South America: Toward an Alternative Future

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skillganon
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 57
  • Views Views 6K
funny you should say that, as it has been said to me before, however I dont really care what anyone thinks as far as my faith goes, usually I will respond to these people with the Apostles Creed which has a line in it that specifically says "I believe in one God the father the almighty, the maker of Heaven and earth, of all that is seen and unseen". I believe in God and I have read his word, and the way I interpret it may be different from others, but it is what I believe is right.

Not only that, and I know this might spawn some controversy, but I do not really have much faith in religions. I love going to Catholic church because I like the service and the readings and homilies but as far as the "catholic" or "protestant" or "islam" or whatever goes I dont really care. We all believe in God and there is the same basic rules that we should live by, so what difference does it make if you pray in a church or mosque, or in a field for that matter. As long as you believe in God that is all that matters.

surely it should be what God wants that matters?

hence the disagreements over religion, but would you not agree it is not what you or me think that matters but what God wants for us?

hence why we have to look to scripture. are you happy with the christian scripture as a true guide to God's will?

peace be upon those who follow righteous guidence,
Abu Abdullah
 
hola MTAFFI,

i do not mean to sound mean but if you are not agreeing with the scutum fidei you are not agreeing with the Trinity... which is a very serious problem... have you talked to your priest about the Holy Trinity... ?

Dios te bendiga...

yes i have, however it is just no amount of explaining is going to convince me that Jesus was God, I mean it says in the bible he is his son, which I do believe, but I do not believe that God is the same as Jesus. Preists always tell me to pray and they will pray for me, but really I have talked to one about it in a long time because we couldnt come to any medium. He wanted me to believe one thing and from what I have read in the bible and other books I dont think Jesus was supposed to be God on Earth.
 
surely it should be what God wants that matters?

of course it is

hence the disagreements over religion, but would you not agree it is not what you or me think that matters but what God wants for us?
right

hence why we have to look to scripture. are you happy with the christian scripture as a true guide to God's will?

I dont just read the bible, I have read much of the Quran and I have read into Thaoism along with a few others, and I take what strikes me as what God meant from each of these books and apply it to my own life, or as much as any man can.

peace be with you
 
Hey, looks like we're going off-topic here a bit...and I don't want this to turn into an inter-faith discussion because they can get messy if not controlled properly. Anyways, I'll try to minimize inter-faith talk in my reply...if I can...

MTAFFI said:
skywalker

I find it intriguing that you as a Muslim think that this should be done, since as far as I know Muslims are not to try to convert people but only tell them about Islam if asked. I also find it odd because if you convert from Islam it is punishable by death according to Islamic Law, so why would you think it is OK to go around attempting to convert Catholics? Islam is for people that need answers, or at least this is how I see it, as a Catholic I honestly dont need answers, I know what is right and wrong and I know there is a God and I know I worship him.. What is so wrong with a country like SA being Catholic, the middle east is Muslim and no one goes there trying to convert people. I am not trying to be offensive, but I just think if Islamic countries can make it a law that no one can try to convert the Muslims of their countries why should Muslims be allowed to come and try to convert people of other countries, I guess it just seems like a double standard to me
Interestingly enough, there a LOT of Christian missionaries in places like Egypt, who usually target areas with low levels of education, where most people don't know jack about Islam, like the south of Egypt for example, and they build schools and churches all over the place. It doesn't seem like they're playing fair, but oh well, God knows all that they do. Islam does not work through missions or anything like that at all. We don't go door to door or anything like that, we just provide facilities for those who are interested in learning about it. We do try to reach as many people as possible with the message of Islam, but only to deliver the message. If they wish to pursue further knowledge on their own free will, we try to facilitate that as well. A lot of people these days are taking an interest in Islam because of its financial policies, and now banks all over the US and Europe are starting to incorporate Islamic Shariah in their policies. That's one way that Islam spreads, people get attracted to the logic, the justice, and the wisdom that Islam provides, and then go on to learn more about it.

