I see that you are quite frustrated as the killing of innocent civilians has no basis in Islam whatsoever, unless God Himself has designated this task to people like ISIS, which obviously is impossible. I know that Allah (swt) will not ask me why President of France did so and so, but I tell you that ISIS minded individuals will have to do a lot of answering before Allah (swt) for what they're doing....
May Allah (Swt) guide you as your understanding of Islam is incorrect. Sadly
for you killing any civilian is Qisas!
There is a huge difference between an innocent civilian and an admitted and participating shareholder with a stake in injustice in a mercenary and unjust nation.
If you claim to be a participant in a democracy, you are the boss of your leader and his actions are taken with your blessing and under your control, you will have to bear the burden and consequence of your leaders acts in such case.
I notice that that you have refused to resort to the Allah's laws and will in your constant bickering and prodding and are resorting to arrogantly speaking nonsense light an ignorant monkey taunting a lion, peace be to those who follow the guidance, i shall resort to the book of Allah and His guidance instead of wasting my time bickering with fools.
So let me get this striaght -Do you believe the organisation (Isis) that enslaves and rapes Yazidi women to be on the path of God?
I believe that the u.s government brutalized the people of Iraq and caused many of them to think diifferently from the way you think, the stories of the iraqi Muslim sisters would make any sincere Muslim want to obtain retribution from the kuffar invaders.
yazidis were given a clear and unambiguous call to repent to Allah and accept the law of God or leave, their safe and secure migration would have been facilitated had they taken the lower option of being content with kufr of God and not fearing standing before Him, it was the U.S and french governments who were guilty of keeping them on site with false stage managed acts until there was a scene from which they derived propaganda, why did they not pick them up peacefully and take them as pets before the siege?
These details have been looked at further in the relvant thread.
Do you believe the death of Alan Henning (a man that was helping the syrian refugees) to be a moral act?
If i knew exactly what Alan hemming was eally doing in the region i would be in more of a position to answer the question, there are many western mainstream media reports of some of the pasts of those claiming to be peaceful aid workers as being from zionist backgrounds which they actively sought to erase from the web after their capture, many mercenaries also use the disguise of aid workers and missionaries.
I believe it would be unjust to kill Alan hemming if was genuinely seeking to distribute food or lawful medical supplies to the people of Syria without any intended malice.
if he was a mercenary, unlawfully invading soldier or "civilian contractor" working for a mercenary firm or country that was commiting injustice and aiming to oppose Allah and his messengers and the law and will of Allah, in order to foolishly attempt to make the kufr of Allah above belief in and submission to Allah, then his crime is a capital offence.
Do you believe the killing of around a million Muslim men, women and children over the past ten years were moral acts?
Do you believe the people of Iraq should have been killed under the guise of removing Saddam Hussain for crimes he had committed as a friend, ally and active agent of the U.S government, or that those who invented and used the fabricated weapons of mass destruction lie as an excuse to kill people in iraq and used the staged false flag events of september 11 2001 to stage a totally false "war on terror" are not punishable in absence of sincere repentance?
And do you believe the murder of the 16 year old abdur Rahman al awlaki, and subsequent vover up and mass media lie that he was a 21 year old planning unlawful acts - was a moral act?
Do you believe that Muslims who want to kill citizens of a certain country by leaving it and planning attacks against it to be just? Should other countries with majority Muslim populations allow there own citizens to do the same thing?
My beliefs should be measured under the high plumbline of what is right in Allah's sight, therefore the question would go back to probe your thinking as to whether your thinking falls in line with the law and will of Allah.
Do you believe the Prophet pbuh was right to leave Mecca after suffering injustice and persecution, and do you believe that he had a right to attack the Quraish from medina,
Do you believe he (pbuh) would have attacked them while under a peace treaty and did he attack them when the truce of Hudaybiyyah was made? And what was his (pbuh) response when the kuffar of Quraish themselves broke the truce?
[/QUOTE]
Why do you love the al qeada Imam Anwar al waki so much? and no other person on the planet.
A childish and totally stupid question by an adult and lacking any positive substance, sincerity or truth requires no homour or response.
One would maybe understand the folly and coloring of the question if i responded with something like: why do you love the radical malcolm x
and no other person on the planet?
Do you believe suicide attacks in Lebanon, Yemen and most of the Muslim world are justified?
Again, what i believe and what you believe must come under the tall plumbline of Allah in order to be correct and accurate, it is not a matter of hawa and media heart-string pulling manipulation.
There is a huge difference between suicide and martyrdom, there are times when a person needs to avoid being tortured or having details of his/her group being extracted in an unlawful manner,
You would need to look at the treatises of qaradawi and ibn taymiyyah and also reflect upon the story of the boy and the king, it would be more beneficial than baiting people and causing fitnah.
It is not for a Muslim to believe in suicide or atonemenent for the sins of others by death.
Each individual is in pledge for his/her deeds and it is best therefore to Repent.
I believe both martin luther and malcolm x had some valid viewpoints in the debate below, however, none of them appeared to be the type that enjoys or condones being oppressed, I don't subscribe to racism and i applaud brother Malcolm for having corrected his stance after pilgrimage despite the amount of opposition and pushing into false paradigms that was shrewdly being practised.
