Mr. President, don’t do it. Don’t bomb Iran!

Status
Not open for further replies.
islamirama said:
um have you been listening to your lunatic president lately? Iran is under thread becuase some moron claims that he is buidling nukes and not nuclear technology for energy only (something he has right to under UN laws).
Click to expand...

Why does Iran needs nuclear reactors for energy while Iran has one of the biggest oil resources in the world?
Personally i dont think that Iran's president and ayatollahs are so stupid to attack Israel. They must know that first of all attacking Israel means death of hundreds of thousends sunni muslims living in Israel and nearby countries. Second, Israel's reply would be crushing for the whole Iran.
But Israel cant ignore such threats from a president of another country.
Just imagine, your neighbour speaks once a month that he will kill you, and few weeks ago he bought a new rifle. Wouldnt you be careful ?
Israel has atomic weapon i dont negate it, but this country is sorrunded by hundred millions of enemies. So no wonder that they must protect themselves.
 
Aaron85 said:
Why does Iran needs nuclear reactors for energy while Iran has one of the biggest oil resources in the world?
Personally i dont think that Iran's president and ayatollahs are so stupid to attack Israel. They must know that first of all attacking Israel means death of hundreds of thousends sunni muslims living in Israel and nearby countries. Second, Israel's reply would be crushing for the whole Iran.
But Israel cant ignore such threats from a president of another country.
Just imagine, your neighbour speaks once a month that he will kill you, and few weeks ago he bought a new rifle. Wouldnt you be careful ?
Israel has atomic weapon i dont negate it, but this country is sorrunded by hundred millions of enemies. So no wonder that they must protect themselves.
Click to expand...

The Question you should be asking is why is US going to wars for israel? Why is the US a goefer for israel? the politicans at the white office don't care about it's citizens and continue to send it's troops to their deaths and continue to make this world a dangerous place for everyone, esp. americans. Got one word for you, AIPAC.... look it up, you'd be surprised as to who is running the show in DC.
 
:sl:
Cognescenti said:
...
The poor, conflicted author decries his comfortable life in the US while his "brothers and sisters" suffer. I merely offered a simple solution to his dissonance. Get the Hell out.
Click to expand...
Actually you said ''don't let the door hit you on the way out'', hence I made the comment about your being tolerant.
 
aamirsaab said:
:sl:

Actually you said ''don't let the door hit you on the way out'', hence I made the comment about your being tolerant.
Click to expand...

Oh dear. I took that to be sarcastic :-[ If you meant that literally, then it seems I owe you an apology.

Sorry about that.
 

With the name of ALLAH ( God Almighty ) -The Bestower Of Unlimited Mercy, The Continously Merciful

Salaam/ peace ;

Threat to world peace: The possibility of a US attack on Iran




Excerpts of presentation, Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference

By Prof. Peter Dale Scott

"I have been speaking in public for 60 years, but this is perhaps the most important topic I have ever spoken about."


"I want to talk about the threat to world peace, and the possibility of a US attack, possibly a nuclear attack, on Iran."




http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17926.htm



Report: IAF preparing for Iran strike:

The Israeli Air Force (IAF) has been training on long-range flights, including refueling in mid-flight, in preparation for potential strikes against Iranian nuclear targets.


http://tinyurl.com/3br38m
 
Last edited:

With the name of ALLAH ( God Almighty ) -The Bestower Of Unlimited Mercy, The Continously Merciful

Salaam/ peace ;


guyabano said:
....informationclearinghouse is also so reliable and trustful than apostates of islam.

Get it now ? :rollseyes
Click to expand...

[ don't remember if i answered to this post :-[ ]



no.

I read in an anti-Islamic site where the so-called Christian claimed that Islam allows prostituion , homo sexuality etc. Muslims will go to heaven if they abandon slaves in the streets when slaves are old etc .

These are clear lies & hatred against Islam. Unbelievable that a person can call himself follower of Christ (p) & can write lies like these.

can u give me examples where info....... site intentionally lied ? Details will be off topic , so u may start a thread --how reliable is media/ US site etc.


