The ‘Mechanism’ Behind Intelligent Design

[جوري]

You're the one who tried to apply an idea to a situation for which it wasn't intended.

I can't make up for the shortcomings of an insufficiently educated troll!

Your favoured definition:
"a natural process that results in the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups best adjusted to their environment and that leads to the perpetuation of genetic qualities best suited to that particular environment"

It doesn't say what that environment can or cannot be. This is why I noted that the distinction between natural and artificial is arbitrary since everything could be considered natural as it all comes from 'nature'.

Another non sequitur that has positively no relevance to what I have written, the subject matter, the definition or what falls into its confines-- a group of plastered words as is expected of someone who draws satisfaction of overly simplistic conclusions!




all the best

 

[JaffaCake]

Does it irritate you when the insufficiently educated can point out the flaws in your killer arguments?

 

[جوري]

Does it irritate you when the insufficiently educated can point out the flaws in your killer arguments?

Rather, I find it amusing and virtually appealing that they are able to distinguish a flaw from their crypts of morgagni, given that all their contentions come straight out of there

all the best!

 

[JaffaCake]

Either way, it's not a great endorsement of your own education that on failing to discredit an idea as it is, you seek to change it until you can.

 

[جوري]

Either way, it's not a great endorsement of your own education that on failing to discredit an idea as it is, you seek to change it until you can.

My education is verified by the highest accrediting body in the western world, the rant of a gadfly whose two remaining brain cells are held together by a spirochete, and can't argue sense to save his dear life, holds no bearing on the matter!

all the best

 

[JaffaCake]

It's a shame then that the opinions of the great scholars of the western world don't actually seem to mean anything to you.

Hope we can find something to argue over in future Ta-ta for now.

 

[جوري]

It's a shame then that the opinions of the great scholars of the western world don't actually seem to mean anything to you.

Hope we can find something to argue over in future Ta-ta for now.

opinions? if such is the case then there is plenty of opinion from both sides argued by great scientists .. Being a scientist doesn't denote automatic belief in evolution or anything in between. Science is concerned with facts not fiction. ..

all the best!

 

[JaffaCake]

Even more of a shame that you disregard that which western scholars consider fact.

 

[جوري]

Even more of a shame that you disregard that which western scholars consider fact.

I guess the shame goes both ways especially when we speak of 'facts'?

http://www.iscid.org/papers/Mullan_PrimitiveCell_112302.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/q-bio/papers/0603/0603005.pdf

and if I am merely to go on your preferred style of empiricist philosophy!

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/56427

BTW, I like showcased apes at the natural history as much as the next guy though, but I think they share a common ancestor with atheists only!

all the best

 

[Woodrow]

Because of technical difficulties we will now lose contact with WW3 as the

:threadclo:

Self Destruct sequence has been activated. Please leave the thread before detonation.