Pygoscelis
Account Disabled
- Messages
- 4,009
- Reaction score
- 358
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Atheism
The thread on End Times got me thinking about Religion and Authoritarianism.
I remember back when I was doing my undergrad (psych) we did some studies on the psychology of religion and one strong correlation we found was between Religiouslity and Authoritarianism.
This was mostly amongst a liberal christian population, with some fundamentalist christians, Jews, atheists and agnostics in the pool as well. No other groups were significantly represented (One Hindu, five Buddhists if I recall correctly and a hand ful of muslims in a subject pool of over a thousand).
We did surveys. These consistently showed the less religious to have less mainstream ideas and opinions. They wre more likely to support legal marijuana, or gun ownership (this was in Canada where most oppose it) or capital punishment (also majority opposed).
We also did various experiments to get this data, including the famous Asch experiment (show a bunch of lines, one obviously being longer, tell them the shorter one is longe, will they accept it? Will they believe it? The more religiously minded were more likely to) and the classic torturer experiment (where an authority figure tells you to punish somebody for wrongly answering questions, by giving them electrical shocks. The more religiously minded went further before refusing)
It seems to make sense to me that less religious people would be more likely to be social rogues. Less likely to be led by others and more likely to sacrifice social acceptance for their own personal convictions.
It also seems to make sense that religious folk would be authoritarian followers, as God is imagined to be the greatest authority. And it shows in the contempt that theists show atheists for not submitting to their God (for not submitting to authority as they see it).
Is this just obvious or are their other explanations? Thoughts?
I remember back when I was doing my undergrad (psych) we did some studies on the psychology of religion and one strong correlation we found was between Religiouslity and Authoritarianism.
This was mostly amongst a liberal christian population, with some fundamentalist christians, Jews, atheists and agnostics in the pool as well. No other groups were significantly represented (One Hindu, five Buddhists if I recall correctly and a hand ful of muslims in a subject pool of over a thousand).
We did surveys. These consistently showed the less religious to have less mainstream ideas and opinions. They wre more likely to support legal marijuana, or gun ownership (this was in Canada where most oppose it) or capital punishment (also majority opposed).
We also did various experiments to get this data, including the famous Asch experiment (show a bunch of lines, one obviously being longer, tell them the shorter one is longe, will they accept it? Will they believe it? The more religiously minded were more likely to) and the classic torturer experiment (where an authority figure tells you to punish somebody for wrongly answering questions, by giving them electrical shocks. The more religiously minded went further before refusing)
It seems to make sense to me that less religious people would be more likely to be social rogues. Less likely to be led by others and more likely to sacrifice social acceptance for their own personal convictions.
It also seems to make sense that religious folk would be authoritarian followers, as God is imagined to be the greatest authority. And it shows in the contempt that theists show atheists for not submitting to their God (for not submitting to authority as they see it).
Is this just obvious or are their other explanations? Thoughts?