MTAFFI said:
"I believe in one God the father the almighty, the maker of Heaven and earth, of all that is seen and unseen"
Wow, take out the word father and you're a Muslim bro! :D

Jayda said:
hola Skywalker (may the force be with you )
Hola amiga, may the Force be with you too :P

Jayda said:
the Church is bringing the Truth to people... not perpetuating their confusion with ambiguous messages about other possible "paths" or telling them to search all other paths that lead to nowhere first before they come back to the truth... things like other angles are illusions to try and trick people away from the truth, the Church stands as a bedrock against this...
Well Islam doesn't tell everyone to go out and do heavy exploration either, but each person should do as much exploration as they need to reach a state of conviction. For example, you could have a person who only needs to read the Qur'an to be conviced that it's the truth, while someone else would like to read the Qur'an, the Bible, the Torah, and any other religious book to be convinced that Islam is the truth. It depends on the nature of the person, but nobody should be denied the right to explore other religions, especially if a person is born into a religion that they don't feel like they belong in.

Jayda said:
and i do not think that it is necessary to become somebody else in order to understand them at least enough that you can respect them as a neighbor...
Well I never said that you need to become someone else, but it's good to see things from several points of view instead of just one. We're in the 21st century, we have the facilites, why not make use of them?

Jayda said:
because there are good things derived from questioning the Church and good things derived from examining other religions, the Church must find a way to show us how to achieve these benefits without being corrupted by the negative temptations that are associated with such examinations... this is exactly why the Church gives as you say "proper guidance" concerning these other religions... information in which temptation is filtered from it...
In other words...only their version of the truth is allowed to reach the ears of their followers, and anything else would be a sin? That's a little twisted, don't you think? Islam also gives "proper guidance" with filtered information and all that, but it also tells people to read, the educate themselves, because only though education and knowledge can a person really appreciate God's beautiful creations and only through knowing other religions can a person be truly grateful that God has guided them to Islam.

Jayda said:
i think this makes sense in terms of islam because islam really thinks of itself as a "religion" that came from God to compete against other man made "religions" ... Catholicism is called a religion because that is convenient in lingua franca, but it is not how the Church concieves of this... Christianity is a mission and a ministry continuing from Jesus time on Earth, it is a call to an entire way of life and way of thinking and it is the only true path. the Holy Church was created to protect the people of the ministry and to continue guideing them... we are following Jesus, not entering into a "religion" (like entering a club or joining a team) as the common term is used...
This is the main point that I wanted to clear up, because I don't think you have the proper understanding of what Islam is. It's not just a religion, it's a complete way of life, from etiquette, to economy, to politics, to how many gulps of water to take when drinking...there is no set of rules for life more complete or more encompassing than Islam.

Jayda said:
islam as you are explaining considers itself a religion competing with other religions and so you must explore the other religions so that comparatively islam can be comparatively more true...
Not at all, as I said before, you're not required to examine all religions to be convinced, but if you must for your own reasons, then so be it. Therefore Islam is not competing with any other religion, it doesn't need to compete, it's just one of the choices that a free-minded individual can consider when he asks himself the question, "Who am I?"

Jayda said:
i think this kind of thinking is very close to self deception... because you are exploring a confusing world of false promises in a setting of moral relativity to sort out what is comparatively best... why seek God in such a place?
Where you see self-deception I see self-enlightenment. I agree with you that going out onto the sea by yourself is dangerous, that's why I completely support guidance from your religion, but not pure indoctrination. Sometimes a person needs to see things for himself to be convinced of the truth, but as I said, different people need different levels of knowledge to achieve conviction.

As for the trinity pic...can anybody explain that to me, because logically or mathematically it makes no sense at all...

Jayda said:
my name is annette btw, i think you are new but i have not seen your greetings thread... it is very delightful talking to you.
Very nice meeting you Annette, and yeah you can check out my greeting thread in the intros forum.

If I could just mention something; you might want rephrase some of your statements like "the Church is the truth" to something along the lines of "we believe that the Church is the truth", because we are after all in an inter-faith forum, and some people might take offence. I myself have no problem with it, but it's better to be politically correct cuz you don't know how some individuals might respond to different comments. Anyways, sorry if I said anything out of line.

Adios amiga!

If I keep writing long posts like this, I'm gonna be a limited member for a very long time....grrrrr
 
MTAFFI said:
I dont just read the bible, I have read much of the Quran and I have read into Thaoism along with a few others, and I take what strikes me as what God meant from each of these books and apply it to my own life, or as much as any man can.
Nice...I like that. Go with what makes sense to you. God punishes those who know the truth and turn away from it, but for someone who tries hard to find the truth, and goes to the limit of his mental capabilities but still can't find it, I think God will forgive him, because he tried.

