Textual corruption of the Qur'an?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sojourn
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 66
  • Views Views 18K

Sojourn

Elite Member
Messages
252
Reaction score
8
Gender
Male
Religion
Christianity
Greetings,

I came across an article written by James A. Bellamy who is professor emeritus of Arabic Literature at the University of Michigan. In the article he addressed 11 difficult passages in the Qur'an that have been puzzled over by Muslim commentators and has proposed that they are best explained as corruptions from faulty copying. He suggests clarifying the verses by identifying what he believes were the original words the prophet Muhammad recited.

I understand that from a pure faith view this will be rejected, but I would like the rational opinion of a knowledgeable Muslim in both Arabic and the Qur'an on just how sound his arguments are.

He wrote two articles, they can be found in JSTOR but require a log in:

http://www.jstor.org/stable/605787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Otherwise a basic text edition can be found here:

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Some+proposed+emendations+to+the+text+of+the+Koran.-a015232636
 
I would highly suggest getting a free account from JSTOR and reading it there. The basic text from freelibrary.com appears to have been an auto change to text that makes it very hard to read!
 
From above article:

===QUOTE===

1. HASAB : FUEL


We shall begin with a case in which, by a lucky accident, both the original and the error have been preserved. In 21:98 we read: innakum wa-ma tabuduna min duni llahi hasabu jahannama, "You and what you worship other than God shall be the fuel of hell." However, Ubayy read hatab instead of hasab, as did Ali and Aishah.(5) Bell, p. 313, translates, "coals," but in a note says it literally means "pebbles"; Paret, p. 269, has "Brennstoff" with a query.

Hasab, in the meaning of fuel, is found only here. The basic meaning of the verb hasaba is "to pelt with pebbles" or "to scatter pebbles." From this sense the lexicographers redefine it to mean "to throw pebbles (i.e., fuel) on a fire"; others limit it to fuel which is thrown into an oven, or used as kindling, but they offer no shawahid in support of any of these meanings. In order to explain its strangeness they hold that hasab is Ethiopic, or in the dialect of Nejd or the Yemen;(6) the word is also said to mean "the fuel of hell" in Zanjiyah.(7) All this only goes to show that it was not known to the Meccans and Medinese. Rabin, p. 26, apparently takes the Yemeni ascription seriously, but does not mention Nejd or Ethiopia. He relates it to the Hebrew hasabh, the agent noun of which, hosebh, occurs in Isaiah 10:15, as the hewer or chopper with an ax. However this is the only occasion on which the word "apparently" refers to cutting wood; the other instances refer to hewing stone.(8) We note too that the regular Old Testament verb for cutting or gathering firewood is hatabh = Arabic hataba.

Obviously correct is hatab; it is the regular word in Arabic for firewood and occurs elsewhere in the Koran (111:4 and 72:15) in that meaning. Closely parallel to 21:98 is 72:15: wa-amma l-qasituna fa-kanu li-jahannama hataban, "As for the unrighteous, they shall be fuel for hell." It is easy to see how the mistake occurred; in copying hatab, the scribe forgot to write the vertical stroke of the t, turning it into a s. This is much like our forgetting to cross a t or dot an i, something that everyone does from time to time.

===END QUOTE===
 
Interesting observation, i hope someone with deeper knowledge of the Arabic language will look into it objectively and advise us, however, regardless of the theories arrived at via scrutiny - theories may be incorrect, It would be best to leave the Quranic text exactly as it is unless there is certainty beyond doubt, it hasn't been tampered with since the first generation and setting such a precedent would result in corruption.
if anyone feels convinced that there is a scribal error, it is best they add it in a footnote.
Prudence dictates that messing with the scripture ends in mass deviation - the numerous versions of previous scripture has left no doubt of this, and it would be useful to bear in mind the statement of the khalifah who refused to start a trend of changing the shape of the ka'bah after the two renovations despite witnesses attesting to the statement that it was indeed rectangular.

There is no harm in studying though since the hadith clearly show us that the Prophet pbuh himself sometimes forgot whole surahs, and much in terms of abrogated verses was discarded when the written version was penned. The strict verification requirements laid down for Zaid (ra) also meant that he (ra) would have had to let go of some verses despite huffadh/text being available due to the absence of either text or witnesses. One thing of which we can be reasonably assured of is that what remains is sturdy.



