Problem with Facebook

  • Thread starter Thread starter islamica
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 99
  • Views Views 25K
Nothing is hack free. Even you just leaving logging into a site with ur IP address...opens doors for hackers. Online shopping, anything with credit cards. The government has numerous ways of tracking you down and getting information on your life...FB and all. Even forums like the ones we're on currently are watched constantly.
 
hey! I never saw you complain when everyone had MySpace


just kidding


I agree with you facebook has more good than bad in it....are we strong enough to avoid the bad...if we can't its better we just refrain from it.
 
wasalaams

they are not in bed with the CIA. Stop arguing pointlessly and go do what you like, if you don't like the info on here then don't read it.

:sl:

Ah I'm certain intelligence agencies monitor all forms of social networking to gather information, with or without their permission. All sites can be hacked. When did I say that new site was in bed with the CIA?

I will argue as much as I want until I get bored or the topic is closed. :p: You can ignore my posts if you want...unless you prefer to have the last say. O____o
 
Last edited:
Facebook “Causes Syphilis”

Date: Mar 26, 2010

A researcher has claimed Facebook is connected to a rise in syphilis as it is a hotbed of casual sex, unsurprisingly something Facebook angrily denies.

Professor Peter Kelly, a public health official in northern England, found that the Teeside region he is responsible for is the area of Britain with the highest rates of Facebook and SNS usage, and asserts that their research found a link between this usage and a jump in the cases of syphilis the area is experiencing:

“Syphilis is a devastating disease. Anyone who has unprotected sex with casual partners is at high risk.

There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected with more young women being affected.

I don’t get the names of people affected, just figures, and I saw that several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites.

Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex.”

Facebook scoffs at the claims:

“The assertion that Facebook is responsible for the transmission of syphilis is ridiculous.

Facebook is no more responsible for STD transmission than newspapers responsible for bad vision.”

Rather less convincingly, they claim the site is purely a wholesome family friendly one:

“As Facebook’s more than 400 million users know, our website is not a place to meet people for casual sex – it’s a place for friends, family and co-workers to connect and share.”





Facebook 'linked to rise in syphilis'


Facebook has contributed to a resurgence in the sexually-transmitted disease syphilis, a health expert has claimed.
Published: 24 Mar 2010

Case have increased fourfold in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside, the areas of Britain where Facebook is most popular.

Professor Peter Kelly, director of public health in Teesside, claimed staff had found a link between social networking sites and the spread of the bacteria, especially among young women.

He said: “Syphilis is a devastating disease. Anyone who has unprotected sex with casual partners is at high risk.

"There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected with more young women being affected.

"I don't get the names of people affected, just figures, and I saw that several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites.

"Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex."

In Teesside there were 30 recorded cases of syphilis last year, but the true figures are expected to be much higher.

Research has shown that young people in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside were 25 per cent more likely to log onto social networking sites than those in the rest of Britain.

A Facebook spokesman said: “The assertion that Facebook is responsible for the transmission of syphilis is ridiculous. Facebook is no more responsible for STD transmission than newspapers responsible for bad vision. Today’s reports exaggerate the comments made by the professor, and ignore the difference between correlation and causation.

"As Facebook’s more than 400 million users know, our website is not a place to meet people for casual sex – it’s a place for friends, family and co-workers to connect and share.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7508945/Facebook-linked-to-rise-in-syphilis.html





Facebook: what social networking site 'is blamed for' amid syphilis claims

There are, it seems, few social ills that have not at one stage or another been blamed on Facebook.

Published: 25 Mar 2010

Since its creation in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg the site has been held responsible for everything from the breakdown of marriage to childhood obesity. Most recently, a public health official even linked social network sites to a resurgence in the sexually-transmitted disease syphilis.

Below are a few examples of the more unexpected outcomes which have been pinned on social network sites by everyone from the head of the Catholic church in Britain to University researchers.

* Facebook ‘fuels divorce’

Lawyers blamed Facebook for almost one in five of online divorce petitions, saying the social networking site, which connects old friends and allows users to make new ones online, was behind the increase increasing number of marital breakdowns and the temptation for people to cheat on their partners.

* Facebook leads ‘children to suicide’

The head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Archbishop Vincent Nichols, warned that Facebook encouraged teenagers to view friendship as a "commodity" and was leading them to suicide. It was, he argued, one of the many social networking sites that led teenagers to build "transient relationships", leaving them unable to cope when their network collapse.

* Facebook ‘killing off traditional sayings’

The social networking site was blamed for the slow death of British sayings such as “a little birdie told me” and “hold your horses”. In a survey on communication trend researchers found phrases commonly used by parents and grandparents were disappearing.

