IbnAbdulHakim
IB Addict
- Messages
- 16,476
- Reaction score
- 2,628
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
huh why? LOL. jus now?? :X
yes i scanned through his posts and cant seem to find why it could be :?
huh why? LOL. jus now?? :X
What will it take for you to break down?
Is it surprising that they see Russians and Russians as the ones to kill.
Not relevant
If they have "gone psycho" as you put it, then they are "psycho" and they should be locked up. How a danger to society comes to be is not relevant to the fact that it needs to be neutralized. If people seriously want to tear apart innocent Russian civilians, they need to be locked up, plain and simple. That or destroyed.
And again with your straw man. Why do you keep insisting on this? Who here has said that attrocities done to muslims are any less sickening? You seem to want to paint everybody as evil. Perhaps to justify a bigotry you care not to admit?
What can i say. The difference in muslim and nonmuslim lives became even more apparent after Beslan.
Esp. in the west.
If western leaders invite Putin to meet and discuss with, why are they so disgusted with the "terrorists" in Beslan? Why is there still more discussion on the 200 non-muslim kids in beslan than the 40,000 muslim kids in chechnya?
As for whose to blame for these guys being power - i would have thought the answer obvious: the nations that elected them.
Because the up-close butchery of innocent children, much of it captured on video, tends to have more impact than a news article on a statistical number of civilians killed in Chechnya. That is the cold hard reality of the situation. Plus, Putin and Bush were good friends at one time. They aren't anymore. However, the U.S. is in a tough position politically with Russia. Putin has done a good job at painting all the Chechen fighters as terrorists, and obviously Beslan cemented that description for everyone. If the U.S. criticizes Russia for fighting an enemy capable of butchering schoolchildren huddled in a gym, Russia would accuse the U.S. of being hypocritical on the issue. If Beslan hadn't happened, there would have been more avenues to pursue politically.
Because the up-close butchery of innocent children, much of it captured on video, tends to have more impact than a news article on a statistical number of civilians killed in Chechnya. That is the cold hard reality of the situation. Plus, Putin and Bush were good friends at one time. They aren't anymore. However, the U.S. is in a tough position politically with Russia. Putin has done a good job at painting all the Chechen fighters as terrorists, and obviously Beslan cemented that description for everyone. If the U.S. criticizes Russia for fighting an enemy capable of butchering schoolchildren huddled in a gym, Russia would accuse the U.S. of being hypocritical on the issue. If Beslan hadn't happened, there would have been more avenues to pursue politically.
already answered that before
all political ways to stop the slaughter of the chechen people were dead - the international community either support putin or gave its silent approval as to what he was doing
chechens didnt lose anyting in beslan since they didnt have anything in the first place - no world support, muslim or non-muslim (apart from afghanistan).
If i am to believe what you say, then i must assume all non-muslims are so fickle that they think 200 dead kids is worse than 40,000 dead kids simply because the former "happened on the telly" and the latter didnt
i cant begin to tell you how idiotic that is
you guys arent really inspiring me with confidence here:rollseyes
It isn't that hard to understand. Watching bloody naked children running out of a burning building and screaming parents holding their dead child in their arms has more impact if one can see the images and hear the screams. There is nothing "idiotic" about that reality, it is human nature.
It isn't that hard to understand. Watching bloody naked children running out of a burning building and screaming parents holding their dead child in their arms has more impact if one can see the images and hear the screams. There is nothing "idiotic" about that reality, it is human nature.
If you really think that someone has gone through war and has seen things that haunt him he should be locked up? Why don't we lock up all the mentally retarded people
If i am to believe what you say, then i must assume all non-muslims are so fickle that they think 200 dead kids is worse than 40,000 dead kids simply because the former "happened on the telly" and the latter didnt
We do, when they are a danger to society. This is no different.
''Hypocrisy'',''friend''? An odd choice of words. I have not given any demonstration of hypocrisy. Please point out where. ''Friend''? You and I are definitely not friends. I would never befriend a person that openly supports murdering children.your hypocrisy has been exposed my friend
if im glorifying the murder of children, then what about americans, israelis and russians who VOTED their leaders in to continue killing Muslim children - these whole nations are therefore child-killers by nature lool - they should all be wiped out, right?????![]()
What have they got to do with our conversation? I'm pretty sure neither you or I are from these countries. And it wouldn't matter. The "what about them" arguement does not make it ok for you.then what about americans, israelis and russians
No, that's rediculous. Most people don't vote. And the ones that do are not voting to kill muslims. In any of the countries you named, people vote based on domestic issues. Taxes, economy, social programs, and also mixed in foreign policy.these whole nations are therefore child-killers by nature
not worth anymore response than this.they should all be wiped out, right?????
We have not yet discussed in depth the killing of other children, be it muslim or non-muslim. So at this point your accusation of hypocrisy is baseless.of course as i say your evident hypocrisy on the difference between muslim and non-muslim children causes you only too bark like a dog when its non-muslim children being killed
Yeah Shamil said that he thought that like any normal human being Putin would go negotiate if he used children but he was shocked when Putin just ordered to attack the building without taking a second to think the situation through. Putin showed the whole world he didn't care about anyone's lives not even of his own people. Shamil was 100% sure that Putin would negotiate like the Russians had done in Budenyvosk but at the end it just turned out how he never suspected it would happen.
The Chechens have always been seen as evil. Even by most of their "muslim" brothers. Nothing has changed. And I still can't manage to understand how we who have been oppressed for 400 years, have gone through all sorts of torture, have lost 300 000 people among them 50 000 children for these last 12 years only, 80% of our country has been destroyed and at the end WE are the evil ones??
I have never seen this. Personally, I don't think chechens are evil. I know two chechens (related to one) that are wonderful. Not evil.The Chechens have always been seen as evil.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.