Mahmoud Ahmedinejad at the UN assembly - tells it like it is

[Abz2000]

 

[Scimitar]

Ahmedinejads charm is something else, he answers questions with no "politicking" - only straight answers... Also, keep your ears open at 6:00 he answers that question in a short, yet very to the point manner whhich left me smiling...

Now watch this interview with an American news show, in which he once again, gives straight up answers with no "politicking", making it clear that he is in open defiance of aggressive pressure from the USA.

I can't remember the last time I heard a leader speak so plainly, it's just so **** refreshing...

 

[Scimitar]

Ohahaha, Abz - you diamond bro

 

[Trumble]

Once again, you bring me "opinions"... based on what though? Care to produce the evidence?

The 'evidence' for the responses to Ahmedinejad and Abbas were broadcast on TV worldwide.

And now you talk as if you can see inside the mind of Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, come on - this is a very transparent way to rebuttle a point, and I'm guessing there are many members here who can see through this rather weak method of debate, which you bring here.

Another member of the froth club, I see. Of course I can't 'see inside his mind'. I can, however both hear his speech and watch the reaction to it, with some awareness of the issues involved and of the fact that the man is a politician. You don't end up in his position by being 'uncaring' about anything, let alone the content of major speeches.. that applies to Abbas and Netanyahu as much as Ahmedinejad.

Trumble, I've humoured you once with a reply, i'm not going to humour you again.​

No loss. You have nothing substantive to say, it seems.

 

[جوري]

'froth' 'twaddle' 'waffles' and the likes which often pepper your posts if not makeup its main theme aren't a rebuttal not in politics nor science I am afraid .. Holding a popular opinion isn't an indication of correctitude nor is it a concise stepwise process with some semblance of a logical consistency.. If you are that lazy why partake in a topic? Either bring some substance to the table or sit this one out.. Or do you just enjoy being the voice of dissent? Either refrencing us to some vague sources or jumping on a popular wagon from which somehow we're to glean some cryptic message that we would have otherwise understood if we weren't too mired in waffles and pancakes? dude you are a hoot!

 

[Abz2000]

Trumble, your desperation shows in your words,
I distrust Abbas more than I distrust ahmedinejad - despite not being a part of any sect other than Islam.
Abbas fought against Hamas despite Hamas winning a landslide victory, and he was still held up as a legitimate leader by bush.
I got a feeling Abbas is just playing their game and they've discredited the un bad enough with their criminal invasion of Iraq, and then the un sending the criminals to "help" libyans,
I do believe the us are getting ready to pull out of it and so is the Zionist regime. (or now that theyve bankrupted the us and armed it, theyll "elect" a president who prefers "non interventionist policy" They've milked it to the max, got 50/50 of palestinian land through it (using the holocaust) and then stolen more with the un b!tching publicly while supporting them, and they've even dethroned their faithful puppet Mubarak - which suspiciously looks like a move towards Sinai and Egypt - since it's unlikely they'd try anything with their faithful puppet there. They're building hostility in an attempt to to reject the rest of the world with scorn - putting faith in their might, while forgetting the Almighty, well theyre in for a surprise, sad thing is we'll have to suffer heavily through it.

 

[Ramadhan]

Why are you guys taking Trumble so seriously?

He of the fame "I believe that the US will pull out all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan by the end of the year because Obama said so"?

 

[Scimitar]

[snip]Another member of the froth club, I see.[snip]

Yes, if you meant I was sitting with a frothy coffee, awaiting an intelligent response backed by evidences... Unfortunately, all I got was the froth, and a bitter taste to follow from your words...

1) You don't know me, but I'll tell you a little so you know exactly how futile your logic seems to me Trumble. I'm an editor by trade - in globally recognized publications... I read "intent" as well as "content" and deduce from there. You've bought nothing to this debate but "opinion" like I said. And you do it once again. A very weak repsonse from you, vague as William Hague, and about dumb as dumb gets. If you think you are fooling anyone with your pseudo-trolling, think again - you're about as transparent as the layer i'm working on in photoshop.

2) If you do wish to partake in this debate, then make your posts worth some substance (back them up with evidence), and don't use conjectural analysis, or commentary which implies that you can read minds, as you have done.

Otherwise, do as you will and we'll just ignore your foolishness. Oh and before you let your ego take a hold of your sense and post back some other pseudo-trolling comments, thinking you know "my type", just read the responses here in this thread, and check which ones got liked and which ones got nothing... that is all. Have a nice *frothy* coffee. Put plenty of sugar in it too, you'll need it.

EDIT:

No loss. You have nothing substantive to say, it seems.

You really should use a dictionary - the word you were looking for is "substantial"... you're way out of your league here mate.

 

[Trumble]

Yes, if you meant I was sitting with a frothy coffee, awaiting an intelligent response backed by evidences... Unfortunately, all I got was the froth, and a bitter taste to follow from your words...

The word you were looking for is 'evidence', not 'evidences'. My answer fully addressed the points raised (contrast with your own, which addressed none of them).

You don't know me, but I'll tell you a little so you know exactly how futile your logic seems to me Trumble.

I haven't attempted to use any logic. Why, therefore, should I give a toss about your opinion when you don't even know what the word means?

I'm an editor by trade - in globally recognized publications...

Whoopey doo...

If you do wish to partake in this debate, then make your posts worth some substance (back them up with evidence), and don't use conjectural analysis, or commentary which implies that you can read minds, as you have done.

Please keep your instructions to yourself. You aren't in the office now.

Otherwise, do as you will and we'll just ignore your foolishness.

You are, of course, quite at liberty to ignore whatever you wish.

Oh and before you let your ego take a hold of your sense and post back some other pseudo-trolling comments, thinking you know "my type", just read the responses here in this thread, and check which ones got liked and which ones got nothing... that is all.