1.*Glorify the name of your Guardian-Lord the Most High,
2.*Who created, and further, gave order and proportion;
3.*And Who ordained laws/decreed. And granted guidance;
4.*And Who brings out the (green and luscious) pasture,
5.*And then makes it (but) swarthy stubble.
6.*We shall teach you to recite so that you shall not forget,
7.*Except as Allah wills: For He knows what is manifest and what is hidden.

8.*And We will make it easy for y'ou (to follow) the simple (Path).
9.*Therefore give admonition in case the admonition profits (the hearer).
10.*The admonition will be received by those who fear ((Allah)):
11.*But it will be avoided by those most unfortunate,
12.*Who will enter the Great Fire,
13.*In which they will then neither die nor live.
14.*But those will prosper who purify themselves,
15.*And glorify the name of their Guardian-Lord, and (lift their hearts) in prayer.
16.*Nay (behold), ye prefer the life of this world;
17.*But the Hereafter is better and more enduring.
18.*And this is in the earliest scrolls,
19.*The scrolls of Abraham and Moses.


 
It has been proved with mutawatir (overwhelming majority) that there are no mistakes in the Qur'an, whether textual or any other. What these orientalists do is simply assume things based on misunderstanding.

The Qur'an was completely memorized by heart by several companions of the Prophet :saws: during his lifetime. It was also written down completely during his lifetime itself but the written parchments were scattered among the companions.

During the time of first Khalifah, Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq :ra:, the written parchments were compiled together in a book form. During the compilation, each written verse was confirmed by at least two companions who had it memorized and written during the Prophet's :saws: lifetime.

Then again, during the time of the third Khalifah, 'Uthman ibn 'Affan :ra:, Islam became widespread and people began reciting the Qur'an with a slight tint of their own dialects. In order to preserve the original dialect in which Qur'an was revealed, he :ra: ordered copies of the Qur'an in the original Quraish dialect to be made and distributed to all provinces, and asked other various dialects to be discarded.

It is important to note that we have several un-broken mutawatir chains of narration of the Qur'an present even until now. Had there been any mistake in recitation, there would be several hundreds and thousands of Huffaz at any point in history to correct the mistakes.
 
In addition to my above post, there was good website know as LinguisticMiracle which closed down for some unknown reasons. If we go through its archives, we can find explanation of several of words of the Qur'an, and how perfectly they are chosen and at the perfect context and location. Please see these pages for details:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150120063300/http://www.linguisticmiracle.com/science

https://web.archive.org/web/2013101...uisticmiracle.com/gems/precise-word-selection

You can go through the various links on the page to find out more.
 
It has been proved with mutawatir (overwhelming majority) that there are no mistakes in the Qur'an, whether textual or any other. What these orientalists do is simply assume things based on misunderstanding.

The Qur'an was completely memorized by heart by several companions of the Prophet :saws: during his lifetime. It was also written down completely during his lifetime itself but the written parchments were scattered among the companions.

During the time of first Khalifah, Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq :ra:, the written parchments were compiled together in a book form. During the compilation, each written verse was confirmed by at least two companions who had it memorized and written during the Prophet's :saws: lifetime.

Then again, during the time of the third Khalifah, 'Uthman ibn 'Affan :ra:, Islam became widespread and people began reciting the Qur'an with a slight tint of their own dialects. In order to preserve the original dialect in which Qur'an was revealed, he :ra: ordered copies of the Qur'an in the original Quraish dialect to be made and distributed to all provinces, and asked other various dialects to be discarded.

It is important to note that we have several un-broken mutawatir chains of narration of the Qur'an present even until now. Had there been any mistake in recitation, there would be several hundreds and thousands of Huffaz at any point in history to correct the mistakes.

IDk if this is true, but I've heard that Allah sends someone very pious and knowledgable to the Ummah every century..

I don't know exactly the functions of those people. But Alhamdulillah, Allah will never break His Promise in preserving and protecting the Quran. :D
 
Last edited:
Greetings,

I came across an article written by James A. Bellamy who is professor emeritus of Arabic Literature at the University of Michigan. In the article he addressed 11 difficult passages in the Qur'an that have been puzzled over by Muslim commentators and has proposed that they are best explained as corruptions from faulty copying. He suggests clarifying the verses by identifying what he believes were the original words the prophet Muhammad recited.

