marwen
IB Expert
- Messages
- 2,089
- Reaction score
- 596
- Gender
- Male
- Religion
- Islam
As the muslim ummah has not enough power in political and military levels, we need to make pressure on ennemies to defend ourselves using other available means.
One big characteristic of muslim world is the big population and the high rate of consumption. Unfortunately our irrational consumption is serving our enemies' economy because the bigger part of products we consume is brought from there. And this has the following disadvantages :
1) help enemies' economy.
2) recession of local economy and local products.
3) harm the islamic industry.
4) make muslims always retarted and dependant on the west.
5) help finance israeli and american wars against muslims = killing ourselves.
=> That's said, the solution proposed by muslim scholars, politicians and economists is to boycott enemies' products.
The "Boycott" strategy seems to be a pretty good way to put economic pressure on our enemies and to defend ourselves when the muslim lands or the muslim religion is agressed.
But lately, I found that only few number of muslims are boycotting products from "anti-islamic" lands. Many muslims are not even aware of it, or just don't do it. Why ?
Is there some difficulties ? or other opinions ? is the boycott not effecient.
Is there a risk for our lives if we boycott these unecessary products ?
What do you think ?
A) The boycott is a good civilised and effecient way to defend ourselves. We should do it.
B) Boycott has no effect on enemies. It's just a pointless effort. We should do more serious actions (military actions).
C) Boycott will put on risk our lives and our jobs, more that our enemies'. We can't live without these products.
D) I don't know, I don't see results.
One big characteristic of muslim world is the big population and the high rate of consumption. Unfortunately our irrational consumption is serving our enemies' economy because the bigger part of products we consume is brought from there. And this has the following disadvantages :
1) help enemies' economy.
2) recession of local economy and local products.
3) harm the islamic industry.
4) make muslims always retarted and dependant on the west.
5) help finance israeli and american wars against muslims = killing ourselves.
=> That's said, the solution proposed by muslim scholars, politicians and economists is to boycott enemies' products.
The "Boycott" strategy seems to be a pretty good way to put economic pressure on our enemies and to defend ourselves when the muslim lands or the muslim religion is agressed.
But lately, I found that only few number of muslims are boycotting products from "anti-islamic" lands. Many muslims are not even aware of it, or just don't do it. Why ?
Is there some difficulties ? or other opinions ? is the boycott not effecient.
Is there a risk for our lives if we boycott these unecessary products ?
What do you think ?
A) The boycott is a good civilised and effecient way to defend ourselves. We should do it.
B) Boycott has no effect on enemies. It's just a pointless effort. We should do more serious actions (military actions).
C) Boycott will put on risk our lives and our jobs, more that our enemies'. We can't live without these products.
D) I don't know, I don't see results.
