Oh Syria the victory is coming


Down with the **** Bashar and all who support him and all who are like him!
 
you think the lack of water and electricity have nothing to do with the u.s sanctions respected sis?
weren't they "saving iraq from saddam" with similar sanctions while starving over a million children to death?
did it not later become crystal clear that it was nothing to do with saddam but everything to do with installing bases in the heart of the middle east in order to be able to attack any nation who opposed the zionists at a moment's notice?

who do you think controls policy in the u.s? the americans or the rothschild banker controlled zionist lobby?
 
Last edited:




sis, they can't continue to invade Muslim countries the way they have been without muddying the waters and making it look like a "muslim" uprising.

they'd have a full blown anti American insurgency worldwide.

instead we now have british french and us military bases in lybia - a proxy recolonization.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/167578.html

even worse - they are now comfortably continuing their war on Islam against all the Muslims of neighboring countries from there with drone bases:

The website Algeria ISP reports (citing unnamed "Arab" sources) Dec. 11 that the US and France have jointly established a secret drone base in the Libyan desert, near the area of Katroune. Craft from the secret base are allegedly flying missions to Niger, Mali and Mauritania, with the ostensible objective of seeking out Saharan arms trafficking networks of al-Qeada in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Algeria has reportedly refused to allow the drones to fly through its territory.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28165
 
Last edited:
All the more reason for the people to revolt against their puppet regime. What would you rather have them do? go back into their houses and die like cowards? or die like martyrs?
The U.S is indeed tightening its grip on every country in the middle east however:

[FONT=Verdana,arial]
Allatheena amanoo yuqatiloona fee sabeeli Allahi waallatheena kafaroo yuqatiloona fee sabeeli alttaghooti faqatiloo awliyaa alshshaytani inna kayda alshshaytani kana daAAeefan​
4:76 Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan: feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan.

indeed the cunning of Satan is feeble.. The fear has been broken and there's a chain reaction. I am hopeful that with it will come khilafah but sooner or later khilafah will come whether forced or naturally evolving ..
​
[/FONT]
 
do you really think that assad suddenly woke up one morning and decided to start shooting civilians in order to destabilize the country or could it be possible that the zionist conrolled ngo's and press kicked into action?
i am no supporter of baathist Assad, but i sure as hell am no supporter of bush, blair, cameron obama sharon or netanyahu.
and i would sooner ally on common cause with assad in order to fend off these wolves with the mutual understanding that i would then settle my dispute with him in whatever way necessary.
 
Last edited:
His citizens woke up one day deciding they didn't want him and he didn't take it well. He's a 3ilawi they're a crazy assed ta'efa. Aside from their loyalty to Israel they hate Muslims. He has his entire air-force composed of those like him for exactly such a reason he has no problem killing them for to them they're kaffirs in his eyes. Be that as it may whether his orders come from Israel or Timbuktu what leader no matter how meek and enfeebled turns his guns on his own citizens? isn't it all the more reasons for folks to revolt against him? I think it is time we stopped blaming the cockroach Zionists for all our woes for they too are crapping their pants with these out of control revolts.
 
supporting the zionists?
are you sure sister?
because i was sure i saw the western lamestream media showing a troll in syria holding up a banner asking for zionist banker controlled and financed nato to enter.

During United States–brokered negotiations in 1999–2000, Israel and Syria discussed a peace deal that would include Israeli withdrawal in return for a comprehensive peace structure, recognition and full normalization of relations. The disagreement in the final stages of the talks was on access to the Sea of Galilee. Israel offered to withdraw to the pre-1948 border (the 1923 Paulet-Newcombe line), while Syria insisted on the 1967 frontier. The former line has never been recognised by Syria, claiming it was imposed by the colonial powers, while the latter was rejected by Israel as the result of Syrian aggression. The difference between the lines is less than 100 m for the most part, but the 1967 line would give Syria access to the Sea of Galilee, and Israel wished to retain control of the Sea of Galilee, its only freshwater lake and a major water resource.[SUP][99][/SUP]
In late 2003, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said he was ready to revive peace talks with Israel.
Israel demanded Syria first disarm Hezbollah, which launched many attacks on northern Israeli towns and army posts from Lebanese territory, and cease to host militant Palestinian groups and their headquarters.
Talks were not initiated.
 
Ghazalah said:
Brother Hamza, I'm not arguing that there is a western mix in all of these uprising, there is no Khalifah, or Sharia at the end, that's a point I'm not disputing. But re-read you first point.