I understand that from a pure faith view this will be rejected, but I would like the rational opinion of a knowledgeable Muslim in both Arabic and the Qur'an on just how sound his arguments are.

He wrote two articles, they can be found in JSTOR but require a log in:

Hi

We know from the day of Prophet Muhammad :saws: there have been several attempts to prove by the Pagans, and the people of the book to prove that the noble quran in copied or learnt from some one very learnt but for the past 1400 years it stands unaltered in its wordings and text since its triple guarded through

1) Memory (even a Kid becoming Hafiz and i do remember my rhymes that i sang when i was a 8 year old though I never practised it for the past 4 decades)

2) Written live by scribes (not after half a century from non witnessess)

3) Read everyday 5 times a day in our Obligatory daily 5 times prayers and taught everyday to even 5 years olds and 7 years old becoming Hafiz is only UNIQUE to the noble Quran which has been from the day 1 of its revelations.

So these are just another attempt by the enviers of the Noble quran (nothing New ) just to make the Noble Quran equal to other scriptures of the people of the book since those presently available books could never even stand close to our EVEN weak hadiths when compared to the stringent RULES about Chain of Narrators and their credibility untill our Prophet :saws: that are applied to validate even the weak hadith. So people with reason of any Religion will accept what i say if they sincerely learn how Hadiths are evolved and protected and why talk about the Noble Quran then ?
 
Still good to research and find answers since i wouldn't want to get red faced and angry if someone asked such a natural question, i would prefer to give a knowledgeable answer if the question is put forward in sincerety.
We must also bear in mind that some huffadh sahabah's knew much more Quran than we presently have, sometimes they were avoided due to the amount of abrogated verses they would recite.
So it wouldn't knock my faith one bit if i found that there were a few scribal errors, the truth of the Quran and Prophethood of Muhammad pbuh is self evident to any with an inquisitive mind.
 
The authenticity of Quran is beyond any doubt. It's not only our iman but also a challenge to the whole world. ''alif laam meem. Zalikal kitabu la raiba feeh''. This is the answer of Quran to all these orientalists who try to create doubts about Quran. And if they still doubt then Quran challenges ''fa'too bisuratin mim mislihi wad'oo shuhadaa'akum min doonillahi in kuntum sadiqeen'' but they can't accept this challenge ''fa in lam taf'aloo wa LAN taf'aloo''
 
Last edited:
We can see from the hadith below and from the khamr verses that much was preserved when it could be preserved:

Al Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 53:
Narrated Ibn Az-Zubair:
I said to 'Uthman bin 'Affan (while he was collecting the Qur'an) regarding the Verse:-- "Those of you who die and leave wives ..." (2.240)
"This Verse was abrogated by an other Verse. So why should you write it? (Or leave it in the Qur'an)?" 'Uthman said. "O son of my brother! I will not shift anything of it from its place."

http://www.sultan.org/books/bukhari/060.htm


We also know from the lost verses of the very long "son of adam mountain belly dust" surah that much was lost, we also know that much of the punctuation we now have wasn't present at the time of the original, i am sometimes surprised when the imam stretches the "raaaaaq" in surah qiyamah as if it must be a fixed duration of standing fathas despite most of the sahabah's (ra) having been simple people reciting to the best of their ability and in different dialects with no complaints.
Therefore i have no issues with someone reminding me of the possibility that a word might have missed a jot if they can provide sound observations, i would keep that possibility in mind if it was a sincere effort to find the truth and a reasonable note, and i would continue reciting exactly as it is written in the Quran as it was 1,400 years ago and as it is now unless there was a beyond doubt reason that has been sufficiently and honestly examined internationally to rectify a demonstrable scribal error.

I'm not advanced in Arabic but i'm pretty sure some of us have come across places where a question is begun to be posed such as "am man" or "am" and the latter part appears not present, i would presume that that's either exactly how it was meant to be, or that it wasn't able to be verified stringently at the time of compilation.
Allah knows best.
But i'm definitely not going to waste my time on mutashaabihaat since what is available in terms of guidance is weightier than anything else available on the planet and i don't believe a lifetime is enough to absorb what's available, if someone has the time and can find a good observation, thanks, i'll absorb what knowledge i can if it's worthwhile.

