Question about BBC World and its new SOUTH ASIAN OBSESSION.

[Supreme]

China is in asia, and the guy about to get is south asian

and the nigerean is muslim

China is in East Asia, not South Asia, the man was British South Asian so the story was very relevant to a British news broadcaster, and the Nigerian was Muslim, but he was African, not South Asian.

 

[Supreme]

That is true I guess but the Nigerian individual was a Muslim. The BBC does report a lot of activities that take place in the Middle East, South Asia and Muslims.

That's because South Asia and the Middle East are where most 'interesting' (ie wars and killing and terror) take place. It's either that or report on Islington's council's plans to ban cars stopping in the middle of the road outside of Arsenal's Emirates football stadium.

 

[noorseeker]

^^^^ Would you agree with me , where i get the impression they love bad news, wheter south asia or not,

When i watch the bbc or itv, i get the impression they cant wait FOR A TERROR ATTACK TO HAPPEN,

They will want to get there first , and get the exclusives like hungry dogs,.
They dont care about the people, they just want their story.

They cant wait to put john simpson on a plane .

Dont get me wrong they have to report the story, but they seem to enhusiastic.

 

[Raaina]

^^^^ Would you agree with me , where i get the impression they love bad news, wheter south asia or not,

When i watch the bbc or itv, i get the impression they cant wait FOR A TERROR ATTACK TO HAPPEN,

They will want to get there first , and get the exclusives like hungry dogs,.
They dont care about the people, they just want their story.

They cant wait to put john simpson on a plane .

Dont get me wrong they have to report the story, but they seem to enhusiastic.

Of course they can't wait for something bad to happen.

Bad news, sells more papers. More papers = More money

 

[Supreme]

^^^^ Would you agree with me , where i get the impression they love bad news, wheter south asia or not,

When i watch the bbc or itv, i get the impression they cant wait FOR A TERROR ATTACK TO HAPPEN,

They will want to get there first , and get the exclusives like hungry dogs,.
They dont care about the people, they just want their story.

They cant wait to put john simpson on a plane .

Dont get me wrong they have to report the story, but they seem to enhusiastic.

Bad news, much like sex, sells. You're rarely going to encounter a happy story that doesn't depress, because they're just not interesting. And of course the reporters don't care about the people involved. They're exposed to tragedy and murder and bad news daily, it's part of their job not to care. I suppose if they did care they might be biased.

 

[Supreme]

Of course they can't wait for something bad to happen.

Bad news, sells more papers. More papers = More money

We're talking about the BBC here, the BBC don't sell papers, neither do they accept advertising revenue.

 

[Italianguy]

Aha! An assimilation programme. The British government tried that during it's rule in India but it failed because the Anglo Saxons sent to India to inhabit and marry the natives instead became polygamous and adopted Hindu and Muslim ways.

Maybe they have reversed course and have invited South Asians to Britain to be assimilated into British/Zionist ways and to send some back to their native lands as NGO agents to convert the masses. This treacherous tactic could however backfire ...look what happened to Gandhi, he was a model assimilant to the British but he eventually woke up to their Imperialist treachery and preached passive resistance in defiance of the British.
Things seem to be going wrong for the British Neo Imperialist Order already as their worst enemies seem to be coming from within by home grown terrorists and dissidents.

I married a south Indian woman, and we're both Christian.......although i have no Britisher ties?....I'm Italian.......never mind my opinion doesn't count anywayimsad

 

[Woodrow]

We're talking about the BBC here, the BBC don't sell papers, neither do they accept advertising revenue.

I was going to disagree with you. But, I did a quick search for the annual revenue sources for the BBC and was surprised to discover they are funded by the UK government. Government funding of news media is an alien concept to me and I view it as immoral.

You are correct in your post and I found verification of your post in what I found while trying to prove they depended on advertising.

 

[noorseeker]

bro woodrow, they are funded by everyone who owns a t.v in uk

the t.v license fee, it all goes to the bbc. Because they dont have advertising

thet do waste it on as lot of things.. If you dont pay , you can get a £1000 fine

 

[Karl]

With regards to New World Order, the politicians are saying it themselves. Gordon Brown, George Bush, Tony Blair and I think Obama too.

