you have failed to see the double standards because you missed my point again. in both instances i mentioned that our ways of life/beliefs were at threat hence the drive for both of us to react the way we did/do,
Ah, maybe this is the crux of the problem. You believe that when people insult your beliefs that your beliefs are threatened. I don't see that.
You believe in Islam. How does someone insulting your belief threaten it? Does it change the way you feel about Islam? Does it make Islam any less true to you? Is Islam in any way, shape or form actually harmed by these insults?
I don't believe that insulting a belief harms that belief.
even under secular laws, correct me if im wrong, it is illegal to defame anyone's religion anyway so im not too sure why we are getting the full blame here.
In some countries it is illegal. In others it is not. In the United States, for example, I am not aware of any such laws. Freedom of speech here is a basic part of our law that is in our Constitution. One of the few limits is on speech that incites violence.
I am not sure what you mean, exactly, when you say "the full blame". While I believe that much of the insults hurled at Muslims and Islam are uncalled for, I also believe that the overreaction of some Muslims is uncalled for also.
the question still goes begging: what is their agenda with us that they have the need to stir our anger? it says more about them then it does about us.
It says a lot about both sides.
2)what about the businesses that lost profit when we decided to boycott them? so acting does sometimes help
You bet it does, and such non-violent reactions are the ones that make the biggest impact. The violent ones are the ones that actually end up hurting Muslims more than the intended target. Look at the riots that ensued. How many Muslims lost their lives and how many Danes? Who actually lost the most in this battle?
3) is this really about us? what i mean is that direct comments, (i,e ones intended to insult Islam, not ones that are intended to insult Muslims) are made etc hence, is it really our honor for us to ignore.
The intent is often to rile Muslims. Surely many of those that reprinted the cartoons had that intention. Then when the Muslims called for violent measures the insulters pointed their fingers and said "look, that is what Islam is all about". So who hurt the image of Islam the most, the publishers and the bloggers, or the Muslims that rioted and the leaders that called for peoples death?
And again, did any of their pictures or words truly hurt Islam? Does God really need people to defend him with violence?
*sighs*seems like you didn't read my previous post. did you?
Yes, I did. That is why I have all these questions for you. I honestly want to know your answer to them. I truly want to understand the reasoning behind endorsing violence against someone for an insult. I want to understand how someone can believe they are defending their beliefs, or honoring their Prophet, by calling for people to be killed or beaten over an insult.