The Jews of Medina

[therebbe]

I would rather have a Jewish teacher teaching me Jewish history than a non-Jew, because they properly understand the subject.

Exactly! I would much rather have a Muslim teacher, teaching me about Islamic history then a Christian, Jewish, or Hindu teacher.

 

[- Qatada -]

:salamext:


Please don't go offtopic guys insha'Allaah.



Peace.

 

[QuranStudy]

So you would prefer a Hindu teach Islamic History over a Muslim?

Usually those to teach Islamic history in universities are non-Muslim.

It depends who it is. Jews know the most about our own history. Maybe it is the student who should not walk into the class with hate and misconceptions.

Of course they know more, but they are biased. It does disservice to the student when a professor teaches one side of the story. For instance, a jew will definitely be biased over the formation of Israel.

 

[therebbe]

Usually those to teach Islamic history in universities are non-Muslim.

You didn't awnser my question. Would you rather have a Muslim teach Islamic history or a Hindu teach Islamic history?

Of course they know more, but they are biased. It does disservice to the student when a professor teaches one side of the story. For instance, a jew will definitely be biased over the formation of Israel.

Everyone has biases. The bottom line is that a Jew can give yo much more insight to Jewish history, and why somethings are the way they were or happend according to Judaism.

 

[QuranStudy]

You didn't awnser my question. Would you rather have a Muslim teach Islamic history or a Hindu teach Islamic history?

If the Hindu had a the credentials and degrees on Islamic history, then sure.

Everyone has biases.

Some are more biased that others.

The bottom line is that a Jew can give yo much more insight to Jewish history, and why somethings are the way they were or happend according to Judaism.

You are linking religion with history ("according to Judaism"). History is entire factual, events cannot be refuted. Religion is not factual, but faith-based.

 

[therebbe]

Some are more biased that others.

It goes both ways.

 

[Bassam Zawadi]

http://www.call-to-monotheism.com/the_jewish_tribes_of_madinah1

 

[Aprender]

Are there any Jewish people left in Saudi Arabia now? I know that practicing the religion is banned there but what happened to them?

Are there Jews there who are now Muslims or did just migrate to other places?

 

[جوري]

Are there any Jewish people left in Saudi Arabia now?

my feeling is that the current ruling family is the remnant of Banu Qynuqaa.. You should google and read about Crypto-Judaism...

 

[Karl]

It just goes to show that multi culturalism does not work. Especially with the "chosen ones". Things never seem to change. Alexander the Great tried to build a commonwealth and had the same sort of trouble as Muhammad (PBUH).

 

[Vlad]

So Sa'd Bin Muadh was previously a Jew, there is different Hadith on what happened to Bani Quraizah, one say all the men were killed women and children killed, one says all the able bodied males were killed and another says only the cobatants, props on this though, assalam-u-alaikum

He raised that point on two different threads but no one answered his vitriol, notwithstanding in a tribal warfare, all able-bodied(adulthood in general) males are considered combatants. Pakistani army are bombing tribal combatants(Taliban) indiscriminately, in Anbar US strikes kill 100's of IS fighters in Iraq weekly, but the tribes (who see IS as their way of kicking out the iraqi militias of a certain sect) just pump in 100's of more adult fighters.
Many 11 and 12 years old boys are fighting against U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq, has anybody in the international media considered the killing by U.S. and secular Pakistani establishment a massacre of tribal children? Nope, simply in Army they say when an adult take up arms, he should be abe to take a bullet.

Note: Not exonerating U.S. and Pakistani establishment from the massacre of tribal children and women.

 

[Karl]

Are there any Jewish people left in Saudi Arabia now? I know that practicing the religion is banned there but what happened to them?

Are there Jews there who are now Muslims or did just migrate to other places?

Yes they do the banking for the Royal family. But they must not be Zionists only master bankers. With all that oil revenue they get the best bankers that only invest 5% of shares into any non Zionist company. Before the oil boom Saudi Arabia had a GDP one year of about $50 US dollars. Camel raiding was the pastime of the men and life was very simple, so when the oil was discovered they had no skills or infrastructure to deal with it, so Western experts did it for them and the Jews were known to be experts with money so they got the job.
I suppose they have done a deal with the devil, tapping the treasures of Pluto, better had they kept camel raiding and eating dates and staying simple and pious, maybe there would be no war and strife in the Arab world today.

 

[Karl]

He raised that point on two different threads but no one answered his vitriol, notwithstanding in a tribal warfare, all able-bodied(adulthood in general) males are considered combatants. Pakistani army are bombing tribal combatants(Taliban) indiscriminately, in Anbar US strikes kill 100's of IS fighters in Iraq weekly, but the tribes (who see IS as their way of kicking out the iraqi militias of a certain sect) just pump in 100's of more adult fighters.
Many 11 and 12 years old boys are fighting against U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq, has anybody in the international media considered the killing by U.S. and secular Pakistani establishment a massacre of tribal children? Nope, simply in Army they say when an adult take up arms, he should be abe to take a bullet.

Note: Not exonerating U.S. and Pakistani establishment from the massacre of tribal children and women.

Give these 11 and 12 year old jihadi some respect they are not effeminate dancing boys but young men, they are definitely not children. And what is the international media? Liberal leftist Zionist liars, propagandists. War is war, there is no mercy from the war machine. The West is a two faced beast, one cries platitudinous slogans "human rights", "what about the children", "peace" and "freedom" while the other cries kill 'em all.

 

[Karl]

He raised that point on two different threads but no one answered his vitriol, notwithstanding in a tribal warfare, all able-bodied(adulthood in general) males are considered combatants. Pakistani army are bombing tribal combatants(Taliban) indiscriminately, in Anbar US strikes kill 100's of IS fighters in Iraq weekly, but the tribes (who see IS as their way of kicking out the iraqi militias of a certain sect) just pump in 100's of more adult fighters.
Many 11 and 12 years old boys are fighting against U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq, has anybody in the international media considered the killing by U.S. and secular Pakistani establishment a massacre of tribal children? Nope, simply in Army they say when an adult take up arms, he should be abe to take a bullet.

Note: Not exonerating U.S. and Pakistani establishment from the massacre of tribal children and women.

Give these 11 and 12 year old jihadi some respect they are not effeminate dancing boys but young men, they are definitely not children. And what is the international media? Liberal leftist Zionist liars, propagandists. War is war, there is no mercy from the war machine. The West is a two faced beast, one cries platitudinous slogans "human rights", "what about the children", "peace" and "freedom" while the other cries "kill 'em all".