Is it indeed. I wonder who liked them?! Rhetorical question... ;D

You really should use a dictionary - the word you were looking for is "substantial"...

No, SUBSTANTIVE is the word I meant, the word I used and 'looking' for it wasn't necessary. Go look it up in your dictionary, and widen your vocabulary.

you're way out of your league here mate

Hardly, 'mate'. Well, not in the sense you meant anyway.

EDIT: Your 'type', BTW? Just another arrogant smarta$$ with a vastly inflated opinion of his own importance and ability. Not to mention the extent of his vocabulary. Just my own 'opinion' of course, although the evidence is stark enough without me having to point it out. I don't particularly hold that against you by the way; as with politicians it's probably impossible to become an "editor by trade - in globally recognized publications" without being an arrogant smarta$$ with a vastly inflated opinion of his own importance and ability, and we all have to make a living after all.

Anyway, you have achieved something. After 3,300 posts, 9999(!) rep and five years, sadly ending with the catastrophic decline in quality in this forum in recent months, I've finally had enough, I think. I won't slam the door on the way out.

 

[Trumble]

'froth' 'twaddle' 'waffles' and the likes which often pepper your posts if not makeup its main theme aren't a rebuttal not in politics nor science I am afraid

You are quite correct, they are not a rebuttal. I used those terms to indicate there was nothing in the post to which I was responding that required a rebuttal.

Cya.

 

[Galaxy]

If only we had leaders with courage as his. Sunni leaders should be like this guy.

From Sheikh Imran Hoseins definition, he propagates that the day like a year was the long rule of Brittania, the day like a month, is the rule from USA and the day like a week is to be the rule from Israel...

The day like a year is the day like a year, it doesn't mean the long rule of Brittania, otherwise the Companions radi Allaahu anhum would have never asked the Prophet :saws1: about the 5 daily prayers being sufficent on those days.

 

[m2p]

If only we had leaders with courage as his. Sunni leaders should be like this guy.



The day like a year is the day like a year, it doesn't mean the long rule of Brittania, otherwise the Companions radi Allaahu anhum would have never asked the Prophet :saws1: about the 5 daily prayers being sufficent on those days.

i was just about to post that but allah knows best im sure the sheikh knows about this but has analysed it with other things in mind still its something id like to ask the sheikh about

 

[Scimitar]

Trumble - you seem butthurt, just like those members of the UN assembly. ;D

 

[Scimitar]

If only we had leaders with courage as his. Sunni leaders should be like this guy.



The day like a year is the day like a year, it doesn't mean the long rule of Brittania, otherwise the Companions radi Allaahu anhum would have never asked the Prophet :saws1: about the 5 daily prayers being sufficent on those days.

Nope, you have it slightly wrong there. 5 daily prayers are part of our fardh.

When dajjal manifests in this world in the form of a human, it is at that time that the Muslims will have no food/water because the dajjal will be in full control of food and water. This is when doing Zikr of Allah SWT will be sufficient for the Muslims... the 5 daily prayers are also a part of Zikr.

Here, watch this if you have time, makes it pretty clear:

 

[GuestFellow]

What 'respect'? The guy has turned himself into the UN's resident clown. Even his 'friends' didn't know whether to applaud, laugh, or just take a sudden interest in something stuck on the bottom of their shoe. Ahmedinejad should have shown Abbas some respect and stayed at home. As it was, Netenyahu made him look like a naughty schoolboy.

I think Gadaffi was a clown at the UN lol. I admit, I'm going to miss his speeches at the UN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN0fZp7FqnQ

 

[جوري]

You are quite correct, they are not a rebuttal. I used those terms to indicate there was nothing in the post to which I was responding that required a rebuttal.

Cya.

So you just felt like leaving some micturate on this particular thread to assert your presence? ^o)

you'll forgive that I won't take you up on that offer of 'cya'

best,

 

[Scimitar]

I think Gadaffi was a clown at the UN lol. I admit, I'm going to miss his speeches at the UN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN0fZp7FqnQ

I saw that video, and it made a mockery of him tbh. I feel that Gadaffi has contributed a lot to freeing up Libya and other African nations from zionist rule. His water project was a direct blow to the zionists and henceforth they began a massive exercise in defaming Gadaffi... I can admit that he comes across slightly extrovert, but I put that down to passion. And that's not really a bad thing.

 

[Galaxy]

Sorry I think I wasn't clear...what I meant to say is, when the Dajjal arrives, he will roam the earth for 40 days, the first day feeling like a year, the second day feeling like a month...and so on. The year-like day doesn't mean the long rule of Brittania. I used the question the Companions radi Allaahu anhum asked the Prophet :saws1: as proof. We said: Allah's Messenger :saws1:, how long would he stay on the earth? He said.. For forty days, one day like a year and one day like a month and one day like a week and the rest of the days would be like your days. We said: Allah's Messenger :saws1:, would one day's prayer suffice for the prayers of day equal to one year? Thereupon he said: No, but you must make an estimate of time (and then observe prayer).

 

[Scimitar]

@Galaxy, did you watch the video response I left you above?

 

[Tyrion]

Oh and before you let your ego take a hold of your sense and post back some other pseudo-trolling comments, thinking you know "my type", just read the responses here in this thread, and check which ones got liked and which ones got nothing...

Err, I pretty much never participate in these kinds of threads... But I have to share some advice here. Next time you enter any sort of discussion or debate, try not to say something like this... (If you want to be taken seriously anyway...) "Likes" on a forum mean absolutely nothing... And the popularity of something says nothing about how correct it is.

Anyway, I'll slowly back out of this thread now... Just wanted to get that out there. :