Poll: Windows or Mac?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Iceee
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 61
  • Views Views 8K

What do you prefer?

  • Total voters
    0
How Windows is boring? I use it just as tool to search and use internet.

^o)
 
Scimitar said:
on the handheld market, they are ahead of Windows, but on the home computer platform, Windows is just too big. I doubt Mac can catch up to Windows.
Click to expand...

Yes, the growth of the tablet market is pushing Microsoft into murky waters, but if the growth continues Microsoft should be worried on the business front and the domestic front. With their latest offering, the Surface, it's a shame they got caught out on false specification.
 
sister harb said:
How Windows is boring? I use it just as tool to search and use internet.

^o)
Click to expand...

As for your question I would like to try something new. I have been using windows for a very long time and it gets boring.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sister harb said:
Then use something else but also accept that some others it isn´t so important what they use for basic using of PC/Internet.

Maybe some others have more patience than you.

:coolious:
Click to expand...

Of course. We all have different tastes...speaking of taste. You should really consider replacing your gold tooth with something else. You look...toxic.
 
marwen said:
Mac = costs too much money, but doing a nice job. (TOO MUCH money !)

Linux = $0 costs (free distributions) + needs a little more computer knowledge + doing your job like a professional + encouraging open source products.

Windows = wasting money + wasting electricity + wasting time + getting dumber everyday + encouraging an exploitive company + being another blue screen of death victim (BSOD).

For me linux is the best choice.
Click to expand...

I've actually blue screened about 5 times since August last year. Should I be worried? :D don't answer that.

But I do have a few questions. How easy is it to learn linux? and can I run adobe after effects on it? I don't have a clue about OS OS (open source operating systems) did I just invent an ebbreviation? <- that wasn't a question. :D

Scimi
 
I think Apple is concentrating more on alternative markets, and are proving to be a dominating influence in those too.

Already, in mobile technology, they simply lead the way and have forced already established mobile phone manufacturers like Nokia (which sponsors the windows platform) into an existence of market place mediocrity. With the advent of applications and the ability to make them functional on mobile phones, the android and apple markets have flourished - and windows has been forced into revising it's whole market strategy, especially in relation to the failing of the windows phone platform. Despite that, Apple face stiff competition on the mobile front from other giants in multi markets, Samsung - a leading phone for the android platform.

anyway,

It does seem that each (Microsoft and Apple) have domination of their own respective markets, and show no signs of being any different at this stage.

having said all this, I would still prefer an Apple Mac beast of a home computer, over a PC, anyday. I voted wrongly, I shoulda voted Mac. *kicks self*
 
In my opinion, mac is task oriented while PC is more flexible. You can run more programs on PC and experiment but with mac, its pretty restricted. But, I guess with mac, you don't get viruses easily?
 
Scimitar said:
How easy is it to learn linux?
Click to expand...
Try Ubuntu, it's very easy and user-friendly. Just install it on a test machine, and try it from time to time, may be you'll like it. :embarrass
You don't need too much knowledge to use the graphical interface, like windows.
(In general to use linux properly you need to learn some command line basics, and a little bit of programming logic, that will help you exploit the power of linux. but it won't be hard if you have the time and the will to learn.)

Scimitar said:
and can I run adobe after effects on it?
Click to expand...
I don't think there is a linux version of Adobe After Effects (or I don't know). But there is open source alternative of Adobe AE, that you can install on linux. There is "Fusion" installable on ubuntu. I don't know if it's as good as AdobeAE.
There is also a possibility to install and use Windows programs on Ubuntu. There is a program called "wine" (haram:omg:) that you can install on ubuntu, and it gives you the possibility to install and use windows (.exe) programs. But using Windows programs on a linux system may be buggy and not "clean", and is not very recommanded.
 