Bukhari
Volume 6, Book 60, Number 8:
Narrated Ibn Abbas:
Umar said, "Our best Qur'an reciter is Ubai and our best judge is 'Ali; and in spite of this, we leave some of the statements of Ubai because Ubai says, 'I do not leave anything that I have heard from Allah's Apostle while Allah:"Whatever verse (Revelations) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten but We bring a better one or similar to it." (2.106)


When conversing about ayaat mutashaabihaat, one must also be careful and concerened of the level of the knowledge of listeners, because one may inadvertently be giving them more debatable stuff than the vast amount of guidance and certain stuff available and thereby cause their ignorance to get the better of them, the Prophet pbuh was cautious of harming them in their sensitive stage, but again he had no qualms in speaking the truth exactly as and when it ws required, we have nothing to hide, and we do not cower in the face of legitimate scrutiny as long as it's respectful.

Volume 6, Book 60, Number 11:
Narrated 'Aisha: (The wife of the Prophet) Allah's Apostle said, "Don't you see that when your people built the Ka'ba, they did not build it on all Abraham's foundations?" I said, "O Allah's Apostle! Why don't you rebuild it on Abraham's foundations?"
He said, "Were your people not so close to jahiliyyah ( the period of Heathenism, i.e. the Period between their being Muslims and being infidels), I would do so."
The sub-narrator, 'Abdullah bin 'Umar said, "Aisha had surely heard Allah's Apostle saying that, for I do not think that Allah's Apostle left touching the two corners of the Ka'ba facing Al-Hijr except because the Ka'ba was not built on all Abraham's foundations."

Another thing i've observed is that Allah in His infinite wisdom :sometimes allows doubts to be created and gets minds to start or restart a process of thinking and questioning, there is much benefit in this ultimately as it sifts the hearts, allows those who bother to thibk to become firmly grounded in faith after comparing things in this imperfect world of humans, and also shows up those who dispute for the sake of ignorant contention, He did it in the recitation of Surah najm, He did it during the siege of the confederates at the trench, He did it to the Prophet pbuh at hudaybiyyah where the Prophet pbuh made a pledge on behalf of Uthman who was presumed to have been martyred - despite being alive, to the extent that some sahabah including 'Umar (ra) began to doubt and they even lost morale to the extent that they refused to get up at Allah's messenger's command, He did it when Musa (as) smashed the tablets, He did it when He sent Maryam (as) unmarried and with a child, He did it when He allowed people to believe in the crucifixion, but the end fact is that He makes sure to prove the truth in the minds of those who care to think objectively, otherwise He could have made it all perfect and sent down a sign by which everyone would bend their necks in abject humiliation, He could have even shown Himself if He wanted to, but He lets us evaluate, compare, ponder, wonder, and come to an overall understanding.
This helps us in many stages of our day to day interactions with each other too.


Hudaybiyah: A Victory in the Long Term

Posted by:*Abu Ibraheemin*Analysis,*History,*Islamic Thought*10/03/20116 Comments*Leave your Comment

Sometimes, events happen that are deemed disturbing by those that witness them first hand. But later on, history will describe these same events as significant positive turning points.

.....Umar bin Al-Khattab (RA) was surprised by all this and said, “I never doubted my Islam except on that day.”
He came to the Prophet (SAW) and asked, “Are you not truly the Messenger of Allah (SAW)?”
The Prophet said, “Yes, indeed.”Umar (RA) asked, “Is not our cause just and the cause of the enemy unjust?”
The Prophet (SAW) said, “Yes.”Umar (RA) asked, “Then why should we be humiliated in our religion?”
He (SAW) said, “I am Allah’s Messenger; I do not disobey Him and He will make me victorious.”
Umar (RA) asked, “Did you not tell us that we would go to the Ka’bah and perform Tawaf around it?”
He (SAW) said, “Yes, but did I tell you that we would visit the Ka’bah this year?”
Umar (RA) replied, “No.
”He (SAW) said, “So you will visit it and perform Tawaf around it!”


http://www.islam21c.com/islamic-thought/2369-hudaybiyah-a-victory-in-the-long-term/