My advice is: don't go with what's easier, go with what makes more sense.






Yippee, I'm one step closer to getting my 50 posts!
 
hola Skywalker,

i think it is the underlying concept of the unity of the three and not the existence of the three that confuses you...

Irish_clover-3.jpg


this is a trefoil clover leaf:

the left leaflet is not the top leaflet
which is yet still not the right leaflet
which in turn is not the left leaflet

but they are one leaf... not three leaves.

Dios te bendiga
 
Last edited:
So in other words, the arrows pointing from the entities of "Father", "Son", and "Holy Spirit" to the word "GOD" should not have the word "IS" on them, but rather "Is part of"? Is that what you mean?

The Islamic idea of God is a lot more simple, and to me personally, it makes more sense. Here's a representation of God in Islam:

oneness.jpg
 
So in other words, the arrows pointing from the entities of "Father", "Son", and "Holy Spirit" to the word "GOD" should not have the word "IS" on them, but rather "Is part of"? Is that what you mean?

hola Skywalker,

not precisely, i used the clover to demonstrate how three independent things can be one organ... in reality anything that is part of God, is God... there is no such thing as seeing "a little bit of God" making it only "partially worth of worship."

God can be everywhere, even at once. since his is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient and has no restrictions (including time and space). so just like when you feel Gods presence in your life (a big promotion, a kind word, a good moral decision), even though you know he is somewhere else in the world and in heaven, you do not say "this is God, but it is merely a part of Him because I know he is also elsewhere right now." you still believe this to be the full divine diety, you are just seeing him from a certain perspective... so he is fully worthy of your praises.

likewise when we see a particular personae of the Holy Trinity, we believe that to be God... not a part of God, still recognizing that there is more of God we are not directly seeing at that time.

The Islamic idea of God is a lot more simple, and to me personally, it makes more sense. Here's a representation of God in Islam:


i think we are not talking about the same thing... issues of Gods singularity "there is one God," "there are no other gods" "there are no associations" unity "God is one" and dominion "God is over all" are not about the nature of God... Holy Trinity is about what God "looks like," what His nature is, how he is comprised.

i look at your diagram and do not disagree (except for Jinn which i do not believe exist), except when I see the big circle for God i realize that God does have a nature, does look like something and that is where my Trinity beliefs become manifested.

muchos gracias
Dios te bendiga
 
Jayda said:
not precisely, i used the clover to demonstrate how three independent things can be one organ... in reality anything that is part of God, is God...
Hola Jayda!

I don't know if I'm convinced of that logic; I mean how can a part of something BE that something? It's like saying that the leg of the chair I'm sitting on IS the chair. Of course that's not true, because if I wanted, I could cut that leg off and it would't be a part of the chair anymore, but the chair would still be a chair...but an incomplete chair. Same with the clover, if you take out one leaf, the clover is still a clover, but a leaf on it's own is just a leaf.

Jayda said:
God can be everywhere, even at once. since his is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient and has no restrictions (including time and space).
I don't know what the Islamic view on this is, so if anybody else knows more about this, I'd be glad to hear it. For me though, I don't think that God occupies all time and space at the same time. If that were the case, we would also be part of God since we are part of that space, and by your logic, anything that is part of God is God...and obviously none of us is God. I think God has the ability to occupy any and every part of space and time if and when He desires, but He doesn't because He doesn't need to. We know from the Qur'an that He has a Throne on which He sits, that is above the heavens and the earth, from which He can see every little thing that happens among His creations.

Jayda said:
i look at your diagram and do not disagree (except for Jinn which i do not believe exist), except when I see the big circle for God i realize that God does have a nature, does look like something and that is where my Trinity beliefs become manifested
The only difference is that we as Muslims see Jesus (pbuh) as one of God's prophets, hence only His creation, and the Holy Spirit as (I think, please correct me if I'm wrong) Gabriel the messenger angel, and again one of His creations. God Himself is only one part, perfect in every way. Perfection is defined by independance, so if God needs 3 parts in order to be whole, He is therefore dependant, and thus, imperfect.

By the way, are the powers of the 3 "parts of God" in your religion equal, or do some parties have more power than the rest? For example, why did "the Son" ask "the Father" to save him from the humans that were hurting him if he could've just pulled himself out of that mess?

