Muslims converting to Christianity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Draco
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 464
  • Views Views 49K
I personally have only minor problems with God coming in human form, the main one being, it's a bit easy for a standard run-of-the-mill non-divine human to claim they are God. I work in psychiatry and hear it evry day.

The bit I wonder about is, If God decided to appear in human form in order not to freak people out by appearing as a fifty headed cat or something , quite clearly supernatural, then why did he go to all the fuss and bother of being born conventionally. Why wait 27 years before jumping up and saying "Hey everyone, I'm actually God, i was just keeping me head down for a bit, but nows the time to come clean!"
Why not just appear on the mountaintops, glowing a bit and appearing simultaniously to the Israelites, The Romans , The Gauls and the Native Americans and Inuits, so that everyone got his message, was in no doubts and could get on with praising him and making the world nice.

Total Public Relations muck up.
 
as much as I have come to be annoyed with your posts, I almost choked on my food and fell of the chair reading this one. :lol:
 
First, I know of no place in the Bible where that exact phrase is used to refer to Jesus. But, perhaps you are referring to this passage:




I suspect you will consider the answer just as "messed up", but it makes perfect sense to me. (So, maybe I am messed up to, though that would be no news to my wife.)

Anyway, you must recall that Jesus is both fully God and fully man. 100% of each, possessing two natures in his one person. In his time on earth, Jesus lives a very ordinary human life. Scripture tells us in Philippians 2 that he gave up his divine perogative, the Greek behind it basically says that he "emptied himself" of his divine attributes and took on human form, humbling himself, "taking the very nature of a servant" (Phil. 2:7). This is part of what I already mentioned regarding Jesus having two natures. He didn't lose his divine nature in doing this, but he operated strictly as a human being. All the power of God that we see in Jesus' life to do miracles comes, not from his divine nature, but from the fact that he is living completely in the Father's will and is blessed by the Spirit's presence in his life. So, he prays to the Father. This is not Jesus praying to himself. Also we see that he does not have knowledge of the end times, because this is not something known to him, but is knowledge held only by the Father. I would go so far as to say that as a human being, Jesus had no special knowledge about science, history, or geography beyond that of any other 1st century Palestinian carpenter. What he did know was that he knew God. And I don't mean that he knew about God either, I mean that he knew God, had an intimate connection because he himself is part of the God-head. And that, as Muslims often misconstrue, is not an associating of partners with God. It is recognizing that, though only one being, God is a uniquely a plural-singular being.

Speaking not for Keltoi, but for myself alone. I can live with the term. But I wish that Catholics didn't use it, because I think it leads to other people misunderstanding and thinking that they are really talking about God having a mother as if a progenitor. Of course, God has no progenitor. But the term "Mother of God" sounds like one. I much prefer the more technical term "theoktos" meaning "God bearer", because Mary did carry Jesus around in the womb for 9 months and in that sense bore God. But God didn't need Aary to come into being, God already existed long before Mary and in fact created her, not the other way around. And I think that the term "Mother of God" leads to confusion on that point.

:sl:

Greetings of Peace Gene,

looking at the 2 posts above, they seem to be in contradiction. IF Jesus, being God, divested himself of ALL divine attributes, then according to this logic, Mary bore no God at all in her womb, but strictly a human being! therefore the term "mother of God should NOT be used at all! unless we are being less than frank about him "emtying himself of his divine attributes!"

THIS, you can ask your better than "average Christians" about! i'd love to hear THEIR response!!

:w:
 
Grace Seeker said:
God is a uniquely a plural-singular being.

What the ....? The statement is a mess and a nonsense. The plural-singular thing (whatever that is!) cannot exist. Not in ones mind, not in reality.
 
Me too, and I hope that some Christian will answer barney's questions! :hmm:
Why did Allah choose to reveal himself in some Godforsaken sandy peninsula just 1400 years ago? Why didn't he just open the skies and said Hey, people! Yeah, I am your God, worship me, etc, etc. It would surely make things a lot easier; all people would realize the truth, islamic state would be formed in no time, there would be virtually no disbelievers...
 
Yeah...Can they?

Well if a Muslim can provide evidence which you both agree upon as being evidence and then show that this leaves no other probable conclusion other than his source being accurate then he/she has hit the jack pot.

