Sir Usamah bin Laden

  • Thread starter Thread starter binAadam
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 47
  • Views Views 7K
Status
Not open for further replies.
We don't need to give the title "sir" to OBL, the man is above those hollow titles saved for cowards. The man is greater than a 1000 of these sirs put together. When Afghan bombing started and destruction of a nation by the kuffars,500 mothers named their borns "Osamah" to show their support for this man against the kuffargs bombing their them. Show me one "sir" or any kuffar is given that much support and honor?

I think that the difference between christians and muslims is that while 99,9 % of christians condemn Adolf Hitler, i am afraid that many muslims (too many) support Osama ben Laden.
 
adolf the Nazi catholic mason, Hitler is proven to have robbed murdered almost 5 mill plus Jewish people and many others while all that can be proven about osama is that he was a CIA fellow gone lone ranger
 
:sl:

Like Dr. Zakir Naik says, i am not on Bin Laden's side neither am i on Bush or Blair's side. Same with me i do not support either of these Groups, because i do not know the truth behind them. I have not seen Bin laden prepare the 9/11 attacks or seen him actually do it.

:w:

Osama said many times in video tapes that he did it.
 
I think that the difference between christians and muslims is that while 99,9 % of christians condemn Adolf Hitler, i am afraid that many muslims (too many) support Osama ben Laden.

Peace

that could be because as i said, many people dont know exactly who he is or what hes about. hes mysterious, hes hiding, he could be dead, or maybe alive and people dont know if hes behind what hes been accused of.
 
Okay. Legitimate discussion seems to have broken down for the most part (apart from a few people), everyone seems to be fighting.

Therefore, this thread is not constructive and will just lead to more insulting. I'm closing it.
 
And this knowledge of WWII is provided by the same American Heroes, no?

No. I'm afraid this is one instance where simplistic anti-American revisionism won't cut it.

Estimated civilian casualties alone, had an invasion of mainland Japan been necessary, were around 1.5 to 2 million. If you think an invasion of Japan might not have been necessary don't ask Americans; ask the Koreans or Chinese.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Back
Top