Jayda said:
(except for Jinn which i do not believe exist)
I was always curious as to the Christian explanation of how the devil reaches so many minds at the same time if he doesn't have minions? Can you provide some info on that?

Take care amiga!
 
Last edited:
Hola Jayda!

I don't know if I'm convinced of that logic; I mean how can a part of something BE that something? It's like saying that the leg of the chair I'm sitting on IS the chair. Of course that's not true, because if I wanted, I could cut that leg off and it would't be a part of the chair anymore, but the chair would still be a chair...but an incomplete chair. Same with the clover, if you take out one leaf, the clover is still a clover, but a leaf on it's own is just a leaf.

hola Skywalker,

i think it is important to remember that the clover was used to demonstrate how three can be one (as sacred scripture and tradition says God is comprised of a Father, Son and Holy Spirit)...

after that point we must be careful in how we use allegories or allusions in describing the nature of God. we must remember that the reason for the allegory is to explain a revelation or group of revelations concerning the nature of God that is difficult to understand. the rule is look to the bible and sacred tradition for the truth or the raw information, then use allegories or demonstrations to help explain these things or better understand them.

sacred Scripture and Tradition also tell us that God is eternal, which of course means he cannot be destroyed or come to an end, the very idea of this is impossible. therefore discussing the ability to destroy a clover by separating a trefoil from it, or a chair by cutting off a leg cannot possibly still be describing God since we know he cannot be destroyed.

so it is best to remember that allegories are not meant to elaborate lessons upon basic already revealed truths... we cannot turn these allegories into the truths themselves.


I don't know what the Islamic view on this is, so if anybody else knows more about this, I'd be glad to hear it. For me though, I don't think that God occupies all time and space at the same time. If that were the case, we would also be part of God since we are part of that space, and by your logic, anything that is part of God is God...and obviously none of us is God. I think God has the ability to occupy any and every part of space and time if and when He desires, but He doesn't because He doesn't need to. We know from the Qur'an that He has a Throne on which He sits, that is above the heavens and the earth, from which He can see every little thing that happens among His creations.

in Christianity God is supreme, has the ability to transcend time and space and in certain situations which have been directly revealed to us, he does just this.

the image of a Zeus-like deity literally sitting upon a throne as an image of power just as humans do, commanding his soldiers against the anti-god Satan who likewise sits upon a throne and commands his soldiers against God goes against what we have been taught from God about God. i hear these things and cannot help but see that this is God made in Man's image...

He is active in the affairs of people, chooses to dwell in our hearts to guide us (through the Holy Spirit), chooses to incarnate Himself to (among other things) show us how we are meant to follow Him, and chooses to be in heaven, and all at the same time should he choose to (and the sacred tradition and scriptures tell us that he does this).

a muslim told me that muslims believe God is in Heaven, christians believe God is everywhere, and hindus believe God is everything... i think i agree...

The only difference is that we as Muslims see Jesus (pbuh) as one of God's prophets, hence only His creation, and the Holy Spirit as (I think, please correct me if I'm wrong) Gabriel the messenger angel, and again one of His creations. God Himself is only one part, perfect in every way. Perfection is defined by independance, so if God needs 3 parts in order to be whole, He is therefore dependant, and thus, imperfect.

God does not need to be triune... God is triune... questions concerning why He decided to be as He is are not things we can answer because they are not revealed to us... the nature of God is only given to us in shades directly through revelation.

i think from what you said muslims do not have a difficulty with God being triune, rather their difficulty is that we identify Jesus, whom you consider to be a mere man, and the Holy Spirit, which you misidentify as an angel, to be part of God yes?

but you must recognize that it is not our belief that Jesus was a mere man or the angel Gabriel is the Holy Spirit. we believe Jesus had two natures, man and divine and that the Holy Spirit is also a divine person of the Trinity. we believe this because scripture and tradition revealed these things to us.

By the way, are the powers of the 3 "parts of God" in your religion equal, or do some parties have more power than the rest? For example, why did "the Son" ask "the Father" to save him from the humans that were hurting him if he could've just pulled himself out of that mess?

I was always curious as to the Christian explanation of how the devil reaches so many minds at the same time if he doesn't have minions? Can you provide some info on that?