 
Last edited:
1. That's good that Republikkkans are finally accepting the fact that the war in iraq is a disgrace, and that we should not go to war in iran!

2. america would not do it anyways!

3. With the unpopularity Iran's president is getting, I am sure he will be out soon :)
 
However,

Israel is NOT the United States.

What will happen if Israel strikes Iran, and the US does not?

It may not matter to Iran, but it will matter a GREAT deal to the US citizen.

And if Iran strikes at the USA.......then the problem will be over.
 
Muslim Woman said:

With the name of ALLAH ( God Almighty ) -The Bestower Of Unlimited Mercy, The Continously Merciful

Salaam/ peace ;




[ don't remember if i answered to this post :-[ ]



no.

I read in an anti-Islamic site where the so-called Christian claimed that Islam allows prostituion , homo sexuality etc. Muslims will go to heaven if they abandon slaves in the streets when slaves are old etc .

These are clear lies & hatred against Islam. Unbelievable that a person can call himself follower of Christ (p) & can write lies like these.

can u give me examples where info....... site intentionally lied ? Details will be off topic , so u may start a thread --how reliable is media/ US site etc.
Click to expand...

There are no reliable news on this website. It's all just opinions but no serious journalism. Anyway, it's so blatant, that all muslims enjoy to provide theirs news on such websites as they perfectly fit theirs needs
Most just bring up infoclearlinghouse, youtube and liveleak as 'serious' sources. That make me so laugh!
 
Chiteng said:
However,

Israel is NOT the United States.

What will happen if Israel strikes Iran, and the US does not?

It may not matter to Iran, but it will matter a GREAT deal to the US citizen.

And if Iran strikes at the USA.......then the problem will be over.
Click to expand...

Or how about if Israel launches air strikes on Iran, and Iran responds with a similar attack on Israel. I can see the US spinning that as an excuse for the US to attack Iran.
 
Muslim Woman said:
yap ,sure , u will find reliable news on CNN & other mainstream media LOL





How The Presstitutes Lie To America :Jessica Lynch myth

http://www.islamicboard.com/general-chat/41741-how-presstitutes-lie-america-jessica-lynch-myth.html
Click to expand...

So the press was misinformed, and then what happened? They were informed of what actually happened and it was then reported and corrected, to me that is pretty reliable, if the press were truly unreliable they would have just said yeah whatever, that is our story and we are going with it and there would have been nothing she could have done
 
MTAFFI said:
So the press was misinformed, and then what happened? They were informed of what actually happened and it was then reported and corrected, to me that is pretty reliable, if the press were truly unreliable they would have just said yeah whatever, that is our story and we are going with it and there would have been nothing she could have done
Click to expand...

it's the way most crooks work, they deny it until they are caught red handed or proven wrong then they back track and try to say we made a "mistake" and it should be this or that. US gov't has don't thousand times during this war, and who do you think the media works for during "war"?
 
islamirama said:
it's the way most crooks work, they deny it until they are caught red handed or proven wrong then they back track and try to say we made a "mistake" and it should be this or that. US gov't has don't thousand times during this war, and who do you think the media works for during "war"?
Click to expand...

Really the media works for the government right now huh? Boy I sure wish that I could just talk openly, like the media does about the US government, about someone I worked for! Take a look at the news on a daily basis, it not only talks negatively about the US government but it also talks about what it should be doing and how it could be better! It is constantly critical of the Bush administration and has been since the beginning of this war, any chance they get to trash Bush or his campaign in Iraq they take it, so simply based on the news that is conveyed through the TV and the internet everyday your paragraph holds no weight
 
MTAFFI said:
Really the media works for the government right now huh? Boy I sure wish that I could just talk openly, like the media does about the US government, about someone I worked for! Take a look at the news on a daily basis, it not only talks negatively about the US government but it also talks about what it should be doing and how it could be better! It is constantly critical of the Bush administration and has been since the beginning of this war, any chance they get to trash Bush or his campaign in Iraq they take it, so simply based on the news that is conveyed through the TV and the internet everyday your paragraph holds no weight
Click to expand...

