Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Council

[Mustafa16]

Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Council

https://eurasiantimes.com/veto-powers-un-security-council/

114 nations and 2 observer states of the UN Gernal assembly voted to limit or end the veto power by the 5 permanent nations of the UN security council (US, Russia, China, UK, France), thus paving the way for a security council resolution on an invasion of burma, and an end to settlements in the west bank, as well as an end to other israeli apartheid policies [MENTION=9623]sister herb[/MENTION] [MENTION=16149]anatolian[/MENTION] [MENTION=282]*charisma*[/MENTION] [MENTION=20685]Hamza Asadullah[/MENTION]

- - - Updated - - -

oh, i forgot to mention, this is only in the case of "mass atrocities"

 

[sister herb]

Re: Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Counci

Well, life is not fair.

 

[anatolian]

Re: Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Counci

Do you really believe in the UN?

 

[Mustafa16]

Re: Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Counci

Do you really believe in the UN?

why not?

 

[Mustafa16]

Re: Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Counci

Well, life is not fair.

what do you mean? Isn't this good news?

 

[anatolian]

Re: Palestine, Rohingya. "Permanent five" of UN can no longer veto in Security Counci

why not?

How can a real United nations have five more important members than the others at the beginning? Its not a union of nations but a power source for these five members.