The opinion that I had that there is a nationalistic element in Islam. And even you seem to be abiding by this Pan-Islamism. I don't understand what the problem is. It is a generalization, but not without truth.
I refer to this statement made in your OP:
For example, Muslims often speak out against the atrocities of war against Pakistan, Syria and other such Islamic countries. But by they same token, that don't seem to speak out against evils in the world that don't effect the Muslim world.
Which I have explained to be a generalisation of all muslims, and for which I have already given examples as evidence against it.
With regards to the brotherhood of muslims (which is a seperate issue), I have also provided you clear references for this - what do you still not understand?
Well in that case Muslims should not move into secular societies and should remain in Islamic states. If I move from the US to lets say Iran, it is a given that I have to abide by the law of the place, if not I could be legally prosecuted against. Simple. I am not expecting muslims to shed their belief systems. But the least that they can do is abide by the law and not come in conflict with it. Especially given that most secular systems are built to allow most amount of freedom to the individual. And if at all there are laws that muslims don't agree with, they should engage in debate and discussion and not blatant violation of it.
There are christians, jews, hindus and guess what - even atheists who do not 'abide by the law' and 'come in conflict with it'.
What is your point?
Whatever example you may hold of the above - is certainly not from the teachings of Islam.
Again, you have chosen to take isolated incidents and generalise it to the entire community of muslims as not 'abiding to the law'.
Why do you not look at the other 99% of muslims who DO abide to the law - while still maintaining their Islamic identity?
But muslims seem to live in their own deluded world forcing their belief systems onto others. Lets say if my mother was to move to Saudi Arabia, for whatever she can't drive there. If she did try to break the law, she'd be punished. If Muslims expect such laws to be enacted in secular countries, they are very mistaken.
The world is spacious enough for all of us.
If you chose not to abide by the laws of a specific country, then move on elsewhere - and this applies to all of us, including muslims.
Firstly, he is not my creator. He doesn't exist. And believe me, apart from the lack of evidence for god, I still went ahead and read many holy books Including the Old testament, the new testament the quran, bhagavat gita, The Upanishads, the guru granth sahib and a few other religious texts. The Quran would easily place first as the most oppressive, violence encouraging and fundamentalism inducing peace of text.
Its amazing - the same piece of text, read by millions (no, billions) across the world, is the source of peace, brotherhood, love for mankind and equality irrespective of race.
Its the reason why Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world, because of the realisation of its beautiful teachings.
I will leave you with this verse from the Holy Quraan:
“Verily, Allah is not ashamed to set forth a parable even of a mosquito or what is smaller than it.
And as for those who believe, they know that it is the truth from their Lord, but as for those who disbelieve, they say: “What did Allah intend by this parable”
By it He misleads many, and many He guides thereby. And He misleads thereby only the Fasiqin (the rebellious, disobedient to Allah)” (2:26).
I hope we have been sufficiently able to answer your queries.
And if not, then do know - 'Somethings are true, whether you believe it or not'.
All the best with your journey of knowledge.
Peace