Respected Japanese Politician questions "official" 9-11 explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Prince
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 63
  • Views Views 10K
Status
Not open for further replies.
keltoi why dont you then answer this Q, why did silverstein say they pulled building 7? meaning they took it down? lol he was ON TV SAYING IT, is that a conspiracy?

why did BBC report building 7's collapse before it even fell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Somehow I dont get it. How is it possible that muslims radicals (ben Laden and those suicide bombers from Europe) could be in alliance with CIA (The Great Satan isnt it?) And if Osama was really a CIA agent, so how is it possible that he was defended and hided by muslim radicals- talebans from Afghanistan? If he was raeally a CIA agent so why he became a hero for hundreds of muslim extremists from all over the world and Al Quaeda?

howdy, now i dont believe osama is a CIA agent, but what you say is very simple and COULD BE DONE.

this is the CIA, they are trained experts in fooling people and putting in spies and stooges....i mean the FBI has managed to infiltrate mafia groups by putting their own men in the orginizations, an example is donnie brasco, he was an FBI agent who infiltrated the mafia, he was so good he was going to be made into a 'made guy' which means an official mafia member! give him many more years and he would eventually become a leader!

now imagine the CIA, and double the years into 20 years....it could be very possible.
 
It has been quite amusing seeing these old faces coming time after time to parrot the same thing their leaders are throwing to shove down the world's throat. There's the american's version and the real version in everything.

First we had...

Ex-Italian Prime Minister says 9/11 was carried out by CIA and Mossad

and now we have Japanese parliament stating 9-11 done by bin laden is US VERSION and we don't have any evidence, we want to do our own investigation rather then believe their ASSUMPTIONS which have not been proved.

And then you have FBI, which investigates cases on a federal level have a number of things under bin laden profile but did not find any evidence on bin laden and 9-11.

I thought you were innocent until proven guilty in a democratic society?

and yet we have bush and his regime saying bin laden did it, and then they hampered any investigations from being done into the matter.

So in essence, you don't do your own investigations. You don't demand prove and evidence. You believe what we tell you. and we will wage war based on what we believe and we will force the world to believe our story. Like bush said, "you're either with us, or against us"

i guess a few blind followers want to be with the him and keep proving to us even a monkey can have followers :D

Some people are only too delighted in their ignorance.. I only find it annoying when they force feed everyone their dribble with severe rebuke and censure as if they own the boards and have unplumbed understanding of politics..
You'd think they would reach for more mature defense mechanism than readily used by fifth grade bullies.

the other guy though is a piece of work though... one vote seems to be a threat to his very manhood..
Now, how can that not be amusing?

:w:
 
It has been quite amusing seeing these old faces coming time after time to parrot the same thing their leaders are throwing to shove down the world's throat. There's the american's version and the real version in everything.

First we had...

Ex-Italian Prime Minister says 9/11 was carried out by CIA and Mossad

Umm...even if the idiot did say such a thing...you left out an important detail............he hasn't been in power since 1992. He has no insider knowledge, he has no access to intelligence. His view is no more valid than mine. I have a sneaking suspicion (call it a conspiratorial notion) that he is a Leftist with a political ax to grind.

and now we have Japanese parliament stating 9-11 done by bin laden is US VERSION and we don't have any evidence, we want to do our own investigation rather then believe their ASSUMPTIONS which have not been proved.

No you don't you perhaps have a single member of parliament who has stopped his antipsyochotic meds.

.
And then you have FBI, which investigates cases on a federal level have a number of things under bin laden profile but did not find any evidence on bin laden and 9-11. .

No you don't. It is merely omitted from his warrant (which was issued before 9-11....you...ah never mind)


So in essence, you don't do your own investigations. You don't demand prove and evidence. You believe what we tell you. and we will wage war based on what we believe and we will force the world to believe our story. Like bush said, "you're either with us, or against us"

i guess a few blind followers want to be with the him and keep proving to us even a monkey can have followers :D

What do you think that big thing with wings that flew into the WTC was, sweetheart?

This is a joke right? Y'all are having sport with us, right?
 
conge,,, why do you call the ex italian prime M an idiot?????? see folks notice how PATHETIC these neocons are, they only insult and label people......

and then you say hes a LEFTIST who has an axe to grind, the other typical neocon move! they label ppl as liberals or lefty loonies ALWAYS....

now even if he is a leftist SO WHAT? other neocon move, anyone who is a liberal or lefty is automatically bad.....notice the cheap propaganda these neocons use????????
 
tabes dorsalis?..
even if the idiot did say such a thing...you left out an important detail............he hasn't been in power since 1992.
He is past expiration date? Makes you wonder; by what token do you feel qualified to write here considering your all too frequent 'umm'

He has no insider knowledge, he has no access to intelligence. His view is no more valid than mine.
You are only half right.. any guess as to which half?