:salamext:


Yasir Qadhi: My Conversion – Admitting One’s Mistake and Moving On

This is, in many ways, an awkward post for me. Admitting one's mistake is not easy to do. Claiming that one's past opinions were wrong – opinions that were defended publicly, in writing and speech, and championed for many, many years – is always a bitter pill to swallow. And this is even more difficult to do when the 'mistake' is not just one secondary matter or trivial opinion, but rather an entire framework or methodology.

But now, I am forced to make such a confession. I have given the matter great thought, and have realized there is no way forward unless I break clean of my past. And if I do so, I am not the first, nor shall I be the last, to make such a claim. Many great scholars in our tradition have gone through phases of their life, realizing later on that they followed an incorrect system in an earlier stage.

It is an open secret that there are two great traditions in our times competing with one another. Each of these two systems claims to be better and more perfect. Each one claims to be older, or more 'orthodox'. Each one claims to have large numbers of followers. Each one presents an entire methodology – a holistic framework from which all other programs of one's life should spring forth. Each one is eager for converts, critiquing the other tradition with utmost contempt (sometimes with very cheap and underhand tactics – as bloggers know all too well).

It is obvious that both of these systems cannot simultaneously be true in all that they say. One of the two MUST be the more correct and better.

For many years of my life, (in fact for ALL of the years that I have been of age), I had been an ardent follower of what I thought was the only system. As a young teenager, I never even knew that people followed other methodologies, and the first time I was exposed to the other system I truly found it incomprehensible. It seemed too difficult to follow, too 'strange' and exotic. As I grew older, and learnt more about both systems, initially my faith in my own tradition grew stronger and stronger. It is actually ironic that I wrote many works, books and treatises in its framework. In many public and private gatherings, I had defended my own preferred methodology and mocked the other.

It is true that many people tried to convert me, and initially I rebuffed them quite easily. But as these efforts increased in earnestness, and I found close friends of mine, people whom I truly looked up to, convert one by one, I felt the seeds of doubt grow within me. Perhaps my system was not the best? Perhaps the framework that I had initially been led to believe was the truest and most perfect was not actually so?

One by one, those whom I admired began to drop their 'old school' affiliations and change boat. I was truly shocked – my very foundations shaken. Eventually, not a single friend of mine who specialized in the field still remained with me in the old camp. When the final person in my circle of friends converted, it was the last straw.

So I decided to take time out of my other projects, and do some research. After all, this was not a trivial matter, it was an entire methodology of operation. Taking a deep breath putting aside all my previous prejudices, with a pure and unbiased heart, I began to read. And read, read and read. History, works of methodology, testimonies from converts, and even biographies of the founders of these schools. And that was when I realized that I had been wrong all along.

Reading the material that I read, it dawned upon me that the more orthodox of the two methodologies was NOT, in fact, my current one. Rather, it was quite clear that the other system was older, and that mine was but a cheap attempt at imitation. It was also clear to me that my own system, unlike the other one, was full of mistakes – mistakes that I had tried to ignore or brush aside, but existed nonetheless. The other system attracted all the high-profile converts; surely there was a reason for this?

In the end of the day, the evidence spoke for itself. I decided to cast aside my old prejudices, and at least try the new methodology for a while. Until one experiences certain 'realities', book knowledge alone will never be sufficient. So, gathering whatever courage I could, I went ahead and took the plunge. For a full week, I immersed myself in a new and fascinating world. I discovered matters that cannot even be expressed in words. The simplicity, elegance and profundity of it all truly blew me away. It was, in all senses of the term, a truly mystical experience compared to my previous ones.

That week is over now, and I cannot remain quite any longer. I too have converted, and this conversion must be made public. This is the truth, and it shall set me free.

I hereby renounce any affiliations I previously had with the PC, and am now a die-hard Mac fan.

http://muslimmatters.org/2009/05/18/yasir-qadhi-my-conversion-admitting-ones-mistake-and-moving-on/
Click to expand...
 
funnycomicupdatecomputerlinuxwindowsmac5-1.jpg


I don´t know about others, but that Windows one I agree 100%.

:heated:
 
^ Omw!

I thought he was speaking about madhabs the entire time! lol :hiding:
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top