This seemed like a technicality to 'Umar (ra) and he was harsh in speech, he also went to Abu Bakr (ra) and it is the method of thought and words of Abu Bakr that actually make things clear, after repeating almost exactly what was said by the Prophet pbuh, he said, i bear witness that he is indeed Allah's messenger and that Allah will not forsake him, so stick to his stirrup til the end.
Abu Bakr's mentality was very different and his title is As-Siddeeq, he was able to bypass the smaller issues and look at the big picture.
His faith was not to be shaken on technicalities even if he was proven to have had a wrong interpretation or understanding initially.
The thing we'd have to wonder is: would the Prophet Muhammad pbuh stop being the Messenger of Allah even if a scribal error was found? Would the truth of Allah's existence be nullified if such an inconsequential fact was later proven? Are we of blind faith and would we follow the method of the people before us who claim that thousands of different totally contradictory versions aren't scribal errors but correct? Would we get angry and reject it if an original parchment proved beyond doubt that a jot was misplaced or would we be prepared to consider?
I'd be prepared for such shocks just in case.


9.*O you who believe! Remember the Grace of Allah, (bestowed) on you, when there came down on you hosts (to overwhelm you): But We sent against them a hurricane and forces that ye saw not: but Allah sees (clearly) all that ye do.
10.*Behold! they came on you from above you and from below you, and behold, the eyes became dim and the hearts gaped up to the throats, and ye imagined various (vain) thoughts about Allah.
11.*In that situation were the Believers tried: they were shaken as by a tremendous shaking.
12.*And behold! The Hypocrites and those in whose hearts is a disease (even) say: "(Allah) and His Messenger promised us nothing but delusion!"
13.*Behold! A party among them said: "Ye men of Yathrib! ye cannot stand (the attack)! therefore go back!" And a band of them ask for leave of the Prophet, saying, "Truly our houses are bare and exposed," though they were not exposed they intended nothing but to run away.
14.*And if an entry had been effected to them from the sides of the (city), and they had been incited to sedition, they would certainly have brought it to pass, with none but a brief delay!
15.*And yet they had already covenanted with Allah not to turn their backs, and a covenant with Allah must (surely) be answered for.
16.*Say: "Running away will not profit you if ye are running away from death or slaughter; and even if (ye do escape), no more than a brief (respite) will ye be allowed to enjoy!"
17.*Say: "Who is it that can screen you from Allah if it be His wish to give you punishment or to give you Mercy?" Nor will they find for themselves, besides Allah, any protector or helper.
18.*Verily Allah knows those among you who keep back (men) and those who say to their brethren, "Come along to us", but come not to the fight except for just a little while.
19.*Covetous over you. Then when fear comes, thou wilt see them looking to thee, their eyes revolving, like (those of) one over whom hovers death: but when the fear is past, they will smite you with sharp tongues, covetous of goods. Such men have no faith, and so Allah has made their deeds of none effect: and that is easy for Allah.
20.*They think that the Confederates have not withdrawn; and if the Confederates should come (again), they would wish they were in the deserts (wandering) among the Bedouins, and seeking news about you (from a safe distance); and if they were in your midst, they would fight but little.
21.*Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah.
22.*When the Believers saw the Confederate forces, they said: "This is what Allah and his Messenger had promised us, and Allah and His Messenger told us what was true." And it only added to their faith and their zeal in obedience.
23.*Among the Believers are men who have been true to their covenant with Allah. of them some have completed their vow (to the extreme), and some (still) wait: but they have never changed (their determination) in the least:
24.*That Allah may reward the men of Truth for their Truth, and punish the Hypocrites if that be His Will, or turn to them in Mercy: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
25.*And Allah turned back the Unbelievers for (all) their fury: no advantage did they gain; and enough is Allah for the believers in their fight. And Allah is full of Strength, able to enforce His Will.

 
Last edited:
The Qur'an is in classical Arabic, and in today's time, grammar rules are changing in modern arabic etc. So you can't really apply the grammar rules of today to the Quran. So lets say, in the Quran, the Quran used gramma rule x.. But in today's time, it is not x... rather the language has become corrupt and now, what should have been x is now y... Audhu billah. So you can't really apply it like that.

The Quran uses pure classical Arabic, if I am not mistaken.

May Allah forgive me if I said anything wrong.

Allahu alam.
 
Last edited:
Brother Abz, just to clear some points, the abrogated verses were abrogated during the lifetime of the Prophet :saws: and he himself had informed the Sahabah about it. That is the reason why they were not included in the compilation. Some of the abrogations were still in memory of some companions so they referred to it sometimes, but they did not consider it to be part of the Qur'an anymore, as indicated by the Hadith you have quoted above.

