it is interesting to look at films through the decades to see how the choice of baddies has changed.
First thing to remember is that many films need a baddy for dramatic purposes, so someone has to get the part. The choice tends to reflect current conflicts. The James Bond series is particularly revealing because it spans the whole period from the 60s to the present day. In the Cold War, the Russians were the generic baddies. But post Glasnost that's not so easy so the selection has changed. It's hardly surprising Muslim terrorists are a popular theme right now - they have the added advantage of not necessarily belonging to a particular country, so no state can be offended.
If you sit down and try to think of it from the movie producer's point of view, finding a suitable baddy is genuinely more complicated these days. Who else do you expect them to choose?
So Muslims have been one of the new categories - but it's not as simple as that. Another major theme is an internal right wing US conspiracy. Particularly interesting is the recent Iron Man 3 (5th highest grossing film of all time) which appeared to have an evil Muslim as the main villain - but he turns out to be a front used to throw suspicion elsewhere by the real villain, a right winger. (Sorry if i ruined the surprise but it's not much of a movie.) The picture is far from as black and white as you suggest.
One interesting Hollywood trend that has persisted for 50 years and more is the use of English actors to play the main villain (even in Iron Man 3 the 'Muslim baddy' was actually English, both dramatically and in actual fact!). The reason for this lies partly in ambiguous attitudes in the US towards the UK, but also especially because an English accent sounds 'foreign' whilst being entirely comprehensible. They don't necessarily play the part of an English character in the drama - for instance, they may play an evil Roman character etc.
As we all know, the UK has been the US's most important ally since WW2, so it's strange that they have depicted English actors so unfavourably. Do I think this is a conspiracy? No I don't. But if English people happened to be all Muslim, you would be including that on your conspiracy list.
i dont think any of it is a conspiracy.
you take what you have and weave a story out of it.
it needs to be relavent to have appeal.
so you look at social trends and news for inspiration.
media sources you use for inside jokes.
and lastly reference material.
9 times out of ten you can point a finger and say that reminds you of something.
most things that are edited out are simpy to widen the audiance appeal at the loss of accuracy.
thats why its hollywood.
incidentally iron man one had the bad dad villian...plus terrorist mercs.
iron man two was russian.
so its hardly set in stone.
also batman had something very similar in ras al gual.
...suprisingly george cloony batman is always overlooked.
its a joke, you can literally make of it what you will.
but most kids grow up reading comics because they relate to it, its an escape an ideal.
and for some time, it is very easy.
...its hardly the ark of the covenant but you could almost imagine.
thats the joke really.
..its not.
my brother was talking about alexander the great the other day.
im not sure what importance he played within islamic history.
but the hollywood adaptation does not portray him as having had islamic values.
anyway, we are all here to learn about the quran,
islam and how our own opinions of it differ.