* Facebook blamed for ‘rickets surge’

Facebook has been blamed for the surge in the number of children suffering from rickets. Researchers writing in the British Medical Journal found the social networking site, and computer games had led to the disease, caused by chronic vitamin D deficiencies, which can be triggered by long periods out of natural sunlight and a poor diet, being “disturbingly common” among British children.

* Facebook ‘turning Britons into introverts’

A study from Mintel, the market research company, found more than half of adults who use sites such as Facebook admitted they spent more time chatting online than they did actually speaking to friends and family. Researchers also found users made fewer phone calls, sent fewer texts and emails, watched less television and spent less time playing computer games because of their online habit.

* Facebook ‘makes partners jealous’

University of Guelph researchers found Facebook use increased jealousy in relationships, amid greater social exchanges with friends and previous partners. They found that the more time one person spends online on the social networking site monitoring his or her partner, the more suspicious that person becomes.

* Facebook ‘challenges legal restrictions’

In the wake of the Baby P case, legal restrictions that banned the naming of Tracy Connelly, Peter’s mother and Steven Barker, her boyfriend, provoked a furious backlash on the site. Facebook campaigners challenged their right to anonymity while several sites were set up to fight for “justice for Baby P”. There were concerns that some of the groups could lead to their trial being aborted amid fears they would not get a fair hearing.

* More middle-aged people ‘learning to love’ Facebook

But despite perceived problems, Ofcom, the communications regulator, found more middle-aged people are logging on to social networking sites such as Facebook in ever larger numbers. It found the phenomenon of signing up for social networking sites had "begun to mature", with the number of 35 to 54-year-olds accessing such sites jumping by 25 per cent over the past year alone.

* Facebook makes users ‘feel unattractive’

Millions of Facebook users say they avoid uploading photos and remove their name from all pictures of them on the site because they feel too fat, old or ugly. A survey found almost one in two people admitted to leaving out pictures from their "fat days" when uploading pictures to their online profile.

* MI6 chief Sir John Sawers ‘compromised by wife’s Facebook page’

Sir John Sawers, the new head of MI6, was left exposed in a potential security breach after his wife, Lady Shelley Sawers, published intimate photographs and family details on Facebook. Sir John who became chief of the Secret Intelligence Service in November was left embarrassed after his wife's entries on the social networking site detailed where they lived and worked, who their friends were and where they spent their holidays.


[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7521035/Facebook-what-social-networking-site-is-blamed-for-amid-syphilis-claims.html[/URL]
 
Last edited:
As'Salaam Alaaykum

I agree with both sides, as they both have a point.

However, we can go on arguing on this forever and never agree, even though we've both made our points numerous of times ..

I only believe the sister posted this thread for our own benefit, the point i believe she was making were stating the dangers of fb, although this isnt only the case with fb and i'm sure we'd all agree on this. It is true that no matter how many times we bring up this topic, fb won't be closed down and even if that is the case they'll probably have some other site up and running..but we will atleast become aware of the dangers in general perhaps, and not restricting it just to fb and also others including the net as stated many times before throughout other fb threads.

However, let's not forget that there are things that have more good than bad, sometimes the good outweighs the bad and the bad outweighs the good, so either we promote it or we leave it, our personal choice, i'm sure through all these posts i've seen we're wise enough to figure this one out inshaa'Allaah ..

So anyways, I'm sure we've all made our point and with that I hope this thread can be closed.. not that i'm a mod :\
 
Last edited:
There is no need to close the thread. I"m merely posting articles to inform others, those who disagree can voice their opinions all they like.
 
In the left corner we have islamica, a staunch social networking hater who believes the root of all evil is facebook and on the right we have jazzy the light of heaven, a facebook addict.

how will this face-off end?
 
Last edited:
There is no need to close the thread. I"m merely posting articles to inform others, those who disagree can voice their opinions all they like.

Then why the offensive comment before? The one I quoted...at least dont say that if ure encouraging differing opinions.
 
Israel 'using Facebook to recruit Gaza collaborators'

By Jon Donnison - 5 April 2010

In a busy internet cafe in the centre of Gaza City, lots of people, mostly young, are typing and clicking away.

_47541187_facebook466-1.jpg


Some of them are engrossed in the world of Facebook. "I use it 10 hours a day," says Mohammed who owns the shop. "I have over 200 Facebook friends."

But Hamas, the Islamic movement that controls the Gaza Strip, believes the population's love of social networking websites is making it easier for Israel to recruit spies.

Israel has long maintained networks of informers in the West Bank and Gaza in its effort to derail the activities of militant groups.

Historically, collaborators have often been killed if discovered, and this week Hamas announced it would execute anyone caught acting as an agent for Israel.

Personal problems

Facebook "is a big, big thing that the Israelis use", says Ehab al-Hussein, a spokesman for the Hamas-run interior ministry.

"Many people don't have security sense. They go on the internet and talk about all their personal problems such as with their wives or girlfriends," he says.