Take care amiga!

we do believe Diablo has servants, who are fellow fallen angels as he is. however we do believe he is a pure spirit and therefore is more powerful than we are, so he is responsible for tempting us and trying to draw us into sin. we do not know why God allows this, we know that He does allow Diablo to continue to exist, will punish Diablo and the other fallen angels on judgment day, and that He has reasons for this.

we do not believe in Jinn. Jinn according to the muslims i have talked to are creatures created from smoke that have entire civilizations here on earth, and we cannot see them, and just like humans they have freewill and follow prophets and God and will have a judgment day...

this does not exist in Christianity, i do not think i have heard of this in anything other than arabic religions... genies and things like this...

in Christianity God created angels to serve Him, and Man to serve Him on Earth, but Man was made differently and is special Man can choose God or Evil... then there are the cursed ones who are angels, but have rebelled and therefore no longer can be called angelos (messenger), but are of the same substance as angels (pure spirit) and of the same origin... they have sinfully chosen to rebel against God.

if you have any questions i think it is best to look at the Roman Catholic Catechism.

this explains in extreme depth everything we must believe, in the form of the apostles creed ("i believe in God the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth...") broken down into sections which is very helpful...

Dios te bendiga
 
Last edited:
Hola hola!

i think it is important to remember that the clover was used to demonstrate how three can be one
Actually it demonstrates that three can be a part of one, not that they can be one.

we must remember that the reason for the allegory is to explain a revelation or group of revelations concerning the nature of God that is difficult to understand. the rule is look to the bible and sacred tradition for the truth or the raw information, then use allegories or demonstrations to help explain these things or better understand them
Can you give us any scriptural referrences that describe the nature of God in your religion, and how this "trinity" plays a part of His nature?

therefore discussing the ability to destroy a clover by separating a trefoil from it, or a chair by cutting off a leg cannot possibly still be describing God since we know he cannot be destroyed.
God cannot be destroyed, but if the "three parts of Him" were to separate, hypothetically like when Jesus (pbuh) came to earth, would this mean that there was no God at that time?

He is active in the affairs of people, chooses to dwell in our hearts to guide us (through the Holy Spirit), chooses to incarnate Himself to (among other things) show us how we are meant to follow Him, and chooses to be in heaven, and all at the same time should he choose to (and the sacred tradition and scriptures tell us that he does this).
I'm not saying that you're wrong, but why would God personally come to Earth to tell His tiny little creations how to worship Him? What if He has created many other civilizations like our own throughout the universe? Would He personally have to visit each one? Why would God make Himself vulnerable to the ignorant attacks of His own creations if He has the power the make them not exist in an instant? Why not just communicate to one from among them to relay His divine message?

i think from what you said muslims do not have a difficulty with God being triune, rather their difficulty is that we identify Jesus, whom you consider to be a mere man, and the Holy Spirit, which you misidentify as an angel, to be part of God yes?
Actually we don't look at Jesus (pbuh) as a mere man, but one of the holy prophets of God. To believe that a person or an angel as being divine or having any power that God hasn't given them is the biggest and the only unforgivable sin in Islam. God is one and only, with no partners, none that share His power, none that compare to Him in power.

I'm interested in your response to this question from my last post:
By the way, are the powers of the 3 "parts of God" in your religion equal, or do some parties have more power than the rest? For example, why did "the Son" ask "the Father" to save him from the humans that were hurting him if he could've just pulled himself out of that mess?

in Christianity God created angels to serve Him, and Man to serve Him on Earth, but Man was made differently and is special Man can choose God or Evil... then there are the cursed ones who are angels, but have rebelled and therefore no longer can be called angelos (messenger), but are of the same substance as angels (pure spirit) and of the same origin... they have sinfully chosen to rebel against God.
I talked with a Christian about the existance of jinn and he told me that there is nothing in Christian scripture that denies their existance, and that it does mention "the demonic" or similar words to describe the minions of Satan, which he told me could possibly mean something like the jinn. Is this true?

Lastly, about the apostle's creed...
i believe in God the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and Earth
Doesn't this seem to mean that it's actually the "Father" that is God, and that He is the Creator of the heavens and the Earth? It doesn't mention the Son or Holy Ghost, what's that about?

Adios!
 
Last edited:
hola Skywalker,

i think it is the underlying concept of the unity of the three and not the existence of the three that confuses you...

Irish_clover-1.jpg


this is a trefoil clover leaf:

the left leaflet is not the top leaflet
which is yet still not the right leaflet
which in turn is not the left leaflet

but they are one leaf... not three leaves.

