I think I made my feelings quite clear about "Spoon feed", and they remain.
If you are unable to see the insult in that, you need to reread.
You are very sensitive! To take offense to someone you have never met telling you they do not want to be "spoon fed"... :? Like I said this is supposed to be a discussion. Not about hurt feelings over someone telling you they do not want to be spoon fed ridiculous hearsay, to swallow nonsense said by a person about their faith.
You know, some times I get that way. When I ask a straight forward question with a true desire to understand any the replies I get are insulting and derogatory. That tends to break my normal laughing mood.
I would understand if someone called you a name or used deragatory words against you, but nothing of the sort was done spoon fed is not even close please. If it was, the moderators would have removed it according to the rules of this forum. If you feel so strongly about it then complain. But believe what you want, everyone here is entitled to agree to disagree as far as I know.
When you say:
I don't know about you, but when I'm falsely accused, I take it personally.
Falsely accused of what? You cannot even mention what it was after saying you were falsely accused. Come on give me a break.
Never ask you to. I ask why you thought he was "anti-Qur'an, anti-Muslim, anti-Islam".
The fact that you MISSED what I have already stated concerning those matters shows me that you didn't even read my post correctly. If u did you would have asked about my answers, but you didn't, instead you asked the same original question AGAIN of why I thought this or that but it's not about what I think, it's about the reality of what he said are false allegations against the holy book of Islam, generalization on ALL the Muslims in Canada, among other things. In case you missed it before........
Because others have "done a better job than him", does not make him wrong.
Mr. Wilberhum. Apparently you are not reading my posts. I said that there are people who are more qualified than him to speak on issues regarding terrorism. What Amiruddin did was fabricate things to a level that is not true. The Saudi Qur'ans have no essays in the back speaking of Jihad, those essays speak of Tauhid, Shirk, Jurisprudence. There is no mention of Jihad. Obviously you take what Amiruddin says at face value without verifying what he has said as being a fact, or fiction - and it is fiction.
Now that is nothing but bigotry. And gives me concern about taking anything you say as an honest assement.
Now you are the one making accusations, against me, of bigotry. If you cannot accept the fact that there are muslim children who can explain terrorism and that it does not have to do with the religion of Islam itself, that is your own problem but it is true! And again, very poor excuse of accusing me of bigotry to avoid responding to my answers of terrorism having nothing to do with Islam or our holy book... Nice try.
You are welcome to continue debating this matter as I said you're entitled to think whatever you want, but it doesn't mean that others have to accept what you might agree with as being something that is "good", or the "right thing."
Assalaam-Alaikum