Absolutely. And notice that they all incessantly employ that new popular expression-- "The International community". This vile expression has global socialism/communism/fascism written all over it! There is simply no such thing as "The International Community". The world consists of freestanding sovereign nations with hundreds of independently diverse communities (not to mention smaller units such as individualists who don't see themselves as fitting into ANY "community"). The "International Community" is merely an expression not for what IS, but for what the Anglo-Amercian alliance WANT (a one world government with one homogenous culture and one set of laws, Jew York being at the helm). And at the moment the phrase in actuality only really represents Britain and the USA (and sometimes with their French, German and South Korean bootlickers). The selfrighteous and arrogant USA and UK (Romeo and Juliet) try to speak on behalf of all nations, most of whom simply never give any indication of ratification to what the US and UK moot, want or do. You know, sometimes it makes me wonder why the American War of Indepenence even HAPPENED.

 

[Supreme]

a one world government with one homogenous culture and one set of laws, Jew York being at the helm

That's not what I want, and please refrain from using phrases such as 'Jew York'. I'm sure you don't mean to, but it sounds anti semitic.

And at the moment the phrase in actuality only really represents Britain and the USA (and sometimes with their French, German and South Korean bootlickers).

Not to mention Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Japan, etc...

The selfrighteous and arrogant USA and UK (Romeo and Juliet) try to speak on behalf of all nations, most of whom simply never give any indication of ratification to what the US and UK moot, want or do. You know, sometimes it makes me wonder why the American War of Indepenence even HAPPENED.

Strong relations between two powerful nations is never a bad thing. Would you rather the UK and USA were on a brink of a nuclear world war and you had to run to your shelter every five minutes?

 

[GuestFellow]

That's not what I want, and please refrain from using phrases such as 'Jew York'. I'm sure you don't mean to, but it sounds anti semitic.

I agree. I hope members will not insult those of other religions.

Absolutely. And notice that they all incessantly employ that new popular expression-- "The International community". This vile expression has global socialism/communism/fascism written all over it! There is simply no such thing as "The International Community". The world consists of freestanding sovereign nations with hundreds of independently diverse communities (not to mention smaller units such as individualists who don't see themselves as fitting into ANY "community"). The "International Community" is merely an expression not for what IS, but for what the Anglo-Amercian alliance WANT (a one world government with one homogenous culture and one set of laws, Jew York being at the helm). And at the moment the phrase in actuality only really represents Britain and the USA (and sometimes with their French, German and South Korean bootlickers). The selfrighteous and arrogant USA and UK (Romeo and Juliet) try to speak on behalf of all nations, most of whom simply never give any indication of ratification to what the US and UK moot, want or do. You know, sometimes it makes me wonder why the American War of Indepenence even HAPPENED.

Hmmm

We have the European Union, Northern American Union, African Union and some day Asian Union. The European Union is heading towards a single currency if Britain and Sweden adopt the Euro. I do see nations coming closer and closer.

The International Community consist of Western nations and those who support them. It does not fairly represent the views of other countries such as Iran or Cuba. It is a form of segregation. Those countries that do not comply with the super powers will face sanctions and threats.

From the evidence, the politicians speak of this New World order and we have 3 Unions established. The media does not speak of these Unions. These are the problems with NWO, firstly not many are aware of it, secondly the public have less control who makes decisions for them and lastly, it is too much power for a group of people representing these unions.

Can you see everything binding together....

 

[GuestFellow]

Strong relations between two powerful nations is never a bad thing. Would you rather the UK and USA were on a brink of a nuclear world war and you had to run to your shelter every five minutes?

It does become a problem when the relationship becomes too strong. America went to war with Iraq with not evidence of WMD, Britain supported America without even questioning their motives. Blindly supporting a country is dangerous.

 

[Karl]

The BBC are nothing like Fox News. Fox News is the media embodiment of Republican bias. The BBC I believe is rather liberal.

Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!

 

[JoshuaD]

Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!

Your post contains nothing more than buzzwords which you appear to have the most minimal of understanding about. Do you even know what Communism is?

 

[GuestFellow]

Your post contains nothing more than buzzwords which you appear to have the most minimal of understanding about. Do you even know what Communism is?