Well, for a Jew Judaism is the best faith, for a muslim Islam is the best faith. The same goes for most religions...To me religions are pretty much the same in terms of bestness. I like Islam for its significant amount of book-miracles, I like Christianity for its charm, personal human-God relationship and slightly less significant amount of book miracles.
Now, I don't even know what crietria can be used to detrmine the strenght/bestness/rightness of religions. Book miracles? The chram? The feeling? Why should only one religion be the right one? what if the actual god wanted to have many? Who are we, people, to know God? Etc, etc... etc?

Wel this is where one becomes objective.

I mean those questions are interesting, we cannot comprehend God, but if we both agree to the supposition that God is Just, then we will agree that he will communicate in ways which are comprehensible and would not hold us account for matters which we did not understand.

With that said, it is then possible to provide certain criteria, right? Its a path you'd have to take. There's an article I read a while back, I'm gonna try put it up on my user page, written by an ex Christian on this topic, Two Requirements of the True Religion, To Aid Those Ready to Make a Desicion.

Eesa
 
Well if a Muslim can provide evidence which you both agree upon as being evidence and then show that this leaves no other probable conclusion other than his source being accurate then he/she has hit the jack pot.
Are you talking about the Quran?
What I wanted is some other, reliable historical source that could prove Moses believed in islamic concepts not mentioned in the Torah. And I kinda thought you were gonna provide biblical evidence, as you always do.:sunny:
Wel this is where one becomes objective.

I mean those questions are interesting, we cannot comprehend God, but if we both agree to the supposition that God is Just, then we will agree that he will communicate in ways which are comprehensible and would not hold us account for matters which we did not understand.

With that said, it is then possible to provide certain criteria, right? Its a path you'd have to take. There's an article I read a while back, I'm gonna try put it up on my user page, written by an ex Christian on this topic, Two Requirements of the True Religion, To Aid Those Ready to Make a Desicion.

Eesa
In my opinion, god, if it exists, is not particulary just...just look at the world around you... And if it were just, in my opinion, it would reveal in a completely obvious way, in a way that would allow everyone, regardless of tehir previous religion, their psychological state, their culture, their charachter etc, to realize the "truth".

I don't find a couple of dubious verses that happen to have paralels with modern science (and are found in all sacred writings) to be eveidence of anything. Nor a few interesting number repetitions or codes, (which are found in all religions). And claims about Quran having no mistakes...I don't buy them. It has less mitakes than the Bible, which (to a non believer) only shows that Mohammed planned it carefully. That doesn't eman there are no mistakes. There are and can eb found on many sites. Sure, you explained them, interpretated them, add something about Arabic being required to understand it... Just like in Christianity. A Bible believeing christian will be able to explain and justify all suppossed contradictions and mistakes. they will use hebrew or greek. They even have evidence for creationism and against evolution...

Belief always finds a way.:peace:

PS: I'm not in the mood to argue about the Quran. And even if I did it probably woudn't change my opinion. I guess Allah sealed my heart or whatever muslims say..
However, I would appreciate your answer on the Moses question.:)
 
Last edited:
Are you talking about the Quran?
What I wanted is some other, reliable historical source that could prove Moses believed in islamic concepts not mentioned in the Torah. And I kinda thought you were gonna provide biblical evidence, as you always do.:sunny:

In my opinion, god, if it exists, is not particulary just...just look at the world around you... And if it were just, in my opinion, it would reveal in a completely obvious way, in a way that would allow everyone, regardless of tehir previous religion, their psychological state, their culture, their charachter etc, to realize the "truth".


I don't find a couple of dubious verses that happen to have paralels with modern science (and are found in all sacred writings) to be eveidence of anything. Nor a few interesting number repetitions or codes, (which are found in all religions). And claims about Quran having no mistakes...I don't buy them. It has less mitakes than the Bible, which (to a non believer) only shows that Mohammed planned it carefully. That doesn't eman there are no mistakes. There are and can eb found on many sites. Sure, you explained them, interpretated them, add something about Arabic being required to understand it... Just like in Christianity. A Bible believeing christian will be able to explain and justify all suppossed contradictions and mistakes. they will use hebrew or greek. They even have evidence for creationism and against evolution...

Belief always finds a way.:peace:

PS: I'm not in the mood to argue about the Quran. And even if I did it probably woudn't change my opinion. I guess Allah sealed my heart or whatever muslims say..
However, I would appreciate your answer on the Moses question.:)

Why did Allah choose to reveal himself in some Godforsaken sandy peninsula just 1400 years ago? Why didn't he just open the skies and said Hey, people! Yeah, I am your God, worship me, etc, etc. It would surely make things a lot easier; all people would realize the truth, islamic state would be formed in no time, there would be virtually no disbelievers...