Israel's intelligence services can then contact people by telephone, e-mail or using existing Israeli agents in Gaza, and use the information to pressure people to become spies.

The internet "allows them to make people feel Israel knows everything about them", says Mr Hussein.

Ronen Bergman, an Israeli expert on intelligence and author of Israel's Secret War with Iran, says monitoring social networking sites is the very minimum you would expect from his country's intelligence services.

"Israel is using the personal information that is put in massive amounts on the internet to identify the people who can maybe help Israel," he says.

"If in 50 years they open up the secret files of the Israeli secret service, the Shin Bet, and military intelligence, the sophistication of electronics that is being used by Israel now in the Gaza Strip would put even the legendary Q from the James Bond movies to shame."

But Mr Bergman says that the intelligence community's current thinking is that using personal information gleaned from the internet to pressure or even blackmail potential informants is not considered effective in recruiting long-term informants.

He says such threats are not often enough to get people to commit such a serious offence as collaborating.

But online detail, he says, can help intelligence services identify people who might be useful - such as those with good access to Hamas or to criminal networks.

When asked to comment, the Israeli government said it was not its practice to talk about its security services' modes of operation.

Phone fears

Even Mr Hussein admits he has a Facebook page, "but I'm careful about the information I put on," he says. "I only say I am a Hamas spokesman."

He is probably not the only member of Hamas communicating on Facebook and the internet.

This is partly because other forms of communication, particularly mobile phones, are easily bugged and can be used to track movements, Mr Bergman says, so the internet has become a more preferable option.

One reason Israeli intelligence is watching the social networking websites to try to identify potential informants is because a historical source of collaborators no longer exists, according to Mr Bergman.

Up until the second intifada, or Palestinian uprising, started in 2000, thousands of Gazans had permits to enter Israel each day to work.

These people had direct contact with Israelis and were sometimes approached by Israeli intelligence officers and asked to collaborate.

But these days the border is virtually sealed.

Virtually the only Palestinians allowed through are often in wheelchairs or bandaged up, seeking medical treatment in Israel.

Some of those say they've been asked for information about Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

"They asked if I knew any people in my neighbourhood who were members," says Khaled, a young man from Gaza City, who will give only his first name.

'Not safe'

He had to go to Israel to seek medical treatment after being injured in last year's conflict with Israel.

He says he did not pass on any information that the Israelis would not already have known.

But he gives an insight into how intelligence officers pressure people to become informants.

"They say that they know everything about you, but actually it's information you have already published on Facebook," he says.

"It's not safe to publish such information - I believe it allows Israel to keep watching our movements."

Last year, Israel dismissed as "simply ludicrous" allegations that its security forces had told Palestinians seeking permits to exit Gaza for medical treatment that they would only be allowed to leave if they supplied information on militant groups.


[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/8585775.stm[/URL]
 
Jazzy throws the first punch, by pointing to the fact that islamica used an offensive remark,but islamica is no fool, she put her guard up and blocked jazzy's allegations by saying its all in your mind jazzy!...its all in your mind!

jazzy, however is adamant that it was offensive and quickly throws a 'mean' left hook that catches islamica unaware, whilst she was posting the next 'FB is evil' post.
 
sorry off-topic (and to defuse the rather heated argument :)),

but Abdullaahi, your best ever ringside commentary was during the great debate between brother MustafaMC and pastor Grace Seeker.
That was without doubt the highlight of your career, you are going downhill now
:p
 
sorry off-topic (and to defuse the rather heated argument :)),

but Abdullaahi, your best ever ringside commentary was during the great debate between brother MustafaMC and pastor Grace Seeker.
That was without doubt the highlight of your career, you are going downhill now
:p

Wallahi you are true, brother can you help me retrieve all the funny posts that were deleted by the super mod...i think it was muezzin ...Allah knows best.

Im going down hill because the people have lost their ability to smile and laugh,,,but i was never a joker....i do this to alleviate stress


Remember the character 'bushy' lol
 
Last edited:
I"m merely posting articles to inform others, those who disagree can voice their opinions all they like.

Salaam,

How many articles are you going to post? I mean cannot you not do a summary and then post the sources?
 
assalam o alaikum

the debate going on here is a never ending debate and is found now a days every where around us.. its right that facebook has both good and evil sides. it may have lots and lots and lots of good but the facts the OP posted also can not be denied and here i find the purpose of this thread is to highlight the other side. So whats wrong in it? why are we arguing like this..
at the end it all comes to the users decision but for that he should be aware of both the sides..

lets keep this thread just an awareness thread for those who want to know and if any one wants to bring above the goods of FB he/she is welcomed (and if its not fine here he/she can him make a new thread for it) so that both the sides can clearly come up and will be easy for us to understand our opportunities, vastness, dangers and limits with the specific social community...
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top