Also, the tajweed rules were also documented very early and there are continuous chains of narration for that as well. If you look at the end of the Qur'an, the details are written as follows:
iof12t-1.png

The first paragraph is the chain of narration with the riwayah of Hafs, all the way up to Prophet :saws:.

And the remaining paragraphs explain the details of spelling, letters, vowel signs, numbering of verses, chapters and its parts, and classification of Makky and Madany Surah.

The third paragraph in particular says:
"Each and every letter in this MusHaf is in accordance with the MusHaf prepared and distributed by 'Uthman :ra:."

MusHaf means copy of the Qur'an in book form.
 
JazakAllahu khayran for that clarification brother :) , i just keep the possibility in mind in case i'm proven wrong in future, since Allah is always right anyway.
 
The Qur'an is in classical Arabic, and in today's time, grammar rules are changing in modern arabic etc. So you can't really apply the grammar rules of today to the Quran. So lets say, in the Quran, the Quran used gramma rule x.. But in today's time, it is not x... rather the language has become corrupt and now, what should have been x is now y... Audhu billah. So you can't really apply it like that.

The Quran uses pure classical Arabic, if I am not mistaken.

May Allah forgive me if I said anything wrong.

Allahu alam.


You are very correct in my understanding. Now the Aarabs speak "amiyyah" a language which is far from real Arabic. The fus'ha (Classical Arabic) is preserved with the Holy Quraan.
 
Interesting observation, i hope someone with deeper knowledge of the Arabic language will look into it objectively and advise us, however, regardless of the theories arrived at via scrutiny - theories may be incorrect, It would be best to leave the Quranic text exactly as it is unless there is certainty beyond doubt, it hasn't been tampered with since the first generation and setting such a precedent would result in corruption.
if anyone feels convinced that there is a scribal error, it is best they add it in a footnote.
Prudence dictates that messing with the scripture ends in mass deviation - the numerous versions of previous scripture has left no doubt of this, and it would be useful to bear in mind the statement of the khalifah who refused to start a trend of changing the shape of the ka'bah after the two renovations despite witnesses attesting to the statement that it was indeed rectangular.

There is no harm in studying though since the hadith clearly show us that the Prophet pbuh himself sometimes forgot whole surahs, and much in terms of abrogated verses was discarded when the written version was penned. The strict verification requirements laid down for Zaid (ra) also meant that he (ra) would have had to let go of some verses despite huffadh/text being available due to the absence of either text or witnesses. One thing of which we can be reasonably assured of is that what remains is sturdy.





It seems that you, like shiyah sect, don't believe in the preservation of the Holy Quraan. You also have no belief in the verse 9 of surah Al-Hijar, its translation is here:


[h=2]Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption).[/h]
My sincere advice is that you must improve your faith before death overtakes you, and then there will be no way to escape.
 
You are very correct in my understanding. Now the Aarabs speak "amiyyah" a language which is far from real Arabic. The fus'ha (Classical Arabic) is preserved with the Holy Quraan.

So in actuality. The Quran itself is the master, The Dictionary, the definer of grammar itself.

The Quran is in Pure Classical Arabic. And the grammar it uses is what Arabic has been derived from. AFAIK.

I mean it is like this, take Book A, it has all the grammar rules etc. if someone was to come and corrupt the pure language A grammar, and invent a new grammar rule, then by default I'd say The Language and grammar of the Book A is different from current grammar, invented rules.

You can not apply current grammar rules to the Quran, as they have most likely been deviated from the pure grammar. You need to study Pure Classical Arabic.
The same is with the Quran. I think. In shaa' Allah you get my point.

May Allah forgive me if I am wrong. Ameen.

And Allah knows best.
 
