Greetings,
I disagree with the idea that the Muslim woman did this just to "anger Christians". Perhaps it was the only place she could find a job, and she mentioned that she didn't know that the veil would be an issue. She may not have worn it at first, but what if that was because she was not a practising Muslim then? And just because a man can't walk into the room, it doesn't make it "discrimination"! I think a more accurate word would be privacy or precaution.
She may not have articulated her defence very well, though I don't believe that constitutes making a fool of oneself, much less an absence of qualification. Jumping to conclusions and resorting to degrading remarks doesn't make things any better.
Peace.
I don't think she did it to anger anyone, but the fact remains, it is a christian school. The situation is unfortunate, but if it were a muslim school, I am sure there would be rules imposed upon any woman wanting to teach there. She has no right to sue. If she wishes to wear the veil she should look to be employed at a muslim school, not a christian school.
I had not seen this footage before.I really feel sorry for the sister, for the fact that she couldn't answer the Question, the following day her lawer explained what had actually happend, which wasnt a very bad or sinistar thing!!
Like I said, I have not followed this very much in the media.Do you follow the news? Do you know why she had no face cover when the man interviewed her?
However, even behind the veil it is apparent that the teacher realises very quickly that by answering the question about attending the interview without wearing the veil, she will lose her credibility with the public ... which is why she stalls and tries to avoid answering ...
Like I said, I have not followed this very much in the media.
Can you tell me, why she didn't wear the veil during the interview?
If you have not followed this much...then why comment freely?
I had not seen this footage before.
I too felt sorry for her - TV interviewers are well trained in putting people on the spot and getting their answers, and not necessarily being compassionate in their approach!
However, even behind the veil it is apparent that the teacher realises very quickly that by answering the question about attending the interview without wearing the veil, she will lose her credibility with the public ... which is why she stalls and tries to avoid answering ...
What do you mean by 'her lawer explained what had actually happend'?
Thank you, Eesa. I really appreciate those kind words.Sister, Assalamu aleykum, Glo was just asking, she didnt critisise the sister, Glo just said that it seems as if the sister in the video was sure that if she answered she would be seen as wrong, so Glo asked for clarification thats all.![]()
I agree.Yes well that's their job, I hate people, specially Muslims going on the news, when I get married, I will tell my wife and kids and their family not to go on the news specially live, because to be honest news dudes and dudettes want a story and ask all sorts of things. It only seems in alot of cases that lawers and those who have knowledge of the media can kind of divert attention from issues they don't want to discuss in a discreat manner.
I can understand that she was upset. I would have been too!Her lawyer speaking the next day I think, to BBC or something was saying that she was upset at the way that she was questioned, what had happend was something like this,
Thank you. That puts things into perspective for me.She came wearing the veil, then a teacher, female, took her to interview her so she felt comfortable in taking the veil off so she took it off and then half way through a man walked in, so it's not like the sister just thought 'ok I'll let the guy interview me with no veil on so I wont put him off' as would have been thought if she had said 'yes a guy interviewed me' but she was caught by suprise, I dont know if she then put the veil on or not, I dont think she did, I dont know why.
But you do see that the way the interviewer questioned it 'were you interviewed by a male member face to face' is hard to answer, because its not a simple yes or no, its a yes, but it was something needed to be explained, it wasnt that she just strolled in with nothing on, she actually took it off because she was with a woman.
Anyhow, thats all I can remember.
Eesa
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.