:sl:

looking at these 2 points, lets see what would be "logical" for Allah subhannahu wa ta' aala or not.

right now, there are more than 5 Billion people on the planet. they are born live and die at different times. how many times would "God have to say: Hey, people! Yeah, I am your God, worship me, etc, etc.???" this process would have to be repeated ad naseum in order for ALL PEOPLE to ALWAYS know!

wouldn't it make more sense to convey ALL of the MESSAGE gradually until it's finished and THEN guarantee that the ORIGINAL MESSAGE REMAINS UNCORRUPTED? BTW, Muslims USE the original Arabic Qur'an, Christians don't use the original ARAMAIC Gospel now do they. in fact their original is in Greek, even though it's possible that Jesus nevered used a single word of Greek in his life!

they say that when you pay for something you get more use out of it, if we can all SEE & HEAR God, faith wouldn't be required. today, FAITH IS REQUIRED! BUT NOT FORCED!

regarding Moses, simply compare the 10 commandements and Sharia!

:w:
 
Are you talking about the Quran?
What I wanted is some other, reliable historical source that could prove Moses believed in islamic concepts not mentioned in the Torah. And I kinda thought you were gonna provide biblical evidence, as you always do.:sunny:

Well no, I would not believe in Moses through a historical source, but through a source which I deem to be reliable. I guess you don't, so the next step would be to agree on that, if ever possible.

In my opinion, god, if it exists, is not particulary just...just look at the world around you... And if it were just, in my opinion, it would reveal in a completely obvious way, in a way that would allow everyone, regardless of tehir previous religion, their psychological state, their culture, their charachter etc, to realize the "truth".

I want you to be objective though, what it feels like you are doing, I might be wrong, is saying that since my perception of this world is that it is unjust it indicates that God is not alive or not just.

The key part being our perception. Imagine you manufactured a new item for cleaning your teeth, it was perfect for the job. But someone came along and said, 'nah, this cannot be something designed by someone, its junk, I mean how could I use this as a door stop!'

What am trying to potray in the above example is that the second person judged the amount of work gone into to make your product through his view. His view being flawed.

We would need, being objective, to take into account different possabilities for God's plan of the earth and also take into account any information which he might have that we don't. Sometimes a family friend does something we deem stupid, but only until we are told some extra information that we realise that this friend done the right thing.

I understand your point on allowing everyone to see the truth, but what is the point in that? Let us speculate, would the point be so that they can make their desicion? I think we'd need another thread to speak on this matter.

Islam does teach we have free choice, and this is what we are to be judged upon, the choices we make within the peramaters we are given and not why we didnt make another path.

I don't find a couple of dubious verses that happen to have paralels with modern science (and are found in all sacred writings) to be eveidence of anything. Nor a few interesting number repetitions or codes, (which are found in all religions). And claims about Quran having no mistakes...I don't buy them. It has less mitakes than the Bible, which (to a non believer) only shows that Mohammed planned it carefully. That doesn't eman there are no mistakes. There are and can eb found on many sites. Sure, you explained them, interpretated them, add something about Arabic being required to understand it... Just like in Christianity. A Bible believeing christian will be able to explain and justify all suppossed contradictions and mistakes. they will use hebrew or greek. They even have evidence for creationism and against evolution...

Have you systematically looked at this, assessing all the actual evidence and then the possible interpretations of those, stacked those against the different interpretations of other evidences.

I would find a repetition in a book written before a time where such could be checked easily, which fits into the text nicely, which was not mentioned for a long time after the writing of the book (maybe indicating that people did not know about it) etc. to be pretty interesting.

But more interesting what would be the good of such a 'miracle'

Further you mention about mistakes in religions, I do agree, alot of muslims and christians talk about mistakes in each other's books, but we have to again be reasonable, interpret the evidence in the most probable way.

It takes time and sacrafise but hey it's worth it. :peace:

Belief always finds a way.:peace:

PS: I'm not in the mood to argue about the Quran. And even if I did it probably woudn't change my opinion. I guess Allah sealed my heart or whatever muslims say..
However, I would appreciate your answer on the Moses question.:)

I wouldn't argue much either, only if it felt genuine.

I hope the answer to Moses has happend? I am rather long winded sometimes.
 
:sl:

looking at these 2 points, lets see what would be "logical" for Allah subhannahu wa ta' aala or not.

right now, there are more than 5 Billion people on the planet. they are born live and die at different times. how many times would "God have to say: Hey, people! Yeah, I am your God, worship me, etc, etc.???" this process would have to be repeated ad naseum in order for ALL PEOPLE to ALWAYS know!

wouldn't it make more sense to convey ALL of the MESSAGE gradually until it's finished and THEN guarantee that the ORIGINAL MESSAGE REMAINS UNCORRUPTED? BTW, Muslims USE the original Arabic Qur'an, Christians don't use the original ARAMAIC Gospel now do they. in fact their original is in Greek, even though it's possible that Jesus nevered used a single word of Greek in his life!

they say that when you pay for something you get more use out of it, if we can all SEE & HEAR God, faith wouldn't be required. today, FAITH IS REQUIRED! BUT NOT FORCED!
How come muslims are so confident about "proving" Quran is the word of God?
If I were god, I'd have a constant relationship with my creation. I'd be there for everyone who needed me, I'd answer questions etc.
I don't know why God(who does not have needs) wants people's confirmation. Why does he want people to believe in some semi-convincing book...
Proving Christianity wrong does not prove Islam!

regarding Moses, simply compare the 10 commandements and Sharia!

:w:[/QUOT
Lol, I need to write this one down.:D
 
I personally believe that the Comforter in John refers to Prophet Muhammad (saaws).

John 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he shall guide you into all the truth: for he shall not speak from himself; but what things soever he shall hear, [these] shall he speak: and he shall declare unto you the things that are to come.

When did the Holy Spirit ever speak to humankind? If the Holy Spirit did speak and if it is fully God just like Jesus (as) and the Father are fully God (Christian concept of Trinity), why would it "not speak from himself, but what things soever he shall hear"? Wouldn't the Holy Spirit know and be able to "speak from himself"?
Could the Spirit of Truth/Comforter/Counselor in John refer to the Angel Jibrael?
 
I would find a repetition in a book written before a time where such could be checked easily, which fits into the text nicely, which was not mentioned for a long time after the writing of the book (maybe indicating that people did not know about it) etc. to be pretty interesting.

But more interesting what would be the good of such a 'miracle'

Further you mention about mistakes in religions, I do agree, alot of muslims and christians talk about mistakes in each other's books, but we have to again be reasonable, interpret the evidence in the most probable way.
I think the word repetition in Quran is intentional. Tree equals plant, day equals night etc etc. Mohammed probably added this as a peculiarity for devout readers or something like that . As for the actual "miracles", such as land-water ratio or the thing with human chromosomes, I think those are coincidences which are bound to be found in a book that size.
And I'm not really sure Islamic sites can be trusted. Some of them intentionally exaggerate, use false data, make up scientists and universities...they intentionaly mislead people into beliveng in yet another "miracle. I guess most schoalrs and sites are truthful, but some people don't know how to tell them apart and blindly believe them and their convinving techniques.
 
I think the word repetition in Quran is intentional. Tree equals plant, day equals night etc etc. Mohammed probably added this as a peculiarity for devout readers or something like that . As for the actual "miracles", such as land-water ratio or the thing with human chromosomes, I think those are coincidences which are bound to be found in a book that size.
And I'm not really sure Islamic sites can be trusted. Some of them intentionally exaggerate, use false data, make up scientists and universities...they intentionaly mislead people into beliveng in yet another "miracle. I guess most schoalrs and sites are truthful, but some people don't know how to tell them apart and blindly believe them and their convinving techniques.

muhammad didn't write the qur'an.
 
muhammad didn't write the qur'an.
That's what they say...:D
Even if he didn't, he had people who wrote it down for him and who could read it to him, so he could perfect it.
Mohammad's illiteracy is based on a weak tradition. I think there is even evidence in the Quran/Sunnah he could read and write.
 
muhammad didn't write the qur'an.
I seem to reacall that once there was a thread by one of LIstaff, stating that "any one misrepresnting themselves would be removed and barred from this site" or words to that effect

now look at the profile of ths person which states Way of Life: Agnostic

and all he ever does is spout from trinitarian Bible

what does it it take take to spot these inconsistencies? .........
 
Now, now, I'm not a christian. If I were, I would never claim to be an agnsotic...that's apostacy.:muddlehea
I quote the Bible because because muslims quote it all the time...and I like annoying people - in a christian forum I quoted the Quran and its supposed miracles...got banned for it once.:shade:
 
'whatisthepoint' might be on to something that was lost to all historians through out the ages..
you know the same way 'witch doctors' have cures for diabetes, HTN and pancreatic cancer, that are lost to all the folks at Harvard med!...

I say if you have proof and not alot of bluff bring it forth-- we haven't been entertained here for a while!

cheers!
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top