First and foremost, Quran is the highest form of literature of Arabic language, and Muslim and non-Muslim scholars alike agree on this.
So when the Quran itself is the textbook of literature, then how can it have grammatical errors?
It's like taking a ruler and saying that the measurement in the ruler is wrong, lol, totally illogical.
The problem is, because people have very little knowledge in Arabic, that's why they think there's an error. The language of the Quran is so eloquent, that the people of those times were amazed and shocked, and some people couldn't understand the advanced grammar used in the Quran, that they said there are mistakes, which is not at all the case. So this is not something new, this person and even Muslims who don't understand the eloquence of the Quranic grammar, pose such questions.
Allah clearly mentions in the Quran, that the Quran has no errors. And no one will ever be able to change it, because the duty of the protection of the Quran, Allah has taken that duty upon Himself to protect the Quran from corruption. And Allah challenges the people and says, if you think the Quran is wrong, produce a Surah "somewhat similar" like the Quran. And we all know, the smallest Surah in the Quran in just 3 sentences. The Arabic word used there is "fil misma", meaning, "somewhat similar". So you don't have to be 100% similar, but somewhat similar, and you have a chance to try if you think the Quran is wrong. And Allah also gives the reply, "but if you cannot, and of a surety you cannot; then fear the fire of Hell whose fuel is men and stones and which has been created for those who reject faith".
So these verses are more than enough to explain that the Quran doesn't need to be revised, it's us human beings' who brains needs to be revised. The verse "in this book there is no error" is the best example I can have where I know the Quran is 100% right. Anyone who has the slightest bit of Iman will not disagree with it, that the Quran is 100% right, in which case, the Quran is actually 100% right. Period.
 
It seems that you, like shiyah sect, don't believe in the preservation of the Holy Quraan. You also have no belief in the verse 9 of surah Al-Hijar, its translation is here:


[h=2]Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption).[/h]
My sincere advice is that you must improve your faith before death overtakes you, and then there will be no way to escape.

It seems that you need to avoid pushing silly labels and flying untrue accusations.

I have no reason to believe that the Quran contains errors.
if there did ever turn out to be any scribal errors, it would mean that the verse meant something deeper than a shallow pen slide.
Prophets are also guarded but some have been killed, they did however fulfil what was required in their task.
The Prophet pbuh was also attacked and guarded during battles so the verse promising him protection was deeper than physical attack.
It also appears that "not one jot nor tittle shall be changed till all be fulfilled" was referring to more than just text during the previous scenario.
i keep an open mind, and if anything new ever does come forward, i shan't be of the type who once said: the final messenger must be a jew otherwise we reject him, or the Messiah must be from jerusalem and of david and not Galilee so we reject him because this sinner has no father.
or oh here's undeniable proof that there was an error but i'll be like the pope at vatican city and excommunicate all heretics who believe in God but claim that there's more to the story - thereby losing my own faith before God - instead of saying: O Allah, you know best.

My sincere advice is that you must improve your faith and akhlaq before death overtakes you, and then there will be no way to escape.


For those who are less aware of the events and the fact that some Quran is lost, know that even the Prophet pbuh was not immune from forgetting:

Narrated `Aisha:The Prophet (ﷺ) heard a man (reciting Qur'an) in the Mosque, and he said, "May Allah bestow His Mercy upon him. No doubt, he made me remember such-and such Verses of such-and-such Sura which I dropped (from my memory).
Narrated Aisha: The Prophet (ﷺ) performed the Tahajjud prayer in my house, and then he heard the voice of `Abbad who was praying in the Mosque, and said, "O `Aisha! Is this `Abbad's voice?"
I said, "Yes."
He said, "O Allah! Be merciful to `Abbad!"

http://quranx.com/hadith/bukhari/Book-52/Hadith-19/

Other referencesIn-book reference
Book 52, Hadith 19
Reference
Sahih al-Bukhari 2655USC-MSA web (English) reference
Vol. 3, Book 48, Hadith 823*Related Quran verses

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عُبَيْدِ بْنِ مَيْمُونٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا عِيسَى بْنُ يُونُسَ، عَنْ هِشَامٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ ـ رضى الله عنها ـ قَالَتْ سَمِعَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم رَجُلاً يَقْرَأُ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ، لَقَدْ أَذْكَرَنِي كَذَا وَكَذَا آيَةً، أَسْقَطْتُهُنَّ مِنْ سُورَةِ كَذَا وَكَذَا ‏"‏‏.‏ وَزَادَ عَبَّادُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ تَهَجَّدَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي بَيْتِي فَسَمِعَ صَوْتَ عَبَّادٍ يُصَلِّي فِي الْمَسْجِدِ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ يَا عَائِشَةُ، أَصَوْتُ عَبَّادٍ هَذَا ‏"‏‏.‏ قُلْتُ نَعَمْ‏.‏ قَالَ ‏"‏ اللَّهُمَّ ارْحَمْ عَبَّادًا ‏"‏‏.‏
 
Last edited:

Similar Threads

Back
Top