Dios te bendiga
:sl:
They are three leaves. They are separate from each other right where they join the stem.
:w:
 
:sl:
They are three leaves. They are separate from each other right where they join the stem.
:w:

hola Fishman,

this is not so... botanically this is one leaf, in order to avoid confusion they call the protrusions "leaflets" so that it is understood they are distinct... but it is one leaf.

See the wikipedia article...

The scientific name derives from the Latin tres, "three", and folium, "leaf", so called from the characteristic form of the leaf, which has three leaflets (trifoliate); hence the popular name trefoil. Clovers are used as food plants by the larvae of some Lepidoptera species; see list of Lepidoptera which feed on Clovers.

Dios te bendiga
 
hola Fishman,

this is not so... botanically this is one leaf, in order to avoid confusion they call the protrusions "leaflets" so that it is understood they are distinct... but it is one leaf.

See the wikipedia article...



Dios te bendiga
:sl:
It's still three separate leaves though! :D

Anyway, according to that analogy, Jesus (sulallaahu aleyhi wasalam), God and the holy spirit wouldn't be God, they would be 'Godlets', smaller and less powerful than God, because it is logically impossible for God to be all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful and at the same time have something more powerful than Him.
:w:
 
Hola hola!

:) hola...

im sorry if i am annoying you... it just feels impolite to not have a salutation and valediction when i am speaking with somebody... i will stop..


Actually it demonstrates that three can be a part of one, not that they can be one.

but according to the explanation of the trefoil three things are forming one thing... so that was all i was attempting to explain with that...

however as i said before we must be careful that the allegory is not confused for the thing itself... God is God no matter what "part" you experience of Him... I do not debate that he has parts like me or you or a tree or a shamrock, but I do say that we must be careful to not make the mistake of believing the parts can be separated or that they do not represent God in His fullness...

like we cannot say "oh but this is only God's Word, it is not all of God so ignore it" because as the Bible says Gods word is God, even as a part of Him it still Him and must be treated as Him... or even worse making the mistake of saying "If this is Gods Word and the rest of Him is somewhere else than He is destroyed!" because God is eternal.

Can you give us any scriptural referrences that describe the nature of God in your religion, and how this "trinity" plays a part of His nature?

si,

All of John 1,

1 John 5:20: "We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life."

Matthew 28:19: "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit"

Luke 1:35: "The angel answered and said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God."

John 10:38: "But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father."

Phillipians 2:5-6: "Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: Who, being in very nature God,"

Revelation 1:17-18: "When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: "Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last. I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades." (Isaiah 44:6: "This is what the LORD says - Israel's King and Redeemer, the LORD Almighty: I am the first and I am the last; apart from me there is no God.")

John 10:30: "I and the Father are one."

Hebrews 1:8 recalls a prophecy from Psalms demonstrating a conversation between the Father and Son attesting to their divinity (the Father calling the Son God, the Son calling the Father God).

8 But of the Son He says,
"YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER,
AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IS THE SCEPTER OF HIS KINGDOM.

9 "YOU HAVE LOVED RIGHTEOUSNESS AND HATED LAWLESSNESS;
THEREFORE GOD, YOUR GOD, HAS ANOINTED YOU
WITH THE OIL OF GLADNESS ABOVE YOUR COMPANIONS."

finally there is the comma johannum

1 John 5:7 "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one."

but i am curious why you are only asking about the bible? Catholics believe in the bible and tradition which are both revelation guarded by God... sacred tradition holds trinitarian beliefs back to the beginning... the declaration of the apostles in 70ad quotes our trinitarian baptismal formula.


God cannot be destroyed, but if the "three parts of Him" were to separate, hypothetically like when Jesus (pbuh) came to earth, would this mean that there was no God at that time?

the persons of God have never been separated... such a thing is impossible. Jesus on Earth said to us that the Father and he were one, and that He was in the Father and the Father was in Him...


I'm not saying that you're wrong, but why would God personally come to Earth to tell His tiny little creations how to worship Him? What if He has created many other civilizations like our own throughout the universe? Would He personally have to visit each one? Why would God make Himself vulnerable to the ignorant attacks of His own creations if He has the power the make them not exist in an instant? Why not just communicate to one from among them to relay His divine message?

