Saudi Arabia & witchcraft

[Skavau]

The comparison you made between a Jew returning to Nazi state and this punishment is what The vale is referring to .

Oh, I misread a word. That states the confusion then.

Yes it was a crime. According to the people of Saudi Arabia.

You have not answered my question I put to you earlier:

Why should Saudi Arabia be interfering with (or ending in this instance) the life of Lebanese man for a 'crime' (by their book) that he committed not on their soil?

Comparing North Korean dictator to the people of Saudi Arabia is hardly an intelligent analogy.

I didn't make that comparison. I stated that just as we don't accept the totalitarian quasi-theistic ideology of the 'dear leader' of North Korea that represses so many North Koreans - why should we also accept the same from Saudi Arabia?

 

[جوري]

I don't post on 'every other thread'. I'd ask you how I am commiting a non-sequitor but you refuse to anser 75% of my question. Nevertheless I will leave it open.

you ask alot of non-questions.. non-questions get no answers!

Absolutely. But all sources are indicating they extracted a 'confession' out of him with the promise of a return home back to Lebanon. All sources indicate they lied when they did that.

Who lied?

Skye, you made the claim that he did his crime with malice. I will even quote you saying this:

"If he survives this I hope it shakes others like him to think twice before interfering with the lives of others with the intent of malice!"

You have no grounds to defend this.

Why else are they persecuting him and extracting a confession? why do you need a confession for something that was already on TV? try to put two and two together you don't need a confession for something already seen by everyone? question remains what was in his confession~!

Medieval 'crimes' ought to be a thing of the past. They ought to not exist. Your statement is about as meaningful as claiming that as saying American crimes should get American punishments.

you mock the type of crime committed yet you don't know the nature of the crime but amazingly so discomfited with the punishment, exactly what are you arguing for or against?

You already have judged him. Several times.

Nope that is your own desire!

Did you read the articles?

?

Your typing mannerisms remind me of a small character in the videogame Fable 2.

your typing style reminds of a patient I started on a banana bag!

To topic: you are inconsistent with condemnations. I have seen you hold sympathy for those victims of the many humanitarian crisises within the middle-east and yet reserve no sympathy for those victims of totalitarian regimes. In this instance: You immediately seek to assume Saudi Arabian sovereignty and righteousness in this case, making false claims in the process about the Lebanese man.

This isn't a matter of 'Saudi sovereignty' it is a matter for the courts and you don't know what it true from fiction.. you merely latch on anything you in your mind deem unethical!

 

[Skavau]

go back and read what you wrote.. you can't be that drunk!

I misread a word. My apologies. In any case, I asked you to morally defend your statement that victims of repressive governments ought to just be more careful where they choose to go in future. It comes across as amoral and slightly nasty.

I chose this in the form of asking you whether you would be sympathetic to some Jews who entered Nazi Germany in the 1930's. Would you be sympathetic to them or would you suggest they be more careful where they go?

Again, he made a 'confession' we don't know if the confession included a daily horoscope .. horoscopes are given daily on TV no one has lost their head over it in KSA or anywhere else.. you remind me of that other moron Barrio who wrote a woman in KSA is being persecuted for removing her face veil while I posted for him Jeddah filled with uncovered faces.. but how amusing that you should cite articles from folks who have never even been inside KSA with the intent of inciting public outrage!
you shouldn't speak of what you do not know which is practically every other topic!

This article is based on assuming all sources on the topic are inherently deceptive.

 

[جوري]

I misread a word. My apologies. In any case, I asked you to morally defend your statement that victims of repressive governments ought to just be more careful where they choose to go in future. It comes across as amoral and slightly nasty.

I stand by it. and in fact in light of that a German nazi who is 80 + yrs old is being persecuted for his crimes committed in Germany here in the U.S.. perhaps he should have found a place more friendly to Nazis? if we are to go by your brand of morality and cordiality?

I chose this in the form of asking you whether you would be sympathetic to some Jews who entered Nazi Germany in the 1930's. Would you be sympathetic to them or would you suggest they be more careful where they go?

and I found this semblance to be an Insult .. I chose to ignore it because the cases aren't similar. you simply write as such to elicit a response should the answer be what you are hoping for.. not only have no conscious but you can't differentiate victim from crime

This article is based on assuming all sources on the topic are inherently deceptive.

I have no reason to believe the claims made therein. try to watch forensic files sometimes or crime TV see how the press and the law are in two separate lanes!

the best you can do is conjecture of things you don't understand to the very core!

 

[Woodrow]

This thread has gone on long past any benefits. Time it went to bed

:threadclo: