Men Smarter than Women, Scientist Claims

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonz
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 93
  • Views Views 9K
not always how about if their grandparents had no education and their parents did but didnt really care about their education and were not all that smart then maybe the child would wont a better life for his or her family and take education seriously so no its not always a genetic thing and im smarter than you because i noticed my bad grammar abd apologised for it so ha ha :p
 
One thing to think about is the academic success(in general)of Asian students. It isn't because Asian people are naturally smarter, it is because of the expectations of their parents. If the parents of white, black, or hispanic students were as demanding as those of Asian kids, you would see a fairly intelligent world out there. Then again...some of the most intelligent people I know couldn't change their own tire.
 
I think this is an example of the multiple intelligences theory of Howard Gardner. Women's brains seem to work differently than a man's, which doesn't equate to being "smarter". Gardner lists several "intelligences" that individuals may have.
1. Logical-mathematical
2. Spatial
3. Musical-artistic
and so on...can't remember the others off the top of my head. Interesting theory, and probably makes more sense than simply "men are smarter than women".

I have no idea who Howard Gardner is, but this makes sense. There is intelligence and intelligence.

If you are not intelligent in the matter that I am intelligent in, then how can you measure the degree of my intelligence in that matter.

There are intelligence measures that include speed of response, and those which only depend upon acuracy. Often the difference between speed and accuracy is assumed to relate to the difference between the intelligence of being in an expertise of self, and the intelligence of Spirit and Soul. But there is no measure by which any person of their self can accurately evaluate intelligence of Soul.

So who are we kidding to place any relevance in such tests?

There is worth in testing a person's relative intelligence in a specific field of expertise necessary to perform a specific task. I must thereby assert that women are amply more intelligent than men are at being a woman, and men are amply more intelligent than women at being a man.

Also children are amply more intelligent at being children than adults are and vice versa ETC

wasalam
 
not always how about if their grandparents had no education and their parents did but didnt really care about their education and were not all that smart then maybe the child would wont a better life for his or her family and take education seriously so no its not always a genetic thing and im smarter than you because i noticed my bad grammar abd apologised for it so ha ha :p

Level of education doesnt indicate your level of intelligence. A smart non-educated person will be able to solve a lot of problems that a not so smart educated person may not be able to solve.
I noticed that you had bad grammer and i dont have bad grammer. So that makes me twice as smart as you. :D
 
Level of education doesnt indicate your level of intelligence. A smart non-educated person will be able to solve a lot of problems that a not so smart educated person may not be able to solve.
I noticed that you had bad grammer :heated: and i dont have bad grammer. So that makes me twice as smart as you. :D

talk about ur self lol hahahahahaha iv under lined it so u can see it for ur self ;D :happy: :D :giggling:
 
Intelligence can't replace guidance.

You can be very intelligent and at certain situation be blind as a bat.
 
Intelligence can't replace guidance.

You can be very intelligent and at certain situation be blind as a bat.

That is true. intelligence is relative.
Thats why the gender comparison is not effective as both genders are smart in different things
Anyway Allah swt knows best!
 
talk about ur self lol hahahahahaha iv under lined it so u can see it for ur self ;D :happy: :D :giggling:


THere is nothing wrong with my grammar in that sentence. I was talking about your other post. It makes perfect sense.
You are just reinforcing my point by pointing out a mistake thats not there :happy:
 
Welll uhhhh ummmm let's see, knowing me of course i will say men are smarter than women but no really guys i do believe that women are as intelligent as men but the problem is women use their intelect very rarely.

Fact:

Out of the 758 Noble Peace prize winners ONLY 33 are women

725:33 ----- The ratio speaks for itself :okay:
 
Level of education doesnt indicate your level of intelligence. A smart non-educated person will be able to solve a lot of problems that a not so smart educated person may not be able to solve.
I noticed that you had bad grammer and i dont have bad grammer. So that makes me twice as smart as you. :D

how can i had bad grammar i either have it or i dont:happy:

let me rewrite that sentence for you
"i noticed that you have bad grammar and i dont have bad grammar"
 
Your welcome but i think i made the title of this thread a fact, so i did do something. :p
 
no the title is sexist the scientist is a man and he is sexist and now ur backing up his theory or so called experiment u dont even know if the girls were junkies or street girls lol so infact ur being sexist :smile: :)
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top