God loves us and wished to teach us Himself... as the Catechism explains: The Word became flesh to be our model of holiness: "Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me." "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me."74 On the mountain of the Transfiguration, the Father commands: "Listen to him!"75 Jesus is the model for the Beatitudes and the norm of the new law: "Love one another as I have loved you."76 This love implies an effective offering of oneself, after his example.77

but please remember that Jesus came to do much more than be a model of Holiness...

Actually we don't look at Jesus (pbuh) as a mere man, but one of the holy prophets of God. To believe that a person or an angel as being divine or having any power that God hasn't given them is the biggest and the only unforgivable sin in Islam. God is one and only, with no partners, none that share His power, none that compare to Him in power.

but we do not believe God has partners, shares power or is comparable to anyone...

I'm interested in your response to this question from my last post:

all the persons of God have equal power, judgment and authority... but not necessarily the same purpose at any given time... the Father remained in Heaven, Jesus fulfilled his purpose on Earth and then the Holy Spirit came to be with us all... Jesus says many times in the Bible that His authority is that of the Fathers...

I talked with a Christian about the existance of jinn and he told me that there is nothing in Christian scripture that denies their existance, and that it does mention "the demonic" or similar words to describe the minions of Satan, which he told me could possibly mean something like the jinn. Is this true?

according to the Catholic faith there are no other creations besides the angels (fallen and not), the animals of the world and God's unique creation Man... there is also no other creation that is given free will... so that necessarily precludes Jinn. the minions of Satan are fellow fallen angels, not jinn... tradition and scripture uphold this, they are pure spirits, not smoke.

Lastly, about the apostle's creed...

Doesn't this seem to mean that it's actually the "Father" that is God, and that He is the Creator of the heavens and the Earth? It doesn't mention the Son or Holy Ghost, what's that about?

Adios!

i'm sorry i used an elipses thinking you were familiar with our apostles creed... there is much much more... in fact the first three lines are about the Trinity...

I believe in God, the Father almighty,
creator of heaven and earth.

I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.

He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit
and born of the Virgin Mary.

He suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried.

He descended into hell.
On the third day he rose again.

He ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.

He will come again to judge the living and the dead.

I believe in the Holy Spirit,

the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,

the forgiveness of sins,

the resurrection of the body,

and the life everlasting.
Amen.

Dios te bendiga!
 
:sl:
It's still three separate leaves though! :D

hola Fishman,

i do not mean to sound redundant or something... but no... they are biologically one leaf... please read the wikipedia article for a better explanation than the one i gave you... i think i am confusing you

Anyway, according to that analogy, Jesus (sulallaahu aleyhi wasalam), God and the holy spirit wouldn't be God, they would be 'Godlets', smaller and less powerful than God, because it is logically impossible for God to be all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful and at the same time have something more powerful than Him.
:w:

well... this is what i am trying to explain to skywalker, i was only illustrating how three things can be one... i am not saying that we believe God is a shamrock...

we believe that anything that is part of God is God... we do not say "this is merely the hand of God, a smaller portion and thereby less powerful and less worthy of worship."

i think it is important to say again that the scripture and tradition say that Gods nature is triune, three that are one, and that he is eternal and all powerful... based upon this axiomatic description (since it comes from revelation itself) we must ask questions like this "the bible says God is unified of three... how is this so, since we know of nothing that can be 3 as one?" that is why we say "look at this shamrock" because it helps to explain how this principle can be so...

but we must not confuse the shamrock for the axiom...

Dios te bendiga
 
hola again...

for muslims, in islam, if it is so that you believe God can be everywhere (in time and place) at once, how do you believe it is possible if he is so monolithically human in conception? if i am here and in another place... clearly there are two of me, i cannot be unified with something a great distance away...

how do muslims explain this? what does God look like in islam...

Dios te bendiga
 
hola again...

for muslims, in islam, if it is so that you believe God can be everywhere (in time and place) at once, how do you believe it is possible if he is so monolithically human in conception? if i am here and in another place... clearly there are two of me, i cannot be unified with something a great distance away...

how do muslims explain this? what does God look like in islam...

Dios te bendiga
:sl:
Muslims believe God is above his creation, in the Heaven (not literally in space or the sky, but you get the idea), and do not believe that God is omnipresent.
As for your last question, Muslims do not believe that God looks like anything that he has created.
:w:
 

Similar Threads

Back
Top