The Office of Censorship, an emergency wartime agency, heavily censored reporting during World War II. On December 19, 1941 Roosevelt signed Executive Order 8985, which established the Office of Censorship and conferred on its director the power to censor international communications in "his absolute discretion." Byron Price was selected as the Director of Censorship. However, the censorship was not limited to reporting. "Every letter that crossed international or U.S. territorial borders from December 1941 to August 1945 was subject to being opened and scoured for details."[1] Since that time war censorship had been relatively light until the advent of the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars. In January of 1991, a few weeks before the U.S.-led UN invasion of Iraq during the presidency of George H. W. Bush, Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney had the Pentagon issue a ban on media coverage of returning war casualties.[citation needed]
Several past controversies were the failed attempt to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War and the daily televising of the Iran Hostage Crisis by the national broadcast media, that is believed to have led to the re-election loss of Jimmy Carter in 1980.


http://www.answers.com/topic/censorship-in-the-united-states

Concern grows over media 'censorship'

Media Control

book about journalism, the media, and government control of information during wartime


What little criticism you see of bush is nothing compared to the dirty secretes and warcrimes of US in iraq is being hidden.

-------------------------------

Top 25 Censored Stories of 2006​

#1 Bush Administration Moves to Eliminate Open Government
#3 Another Year of Distorted Election Coverage
#4 Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In
#5 U.S. Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia
#6 The Real Oil for Food Scam
#7 Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood
#8 Iraqi Farmers Threatened By Bremer’s Mandates
#9 Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency
#10 Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy
#11 Universal Mental Screening Program Usurps Parental Rights
#12 Military in Iraq Contracts Human Rights Violators
#13 Rich Countries Fail to Live up to Global Pledges
#14 Corporations Win Big on Tort Reform, Justice Suffers
#15 Conservative Plan to Override Academic Freedom in the Classroom
#16 U.S. Plans for Hemispheric Integration Include Canada
#17 U.S. Uses South American Military Bases to Expand Control of the Region
#18 Little Known Stock Fraud Could Weaken U.S. Economy
#19 Child Wards of the State Used in AIDS Experiments
#20 American Indians Sue for Resources; Compensation Provided to Others
#21 New Immigration Plan Favors Business Over People
#22 Nanotechnology Offers Exciting Possibilities But Health Effects Need Scrutiny
#23 Plight of Palestinian Child Detainees Highlights Global Problem
#24 Ethiopian Indigenous Victims of Corporate and Government Resource Aspirations
#25 Homeland Security Was Designed to Fail

-----------------

Big Media Refuses to Report this Basic Fact: Attacking Iraq Violates International Law

http://www.representativepress.org/ViolatingInternationalLaw.html
 
Last edited:
islamirama said:
The Office of Censorship, an emergency wartime agency, heavily censored reporting during World War II. On December 19, 1941 Roosevelt signed Executive Order 8985, which established the Office of Censorship and conferred on its director the power to censor international communications in "his absolute discretion." Byron Price was selected as the Director of Censorship. However, the censorship was not limited to reporting. "Every letter that crossed international or U.S. territorial borders from December 1941 to August 1945 was subject to being opened and scoured for details."[1] Since that time war censorship had been relatively light until the advent of the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars. In January of 1991, a few weeks before the U.S.-led UN invasion of Iraq during the presidency of George H. W. Bush, Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney had the Pentagon issue a ban on media coverage of returning war casualties.[citation needed]
Several past controversies were the failed attempt to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War and the daily televising of the Iran Hostage Crisis by the national broadcast media, that is believed to have led to the re-election loss of Jimmy Carter in 1980.


http://www.answers.com/topic/censorship-in-the-united-states

Concern grows over media 'censorship'

Media Control

book about journalism, the media, and government control of information during wartime


What little criticism you see of bush is nothing compared to the dirty secretes and warcrimes of US in iraq is being hidden.