I'm know I'm not Karl but my understanding of Communism is...

classless political system: the political theory or system in which all property and wealth is owned in a classless society by all the members of that society.

It sounds like a nice idea but unfortunately its not practical. Just curious whats your view on Communism?

 

[JoshuaD]

Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!

Which reporters in particular were you referring to? I just looked at the list of reporters and not a single one of them is Jewish.

 

[Supreme]

Yeah liberal at being busybody global COMMIES and promulgating the mentality with obvious zeal. They ARE biased stirrers because they often insert either outright obvious or allusive criticisms of aspects of South Asian cultures. The way they report things is like they are trying to rub Asia's nose in the things that the British deem as nefarious. One only has to take a look at their unrelenting disdain for things like "child labour" which of course is NOT an inherently "bad thing" at all, even though new British and American leftist mentality insists it is. And how often does one see them systematically coming in for the kill with current affairs items that serves merely as a clever opening platform to be surreptitiously steered into directions that allow them to take stabs at Asian cultures? ALL THE TIME! How often do they open up a topic about...let's say "tea production in Sri Lanka", only for it to end up as an attack on child labour or the fact that not enough bolshy American feminism is there, therefore "women's rights" must surely be downtrodden and so all Brits, the owners of the world, have a "duty" to do something about it.

The Occidentalized Asian is one of the most absurd looking abominations I know of. Nonetheless the BBC likes to prop them up at the front of the TV screens to constitute about 8 out of every 10 reporters/news readers, kind of as puppets for a more hidden manipulator working behind the scenes. The appearance of the indigenous Anglo Saxon reporter is kept minimal so as to give the impression that British Imperialism is not on the rise again.

Fox has a different looking news reader face. Instead, conceited Jews (some with dyed blond hair to imitate Anglo Saxons) sit there arrogantly spewing out their Zionist propaganda. Fox news comes across as patent Zionist propaganda rather than "conservative". Perhaps Fox and BBC might be slightly different flavours and from slightly different backgrounds, but their New World Order agenda is pretty well the same. Same global imperialist ends, different means, slightly different backgrounds to the promulgators. The main American news corporations reflect USA's chip off the old block from it's old mother Britain. Britain's up front old empire approach has been replaced with a far more treacherous and insidious global Marxist one. God, King and Country imperialism simply replaced with imperialism of the collectivist sheeple. I am convinced that the BBC are the mouth piece representing the hell-bent ambitions of the New World Order, with of course the Anglo-American hegemony being intended as the helm of it. Red is the colour of communism and I don't think that the BBC could plaster more red on its TV screen if it wanted to!

I wanted a response, not an essay you copy and pasted from a jokes website.

 

[Muezzin]

I always thought Sky News was the British answer to Fox News...

On the other hand, if BBC World News coverage is really bothering you as a viewer, you could do a lot worse than complaining to the BBC directly.

 

[Karl]

That's not what I want, and please refrain from using phrases such as 'Jew York'. I'm sure you don't mean to, but it sounds anti semitic.


Strong relations between two powerful nations is never a bad thing. Would you rather the UK and USA were on a brink of a nuclear world war and you had to run to your shelter every five minutes?

Sorry about offending you with Jew York, I picked it up on this forum from a brother and thought it was a joke name for New York. I am not very politicaly correct so I don't have a problem using it. BTW I thought Protestants hated Jews? What about the old British inquisitions trying to rid England of Jews, also the KKK, Nazis etc. Don't get me wrong I am not anti semitic, Semites are ok by me, I do have trouble sexing them at times but that goes for a lot of Asians. LOL

UK and USA on brink of nuclear war? USA would win with nukes to spare. Everyone would say Hooray USA and have a freedom burger with extra large fries. UK is old and crusty and USA can take over the North Sea Oil. British Petroleum would be absorbed by Exxon Mobile. Surviving British insurgents will fight back but US drones will find them and they will be mopped up by US forces. Remember "might makes it right" that's the American way. With this extra conquest Americans will grow richer and more obese and have Limeys as slaves at their feet. :awesome:

And by some miraculous coincidence all the devout brothers and sisters in the UK will be attending the Hajj.