Islam?
definatley not. but should one shut up when they get slapped in the face? I think not!

Does God really need people to defend him with violence?

doing what we do, doesn't mean we are defending God. Indeed God doesn't need anyone to defend him, and certainly not with violence.

Yes, I did. That is why I have all these questions for you. I honestly want to know your answer to them. I truly want to understand the reasoning behind endorsing violence against someone for an insult. I want to understand how someone can believe they are defending their beliefs, or honoring their Prophet, by calling for people to be killed or beaten over an insult.

1) You see it as merely insult, as freedom of speech (don’t do that). we see it as something else. That is the problem; we are on completely 2 different wave lengths. the Iraqi throw thrower got tortured and put in prison cos he threw his show at Bush. Who was Bush at that time? and why was the shoe thrower put in prison? Was it because he expressed his opinion (not likely), or because he threw his show at the President? Same type of principle applies.

2) Islamically speaking, insulting Allah, Muhammad, the Quran, etc is a major sin that calls for a severe penalty (death) under an Islamic state/ruler <---that is the severity of it. In the same way justice is to be handed down to the adulterer by getting the stone And in the same way a Muslim may get put in prison for *supposedly* having links to al-qaeda (under secular laws), then again, the same concept applies. Even if a Muslim was to insult Islam, etc the law still holds. In fact the sin is greater.
im not actually sure if such penalties are still carried out withOUT the Islamic state in place, hence im not sure if these riots, etc are actually Islamically acceptable to even begin with so you can’t shout out "violence violence violence" and point the finger when it hasn’t been clarified from an Islamic perspective.
The whole point of my debate here is that all im trying to say is insulting and defaming islam isnt acceptable to begin with and Muslims shoulnt have the blame put fairly and squrely on them. So as i implied previously, it is essential to look at things in perspective.

“Violence” you keep bring this word up negligently and don’t seem to be fully grasping my explanations? either that or you are ignoring them? So, in light of the above, how is handing down justice considered as violent. if it were, then cops would get it badly, for simply dealing harshly and sternly with those who they hand cuff.

i dont know if it is intended, but you word your sentences in such as a way, that it is only possible to say one thing. dont hold your breath, im not going to say Islam is violent. it's not happening.

if you want to understand us and why we feel so moved when our beliefs are ridiculed, you should consider reading/researching about our beliefs and about Our Prophet and how much we are to hold them dear. Perhaps you should self reflect for a min, as well. Titus, do you hold someone/something is high respect? Do you look up to someone? not necessarily a person, maybe a belief. is this someone/something, one that you emulate and has been an example to you and is a foundation is your everyday life? What about if your language and/or race was insulted. What would you do?

3) you need to get to the root of the problem. And yet again i’ll ask. What is their agenda with us that they need to stir our anger?
 
Just on the matter, all I'm going to say is...

I was so pleased to hear that there is a good amount of Islamic awareness out there. I heard churches, synagogues, temples, and all were being destroyed but the only object that will stand will be none other than the Holy and Sacred Ka'bah! Takbeer!
 
I don't really know how the Kaaba could collapse/be destroyed in a symbolic/dramatic way anyway. I mean, it's just a cube, what could go wrong?

The kaaba will be destroyed by a thin black man from ethopia...am not being a racist here...
 
definatley not. but should one shut up when they get slapped in the face? I think not!

Bad analogy. You are equating a physical act with an insult. If you are slapped then you are being threatened physically. Nobody is being threatened physically by printing cartoons or having the Kaaba destroyed in a film.

“Violence” you keep bring this word up negligently and don’t seem to be fully grasping my explanations? either that or you are ignoring them? So, in light of the above, how is handing down justice considered as violent.

Because I don't consider killing someone over an insult justice. I see it as vengeance. I see it as a disproportionate response. But justice? No way.

im not actually sure if such penalties are still carried out withOUT the Islamic state in place, hence im not sure if these riots, etc are actually Islamically acceptable to even begin with so you can’t shout out "violence violence violence" and point the finger when it hasn’t been clarified from an Islamic perspective.

I am much more concerned about how most Muslims feel about it, not the theological aspect of it. What concerns me is that you, from what I gather from your posts, support fatwahs that call for violence against people over an insult. And yes, violence is the correct wording for fatwahs that call for peoples death. In fact that word may be too tame.

Do not get me wrong. My issue is not with Islam. It is with those that issue fatwahs and those that support such fatwahs.

i dont know if it is intended, but you word your sentences in such as a way, that it is only possible to say one thing. dont hold your breath, im not going to say Islam is violent. it's not happening.

I can promise you that that is not my intention. Again, my issue is not with Islam, but those Muslims that call for the death of those that insult their beliefs.