-------------------------------

Top 25 Censored Stories of 2006​

#1 Bush Administration Moves to Eliminate Open Government
#3 Another Year of Distorted Election Coverage
#4 Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In
#5 U.S. Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia
#6 The Real Oil for Food Scam
#7 Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood
#8 Iraqi Farmers Threatened By Bremer’s Mandates
#9 Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency
#10 Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy
#11 Universal Mental Screening Program Usurps Parental Rights
#12 Military in Iraq Contracts Human Rights Violators
#13 Rich Countries Fail to Live up to Global Pledges
#14 Corporations Win Big on Tort Reform, Justice Suffers
#15 Conservative Plan to Override Academic Freedom in the Classroom
#16 U.S. Plans for Hemispheric Integration Include Canada
#17 U.S. Uses South American Military Bases to Expand Control of the Region
#18 Little Known Stock Fraud Could Weaken U.S. Economy
#19 Child Wards of the State Used in AIDS Experiments
#20 American Indians Sue for Resources; Compensation Provided to Others
#21 New Immigration Plan Favors Business Over People
#22 Nanotechnology Offers Exciting Possibilities But Health Effects Need Scrutiny
#23 Plight of Palestinian Child Detainees Highlights Global Problem
#24 Ethiopian Indigenous Victims of Corporate and Government Resource Aspirations
#25 Homeland Security Was Designed to Fail

-----------------

Big Media Refuses to Report this Basic Fact: Attacking Iraq Violates International Law

http://www.representativepress.org/ViolatingInternationalLaw.html
Click to expand...


WOW it is amazing how you can seem to find all of this censored information but the media is not able to?!?! Funny also how media that is not governed by the US also does not report this?! Oh yes, and perhaps you would like to be more specific on the international law that prevents the US of being able to declare war on Iraq (which by the way is no longer an actual war on Iraq, our Army is serving the elected Iraqi government and the people who elected it AT ITS REQUEST by attempting to provide security to its people) Maybe you should make some phone calls and alert everyone of this....... they may just think you are a crackpot though
 
islamirama said:
The Office of Censorship, an emergency wartime agency, heavily censored reporting during World War II. On December 19, 1941 Roosevelt signed Executive Order 8985, which established the Office of Censorship and conferred on its director the power to censor international communications in "his absolute discretion." Byron Price was selected as the Director of Censorship. However, the censorship was not limited to reporting. "Every letter that crossed international or U.S. territorial borders from December 1941 to August 1945 was subject to being opened and scoured for details."[1] Since that time war censorship had been relatively light until the advent of the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars. In January of 1991, a few weeks before the U.S.-led UN invasion of Iraq during the presidency of George H. W. Bush, Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney had the Pentagon issue a ban on media coverage of returning war casualties.[citation needed]
Several past controversies were the failed attempt to prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War and the daily televising of the Iran Hostage Crisis by the national broadcast media, that is believed to have led to the re-election loss of Jimmy Carter in 1980.


http://www.answers.com/topic/censorship-in-the-united-states

Concern grows over media 'censorship'

Media Control

book about journalism, the media, and government control of information during wartime


What little criticism you see of bush is nothing compared to the dirty secretes and warcrimes of US in iraq is being hidden.

