Malay-Muslim & Chinese-Muslim Paradox

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pomak
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 29
  • Views Views 4K
imam malik has his view,so those who apply maliki's way ,bidaah is wrong.

but still he's a Sunni right?


How about imam shafie's view? do you have any?

I dont have any...

you can start a thread about Marhaban, Berzanji, Mawlid, Yasin etc. and see the responds for yourself...

if you can proof to me bidaah is wrong, then we need to announce the whole Malaysia not to read Yassin every thursday evening. It is a bidaah!

The different thing between me and Dr Asri that I dont go around and say what's bid'ah what's not...

End of the day,it is up to the individual to apply the teachings according to the most righteous way. There are books regarding Bidaah on sale. I'm gonna grab one soon. :)

Yes... it is... so dont call Dr. Asri as a non-Sunni...
 
Sisters in Islam...thats a long time issue and its a disgrace the fact that the members are not wearing veil and beating around the bush about hukum and women's right.

Actually, some of the members do wear veils... Amina Wadood wears veil too...

What happened to these too-knowlegeable Muslims?

Just involved in a conference on man and woman equal rights held in KL last month

http://www.sistersinislam.org.my/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=900&Itemid=1

Astora Jabat...again,old issue and forgotten.

yeah... he's forgotten... he said lots of controversial things and got away with it... sigh...
 
Last edited:
i would suggest you attend a seminar this Saturday at UIA,tittled SEMINAR PEMBANGUNAN UMMAH on 7th March. You will think twice about him and the best platform for you to argue on who is Dr. Asri. I attended the previous lecture.

Thats why.... :D
 
:sl:

Lets stay on-topic please, this is not the place to discuss sectarian issues!

or else this would be my first Thread- closing :D
 
Last edited:
:sl:

I don't want this thread to promote any kind of division or go off-topic further than it has, but I wanted to clarify a few things if possible Insha'Allaah:

Firstly, the term Wah.habi is a misnomer: those who are labelled with it do not themselves use this term, as it is used as a means of belittlement. It is often used to describe those who closely stick to the verses of the Qur'an and the narrations of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alayhi wasallam), hence it is not used for someone opposing Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jama'ah. More info here.

Secondly, if a person is truly following the Sunnah of the Prophet (sallallaahu 'alayhi wasallam), then it should be clear to him that there is no such thing as a "good bid'ah". More info.

Thirdly, "there is nothing wrong with following the four schools of fiqh if a Muslim does not have sufficient knowledge to enable him to derive rulings from the Qur’an and Sunnah himself, but if it becomes clear to him that the correct view is other than that of his madhhab, then he must follow the correct view and not his madhhab." Read more here.

"With regard to the common (i.e. uneducated) man there is no difference between the four imams and others such as al-Layth ibn Sa’d, al-Awzaa’i and other fuqaha’. None of them called people to follow his madhhab, or was partisan in following it, or obliged anyone else to act in accordance with it or with a specific madhhab. Rather they used to call people to follow the Qur’an and Sunnah." Read more here.

And Allaah (swt) knows best.

:w:
 
^can we move away from potential derailing and get back to the topic at hand?
 
this is like in the uk where pakistanis call non-muslims gora and gori, meaning non muslim, ironically sometimes even when i am in the same room with them until i make a polite cough...

then they realise there error.
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top