^^That's what I disagree with. You obviously haven't been following matters from day one then, nor have you met people who have been in the midst of it all. More of an armchair view I'd say, inshAllah khayr, I'm not the one to argue and I don't see why we should be debating on this.

May Allah swt hasten the day when Islam rules the world and the Muslims are reunited under one banner. Ameen.
Click to expand...

Sister yours is also an arm chair view. Which government in this world would let rebels be armed by foreign influences and then allow them to take over towns or citys? Its very easy to sit on our arm chairs and watch a few video clips of civilian casualties and start cursing the government troops but this is a civil war started by the rebels and NO government or even shariah would ever sit there and say " oh let them get on with it". Come on sis wake up and see the bigger picture. This is a civil war and in this case the rebels were set up by and have the full backing of tge west and media. Why? Because this is part of a wider plan.

Why didnt the west back Yemeni rebels? In fact the west attacked the Yemeni rebels (also killing Al Awlaki) claiming they were part of "Al Qaeda". They did not intervene when the Yemeni government "attacked its people". Why didnt they back Bahraini rebels? In fact they are helping the Bahraini government to supress them by sending in Saudi troops. Why didnt they help Jordanian uprising?

Hmm they seem to pick and choose which uprising and rebels they back. Simply because they are all puppets of the west and in fact Saudi has a very good undercover relationship with Israel. But Asad is a friend of Iran. The west and Israel cannot have that. They need to take out any regime which will come to Irans aid. Syria also has a lot of historical significance and is a very strategic location for the west and zionist regime. To good to let go of this opportunity.

So support the intervention if you like because you will in fact be supporting a Syria which will descend into chaos and have Us bases and a zionist/western led puppet government like in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. Where you will have daily lootings, bombings, chaos and destabilisation, aswell as far more civilian deaths.
 
Who Am I? said:
Of COURSE it's another Western plot, just like the Libyan Civil War was. But the USA can't or won't openly support the rebellion because there is no oil in Syria, and the US public is tired of long wars in the Muslim world.

Russia and China don't care. They both have a history of human rights violations anyway, so it's no surprise that they would turn a blind eye to the actions of another dictator brutalizing his own people.

The big winner here if Assad is eventually ousted will be Turkey. Turkey has envied the European nations for a long time, and with the Syrian regime gone, their own power and influence in the region will increase. Iran of course will be the big loser. With Assad gone, Iran's biggest ally is removed.
Click to expand...


USA isn't tired of war infact, it has passed the NDAA bill(kind of martial law) and his warmongering against Iran is starting to get nasty.

Anyway, if syria is gone another enemy of israel will be removed. and Iran without ally, will end up in a bloody war..again.

Doesn't mean that syria and iran are innocent, the world elite controlls all politics and government, don't believe those decievers.
 
Last edited:
:sl:

As Muslims all that is expected from us is to do what is within our means, the rest; we are asked to put our trust in Allah swt. Don't we all believe all that happens in the universe is according to Allah's Will and Plan? All that is taking place in the mid-east is happening according to a Plan, a calculated, strategic, tactical plan. And it is not the plan of the u.s. or isreal, rather it is the Plan of the Best of Planners. If there are some opportunists who are trying to manipulate the honest aspirations of these Muslims to their own advantage, then that shouldn't surprise us. They will do their worst, but that must not change our intentions, our primary objective should be to support the people's aspirations. For in the end if we are true Believers, we are never to rely on our own efforts, tactics or decisions, but rather we must always fully rely on Allah swt, our Protector.

If we are uncertain us to what lies beyond these uncertain times, then know surely, they too are indeed more uncertain, more frightened and have far more to lose.


إِنَّ كَيْدَ الشَّيْطَانِ كَانَ ضَعِيفًا
 
Al-Mufarridun said:
If we are uncertain us to what lies beyond these uncertain times, then know surely, they too are indeed more uncertain, more frightened and have far more to lose.


إِنَّ كَيْدَ الشَّيْطَانِ كَانَ ضَعِيفًا
Click to expand...

nice post, and yes, Allah is the best of planners, but we gotta do our part in supporting what is right and choose the best course perceivable, and if it's to remove one dictator and install an even worse one, i see no point. since this dictator was protecting the Muslim borders, and a western backed one is unlikely to.

and if they aren't striving for khilafah and rule of Allah, why destabilize it and support another kafir uprising which will again reject the rule of the Quran and sunnah?