Perhaps you should self reflect for a min, as well. Titus, do you hold someone/something is high respect? Do you look up to someone? not necessarily a person, maybe a belief. is this someone/something, one that you emulate and has been an example to you and is a foundation is your everyday life? What about if your language and/or race was insulted. What would you do?

I can tell you that I would not call for the death of the person that did it. I am extremely secure in my beliefs, so no insult would bother me to that extent because I would realize that person doing the insult was either ignorant or trying to get me to react. If they are ignorant then I ease my mind with that knowledge and let it go. If they are trying to get me to react then why should I make them happy by giving them what they want?

If you are secure in your beliefs then the insults wouldn't bother you.

Look at it this way. Say I had an attractive wife (which I do) and someone came up to me and insulted her by saying she was ugly and her face looked like a Halloween mask. Now, I know that my wife is beautiful, so why would the insult bother me? I know the man is full of crap. I would have to laugh at the mans stupidity and move on.

The same should go with Islam or Muhammad or whatever else it is that sets you off. If someone wants to destroy a picture of the Kabaa or paint your Prophet as a terrorist then why be bothered by it if you know that it is not the truth?

you need to get to the root of the problem. And yet again i’ll ask. What is their agenda with us that they need to stir our anger?

The same reasons you see people burning American flags. Some people do it because they feel impotent against a superpower so they take their frustrations out on something that cannot hurt them. Others doing it trying to provoke a reaction.

Do you think it would be appropriate for the US government to issue edicts every time someone burns one of their flags in protest calling for the death of that person?

Do you think Jews should be able to put out death warrants on anyone that insults their religion?

If you do believe that they should then I shudder to think what type of world that would be. If you don't believe that then why should Muslims be the exception to the rule and be allowed to condemn to death people that insult their beliefs?
 
im just going to put it this way: we have our way of doing things, you have yours. in fact both our ways are rather similar, only we manifest them in different forms. but most of the time, i think our concepts and ideas are the same thing in essence. really, i do.

in all honesty, i dont know what else to say and/or how to explain it more then i already have.

Because I don't consider killing someone over an insult justice. I see it as vengeance. I see it as a disproportionate response. But justice? No way.
it isnt the insult that is the problem, it is who you are insulting that is. as i said: the Iraqi throw thrower got tortured and put in prison cos he threw his show at Bush. Who was Bush at that time? and why was the shoe thrower put in prison? Was it because he expressed his opinion (not likely), or because he threw his show at the President? Same type of principle applies.

if it was simply putting to death over an insult, then a Muslim would be put to death for insulting another Muslim/non-Muslim.

1. maybe Americans dont dont act when their flags are burnt, becuase they know that they are in the wrong. 2. i think real hard core patriotic Americans would find it offensive threat their flag was getting burnt.

Do you think Jews should be able to put out death warrants on anyone that insults their religion?
i dont care, they can do what they want. i take it you are referring to my previous comment? if yes, saying Jews are :raging: is different from saying Judaism is :raging: i would never insult anyone's beliefs. i would disagree with them, but insult? no.
 
Last edited:
i dont care, they can do what they want. i take it you are referring to my previous comment?

No, sorry, I was not referring to your previous comment. I was just giving another example of a religious group being given "permission" to kill people that believes insult its beliefs.

it isnt the insult that is the problem, it is who you are insulting that is.

Then what would be the problem with the Kabaa being destroyed in a movie?

1. maybe Americans dont dont act when their flags are burnt, becuase they know that they are in the wrong. 2. i think real hard core patriotic Americans would find it offensive threat their flag was getting burnt.

1. No. Not in the least.
2. Does that give them the right to kill the people that did it?

in fact both our ways are rather similar, only we manifest them in different forms. but most of the time, i think our concepts and ideas are the same thing in essence. really, i do.

I agree completely. I know it may seem like I don't because I tend to concentrate on the differences and not the similarities, but I do. I guess I am looking for some kind of understanding here and I just can't seem to find it. I cannot wrap my head around supporting killing people for nothing more than an insult.
 
Last edited:
It's just a movie people. Even if it depicted the Ka'aba being destroyed, what difference does that make to the reality of things? How does that insult Islam or Muslims? It is just a fictional borrowing of an iconic image to create a sense of reality in an otherwise far-fetched typically overblown Hollywood movie.

Let's face it, if Emmerich put the Ka'aba in the movie getting destroyed, there would have been chaos, and regardless of the media trumpeting it (what do you expect them to do?) that is really the fact of the matter.

Muslims are, in their own minds, defending Islam when they take to the streets after a forwarded email reports some new pseudo-blasphemy against Islam, but they are really themselves painting the worst kind of advert for Islam when they act the way many do. This is not how the Prophet would have behaved, in such a knee-jerk fight-every-small-battle kind of way, so why should we?
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top