I have a sneaking suspicion (call it a conspiratorial notion) that he is a Leftist with a political ax to grind.

I have a sneaking suspicion, you have too much free time on your hand.. try to take this opportunity to fill the dorsal side of your driver's license..


cheers
 
yeah when he said they pulled building 7 down he meant they pulled weruhyewrhwirhwifhwaeifweotie4t984yut894389...... :happy:

Yeah, they cover that little conspiracy of yours too...if you actually care to look...which I doubt you will.
 
LOL yeah how conveniant he was refering to another buildin....lol wow i was even going to say that as a joke in my last comment. so FUNNY MAN.
 
LOL yeah how conveniant he was refering to another buildin....lol wow i was even going to say that as a joke in my last comment. so FUNNY MAN.

Yeah, I didn't think you would bother to read it...

Silverstein's Quote:

"I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, you know, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is just pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

-Fact which is undisputed by either side, he was talking to the fire commander

-Fact which is undisputed by either side, both are not in the demolition business

Silverstein's spokesperson, Mr. McQuillan, later clarified:

"In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building."

He could be lying, right? But here is the corroborating evidence...

"They told us to get out of there because they were worried about 7 World Trade Center, which is right behind it, coming down. We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone. We could look right out over to where the Trade Centers were because we were that high up. Looking over the smaller buildings. I just remember it was tremendous, tremendous fires going on. Finally they pulled us out. They said all right, get out of that building because that 7, they were really worried about. They pulled us out of there and then they regrouped everybody on Vesey Street, between the water and West Street. They put everybody back in there. Finally it did come down. From there - this is much later on in the day, because every day we were so worried about that building we didn't really want to get people close. They were trying to limit the amount of people that were in there. Finally it did come down." - Richard Banaciski

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/
Banaciski_Richard.txt

Here is more evidence they pulled the teams out waiting for a normal collapse from fire...

"The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/
Nigro_Daniel.txt

"Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area -- (Q. A collapse zone?) -- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed." - Chief Cruthers

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC
/Cruthers.txt

"Then we found out, I guess around 3:00 [o'clock], that they thought 7 was going to collapse. So, of course, [we've] got guys all in this pile over here and the main concern was get everybody out, and I guess it took us over an hour and a half, two hours to get everybody out of there. (Q. Initially when you were there, you had said you heard a few Maydays?) Oh, yes. We had Maydays like crazy.... The heat must have been tremendous. There was so much [expletive] fire there. This whole pile was burning like crazy. Just the heat and the smoke from all the other buildings on fire, you [couldn't] see anything. So it took us a while and we ended up backing everybody out, and [that's] when 7 collapsed.... Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse, and then we waited a while and it got a lot more organized, I would guess." - Lieutenant William Ryan

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC
/Ryan_William.txt
 
when you wanna evacuate a place you say EVACUATE, LEAVE, i aint never heard someone say pull it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the term PULL IT refers to taking buildings down, yes PULL IT means evacuate.....wow amazing answer
 
keltoi why dont you then answer this Q, why did silverstein say they pulled building 7? meaning they took it down? lol he was ON TV SAYING IT, is that a conspiracy?

why did BBC report building 7's collapse before it even fell!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

<makes groaning sound> The owner of 7 WTC was consulted about calling off firefighting activities inside the building, which had been going on for hours. The fire dept was concerned about risk to the fireman......like building collapse. He answered "pull them" as in removing the crew from danger. This is what he was talking about.....he explained this on TV too.

Of course, it could be he got a ranch in Wyoming too and his story was a cover.....wait a minute, has anyone seen this guy recently....OMG...you could just be right! :eek:

Interesting stuff about the BBC being in on it. There are another 10-20 thousand conspirators. Pretty soon there aren't going to be any ranches left in Wyoming.
 
and actually no i understood the crap you posted....when he said pull it, he meant get the fire fighters out because he feared they would die since the fire was out of control....

thats BS cause when you say evacuate a building you dont say we said PULL IT....THE TERM PULL IT OFTEN REFERS TO BUILDINGS THAT ARE MANUALLY TAKEN DOWN you dudu head.

WHAT A FREAKINGGGGGGGGGGGGGG DESPERATE ANSWER oh man.
 
silverstein said pull IT, ITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT, he didnt say pull THEM, or even pull THEM OUT.....he said PULL IT, so buddy boy your response is so crap its not even funny.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top