-------------------------------

Top 25 Censored Stories of 2006​

#1 Bush Administration Moves to Eliminate Open Government
#3 Another Year of Distorted Election Coverage
#4 Surveillance Society Quietly Moves In
#5 U.S. Uses Tsunami to Military Advantage in Southeast Asia
#6 The Real Oil for Food Scam
#7 Journalists Face Unprecedented Dangers to Life and Livelihood
#8 Iraqi Farmers Threatened By Bremer’s Mandates
#9 Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency
#10 Mountaintop Removal Threatens Ecosystem and Economy
#11 Universal Mental Screening Program Usurps Parental Rights
#12 Military in Iraq Contracts Human Rights Violators
#13 Rich Countries Fail to Live up to Global Pledges
#14 Corporations Win Big on Tort Reform, Justice Suffers
#15 Conservative Plan to Override Academic Freedom in the Classroom
#16 U.S. Plans for Hemispheric Integration Include Canada
#17 U.S. Uses South American Military Bases to Expand Control of the Region
#18 Little Known Stock Fraud Could Weaken U.S. Economy
#19 Child Wards of the State Used in AIDS Experiments
#20 American Indians Sue for Resources; Compensation Provided to Others
#21 New Immigration Plan Favors Business Over People
#22 Nanotechnology Offers Exciting Possibilities But Health Effects Need Scrutiny
#23 Plight of Palestinian Child Detainees Highlights Global Problem
#24 Ethiopian Indigenous Victims of Corporate and Government Resource Aspirations
#25 Homeland Security Was Designed to Fail

-----------------

Big Media Refuses to Report this Basic Fact: Attacking Iraq Violates International Law

http://www.representativepress.org/ViolatingInternationalLaw.html
Click to expand...


WOW it is amazing how you can seem to find all of this censored information but the media is not able to?!?! Funny also how media that is not governed by the US also does not report this?! Oh yes, and perhaps you would like to be more specific on the international law that prevents the US of being able to declare war on Iraq (which by the way is no longer an actual war on Iraq, our Army is serving the elected Iraqi government and the people who elected it AT ITS REQUEST by attempting to provide security to its people, perhaps that is why the media doesnt report it) Maybe you should make some phone calls and alert everyone of this....... they may just think you are a crackpot though
 
:sl:

MTAFFI said:
.. our Army is serving the elected Iraqi government and the people
Click to expand...

a very funny joke :) ....thanks for sharing :D

now ,pl. no more off topic discussion . Pl. start a new thread on Role / responsibilities of media




Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran:

U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama suggested Friday that the United States one day might have to launch surgical missile strikes into Iran and Pakistan to keep extremists from getting control of nuclear bombs.




http://tinyurl.com/yawtm2

===

Bolton: I'm 'very worried' for Israel:

Sanctions and diplomacy have failed and it may be too late for internal opposition to oust the Islamist regime, leaving only military intervention to stop Iran's drive to nuclear weapons, the US's former ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday



http://tinyurl.com/2yy2oc

===

In a world gone crazy:

Congress Votes to Send Iran President Before U.N. Court :

Today the House of Representatives passed H. Con.Res.21, a resolution that pressures the United Nations Security Council to charge Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on Genocide and the United Nations Charter because of his alleged calls for the destruction of Israel.


http://campaignsandelections.com/oh/releases/index.cfm?ID=1328

===
 
Muslim Woman said:
:sl:



a very funny joke :) ....thanks for sharing :D

now ,pl. no more off topic discussion . Pl. start a new thread on Role / responsibilities of media




Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran:

U.S. Senate candidate Barack Obama suggested Friday that the United States one day might have to launch surgical missile strikes into Iran and Pakistan to keep extremists from getting control of nuclear bombs.




http://tinyurl.com/yawtm2

===

Bolton: I'm 'very worried' for Israel:

Sanctions and diplomacy have failed and it may be too late for internal opposition to oust the Islamist regime, leaving only military intervention to stop Iran's drive to nuclear weapons, the US's former ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday



http://tinyurl.com/2yy2oc

===

In a world gone crazy:

Congress Votes to Send Iran President Before U.N. Court :

Today the House of Representatives passed H. Con.Res.21, a resolution that pressures the United Nations Security Council to charge Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on Genocide and the United Nations Charter because of his alleged calls for the destruction of Israel.


http://campaignsandelections.com/oh/releases/index.cfm?ID=1328

===
Click to expand...

If Obama wants to be president he has to be ready to shoot missiles at anybody...comes with the job.

As for Bolton being worried for Israel, that seems a logical reaction. Iran is producing nuclear technology and the Iranian president has threatened Israel with destruction.

As for the congressional vote, it is symbolic. They do stuff like that all the time. Keeps them from voting on important legislation...like immigration.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top