science proves the existence of god

  • Thread starter Thread starter sugaray21
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 67
  • Views Views 11K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you out of your mind to suggest there was a conspiracy against him ??? Some of the things you write leave me feeling like I shouldn't even bother humouring you with posts/replies :D

You always fail to see the context and always get the wrong end of the stick, its becoming a habit.

LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR WHY I POSTED THE EDIT: to prove to you that theories can take 50 years to get noticed. You want them researched, studied and presented to the worldwide audience in just a decade or less - you are deluded.

That is the bottom line.

Scimi
 
Are you out of your mind to suggest there was a conspiracy against him ???
It's fascinating how impossible you find it to deal with ideas outside your comfort zone.

LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR WHY I POSTED THE EDIT: to prove to you that theories can take 50 years to get noticed. You want them researched, studied and presented to the worldwide audience in just a decade or less - you are deluded.
Things move a little faster these days. But in any case, you're missing the point. These self-styled Creationist scientists haven't produced ANY new research worth mentioning. So it doesn't matter how long you wait. 50 years - 1000 years - whenever.

All they do is react to new science produced by others.
 
Last edited:
It's fascinating how impossible you find it to deal with ideas outside your comfort zone.
you're describing yourself here no? even actual scientists whose views don't match yours, you've to denigrate their importance.
glad you're making a career out of this charade!

best,
 
Independent, it's like you want to convince those (atheists) who don't want to be convinced of a Creator, because they actually hate the idea that there is one.

Why bother?

There are plenty of better things to do :)

Scimi
 
Independent, it's like you want to convince those (atheists) who don't want to be convinced of a Creator, because they actually hate the idea that there is one.

Why bother?
In this thread, I am responding to the original poster's request for reaction to the video. I have explained why I don't think it does what it claims (ie prove the existence of God by science). As we have drifted on to the subject of Creationist scientists, I've also explained why I don't admire them (because they have thus far contributed nothing to the advance of science, despite promising to do so). No one has offered any evidence to contradict this.

In what way is it wrong or anti-religious to make factual observations? It's not my fault if some people make false claims for science, seeing as science plays no part in any scriptures, and (in the case of Islam) was barely ever mentioned before the advent of 'Bucaiellism'.

If you or anyone else chooses to associate proof of religion with proof of science, you must accept that science may regularly throw up challenges to your faith. You should not be either surprised or angry about that. And you should not accuse random scientists of being anti religious or conspiracists, simply for doing their job.

Personally, i see zero connection between science and religion and that's what I've argued throughout.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: glo
I'm not sure where the thread is going so to avoid another repeat of earlier threads, perhaps we should end it here. If anyone has anything useful to add, they are welcome to post in the Helpdesk section or contact one of the mods.
 
Re: science proves the existence of god

When I looked at this threadtwo days ago there were more than 4 responses,admin where have the rest of them gone?
 
Re: science proves the existence of god

Salaam.

When I looked at this threadtwo days ago there were more than 4 responses,admin where have the rest of them gone?

Please read: http://www.islamicboard.com/forum-help-feedback/134323007-server-migration-forum-upgrade.html

The forum database is restored back to 10th of Feb, the date when we actually started the migration process. It took almost 3 days for the complete migration to take place. As such, we have lost all the recent posts which were made after the start of the migration process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top