.......therefore fear not men, but fear me, and sell not my signs for a miserable price.
If any do fail to judge by what Allah hath revealed, they are in truth disbelievers.
Quran 5:44
 
I completely agree with you Akhee, that we must be very careful and do our best to handle these situations with the best possible manner. This is the way of our Sunnah. The Prophet(pbuh) was very keen on gathering information regarding the enemies of Allah. Once the Prophet(pbuh) established the Islamic state in Madinah, He begun sending out expeditions, reconnaissance patrols. We must also be more optimistic than pessimistic. I was just reading an piece on libya that the Islamic groups have begun to establish a new Party that is predicted to be the strongest.

I truly don't give the kufar that much credit, that they are behind all these uprisings. I sincerely believe that most of these uprisings are honest expressions of the people, I do agree that they are trying to highjack it, manipulate it, divert it, but beneath all that is an Idea whose time has come. No doubt there are some within our midst that have the same interests as shaydan and the kufar but that too isn't something new. I'm certain they are not the majority, not even close. Change comes with challenges and risks, but it also comes with opportunities. All Dunya-life is but opportunities mixed with difficulties. Alhamdulillah, the Ummah wants Islam, and Insha'Allah they'll have it, yes it will not be an easy road, unless Allah swt wills it to be. Allah knows what tomorrow will bring, all we need is to remain optimistic, do our best and to never be inactive and feel overwhelmed.

Insha'Allah I pray that Allah guides us all to the straight path, the path that leads to his mercy and forgiveness. Ameen

Allah swt knows best!
 
yeah Everyone loves bashar Al'Asad hahahaha..;D;D;D
my name is talking tina and you'd better be nice to me


I am curious bro. ABZ what it is you liked about the above video?
 

<span style="font-family: Courier New;"><font color="DarkSlateGray"><font size="3">


this is how your brothers and sisters are living in Syria.. these are the western instated rebels.. Please wake up!
 
I never said that i liked him in the first place (was it btw directed to me? lol :hiding:)
In my opinion all politics and governments are just a bunch of decievers, especially during this time.
 
Jedi_Mindset said:
I never said that i liked him in the first place (was it btw directed to me? lol :hiding:)
In my opinion all politics and governments are just a bunch of decievers, especially during this time.
Click to expand...

Yep. I have no use for politicians of any party. They're all crooks and liars, and part of the vast conspiracy.
 
Bashar's religious army.. you love 3ilawis surely they're keeping the Israeli at bay.. yeah.. well done!

 
Who Am I? said:
Yep. I have no use for politicians of any party. They're all crooks and liars, and part of the vast conspiracy.
Click to expand...

All just marionettes who get orders from above, (the real world rulers banker families)
 
Last edited:
ßlµêßêll said:
I am curious bro. ABZ what it is you liked about the above video?
Click to expand...

i liked the way the bbc reporter cringed, and the fact that they are "all of a sudden concerned about the people in Syria" doesn't wash.
i do not prefer Assad over an Islamic state.
but i am fully aware that they are picking and choosing to target every single government that opposed them after the "war on terror".
these countries were on the pentagon "hit list" after bush's "either with us or with the "terrorists"" speech.
interesting how they didn't forbid eric prince from going and setting up mercenaries in uae and didn't stir up trouble in all the puppet arab states.
but trouble somehow stirred up in the ones that opposed them.
i would have expected the opposite after what happened in iraq.



Wednesday's demonstration was intended to show that Assad still enjoys the support of many Syrians.
The gathering was huge in comparison with frequent, almost daily anti-regime protests across the country since March which are often met by tear gas and gunfire from police and security forces.

notice how usa today resorts to conspiracy theories but never say such things about the massacre of the whole city fallujah in Iraq.
or about the staged saddam statue toppling celebrations.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2011-10-12/syria-rally/50741316/1
don't get me wrong, i see this as a step in Allah's plan, and the arming of the Arabs :thumbs_up those weapons will come in use in future InshaAllah.
but i sure as hell won't fall for bbc, cnn and fox news coverage, they've proved their hidden agenda so much that when they tell me the sky is blue, i'll pause a moment to wonder if it might be red.
do you see the coverage of all the innocent people the hated libyan puppet ntc murdered on the news every day?
or questions about the events on 9/11?
yet so quick to call anything that doesn't support their agenda "staged", "conspiracy", "barbaric".

lol i can just imagine their coverage if the people in the us or britain took out ak 47's and began shooting at cops, there'd be bodies all over the place.
they were about to impose curfews and release the army on the youth in britain for throwing bricks and looting shops.
and the media was calling them criminals and vagabonds.
 
Last edited:

Similar Threads

Back
Top