Osama Bin Laden has been killed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rabi Mansur
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 544
  • Views Views 84K
Status
Not open for further replies.
thequietone said:
for all the torture vids she's watched, she cannot stomach this...ridiculous Condoleeza rice had more guts
Click to expand...


she had some satay pig tongue and was holding back a big belch...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see a photo of a green toy gun does that mean there were children there? imsad

pls. remove the photo it is disrespectful to them .. even if these pigs enjoy the kill and their over sadomasochism we shouldn't be along the same lines.. we've been refined by our religion!

:w:
 
Sheikh's 13 year old daughter was present in the compound and witnessed the killings. But she was safe alhamdulillah.

ukhti, I think the photos should stay, there is no way I am disrespecting them. It is part of life, and death comes in many different ways.
 
Yeah there was a photo of the helicopter tail too (which they say doesn't look like any currently in use). I'm sure they use top technology but a failure rate of 50% isn't great.

I think it's obvious they had no intention of capturing him. At least 4 people shot dead, 1 injured, and all of them unarmed :S

They've changed the story on the news again too. Yesterday it was reported he was shot twice in the head and today it's one shot in the head and one in the chest. Either way if you shoot someone twice in the head, or in the chest then head, you're not really considering taking them in alive (or taking every care to avoid casualties as was reported).
 
Last edited:
How can a country act like nomad tribe and kill its enemy without judging or showing his justice before aggrieved ones ? What kind of a Government try to play some animated scenarios without thinking new generated communication lines ? Either be Christian or Muslim, You have too much reason to hate US Government. I see a tragedy putting forward the savageness in front of billions.
 
Last edited:
blah blah blah.. blah blah blah... blah blah blah.. blah blah blah.. blah blah blah... blah blah blah .. blah blah blah.. blah blah blah... blah blah blah .. blah blah blah.. blah blah blah... blah blah blah .. blah blah blah.. blah blah blah... blah blah blah
Click to expand...

Are you 10 years old?

I think it's obvious they had no intention of capturing him.
Click to expand...

I believe you are correct.

They've changed the story on the news again too. Yesterday it was reported he was shot twice in the head and today it's one shot in the head and one in the chest. Either way if you shoot someone twice in the head, or in the chest then head, you're not really considering taking them in alive (or taking every care to avoid casualties as was reported).
Click to expand...

For one thing they have never really said they had much of an intention to capture him. If he showed any kind of resistance at all they were going to kill him.

And they haven't really changed their story, as you have multiple government officials (none of whom were there) who got their information third or fourth hand at best trying to answer questions from reporters. Unless you are hearing news from a source that is first hand or that has seen the official report with their own eyes then assume that they may have some of the facts wrong. I have no doubt that, much like 9/11, there will be a lot of misinformation being printed in the first few weeks after the incident.
 
titus said:
Are you 10 years old?
Click to expand...

that is an adequate assessment of your thought process and writing style-- the reply is the most suitable to your level of expertise .. I do wish everyone else would adopt it when replying to you as well!

all the best
 
As expected, a response on the level of "I know you are but what am I". Thanks for the laugh :)
 
The person in the first picture is Sheikh Usama's son, Hamzah. He was 20 years old. may Allah accept him. Ameen
 
titus said:
For a man who issued a fatwah calling for the killing of civilians I find it disturbing that you would wish this.
Click to expand...

You must be disturbed daily because majority americans supported Bush as well as your government who regards non-american civilian lives as "collateral damage".

You need to look at the mirror first, and see what your fellow americans think on daily basis.
 
naidamar said:


You must be disturbed daily because majority americans supported Bush as well as your government who regards non-american civilian lives as "collateral damage".

You need to look at the mirror first, and see what your fellow americans think on daily basis.
Click to expand...

Indeed. Bush and his followers scared the bejeebus out of me. Now note, that doesn't make titus' point any less potent.

Just because somebody isn't an american, or just because somebody isn't a muslim, is no reason to judge them less human or their lives less important. Now, them having ordered the deaths of thousands, that just may be. I have no pitty and feel no loss for Osama. I'm glad he's dead. I don't celebrate his death but I'm glad one monster is slain. I would like to see the same justice befall Bush and Cheney. I was very disapointed in Obama when he didn't even try to hold Bush responsible for war crimes and torture.
 
Last edited:
τhε ṿαlε'ṡ lïlÿ;1434804 said:
You'd think with the kind of Ape bravado they show in Abu gharib, Gitmo, and especially in Afghanistan where they enjoy keeping civilian body parts as souvenirs that they'd jump at the opportunity of displaying the quintessential bad guy mangled and dead if for no other reason than to satisfy their sick hatred of Muslims..
Click to expand...


Sister, this kind of generalisation is not accurate and not helpful. While there are individuals from every nation and religion who will do atrocious things, it is a blind person who paints everyone with the same brush.
 
Bobiraptor said:
Sister, this kind of generalisation is not accurate and not helpful. While there are individuals from every nation and religion who will do atrocious things, it is a blind person who paints everyone with the same brush.
Click to expand...


It isn't a generalization I didn't say ALL I said 'they'.. which is quite nondescript but it does beg the question.. I have no desire to focus on ancillary things like wording that is deemed appropriate.. I'd like to know if 'they' will go after Chabad rabbi for his comment "The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle),"
or does that not qualify as instigatory hate speech?
 
Chavundur said:
That means You say directly, There is no difference between Taliban and USA.
Click to expand...

That would follow only if you are 'saying directly' that there is no difference between OBL and the seven year old the Taliban hung for allegedly 'spying'. Are you saying that?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top