You are contradicting yourself; Iran could not both 'attack back' and 'attack first'. As I said, the Israelis haven't actually threatened anything, let alone done anything in this context.
[PIE]Salaam, Actually it is not a contradiction,in the term of the current world order,the US has already made the first step towards regime change,,those are already fighting words,and it is LAW ..a law which the Isrealis support.
And the ISrealis have threathned many times even saying that nuclear weapon is on the table and what not.
I would just say that despite my many post on Isrelais/US threthning the Iranina with nuclear attack,yet you still deny it,,speak much already about what you choose to believe.
May i ask,do you also support the use of the word regime for Iran? as coind by the west?
[/PIE]
The Iranians are realists, too; it's not as if Israel hasn't been attacked before. The only thing it taught anybody was that "attacking Israel is bad for your armed forces' health".
[PIE]Attacking anyone is bad for your own armd forces health,that is why the US always fight its war ovrseas,where US citizns wont be killed.
Like i said earlier,the Isrealis may take pride in having nuclear weapons,even the US,but having them in their onw land first already is dangerous enough.
[/PIE]
The US didn't supply WMD to Iraq during the Iran/Iraq war. Some US companies provided 'precursor' chemicals and potentially dual-purpose goods. So did the French, Germans, Chinese and lots of other people.
[PIE]I would say you cna search google about the involvement of the US and thir aiding and sponsoring and egging other countries to give saddam wmd..
In the end the US and its citizens have much to answer for,actually the western world does..[/PIE]
They are not 'banned' weapons, even if some people (including me) would like them to be.
Please provide a source showing that either government said that.
Neither the US or Israel has taken any military action against Iran at all.. so how are the aggressors 'clear'? Quite apart from which, it's irrelevant from the Iranian perspective whether that action would be 'justified' or not, it would be totally disastrous for them. The idiocy of launching an unprovoked attack on US troops should be evident. As to Israel, you vastly over-rate the Iranian military capability. Unlike those who have attacked Israel in the past (who still failed misreably) Iran doesn't share a border with Israel, and indeed is some considerable distance from it. The planes would be detected and shot down long before they dropped their bombs. The only consequences for Iran would be humiliation, and the inevitable US or Israeli response.
[PIE]Do you know what is a precursor to war?
Hyperbole,propaganda,invading enemy airspace.
May i ask,do you know that the US has m,ade it into law to increase democracy thru submersive channels in Iran?
It is liken to AlQaeda p[lanting sleeper cell in the US and ISrael,,would you like that?
Also the US has made known that it does intent and to use nucelar weapons and it is a possibility.Those are threats either to force compulsion but in military talk, those outright war talk.
And i take it that the you have sleeping in the world.
Do you know what is happeing in Iraq and Afghan?
Are the US now facing humiliations,with your western president growing whiter hair daily,with firing left and right,and just last week 27 more US invaders death,,Alhamdulilah..
So even if you have best weapons to SHOCK and AWE,all it does harm you back a thousand fold.
And Israel inshallah will be wiped off the map.
[/PIE]
Peace is best when neither side loses anything at all. As, in the scenario you propose,the Iranians would be the aggressors (at least as far as the Israelis and American's are concerned) it is Iran and the Iranian people that would pay that price.
